mirror of
https://github.com/epstein-docs/epstein-docs.github.io.git
synced 2025-12-09 19:46:33 -06:00
its done
This commit is contained in:
nickp
parent
6023d15a34
commit
017ff274cb
@ -88,6 +88,7 @@ python process_images.py
|
||||
The script will:
|
||||
- Process each image through the OCR API
|
||||
- Extract text, entities, and metadata
|
||||
- **Auto-fix broken JSON**: If the LLM returns invalid JSON, the script automatically sends the error back to the LLM along with the original image to get a corrected response
|
||||
- Save results to `./results/{folder}/{imagename}.json`
|
||||
- Track progress in `processing_index.json` (resume-friendly)
|
||||
- Log failed files for later cleanup
|
||||
|
||||
83336
analyses.json
83336
analyses.json
File diff suppressed because it is too large
Load Diff
File diff suppressed because it is too large
Load Diff
11
errors/IMAGES001/DOJ-OGR-00000258.json
Normal file
11
errors/IMAGES001/DOJ-OGR-00000258.json
Normal file
File diff suppressed because one or more lines are too long
11
errors/IMAGES001/DOJ-OGR-00000628.json
Normal file
11
errors/IMAGES001/DOJ-OGR-00000628.json
Normal file
File diff suppressed because one or more lines are too long
11
errors/IMAGES001/DOJ-OGR-00001100.json
Normal file
11
errors/IMAGES001/DOJ-OGR-00001100.json
Normal file
File diff suppressed because one or more lines are too long
11
errors/IMAGES001/DOJ-OGR-00001648.json
Normal file
11
errors/IMAGES001/DOJ-OGR-00001648.json
Normal file
File diff suppressed because one or more lines are too long
11
errors/IMAGES001/DOJ-OGR-00001671.json
Normal file
11
errors/IMAGES001/DOJ-OGR-00001671.json
Normal file
File diff suppressed because one or more lines are too long
11
errors/IMAGES001/DOJ-OGR-00001690.json
Normal file
11
errors/IMAGES001/DOJ-OGR-00001690.json
Normal file
File diff suppressed because one or more lines are too long
11
errors/IMAGES002/DOJ-OGR-00003600.json
Normal file
11
errors/IMAGES002/DOJ-OGR-00003600.json
Normal file
File diff suppressed because one or more lines are too long
11
errors/IMAGES002/DOJ-OGR-00004922.json
Normal file
11
errors/IMAGES002/DOJ-OGR-00004922.json
Normal file
File diff suppressed because one or more lines are too long
11
errors/IMAGES002/DOJ-OGR-00005566.json
Normal file
11
errors/IMAGES002/DOJ-OGR-00005566.json
Normal file
File diff suppressed because one or more lines are too long
138
errors/IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00005935.json
Normal file
138
errors/IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00005935.json
Normal file
File diff suppressed because one or more lines are too long
11
errors/IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006528.json
Normal file
11
errors/IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006528.json
Normal file
File diff suppressed because one or more lines are too long
149
errors/IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006879.json
Normal file
149
errors/IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006879.json
Normal file
File diff suppressed because one or more lines are too long
11
errors/IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00007047.json
Normal file
11
errors/IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00007047.json
Normal file
File diff suppressed because one or more lines are too long
11
errors/IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00007341.json
Normal file
11
errors/IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00007341.json
Normal file
File diff suppressed because one or more lines are too long
11
errors/IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00007343.json
Normal file
11
errors/IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00007343.json
Normal file
File diff suppressed because one or more lines are too long
11
errors/IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00008029.json
Normal file
11
errors/IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00008029.json
Normal file
File diff suppressed because one or more lines are too long
11
errors/IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00008032.json
Normal file
11
errors/IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00008032.json
Normal file
File diff suppressed because one or more lines are too long
11
errors/IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00008283.json
Normal file
11
errors/IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00008283.json
Normal file
File diff suppressed because one or more lines are too long
45
errors/IMAGES004/DOJ-OGR-00009277.json
Normal file
45
errors/IMAGES004/DOJ-OGR-00009277.json
Normal file
@ -0,0 +1,45 @@
|
||||
```json
|
||||
{
|
||||
"document_metadata": {
|
||||
"page_number": "35",
|
||||
"document_number": "A-5673",
|
||||
"date": "February 15, 2012",
|
||||
"document_type": "Eum Document",
|
||||
"has_handwriting": false,
|
||||
"has_stamps": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
"full_text": "Case 1:20-cv-03038-PAE Document 616-1 Filed 02/24/22 Page 35 of 67\nA-5673\nFebruary 15, 2012\nUNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v PAUL M. DAUGERDAS, ET AL.,\n7 (9)\n94:18;194:5,8,9,10;204:18,19,20\n7:52 (2)\n5:2;129:24\n70s (1)\n189:10\n72 (4)\n21:23;22:10;39:11,12\n721 (1)\n100:1\n724 (1)\n100:1\n73 (1)\n24:2\n78 (1)\n26:18\n8\n8 (4)\n64:19;99:15;125:14;126:13\n8:00 (1)\n104:2\n8:33 (1)\n129:22\n80 (2)\n47:8;190:25\n81/2 (1)\n223:4\n81 (1)\n40:19\n89 (2)\n42:12,13\n8th (2)\n109:16,17\n9\n9 (8)\n75:11,19,23,25;85:2;125:12;145:8;175:21\n9:30 (1)\n240:20\n9:45 (2)\n240:21,24\n90 (1)\n42:19\n93 (1)\n189:14\n94 (1)\n48:11\n95 (1)\n51:16\n96 (1)\n51:23\n97 (5)\n18:1,3;20:18;24:13,18\n98 (1)\n184:4\n7 - Allen (2)\nA\nabide (1)\n7:6\nability (6)\n130:16;141:10;192:7;\n216:8,12;22:8;22\nA-blank-blank (1)\n206:23\nable (5)\n47:16;57:2;123:17;\n128:9;137:14\nabove (2)\n22:23;47:3\nabroad (3)\n158:5;167:22;171:25\nabsolutely (19)\n18:13;64:14;96:3;\n111:11;112:25;114:10,\n13,15;123:9;136:4;\n145:16;149:9;172:14;\n197:20;198:2;211:24;\n212:23;213:10;216:5\nabstinence (1)\n182:13\nabstinent (4)\n178:21;179:6;180:24,\n25\naccelerate (1)\n7:7\naccess (5)\n20:25;21:2;3,12\naccessible (6)\n21:18;197:2,5,9,12,18\naccident (1)\n183:14\naccidental (1)\n155:4\naccomplice (1)\n32:20\naccording (1)\n71:1\naccordingly (2)\n53:25;100:11\naccount (2)\n130:19;227:21\naccountants (1)\n207:14\naccounts (5)\n131:2,8,17,23;133:22\naccuracy (1)\n28:13\naccurate (6)\n46:8,17;79:19;208:24;\n153:2,8\naccused (1)\n59:12\nachieve (1)\n238:20\nachieved (2)\n134:20,24\nacknowledge (3)\n38:12;91:7,10\nacknowledging (1)\n91:6\nacknowledgment (1)\n236:17\nacquit (2)\n220:1,3\nacquittal (2)\n220:16,16\nacquitted (1)\n74:24\nacquitting (1)\n164:5\nacross (1)\n142:22\nact (1)\n228:22\nacting (2)\n32:20;128:10\naction (4)\n38:17;53:10,14;\n207:22\nactions (2)\n178:12,18\nactive (1)\n142:13\nactual (1)\n80:20\nactually (24)\n13:9;20:9;28:6;53:12;\n60:8,14;68:17;87:1;\n93:1;131:12;150:5;\n152:9;21;153:5;158:21;\n163:8;165:4;169:3;\n209:5,6,9,10;223:20\nAdam (2)\n4:19;40:1\nadd (2)\n76:18;137:7\nadded (1)\n231:17\naddition (1)\n13:14\nadditional (9)\n14:3,11;18:23;34:10;\n44:25;57:18;59:23;\n85:12;93:7\naddress (38)\n6:22;45;11:50:17,21,\n25:51;5,8,9,11,20,22;\n52:3;56:2;85:13;144:18;\n20;146:23;23,147:6,11;\n153:2,8;157:23;158:4,6,\n196:8,11,16,19;198:10,\n13,16\naddressed (2)\n5:17;188:20\naddresses (4)\n51:10,21;145:25;\n146:25\naddressing (1)\n72:19\nadequate (1)\n99:25\nAdjourner (1)\n240:24\nadmin (5)\n39:17,18,22,24;40:4\nadmiration (1)\n171:18\nadmired (1)\n59:13\nadmissible (1)\n217:12\nadmission (13)\n11:4;19;11:16:20;\n65:15;75:18;76:7;125:5;\n145:1;173:15;175:19;\n179:15;194:4;203:22\nadmit (1)\n19:10\nadmitted (3)\n9:23;174:15;211:3\nadopt (2)\n127:6,20\nadvance (4)\n11:22;19:7;20:14;\n29:18\nadvice (3)\n99:2;102:4,7\nadvised (3)\n5:4;6:1;139:3\nadvising (1)\n124:2\naffect (5)\n216:2,7,12,16;228:22\naffidavit (20)\n125:15;126:6,9,11,18;\n128:13;129:10;133:23;\n134:1,8;135:25;136:19;\n137:16,22,23;150:8,17,\n23;151:14;155:23\naffluent (5)\n152:9;21,25;153:5,9\nafford (4)\n124:16;125:16,18;\n126:10\nafternoon (17)\n7:5;49:6;56:6,19;\n69:22;70:14;83:15;\n86:20,23;87:15,16;\n90:22;92:16;20;129:6;\n130:7;233:22\nafterwards (2)\n93:6;190:10\nagain (19)\n20:23;55:6;71:20;\n80:8;92:6;98:6,11,13,18;\n131:4;153:7,19;22;\n157:6;162:17;163:7;\n191:1;216:25;223:4;\n226:21;230:7\nagainst (26)\n112:14;118:14;122:9;\n123:20;157:18;167:10;\n168:9;191:13;196:8;\n204:17\nagents (1)\n214:19\naggravated (1)\n184:7\nago (15)\n90:5;103:5;113:8;\n131:4;153:7,19;22;\n157:6;162:17;163:7;\n191:1;216:25;223:4;\n226:21;230:7\nagree (30)\n9:25;21:20;26:10;\n29:20;30:6;46:10;56:6;\n67:23;73:2,21;81:8;\n87:2;90:7;92:23;105:25;\n108:10;113:6;116:25;\n119:9,16;120:9;121:17;\n124:1;128:12;137:11;\n154:12,24;159:18;\n197:21;227:4\nagreed (2)\n31:21;231:3\nagreement (1)\n68:1\nahead (2)\n95:22;204:13\nairplane (1)\n189:18\nakin (1)\n192:5\nal (1)\n8:21\nalcohol (7)\n24:7;25:13;97:10;\n98:19;110:5,9;180:12\nalcoholic (8)\n41:4,21;94:17;174:15,\n17;175:9;176:9,13\nalcoholics (1)\n109:18\nalcoholism (9)\n25:13;89:14;174:6,9,\n11,21;176:18;177:9;\n210:12\nalerted (1)\n5:15\nalerting (1)\n63:2\nalleged (2)\n74:19;75:3\nAllen (1)\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS",
|
||||
"text_blocks": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"type": "printed",
|
||||
"content": "Case 1:20-cv-03038-PAE Document 616-1 Filed 02/24/22 Page 35 of 67",
|
||||
"position": "header"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"type": "printed",
|
||||
"content": "A-5673",
|
||||
"position": "header"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"type": "printed",
|
||||
"content": "February 15, 2012",
|
||||
"position": "header"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"type": "printed",
|
||||
"content": "UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v PAUL M. DAUGERDAS, ET AL.,",
|
||||
"position": "header"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"type": "printed",
|
||||
