Add clarifying comments to the binder.

This commit is contained in:
Cyrus Najmabadi
2015-04-20 02:24:47 -07:00
parent aaf9371357
commit 2e8e4a1f5c

View File

@@ -143,7 +143,7 @@ module ts {
return node.name ? declarationNameToString(node.name) : getDeclarationName(node);
}
function declareSymbol(symbols: SymbolTable, parent: Symbol, node: Declaration, includes: SymbolFlags, excludes: SymbolFlags): Symbol {
function declareSymbol(symbolTable: SymbolTable, parent: Symbol, node: Declaration, includes: SymbolFlags, excludes: SymbolFlags): Symbol {
Debug.assert(!hasDynamicName(node));
// The exported symbol for an export default function/class node is always named "default"
@@ -151,7 +151,27 @@ module ts {
let symbol: Symbol;
if (name !== undefined) {
symbol = hasProperty(symbols, name) ? symbols[name] : (symbols[name] = createSymbol(SymbolFlags.None, name));
// Check and see if the symbol table already has a symbol with this name. If not,
// create a new symbol with this name and add it to the table. Note that we don't
// give the new symbol any flags *yet*. This ensures that it will not conflict
// witht he 'excludes' flags we pass in.
//
// If we do get an existing symbol, see if it conflicts with the new symbol we're
// creating. For example, a 'var' symbol and a 'class' symbol will conflict within
// the same symbol table. If we have a conflict, report the issue on each
// declaration we have for this symbol, and then create a new symbol for this
// declaration.
//
// If we created a new symbol, either because we didn't have a symbol with this name
// in the symbol table, or we conflicted with an existing symbol, then just add this
// node as the sole declaration of the new symbol.
//
// Otherwise, we'll be merging into a compatible existing symbol (for example when
// you have multiple 'vars' with the same name in the same container). In this case
// just add this node into the declarations list of the symbol.
symbol = hasProperty(symbolTable, name)
? symbolTable[name]
: (symbolTable[name] = createSymbol(SymbolFlags.None, name));
if (symbol.flags & excludes) {
if (node.name) {
node.name.parent = node;
@@ -160,9 +180,8 @@ module ts {
// Report errors every position with duplicate declaration
// Report errors on previous encountered declarations
let message = symbol.flags & SymbolFlags.BlockScopedVariable
? Diagnostics.Cannot_redeclare_block_scoped_variable_0
? Diagnostics.Cannot_redeclare_block_scoped_variable_0
: Diagnostics.Duplicate_identifier_0;
forEach(symbol.declarations, declaration => {
file.bindDiagnostics.push(createDiagnosticForNode(declaration.name || declaration, message, getDisplayName(declaration)));
});
@@ -204,7 +223,8 @@ module ts {
// but return the export symbol (by calling getExportSymbolOfValueSymbolIfExported). That way
// when the emitter comes back to it, it knows not to qualify the name if it was found in a containing scope.
if (hasExportModifier || container.flags & NodeFlags.ExportContext) {
let exportKind = (symbolFlags & SymbolFlags.Value ? SymbolFlags.ExportValue : 0) |
let exportKind =
(symbolFlags & SymbolFlags.Value ? SymbolFlags.ExportValue : 0) |
(symbolFlags & SymbolFlags.Type ? SymbolFlags.ExportType : 0) |
(symbolFlags & SymbolFlags.Namespace ? SymbolFlags.ExportNamespace : 0);
let local = declareSymbol(container.locals, undefined, node, exportKind, symbolExcludes);
@@ -541,11 +561,10 @@ module ts {
// do not treat function block a block-scope container
// all block-scope locals that reside in this block should go to the function locals.
// Otherwise this won't be considered as redeclaration of a block scoped local:
// function foo() {
// let x;
// function foo(x) {
// let x;
// }
// 'let x' will be placed into the function locals and 'let x' - into the locals of the block
// 'x' will be placed into the function locals and 'let x' - into the locals of the block
return isFunctionLike(node.parent) ? SymbolFlags.None : SymbolFlags.BlockScopedContainer;
case SyntaxKind.CatchClause:
case SyntaxKind.ForStatement: