When executing our test suite with Dash v0.5.13.2 one can observe several test failures that all have the same symptoms: we have a quoted heredoc that contains multibyte characters, but the final data does not match what we actually wanted to write. One such example is in t0300, where we see the diffs like the following: --- expect-stdout 2026-04-01 07:25:45.249919440 +0000 +++ stdout 2026-04-01 07:25:45.254919509 +0000 @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@ protocol=https host=example.com -path=perú.git +path=perú.git username=foo password=bar While seemingly the same, the data that we've written via the heredoc contains some invisible bytes. The expected hex representation of the string is: 7065 72c3 ba2e 6769 74 per...git But what we actually get instead is this string: 7065 7285 02c3 ba02 852e 6769 74 per.......git What's important to note here is that the multibyte character exists in both versions. But in the broken version we see that the bytes are wrapped in a sequence of "85 02" and "02 85". This is the CTLMBCHAR byte sequence of Dash, which it uses internally to quote multibyte sequences. As it turns out, this bug was introduced in c5bf970 (expand: Add multi-byte support to pmatch, 2024-06-02), which adds multibyte support to more contexts of Dash. One of these contexts seems to be in heredocs, and Dash _does_ correctly unquote these multibyte sequences when using an unquoted heredoc. But the bug seems to be that this unquoting does not happen in quoted heredocs, and the bug still exists on the latest "master" branch. For now, work around the bug by using unquoted heredocs instead. Signed-off-by: Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Git - fast, scalable, distributed revision control system
Git is a fast, scalable, distributed revision control system with an unusually rich command set that provides both high-level operations and full access to internals.
Git is an Open Source project covered by the GNU General Public License version 2 (some parts of it are under different licenses, compatible with the GPLv2). It was originally written by Linus Torvalds with help of a group of hackers around the net.
Please read the file INSTALL for installation instructions.
Many Git online resources are accessible from https://git-scm.com/ including full documentation and Git related tools.
See Documentation/gittutorial.adoc to get started, then see
Documentation/giteveryday.adoc for a useful minimum set of commands, and
Documentation/git-<commandname>.adoc for documentation of each command.
If git has been correctly installed, then the tutorial can also be
read with man gittutorial or git help tutorial, and the
documentation of each command with man git-<commandname> or git help <commandname>.
CVS users may also want to read Documentation/gitcvs-migration.adoc
(man gitcvs-migration or git help cvs-migration if git is
installed).
The user discussion and development of Git take place on the Git mailing list -- everyone is welcome to post bug reports, feature requests, comments and patches to git@vger.kernel.org (read Documentation/SubmittingPatches for instructions on patch submission and Documentation/CodingGuidelines).
Those wishing to help with error message, usage and informational message
string translations (localization l10) should see po/README.md
(a po file is a Portable Object file that holds the translations).
To subscribe to the list, send an email to git+subscribe@vger.kernel.org (see https://subspace.kernel.org/subscribing.html for details). The mailing list archives are available at https://lore.kernel.org/git/, https://marc.info/?l=git and other archival sites.
Issues which are security relevant should be disclosed privately to the Git Security mailing list git-security@googlegroups.com.
The maintainer frequently sends the "What's cooking" reports that list the current status of various development topics to the mailing list. The discussion following them give a good reference for project status, development direction and remaining tasks.
The name "git" was given by Linus Torvalds when he wrote the very first version. He described the tool as "the stupid content tracker" and the name as (depending on your mood):
- random three-letter combination that is pronounceable, and not actually used by any common UNIX command. The fact that it is a mispronunciation of "get" may or may not be relevant.
- stupid. contemptible and despicable. simple. Take your pick from the dictionary of slang.
- "global information tracker": you're in a good mood, and it actually works for you. Angels sing, and a light suddenly fills the room.
- "goddamn idiotic truckload of sh*t": when it breaks