"content": "7 (9)\n94:18;194:5,8,9,10;204:18,19,20\n7:52 (2)\n5:2;129:24\n70s (1)\n189:10\n72 (4)\n21:23;22:10;39:11,12\n721 (1)\n100:1\n724 (1)\n100:1\n73 (1)\n24:2\n78 (1)\n26:18\n8\n8 (4)\n64:19;99:15;125:14;126:13\n8:00 (1)\n104:2\n8:33 (1)\n129:22\n80 (2)\n47:8;190:25\n81/2 (1)\n223:4\n81 (1)\n40:19\n89 (2)\n42:12,13\n8th (2)\n109:16,17\n9\n9 (8)\n75:11,19,23,25;85:2;125:12;145:8;175:21\n9:30 (1)\n240:20\n9:45 (2)\n240:21,24\n90 (1)\n42:19\n93 (1)\n189:14\n94 (1)\n48:11\n95 (1)\n51:16\n96 (1)\n51:23\n97 (5)\n18:1,3;20:18;24:13,18\n98 (1)\n184:4\n7 - Allen (2)",
|
||||
"position": "main"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"type": "printed",
|
||||
"content": "A\nabide (1)\n7:6\nability (6)\n130:16;141:10;192:7;\n216:8,12;22:8;22\nA-blank-blank (1)\n206:23\nable (5)\n47:16;57:2;123:17;\n128:9;137:14\nabove (2)\n22:23;47:3\nabroad (3)\n158:5;167:22;171:25\nabsolutely (19)\n18:13;64:14;96:3;\n111:11;112:25;114:10,\n13,15;123:9;136:4;\n145:16;149:9;172:14;\n197:20;198:2;211:24;\n212:23;213:10;216:5\nabstinence (1)\n182:13\nabstinent (4)\n178:21;179:6;180:24,\n25\naccelerate (1)\n7:7\naccess (5)\n20:25;21:2;3,12\naccessible (6)\n21:18;197:2,5,9,12,18\naccident (1)\n183:14\naccidental (1)\n155:4\naccomplice (1)\n32:20\naccording (1)\n71:1\naccordingly (2)\n53:25;100:11\naccount (2)\n130:19;227:21\naccountants (1)\n207:14\naccounts (5)\n131:2,8,17,23;133:22\naccuracy (1)\n28:13\naccurate (6)\n46:8,17;79:19;208:24;\n153:2,8\naccused (1)\n59:12\nachieve (1)\n238:20\nachieved (2)\n134:20,24\nacknowledge (3)\n38:12;91:7,10\nacknowledging (1)\n91:6\nacknowledgment (1)\n236:17\nacquit (2)\n220:1,3\nacquittal (2)\n220:16,16\nacquitted (1)\n74:24\nacquitting (1)\n164:5\nacross (1)\n142:22\nact (1)\n228:22\nacting (2)\n32:20;128:10\naction (4)\n38:17;53:10,14;\n207:22\nactions (2)\n178:12,18\nactive (1)\n142:13\nactual (1)\n80:20\nactually (24)\n13:9;20:9;28:6;53:12;\n60:8,14;68:17;87:1;\n93:1;131:12;150:5;\n152:9;21;153:5;158:21;\n163:8;165:4;169:3;\n209:5,6,9,10;223:20\nAdam (2)\n4:19;40:1\nadd (2)\n76:18;137:7\nadded (1)\n231:17\naddition (1)\n13:14\nadditional (9)\n14:3,11;18:23;34:10;\n44:25;57:18;59:23;\n85:12;93:7\naddress (38)\n6:22;45;11:50:17,21,\n25:51;5,8,9,11,20,22;\n52:3;56:2;85:13;144:18;\n20;146:23;23,147:6,11;\n153:2,8;157:23;158:4,6,\n196:8,11,16,19;198:10,\n13,16\naddressed (2)\n5:17;188:20\naddresses (4)\n51:10,21;145:25;\n146:25\naddressing (1)\n72:19",
|
||||
"position": "main"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"type": "printed",
|
||||
"content": "38:12;91:7,10\nacknowledging (1)\n91:6\nacknowledgment (1)\n236:17\nacquit (2)\n220:1,3\nacquittal (2)\n220:16,16\nacquitted (1)\n74:24\nacquitting (1)\n164:5\nacross (1)\n142:22\nact (1)\n228:22\nacting (2)\n32:20;128:10\naction (4)\n38:17;53:10,14;\n207:22\nactions (2)\n178:12,18\n
|
||||
35
errors/IMAGES004/DOJ-OGR-00009972.json
Normal file
35
errors/IMAGES004/DOJ-OGR-00009972.json
Normal file
@ -0,0 +1,35 @@
|
||||
```json
|
||||
{
|
||||
"document_metadata": {
|
||||
"page_number": null,
|
||||
"document_number": "A-5689",
|
||||
"date": "February 15, 2012",
|
||||
"document_type": "Court Document",
|
||||
"has_handwriting": false,
|
||||
"has_stamps": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
"full_text": "February 15, 2012\nUNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v PAUL M. DAUGERDAS, ET AL.,\notherwise (2)\n101:1;167:14\nourselves (1)\n101:5\nout (44)\n24:17;28:24;39:19;\n41:10;50:6;51:13;55:24,\n25;60:1;69:9,24;71:15;\n80:9;83:12;84:16;86:15;\n92:13;100:14,15;\n101:12;107:24;118:1;\n126:5;129:25;133:17;\n137:22;141:4,11;146:2,\n2;153:25;170:5,9,14;\n174:13;179:9;190:7;\n199:6;15:206:25;212:1;\n218:10;221:15;240:4\noutcome (1)\n214:24\noutright (1)\n181:11\noutset (1)\n141:2\noutside (5)\n34:11;36:7;58:13;\n164:18;170:17\noutstanding (3)\n89:17;202:3;210:14\nover (28)\n28:24;29:4;35:7;40:7;\n43:24;49:16;59:18;70:4,\n6,7;77:3;92:6;96:8;\n116:15;129:9;135:17;\n165:4;177:4;178:21;\n184:15;193:21;206:5;\n208:1;230:7\noverriding (2)\n99:21;100:8\noverrule (1)\n106:22\nOverruled (16)\n113:3;119:14;122:8;\n135:10;141:6;154:9;\n155:9;156:21;162:9;\n177:23;183:24;192:20;\n199:14;202:9;226:6;\n235:18\noverseeing (1)\n11:16\noversight (1)\n155:6\noutdated (1)\n91:4\noverstates (1)\n87:11\noverwhelming (1)\n159:5\nown (16)\n15:13;29:24;44:17;\n47:16;78:3;100:11;\n112:15;123:15;136:23;\n138:11;160:8,14,15;\n162:16,22;164:12\nowned (10)\n138:3;162:2,5,14,25;\n163:21,23,25;164:12;\n207:8\nownership (1)\n138:15\nowning (1)\n168:3\nowns (2)\n162:22;163:19\nPacer (2)\n114:20,22\npage (59)\n17:6;18:19;19:3;\n20:11;21:23;22:1,10;\n24:2;26:18;31:3,4;\n33:12;39:11,11;40:19;\n21:42;12,13,19;48:11;\n50:24;51:16,23;53:21;\n54:7;55:10;66:7;73:3;\n78:13;82:15,16,21;\n104:7;125:10,11;\n74:3;82:8,9;19,97:18;\n120:12;124:1;140:5;\n154:18,20;178:1;180:9;\n188:15;218:6;224:15;\n15:23;10;231:3\npartial (1)\n220:16\nPartially (2)\n222:16;231:25\npages (4)\n18:23;19:10;20:5;\n63:15\nparticipants (1)\n58:2\nparticipated (5)\n67:2;74:11;79:11;\n191:12,16\nparticipating (1)\n67:8\nparticipation (1)\n67:14\nparticular (9)\n14:17;15:11;30:14;\n33:6;44:7;54:25;77:17;\n216:24;222:1\nparticularly (3)\n28:4;30:23;43:3\nparties (6)\n7:15;74:12;97:5,16;\n98:7;129:16\npartly (2)\n124:10;232:10\npartner (6)\n9:6,8,8;12:1;42:2;\n43:12\npartners (1)\n9:18\nparty (6)\n72:23;83:19;98:12;\n99:20;212:15;215:23\npast (2)\n32:23;147:19\nPaste (1)\n199:2\npasted (5)\n42:17;45:18;198:18,\n21,25\npathological (1)\n239:6\nPaul (4)\n4:7,19;212:17;219:17\nPauley (84)\n33:6;34:10,16;37:3,\n17;74;17;21;75:2;77:25;\n104:1;105:12,19;\n107:13;109:20;110:23,\n25;112:22;113:7;\n114:17;23;115:21;\n116:19,20;117:6,10,23;\n118:7;124:2,11;126:14,\n22;128:4;13;130:15;\n131:5;132:9,12;133:3;\n138:23;139:3;140:10;\n16:14;18;143:5;144:4,8,\n8,11,15;19;145:9;151:6,\n21;214:10;216:20;\n217:23;219:24;220:7,\n18;222:18;223:5;\n224:18;226:7\nPauley's (14)\n68:2;98:12;167:15\n104:4;105:22;113:21;\n183:15;216:4;221:24;\n224:20,23;225:1,5;\n227:5;12;228:3,7\nPause (1)\n130:25\npay (5)\n124:18,21;137:14,18;\n219:9\npaying (1)\n131:19\npenance (1)\n192:5\npending (7)\n38:17;51:14;52:18;\n53:1;60:8;98:9,16\npenetrate (1)\n128:6\npenitentiary (1)\n163:14\npeople (30)\n11:25;13:21,25;15:24;\n45:5,8,13;56:12;77:19;\n82:17;87:4;91:23;93:2,\n3;122:5;128:7;168:17;\n20,23;179:17;181:23;\n187:18,21;194:23;203:6,\n12;206:19;209:9;\n210:22;238:13\npeople's (1)\n12:206:19;209:9;\n210:22;238:13\nper (1)\n231:3\npercent (3)\n199:8,17;214:10\nperemptory (3)\n30:3;32:13;86:8\nperfect (2)\n62:7;239:4\nperfectly (1)\n100:24\nperformed (1)\n192:7\nPerhaps (5)\n5:10;45:13;56:7,11;\n209:10\nperiod (7)\n5:11;12;53:19;\n88:13,18;181:9;182:13\nperjure (2)\n192:9;231:6\nperjured (5)\n192:16;227:21;\n232:23;235:9;236:20\nperjuring (1)\n239:9\nperjury (7)\n228:21;231:11;233:3;\n234:3,14;235:11;237:1\npermanent (4)\n158:4,6;159:20;160:7\npermitted (3)\n68:2;98:12;167:15\nperpendicular (1)\n35:8\nperson (53)\n11:13,15;14:7;16:25;\n18:3;34:9;43:17,21;\n46:5,15;47:21;50:3,5;10;\n54:13;55:2;56:15;61:21,\n65:1;154:22;158:16;\n193:13;200:25;201:1,\n1;210:16\npersonal (25)\n38:16,20,23;39:1;\n51:13;60:8,10;98:1;\n131:25;132:6,12,13,18,\n22;133:10;159:10,15;\n187:4;191:18;212:1,17,\n21;214:2,15;218:5\npersonally (5)\n25:7:8;214:6;219:2,5\nperspective (1)\n229:15\npertinent (2)\n171:6;191:9\npetit (1)\notherwise - petit (18)\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPTERS\nDOJ-OGR-00009972",
|
||||
"text_blocks": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"type": "printed",
|
||||
"content": "February 15, 2012",
|
||||
"position": "header"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"type": "printed",
|
||||
"content": "UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v PAUL M. DAUGERDAS, ET AL.,",
|
||||
"position": "header"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"type": "printed",
|
||||
"content": "otherwise (2)\n101:1;167:14\nourselves (1)\n101:5\nout (44)\n24:17;28:24;39:19;\n41:10;50:6;51:13;55:24,\n25;60:1;69:9,24;71:15;\n80:9;83:12;84:16;86:15;\n92:13;100:14,15;\n101:12;107:24;118:1;\n126:5;129:25;133:17;\n137:22;141:4,11;146:2,\n2;153:25;170:5,9,14;\n174:13;179:9;190:7;\n199:6;15:206:25;212:1;\n218:10;221:15;240:4\noutcome (1)\n214:24\noutright (1)\n181:11\noutset (1)\n141:2\noutside (5)\n34:11;36:7;58:13;\n164:18;170:17\noutstanding (3)\n89:17;202:3;210:14\nover (28)\n28:24;29:4;35:7;40:7;\n43:24;49:16;59:18;70:4,\n6,7;77:3;92:6;96:8;\n116:15;129:9;135:17;\n165:4;177:4;178:21;\n184:15;193:21;206:5;\n208:1;230:7\noverriding (2)\n99:21;100:8\noverrule (1)\n106:22\nOverruled (16)\n113:3;119:14;122:8;\n135:10;141:6;154:9;\n155:9;156:21;162:9;\n177:23;183:24;192:20;\n199:14;202:9;226:6;\n235:18\noverseeing (1)\n11:16\noversight (1)\n155:6\noutdated (1)\n91:4\noverstates (1)\n87:11\noverwhelming (1)\n159:5\nown (16)\n15:13;29:24;44:17;\n47:16;78:3;100:11;\n112:15;123:15;136:23;\n138:11;160:8,14,15;\n162:16,22;164:12\nowned (10)\n138:3;162:2,5,14,25;\n163:21,23,25;164:12;\n207:8\nownership (1)\n138:15\nowning (1)\n168:3\nowns (2)\n162:22;163:19",
|
||||
"position": "body"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"type": "printed",
|
||||
"content": "Pacer (2)\n114:20,22\npage (59)\n17:6;18:19;19:3;\n20:11;21:23;22:1,10;\n24:2;26:18;31:3,4;\n33:12;39:11,11;40:19;\n21:42;12,13,19;48:11;\n50:24;51:16,23;53:21;\n54:7;55:10;66:7;73:3;\n78:13;82:15,16,21;\n104:7;125:10,11;\n74:3;82:8,9;19,97:18;\n120:12;124:1;140:5;\n154:18,20;178:1;180:9;\n188:15;218:6;224:15;\n15:23;10;231:3\npartial (1)\n220:16\nPartially (2)\n222:16;231:25\npages (4)\n18:23;19:10;20:5;\n63:15\nparticipants (1)\n58:2\nparticipated (5)\n67:2;74:11;79:11;\n191:12,16\nparticipating (1)\n67:8\nparticipation (1)\n67:14\nparticular (9)\n14:17;15:11;30:14;\n33:6;44:7;54:25;77:17;\n216:24;222:1\nparticularly (3)\n28:4;30:23;43:3\nparties (6)\n7:15;74:12;97:5,16;\n98:7;129:16\npartly (2)\n124:10;232:10\npartner (6)\n9:6,8,8;12:1;42:2;\n43:12\npartners (1)\n9:18\nparty (6)\n72:23;83:19;98:12;\n99:20;212:15;215:23\npast (2)\n32:23;147:19",
|
||||
"position": "body"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"type": "printed",
|
||||
