epstein-docs.github.io/results/IMAGES008/DOJ-OGR-00020513.json
2025-10-07 14:47:55 +11:00

76 lines
6.3 KiB
JSON
Raw Blame History

This file contains ambiguous Unicode characters

This file contains Unicode characters that might be confused with other characters. If you think that this is intentional, you can safely ignore this warning. Use the Escape button to reveal them.

{
"document_metadata": {
"page_number": "27",
"document_number": "3-2",
"date": "07/08/2022",
"document_type": "Court Document",
"has_handwriting": false,
"has_stamps": false
},
"full_text": "Case 22-1426, Document 3-2, 07/08/2022, 3344434, Page27 of 92\n\n| Date | Number | Description |\n|------------|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|\n| 03/26/2021 | | >>>NOTICE REGARDING PRO HAC VICE MOTION. Regarding Document No. 182 MOTION for Sigrid S. McCawley to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Filing fee $200.00, receipt number ANYSDC-24312691. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. The document has been reviewed and there are no deficiencies. (wb) (Entered: 03/26/2021) |\n| 03/26/2021 | 183 | LETTER by Boies Schiller Flexner LLP as to Ghislaine Maxwell addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan from Sigrid S. McCawley dated March 22, 2021 re: Objection to Defendant Ghislaine Maxwell's motion for an order authorizing a Rule 17(c) subpoena. Document filed by Boies Schiller Flexner LLP. (McCawley, Sigrid) (Entered: 03/26/2021) |\n| 03/26/2021 | 184 | LETTER by Boies Schiller Flexner LLP as to Ghislaine Maxwell addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan from Sigrid S. McCawley dated March 26, 2021 re: Proposed redactions to March 22, 2021 Letter (ECF No. 183) Document filed by Boies Schiller Flexner LLP. (McCawley, Sigrid) (Entered: 03/26/2021) |\n| 03/26/2021 | 185 | LETTER by USA as to Ghislaine Maxwell addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan from AUSAs Maurene Comey, Alison Moe, Lara Pomerantz, and Andrew Rohrbach dated March 26, 2021 re: Recent decision in United States v. Schulte, 17 Cr. 548 (PAC) Document filed by USA. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1)(Comey, Maurene) (Entered: 03/26/2021) |\n| 03/26/2021 | 186 | ORDER as to Ghislaine Maxwell: The Court sees no reason to maintain the redactions on Boies Schiller Flexner LLP's March 26, 2021 letter. Dkt. No. 183. Unless the Government indicates an objection to removing those redactions by March 29, 2021, BSF shall file the unredacted version on the docket on March 30, 2021. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan on 3/26/2021) (lnl) (Entered: 03/26/2021) |\n| 03/29/2021 | 187 | (S2) SUPERSEDING INDICTMENT FILED as to Ghislaine Maxwell (1) count(s) 1ss, 2ss, 3ss, 4ss, 5ss, 6ss, 7ss8ss. (jm) (Entered: 03/29/2021) |\n| 03/29/2021 | 188 | LETTER by USA as to Ghislaine Maxwell addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan from AUSAs Maurene Comey, Alison Moe, Lara Pomerantz, and Andrew Rohrbach dated March 29, 2021 re: S2 Superseding Indictment Document filed by USA. (Comey, Maurene) (Entered: 03/29/2021) |\n| 03/29/2021 | 189 | ORDER as to Ghislaine Maxwell. The Court is in receipt of the Government's letter responding to its March 18, 2021 order regarding redactions to its omnibus memorandum of law in opposition to the Defendant's twelve pretrial motions. Dkt. No. 170. the Court ORDERS that the information contained on pages 129134 of the Governments brief be unredacted. With respect to the proposed redactions to pages 118119 and Exhibit 11, the Court now understands that the parties seek redactions on the basis that the material has been maintained under seal in Giuffre v. Maxwell, Case No 15-cv-7433 (S.D.N.Y.). By April 1, 2021, the parties must meet and confer and either submit to the Court justification for those redactionsbeyond that it has been ordered redacted in the civil matter, or notify the Court that the parties are no longer seeking those redactions. If the parties disagree, they shall indicate their separate views in the joint letter. (Signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan on 3/29/21)(jw) (Entered: 03/29/2021) |\n| 03/29/2021 | 190 | LETTER by USA as to Ghislaine Maxwell addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan from AUSAs Maurene Comey, Alison Moe, and Lara Pomerantz dated March 29, 2021 re: Clarification re October 7, 2020 Letter Document filed by USA. (Comey, Maurene) (Entered: 03/29/2021) |\n| 03/29/2021 | | USCAppeal Fees received $ 505.00, receipt number 465401276762 as to Ghislaine Maxwell on 3/25/2021 re: 173 Notice of Appeal - Final Judgment filed by Ghislaine Maxwell. (tp) (Entered: 04/01/2021) |\n| 03/30/2021 | 191 | LETTER by Boies Schiller Flexner LLP as to Ghislaine Maxwell addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan from Sigrid S. McCawley dated March 22,2021 re: Unredacted Objection to Defendant Ghislaine Maxwell's motion for an order authorizing a Rule 17(c) subpoena. Document filed by Boies Schiller Flexner LLP. (McCawley, Sigrid) (Entered: 03/30/2021) |\n\nDOJ-OGR-00020513",
"text_blocks": [
{
"type": "printed",
"content": "Case 22-1426, Document 3-2, 07/08/2022, 3344434, Page27 of 92",
"position": "header"
},
{
"type": "printed",
"content": "The table contents",
"position": "middle"
},
{
"type": "printed",
"content": "DOJ-OGR-00020513",
"position": "footer"
}
],
"entities": {
"people": [
"Sigrid S. McCawley",
"Ghislaine Maxwell",
"Alison J. Nathan",
"Maurene Comey",
"Alison Moe",
"Lara Pomerantz",
"Andrew Rohrbach",
"Schulte"
],
"organizations": [
"Boies Schiller Flexner LLP",
"USA"
],
"locations": [
"S.D.N.Y."
],
"dates": [
"03/26/2021",
"03/22/2021",
"03/29/2021",
"03/18/2021",
"03/30/2021",
"03/25/2021",
"07/08/2022",
"October 7, 2020",
"April 1, 2021"
],
"reference_numbers": [
"182",
"183",
"184",
"185",
"186",
"187",
"188",
"189",
"190",
"191",
"173",
"24312691",
"465401276762",
"15-cv-7433",
"17 Cr. 548 (PAC)"
]
},
"additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court docket sheet with various entries related to the case against Ghislaine Maxwell. The entries include letters, orders, and other documents filed by the parties involved. The document is well-formatted and legible."
}