Continue walking the code path for the >4GB `hash-object --literally`
test. The `hash_object_file_literally()` function internally uses both
`hash_object_file()` and `write_object_file_prepare()`. Both function
signatures use `unsigned long` rather than `size_t` for the mem buffer
sizes. Use `size_t` instead, for LLP64 compatibility.
While at it, convert those function's object's header buffer length to
`size_t` for consistency. The value is already upcast to `uintmax_t` for
print format compatibility.
Note: The hash-object test still does not pass. A subsequent commit
continues to walk the call tree's lower level hash functions to identify
further fixes.
Signed-off-by: Philip Oakley <philipoakley@iee.email>
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
The previous commit adds a test that demonstrates a problem in the
`hash-object --literally` command, manifesting in an unnecessary file
size limit on systems using the LLP64 data model (which includes
Windows).
Walking the affected code path is `cmd_hash_object()` >> `hash_fd()` >>
`hash_literally()` >> `hash_object_file_literally()`.
The function `hash_object_file_literally()` is the first with a file
length parameter (via a mem buffer). This commit changes the type of
that parameter to the LLP64 compatible `size_t` type.
There are no other uses of the function. The `strbuf` type is already
`size_t` compatible.
Note: The hash-object test does not yet pass. Subsequent commits will
continue to walk the call tree's lower level functions to identify
further fixes.
Signed-off-by: Philip Oakley <philipoakley@iee.email>
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
On LLP64 systems, such as Windows, the size of `long`, `int`, etc. is
only 32 bits (for backward compatibility). Git's use of `unsigned long`
for file memory sizes in many places, rather than size_t, limits the
handling of large files on LLP64 systems (commonly given as `>4GB`).
Provide a minimum test for handling a >4GB file. The `hash-object`
command, with the `--literally` and without `-w` option avoids
writing the object, either loose or packed. This avoids the code paths
hitting the `bigFileThreshold` config test code, the zlib code, and the
pack code.
Subsequent patches will walk the test's call chain, converting types to
`size_t` (which is larger in LLP64 data models) where appropriate.
Signed-off-by: Philip Oakley <philipoakley@iee.email>
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
When adding tree objects, we are very careful to avoid adding the same
tree object more than once. There was one small gap in that logic,
though: when adding a root tree object. Two refs can easily share the
same root tree object, and we should still not add it more than once.
When adding tree objects, we are very careful to avoid adding the same
tree object more than once. There was one small gap in that logic,
though: when adding a root tree object. Two refs can easily share the
same root tree object, and we should still not add it more than once.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
macOS with fsmonitor daemon can hang forever when a submodule is
involved, which has been corrected.
* kn/osx-fsmonitor-with-submodules-fix:
fsmonitor OSX: fix hangs for submodules
Usability improvements for running tests in leak-checking mode.
* jk/test-lsan-improvements:
test-lib: check for leak logs after every test
test-lib: show leak-sanitizer logs on --immediate failure
test-lib: stop showing old leak logs
In 6241ce2170 (refs/reftable: reload locked stack when preparing
transaction, 2024-09-24) we have introduced a new test that exercises
how the reftable backend behaves with many concurrent writers all racing
with each other. This test was introduced after a couple of fixes in
this context that should make concurrent writes behave gracefully. As it
turns out though, Windows systems do not yet handle concurrent writes
properly, as we've got two reports for Cygwin and MinGW failing in this
newly added test.
The root cause of this is how we update the "tables.list" file: when
writing a new stack of tables we first write the data into a lockfile
and then rename that file into place. But Windows forbids us from doing
that rename when the target path is open for reading by another process.
And as the test races both readers and writers with each other we are
quite likely to hit this edge case.
This is not a regression: the logic didn't work before the mentioned
commit, and after the commit it performs well on Linux and macOS, and
the situation on Windows should have at least improved a bit. But the
test shows that we need to put more thought into how to make this work
properly there.
Work around the issue by disabling the test on Windows for now. While at
it, increase the locking timeout to address reported timeouts when using
either the address or memory sanitizer, which also tend to significantly
extend the runtime of this test.
This should be revisited after Git v2.47 is out.
Signed-off-by: Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
fsmonitor_classify_path_absolute() expects state->path_gitdir_watch.buf
has no trailing '/' or '.' For a submodule, fsmonitor_run_daemon() sets
the value with trailing "/." (as repo_get_git_dir(the_repository) on
Darwin returns ".") so that fsmonitor_classify_path_absolute() returns
IS_OUTSIDE_CONE.
In this case, fsevent_callback() doesn't update cookie_list so that
fsmonitor_publish() does nothing and with_lock__mark_cookies_seen() is
not invoked.
As with_lock__wait_for_cookie() infinitely waits for state->cookies_cond
that with_lock__mark_cookies_seen() should unlock, the whole daemon
hangs.
Remove trailing "/." from state->path_gitdir_watch.buf for submodules
and add a corresponding test in t7527-builtin-fsmonitor.sh. The test is
disabled for MINGW because hangs treated with this patch occur only for
Darwin and there is no simple way to terminate the win32 fsmonitor
daemon that hangs.
Suggested-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Suggested-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Signed-off-by: Koji Nakamaru <koji.nakamaru@gree.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
We tried quite a few things, but this is a failure introduced at the
last -rc before v2.47.0 _and_ it only documents existing behavior as
far as Windows is concerned (concurrent writes are a problem there with
reftables).
So let's punt and simply disable this test for now, to take the pressure
off of v2.47.0.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Commit 253ed9ecff (hash.h: scaffolding for _unsafe hashing variants,
2024-09-26) introduced the concept of having two hash algorithms: a safe
and an unsafe one. When the Makefile knobs do not explicitly request an
unsafe one, we fall back to using the safe algorithm.
However, the fallback to do so forgot one case: we should inherit the
NEEDS_CLONE_HELPER flag from the safe variant. Failing to do so means
that we'll end up defining two clone functions (the algorithm specific
one, and the generic one that just calls memcpy). You'll see an error
like this:
$ make OPENSSL_SHA1=1
[...]
sha1/openssl.h:46:29: error: redefinition of ‘openssl_SHA1_Clone’
46 | #define platform_SHA1_Clone openssl_SHA1_Clone
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
hash.h:83:40: note: in expansion of macro ‘platform_SHA1_Clone’
83 | # define platform_SHA1_Clone_unsafe platform_SHA1_Clone
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
hash.h:101:33: note: in expansion of macro ‘platform_SHA1_Clone_unsafe’
101 | # define git_SHA1_Clone_unsafe platform_SHA1_Clone_unsafe
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
hash.h:133:20: note: in expansion of macro ‘git_SHA1_Clone_unsafe’
133 | static inline void git_SHA1_Clone_unsafe(git_SHA_CTX_unsafe *dst,
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
sha1/openssl.h:37:20: note: previous definition of ‘openssl_SHA1_Clone’ with type ‘void(struct openssl_SHA1_CTX *, const struct openssl_SHA1_CTX *)’
37 | static inline void openssl_SHA1_Clone(struct openssl_SHA1_CTX *dst,
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
This only matters when compiling with openssl as the "safe" variant,
since it's the only algorithm that requires a clone helper (and even
then, only if you are using openssl 3.0+). And you should never do that,
because it's not safe. But still, the invocation above used to work and
should continue to do so until we decide to require a
collision-detecting variant for the safe algorithm entirely.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The error message added by 296743a7ca (archive: load index before
pathspec checks, 2024-09-21) is misleading: unpack_trees() is not
touching the working tree at all here, but just loading a tree into
the index. Correct it.
Signed-off-by: René Scharfe <l.s.r@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