"content": "Paste (1)\n199:2\npasted (5)\n42:17;45:18;198:18,\n21,25\npathological (1)\n239:6\nPaul (4)\n4:7,19;212:17;219:17\nPauley (84)\n33:6;34:10,16;37:3,\n17;74;17;21;75:2;77:25;\n104:1;105:12,19;\n107:13;109:20;110:23,\n25;112:22;113:7;\n114:17;23;115:21;\n116:19,20;117:6,10,23;\n118:7;124:2,11;126:14,\n22;128:4;13;130:15;\n131:5;132:9,12;133:3;\n138:23;139:3;140:10;\n16:14;18;143:5;144:4,8,\n8,11,15;19;145:9;151:6,\n21;214:10;216:20;\n217:23;219:24;220:7,\n18;222:18;223:5;\n224:18;226:7\nPauley's (14)\n68:2;98:12;167:15\n104:4;105:22;113:21;\n183:15;216:4;221:24;\n224:20,23;225:1,5;\n227:5;12;228:3,7\nPause (1)\n130:25\npay (5)\n124:18,21;137:14,18
|
||||
35
errors/IMAGES004/DOJ-OGR-00009974.json
Normal file
35
errors/IMAGES004/DOJ-OGR-00009974.json
Normal file
@ -0,0 +1,35 @@
|
||||
```json
|
||||
{
|
||||
"document_metadata": {
|
||||
"page_number": "6",
|
||||
"document_number": "A-5691",
|
||||
"date": "February 15, 2012",
|
||||
"document_type": "Court Document",
|
||||
"has_handwriting": false,
|
||||
"has_stamps": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
"full_text": "Case No. 2010-000068-BA: In the Supreme Court of Alabama Document 646-20 Filed 02-15-2012 A-5691 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v PAUL M. DAUGERDAS, ET AL., February 15, 2012 production (1) 82:1 professional (1) 210:20 professor (2) 143:19;227:3 profiles (2) 10:19,21 pro-government (1) 26:12 program (2) 170:9;180:11 programs (1) 174:13 promise (2) 57:1;186:9 promptly (1) 36:4 proof (1) 187:19 proper (4) 175:4;202:15,17,19 property (3) 66:7;189:6,22 propose (1) 19:10 proposing (2) 71:13,14 prosecution (8) 15:17;16:15;30:20; 87:18;111:9;114:1,17; 229:12 prosecutor (1) 195:15 prosecutors (9) 193:16,18,20,25; 194:1,11,15,19;214:18 prospect (1) 116:20 prospective (24) 11:21;13:5,6; 14:22,24;15:23,25;17:7; 19:7;20:9;28:9,18,21,25; 30:11,13;31:6,11,24; 34:8;61:21;69:8;103:9 protect (1) 99:23 protection (1) 184:12 protocol (1) 39:20 provide (1) 56:4 provided (3) 13:8;54:19;126:17 provides (1) 20:18 providing (1) 15:22 psychiatric (1) 176:23 psychological (1) 238:25 psychologist (12) 107:3;109:3;113:5,23; 115:20;117:3;119:19; 120:12,15;121:19;128:5, 6 public (18) 14:1;23:10;28:22; 32:24;33:4;66:20;69:11; 98:4;10,21;99:20;100:3, 10;101:6;114:21,22,25; 115:2 publicly (4) 13:4,10;12:9;97:15 pull (3) 31:2;70:5;95:10 pulled (2) 21:6;55:25 pulling (1) 55:2 punched (1) 183:10 purist (1) 218:24 purpose (9) 29:16;88:22;98:6; 137:23;140:10,20,21; 157:11;238:20 purposes (3) 29:13;98:15;193:10 pursuant (2) 48:5;130:14 pursuing (1) 93:7 put (27) 64:6;78:11,11,11; 79:2,3;81:20;82:4; 94:25;123:4;133:20; 151:21,23;152:18; 161:9;196:8,11,20; 197:1,8,13,15;201:8,11; 210:10;229:4;235:3 Q qualification (1) 126:3 qualifications (1) 126:2 qualified (1) 124:12 qualify (3) 125:24;172:4;210:5 quantum (1) 171:2 quarrel (1) 26:7 questionnaire (2) 13:17;24:15 quick (3) 70:2;83:12;238:25 quickly (7) 20:10;23:20,23;47:6; 61:20;132:2,4 quite (1) 43:7 quote (5) 111:5;118:23;120:10; 199:5;218:24 quote-unquote (1) 121:20 quoting (2) 100:1;235:23 R rabbit (1) 60:17 raise (6) 31:23;32:5;63:12; 129:25;207:15;240:16 raised (2) 36:9;191:10 raising (4) 30:22;31:8;87:24; 88:10 ran (2) 187:5,5 random (4) 17:25;18:3;24:18; 228:11 randomly (1) 24:12 Randy (9) 11:18,25;12:13;14:4; 23:21;27:17;40:1,25; 41:18 Randy's (2) 13:15;14:21 range (1) 18:23 rare (1) 53:8 rather (2) 91:1;221:12 rating (6) 25:22;26:1,2,14,16; 27:13 ratings (1) 27:13 rational (13) 106:17;24;107:2,4; 110:17;120:11,14; 121:25;122:3,17; 128:10;184:17,19 rational/irrational (1) 122:5 reached (5) 110:19;111:15,17; 114:4;115:5,5,7,10,12, 13,24;118:10,11,13, 15,17,22;119:5,7; 124:13,14,20;130:16, 20;131:3,7,21;135:16; 138:7;139:2,7;142:25; read (16) 31:4;37:2,3;12,18; 39:8;41:19;7;2;14;83:6; 122:11,13,14;132:2; 134:8;210:2,3 readily (1) 44:18 reading (11) 37:17;18;72:15;1; 118:20;119:14;145:13; 173:1;199:18;200:5 readmission (1) 224:3 ready (7) 7:12,15;17;21:3; 238:14;239:5,13 real (2) 198:13,15 reality (1) 16:22 realize (1) 91:13 realized (1) 91:24 really (39) 45:14;47:18;49:21; 56:7;70:12;7;5;99:14; 113:11;117:24;121:21; 127:3;14;142:15; 151:22;152:11,23; 160:21;162:21;163:2; 164:6;168:13;170:17; 172:18;20;186:21; reason (23) 5:20;6;11:12;9;25:1; 33:10;34:1;47:4;88:3; 91:4;108:18;20,23; 109:1;124:4;153:7; 175:14;187:16;195:14, 15;198:25;203:5; 237:22;239:4 reasonable (2) 99:23;210:8 reasons (3) 26:14;232:17,25 recall (76) 14:16;17:21;22:3,5,6; 23:25;30:18;31:10;32:9; 33:4;54:21;58:14;59:1; 69:3;70:7;77:1;83:12; 93:16;111:12;131:22 recommended (2) 180:14,16 reconvene (1) 192:25 record (17) 14:1;32:16;66:20; 96:1;97:10,15;98:8; 101:2;114:21,23,25; 115:2;116:1,2;121:16; 122:14;212:13 records (10) 10:69:11;98:5;100:6 recovery (1) 178:22 Recess (11) 188:5;192:5,11;194:3; 195:3;200:2;203:5; 208:1;209:25;231:5; 234:7;15;236:7 recognizance (1) 186:3 recognize (9) 10:15;21;17:5,6; 18:21;19:3;36:16,17; 72:12 recognizing (1) 106:14 recollection (11) 12:7;31:5;58:12,21; 69:3;70:7;77:1;83:12; 93:16;111:12;131:22 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v PAUL M. DAUGERDAS, ET AL., production - recovery (20) SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS",
|
||||
"text_blocks": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"type": "printed",
|
||||
"content": "Case No. 2010-000068-BA: In the Supreme Court of Alabama Document 646-20 Filed 02-15-2012 A-5691",
|
||||
"position": "header"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"type": "printed",
|
||||
"content": "UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v PAUL M. DAUGERDAS, ET AL.,",
|
||||
"position": "header"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"type": "printed",
|
||||
"content": "February 15, 2012",
|
||||
"position": "header"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"type": "printed",
|
||||
"content": "production (1) 82:1 professional (1) 210:20 professor (2) 143:19;227:3 profiles (2) 10:19,21 pro-government (1) 26:12 program (2) 170:9;180:11 programs (1) 174:13 promise (2) 57:1;186:9 promptly (1) 36:4 proof (1) 187:19 proper (4) 175:4;202:15,17,19 property (3) 66:7;189:6,22 propose (1) 19:10 proposing (2) 71:13,14 prosecution (8) 15:17;16:15;30:20; 87:18;111:9;114:1,17; 229:12 prosecutor (1) 195:15 prosecutors (9) 193:16,18,20,25; 194:1,11,15,19;214:18 prospect (1) 116:20 prospective (24) 11:21;13:5,6; 14:22,24;15:23,25;17:7; 19:7;20:9;28:9,18,21,25; 30:11,13;31:6,11,24; 34:8;61:21;69:8;103:9 protect (1) 99:23 protection (1) 184:12 protocol (1) 39:20 provide (1) 56:4 provided (3) 13:8;54:19;126:17 provides (1) 20:18 providing (1) 15:22 psychiatric (1) 176:23 psychological (1) 238:25 psychologist (12) 107:3;109:3;113:5,23; 115:20;117:3;119:19; 120:12,15;121:19;128:5, 6 public (18) 14:1;23:10;28:22; 32:24;33:4;66:20;69:11; 98:4;10,21;99:20;100:3, 10;101:6;114:21,22,25; 115:2 publicly (4) 13:4,10;12:9;97:15 pull (3) 31:2;70:5;95:10 pulled (2) 21:6;55:25 pulling (1) 55:2 punched (1) 183:10 purist (1) 218:24 purpose (9) 29:16;88:22;98:6; 137:23;140:10,20,21; 157:11;238:20 purposes (3) 29:13;98:15;193:10 pursuant (2) 48:5;130:14 pursuing (1) 93:7 put (27) 64:6;78:11,11,11; 79:2,3;81:20;82:4; 94:25;123:4;133:20; 151:21,23;152:18; 161:9;196:8,11,20; 197:1,8,13,15;201:8,11; 210:10;229:4;235:3",
|
||||
"position": "main"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"type": "printed",
|
||||
"content": "Q qualification (1) 126:3 qualifications (1) 126:2 qualified (1) 124:12 qualify (3) 125:24;172:4;210:5 quantum (1) 171:2 quarrel (1) 26:7 questionnaire (2) 13:17;24:15 quick (3) 70:2;83:12;238:25 quickly (7) 20:10;23:20,23;47:6; 61:20;132:2,4 quite (1) 43:7 quote (5) 111:5;118:23;120:10; 199:5;218:24 quote-unquote (1) 121:20 quoting (2) 100:1;235:23 R rabbit (1) 60:17 raise (6) 31:23;32:5;63:12; 129:25;207:15;240:16 raised (2) 36:9;191:10 raising (4) 30:22;31:8;87:24; 88:10 ran (2) 187:5,5 random (4) 17:25;18:3;24:18; 228:11 randomly (1) 24:12 Randy (9) 11:18,25;12:13;14:4; 23:21;27:17;40:1,25; 41:18 Randy's (2) 13:15;14:21 range (1) 18:23 rare (1) 53:8 rather (2) 91:1;221:12 rating (6) 25:22;26:1,2,14,16; 27:13 ratings (1) 27:13 rational (13) 106:17;24;107:2,4; 110:17;120:11,14; 121:25;122:3,17; 128:10;184:17,19 rational/irrational (1) 122:5 reached (5) 110:19;111:15,17; 114:4;115:5,5,7,10,12, 13,24;118:10,11,13, 15,17,22;119:5,7; 124:13,14,20;130:16, 20;131:3,7,21;135:16; 138:7;139:2,7;142:25; read (16) 31:4;37:2,3;12,18; 39:8;41:19;7;2;14;83:6; 122:11,13,14;132:2; 134:8;210:2,3 readily (1) 44:18 reading (11) 37:17;18;72:15;1; 118:20;119:14;145:13; 173:1;199:18;200:5 readmission (1) 224:3 ready (7) 7:12,15;17;21:3; 238:14;239:5,13 real (2) 198:13,15 reality (1) 16:22 realize (1) 91:13 realized (1) 91:24 really (39) 45:14;47:18;49:21; 56:7;70:12;7;5;99:14; 113:11;117:24;121:21; 127:3;14;142:15; 151:22;152:11,23; 160:21;162:21;163:2; 164:6;168:13;170:17; 172:18;20;186:21; reason (23) 5:20;6;11:12;9;25:1; 33:10;34:1;47:4;88:3; 91:4;108:18;20,23; 109:1;124:4;153:7; 175:14;187:16;195:14, 15;198:25;203:5; 237:22;239:4 reasonable (2
|
||||
11
errors/IMAGES004/DOJ-OGR-00011349.json
Normal file
11
errors/IMAGES004/DOJ-OGR-00011349.json
Normal file
File diff suppressed because one or more lines are too long
11
errors/IMAGES004/DOJ-OGR-00011771.json
Normal file
11
errors/IMAGES004/DOJ-OGR-00011771.json
Normal file
File diff suppressed because one or more lines are too long
11
errors/IMAGES005/DOJ-OGR-00013011.json
Normal file
11
errors/IMAGES005/DOJ-OGR-00013011.json
Normal file
File diff suppressed because one or more lines are too long
11
errors/IMAGES005/DOJ-OGR-00013540.json
Normal file
11
errors/IMAGES005/DOJ-OGR-00013540.json
Normal file
File diff suppressed because one or more lines are too long
11
errors/IMAGES005/DOJ-OGR-00013590.json
Normal file
11
errors/IMAGES005/DOJ-OGR-00013590.json
Normal file
File diff suppressed because one or more lines are too long
11
errors/IMAGES005/DOJ-OGR-00014303.json
Normal file
11
errors/IMAGES005/DOJ-OGR-00014303.json
Normal file
File diff suppressed because one or more lines are too long
34
errors/IMAGES006/DOJ-OGR-00015308.json
Normal file
34
errors/IMAGES006/DOJ-OGR-00015308.json
Normal file
@ -0,0 +1,34 @@
|
||||
```json
|
||||
{
|
||||
"document_metadata": {
|
||||
"page_number": "18",
|
||||
"document_number": "SDNY_GM_00006078",
|
||||
"date": "04/27/16",
|
||||
"document_type": "Find Report",
|
||||
"has_handwriting": false,
|
||||
"has_stamps": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
"full_text": "10:46 AM 04/27/16 Accrual Basis SHOPPERS TRAVEL, INC. Find Report All Transactions Type Date Num Name Amount Balance Invoice 5/17/1999 33507 Maxwell/Ghislain 480.00 1,482,084.53 Invoice 5/12/1999 33432 Lewis/Shelly 499.00 1,482,583.53 Invoice 5/11/1999 33389 Kelson/L 120.00 1,482,703.53 Invoice 5/11/1999 33395 Devera/Richlle 311.00 1,483,014.53 Invoice 5/10/1999 33380 Goffinet/François 4,671.80 1,487,686.33 Invoice 5/10/1999 33381 Dardenne/V 7,694.54 1,495,380.87 Invoice 5/10/1999 33382 Dardenne/V 5,644.40 1,501,025.27 Invoice 5/6/1999 33328 Devera/Richlle 75.00 1,501,100.27 Invoice 5/5/1999 33306 Barnett/Richard 560.00 1,501,660.27 Invoice 5/4/1999 33271 Blatier/Thierry 1,293.70 1,502,953.97 Invoice 5/4/1999 33272 Schoettle/D 528.00 1,503,481.97 Invoice 4/29/1999 33184 Butch/Ernesto 261.20 1,503,743.17 Invoice 4/29/1999 33193 Dennisonsarrar/Ni... 753.25 1,504,496.42 Invoice 4/29/1999 33194 Dennisonsarrar/Ni... 622.90 1,505,119.32 Invoice 4/29/1999 33195 Alexander/Miles 1,195.80 1,506,315.12 Invoice 4/28/1999 33173 Tayler/Emma 522.50 1,506,837.62 Invoice 4/28/1999 33170 Gramza/Tiffany 611.95 1,507,449.57 Invoice 4/26/1999 33128 Wallaert/Alexia 314.00 1,507,763.57 Invoice 4/23/1999 33101 Walker/Melanie 413.00 1,508,176.57 Invoice 4/23/1999 33109 Wallaert/Alexia 0.00 1,508,176.57 Invoice 4/22/1999 33086 Hillis/William 1,207.20 1,509,383.77 Invoice 4/20/1999 33047 Button/Terri 535.16 1,509,918.93 Invoice 4/20/1999 33059 Biddle/Sophie 413.00 1,510,331.93 Invoice 4/20/1999 33060 Walker/Melanie 614.95 1,510,946.88 Invoice 4/19/1999 33035 Gramza/Tiffany 431.95 1,511,378.83 Invoice 4/19/1999 33041 Menage/Bernard 649.05 1,512,027.88 Invoice 4/16/1999 32991 Roche/Christian 3,749.70 1,515,777.58 Invoice 4/16/1999 33007 Tayler/Emma 215.00 1,515,992.58 Invoice 4/16/1999 33008 Tayler/Emma 416.95 1,516,409.53 Invoice 4/16/1999 33014 Maxwell/Ghislain 621.95 1,517,031.48 Invoice 4/15/1999 32976 Askew/John 2,488.30 1,519,519.78 Invoice 4/15/1999 32977 Maxwell/Ghislain 530.00 1,520,049.78 Invoice 4/14/1999 32950 Wallaert/Alexia 0.00 1,520,049.78 Invoice 4/14/1999 32965 Wallaert/Alexia 1,367.65 1,521,417.43 Invoice 4/13/1999 32933 Maxwell/Ghislain 6,452.78 1,527,870.21 Invoice 4/13/1999 32937 Perry Lang/Adam 460.00 1,528,330.21 Invoice 4/12/1999 32914 Schoettle/D 970.00 1,529,300.21 Invoice 4/9/1999 32884 Barnett/Richard 487.00 1,529,787.21 Invoice 4/8/1999 32851 Tayler/Emma 329.00 1,530,116.21 Invoice 4/2/1999 32796 Ellison/Amanda 520.40 1,530,636.61 Invoice 3/31/1999 32762 Epstein/J 3,591.00 1,534,227.61 Invoice 3/29/1999 32733 Gramza/Tiffany 0.00 1,534,227.61 Invoice 3/29/1999 32740 Gramza/Tiffany 580.80 1,534,807.61 Invoice 3/25/1999 32685 Blissett/Jean Paul 3,046.54 1,537,854.15 Invoice 3/25/1999 32686 Blissett/Jean Paul 2,188.00 1,540,042.15 Invoice 3/25/1999 32692 Maxwell/Ghislain 780.95 1,540,823.10 Invoice 3/23/1999 32650 Mugnier/Philippe 0.00 1,540,823.10 Invoice 3/23/1999 32651 Maxwell/Ghislain 783.95 1,541,607.05 Invoice 3/23/1999 32658 Goffinet/François 780.95 1,542,388.00 Invoice 3/23/1999 32659 Maxwell/Ghislain 2,342.85 1,544,730.85 Invoice 3/23/1999 32660 Mugnier/Philippe 1,561.90 1,546,292.75 Invoice 3/23/1999 32661 Lapreia/Pascal 780.95 1,547,073.70 Invoice 3/23/1999 32662 Lapreia/Pascal 3,056.00 1,550,129.70 Invoice 3/19/1999 32608 Walker/Starnes/M... 304.00 1,550,433.70 Invoice 3/19/1999 32618 Tayler/Emma 196.00 1,550,629.70 Invoice 3/19/1999 32619 Tayler/Emma 547.71 1,551,177.41 Invoice 3/19/1999 32624 Rysko/Monica 368.00 1,551,545.41 Invoice 3/19/1999 32625 Tayler/Emma 351.71 1,551,897.12 Invoice 3/17/1999 32565 Goodman/Francis 482.00 1,552,379.12 Invoice 3/17/1999 32567 Hembro/Clementine 601.95 1,552,981.07 Invoice 3/16/1999 32546 Perry Lang/Adam 490.95 1,553,472.02 Invoice 3/16/1999 32547 Epstein/J 1,561.90 1,555,033.92 Invoice 3/12/1999 32517 Callhan/Thomas 896.00 1,555,929.92 Invoice 3/12/1999 32530 Maxwell/Ghislain 475.00 1,556,404.92 Invoice 3/11/1999 32497 Gramza/Tiffany 216.00 1,556,620.92 Invoice 3/11/1999 32498 Lewis/Shelly 145.00 1,556,765.92 Invoice 3/11/1999 32510 Burns/Tiffany 307.39 1,557,073.31 Invoice 3/10/1999 32475 Hazel/Clare 209.00 1,557,282.31 Page 18 SDNY_GM_00006078 CONFIDENTIAL DOJ-OGR-00015308",
|
||||
"text_blocks": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"type": "printed",
|
||||
"content": "10:46 AM 04/27/16 Accrual Basis SHOPPERS TRAVEL, INC. Find Report All Transactions",
|
||||
"position": "header"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"type": "printed",
|
||||
"content": "Type Date Num Name Amount Balance",
|
||||
"position": "header"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"type": "printed",
|
||||
"content": "Invoice 5/17/1999 33507 Maxwell/Ghislain 480.00 1,482,084.53 Invoice 5/12/1999 33432 Lewis/Shelly 499.00 1,482,583.53 Invoice 5/11/1999 33389 Kelson/L 120.00 1,482,703.53 Invoice 5/11/1999 33395 Devera/Richlle 311.00 1,483,014.53 Invoice 5/10/1999 33380 Goffinet/François 4,671.80 1,487,686.33 Invoice 5/10/1999 33381 Dardenne/V 7,694.54 1,495,380.87 Invoice 5/10/1999 33382 Dardenne/V 5,644.40 1,501,025.27 Invoice 5/6/1999 33328 Devera/Richlle 75.00 1,501,100.27 Invoice 5/5/1999 33306 Barnett/Richard 560.00 1,501,660.27 Invoice 5/4/1999 33271 Blatier/Thierry 1,293.70 1,502,953.97 Invoice 5/4/1999 33272 Schoettle/D 528.00 1,503,481.97 Invoice 4/29/1999 33184 Butch/Ernesto 261.20 1,503,743.17 Invoice 4/29/1999 33193 Dennisonsarrar/Ni... 753.25 1,504,496.42 Invoice 4/29/1999 33194 Dennisonsarrar/Ni... 622.90 1,505,119.32 Invoice 4/29/1999 33195 Alexander/Miles 1,195.80 1,506,315.12 Invoice 4/28/1999 33173 Tayler/Emma 522.50 1,506,837.62 Invoice 4/28/1999 33170 Gramza/Tiffany 611.95 1,507,449.57 Invoice 4/26/1999 33128 Wallaert/Alexia 314.00 1,507,763.57 Invoice 4/23/1999 33101 Walker/Melanie 413.00 1,508,176.57 Invoice 4/23/1999 33109 Wallaert/Alexia 0.00 1,508,176.57 Invoice 4/22/1999 33086 Hillis/William 1,207.20 1,509,383.77 Invoice 4/20/1999 33047 Button/Terri 535.16 1,509,918.93 Invoice 4/20/1999 33059 Biddle/Sophie 413.00 1,510,331.93 Invoice 4/20/1999 33060 Walker/Melanie 614.95 1,510,946.88 Invoice 4/19/1999 33035 Gramza/Tiffany 431.95 1,511,378.83 Invoice 4/19/1999 33041 Menage/Bernard 649.05 1,512,027.88 Invoice 4/16/1999 32991 Roche/Christian 3,749.70 1,515,777.58 Invoice 4/16/1999 33007 Tayler/Emma 215.00 1,515,992.58 Invoice 4/16/1999 33008 Tayler/Emma 416.95 1,516,409.53 Invoice 4/16/1999 33014 Maxwell/Ghislain 621.95 1,517,031.48 Invoice 4/15/1999 32976 Askew/John 2,488.30 1,519,519.78 Invoice 4/15/1999 32977 Maxwell/Ghislain 530.00 1,520,049.78 Invoice 4/14/1999 32950 Wallaert/Alexia 0.00 1,520,049.78 Invoice 4/14/1999 32965 Wallaert/Alexia 1,367.65 1,521,417.43 Invoice 4/13/1999 32933 Maxwell/Ghislain 6,452.78 1,527,870.21 Invoice 4/13/1999 32937 Perry Lang/Adam 460.00 1,528,330.21 Invoice 4/12/1999 32914 Schoettle/D 970.00 1,529,300.21 Invoice 4/9/1999 32884 Barnett/Richard 487.00 1,529,787.21 Invoice 4/8/1999 32851 Tayler/Emma 329.00 1,530,116.21 Invoice 4/2/1999 32796 Ellison/Amanda 520.40 1,530,636.61 Invoice 3/31/1999 32762 Epstein/J 3,591.00 1,534,227.61 Invoice 3/29/1999 32733 Gramza/Tiffany 0.00 1,534,227.61 Invoice 3/29/1999 32740 Gramza/Tiffany 580.80 1,534,807.61 Invoice 3/25/1999 32685 Blissett/Jean Paul 3,046.54 1,537,854.15 Invoice 3/25/1999 32686 Blissett/Jean Paul 2,188.00 1,540,042.15 Invoice 3/25/1999 32692 Maxwell/Ghislain 780.95 1,540,823.10 Invoice 3/23/1999 32650 Mugnier/Philippe 0.00 1,540,823.10 Invoice 3/23/1999 32651 Maxwell/Ghislain 783.95 1,541,607.05 Invoice 3/23/1999 32658 Goffinet/François 780.95 1,542,388.00 Invoice 3/23/1999 32659 Maxwell/Ghislain 2,342.85 1,544,730.85 Invoice 3/23/1999 32660 Mugnier/Philippe 1,561.90 1,546,292.75 Invoice 3/23/1999 32661 Lapreia/Pascal 780.95 1,547,073.70 Invoice 3/23/1999 32662 Lapreia/Pascal 3,056.00 1,550,129.70 Invoice 3/19/1999 32608 Walker/Starnes/M... 304.00 1,550,433.70 Invoice 3/19/1999 32618 Tayler/Emma 196.00 1,550,629.70 Invoice 3/19/1999 32619 Tayler/Emma 547.71 1,551,177.41 Invoice 3/19/1999 32624 Rysko/Monica 368.00 1,551,545.41 Invoice 3/19/1999 32625 Tayler/Emma 351.71 1,551,897.12 Invoice 3/17/1999 32565 Goodman/Francis 482.00 1,552,379.12 Invoice 3/17/1999 32567 Hembro/Clementine 601.95 1,552,981.07 Invoice 3/16/1999 32546 Perry Lang/Adam 490.95 1,553,472.02 Invoice 3/16/1999 32547 Epstein/J 1,561.90 1,555,033.92 Invoice 3/12/1999 32517 Callhan/Thomas 896.00 1,555,929.92 Invoice 3/12/1999 32530 Maxwell/Ghislain 475.00 1,556,404.92 Invoice 3/11/1999 32497 Gramza/Tiffany 216.00 1,556,620.92 Invoice 3/11/1999 32498 Lewis/Shelly 145.00 1,556,765.92 Invoice 3/11/1999 32510 Burns/Tiffany 307.39 1,557,073.31 Invoice 3/10/1999 32475 Hazel/Clare 209.00 1,557,282.31",
|
||||
"position": "body"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"type": "printed",
|
||||
"content": "Page 18",
|
||||
"position": "footer"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"type": "printed",
|
||||
11
errors/IMAGES006/DOJ-OGR-00016216.json
Normal file
11
errors/IMAGES006/DOJ-OGR-00016216.json
Normal file
File diff suppressed because one or more lines are too long
11
errors/IMAGES006/DOJ-OGR-00016926.json
Normal file
11
errors/IMAGES006/DOJ-OGR-00016926.json
Normal file
File diff suppressed because one or more lines are too long
11
errors/IMAGES007/DOJ-OGR-00018597.json
Normal file
11
errors/IMAGES007/DOJ-OGR-00018597.json
Normal file
File diff suppressed because one or more lines are too long
11
errors/IMAGES007/DOJ-OGR-00019124.json
Normal file
11
errors/IMAGES007/DOJ-OGR-00019124.json
Normal file
File diff suppressed because one or more lines are too long
11
errors/IMAGES007/DOJ-OGR-00019173.json
Normal file
11
errors/IMAGES007/DOJ-OGR-00019173.json
Normal file
File diff suppressed because one or more lines are too long
11
errors/IMAGES007/DOJ-OGR-00019503.json
Normal file
11
errors/IMAGES007/DOJ-OGR-00019503.json
Normal file
File diff suppressed because one or more lines are too long
11
errors/IMAGES007/DOJ-OGR-00019572.json
Normal file
11
errors/IMAGES007/DOJ-OGR-00019572.json
Normal file
File diff suppressed because one or more lines are too long
11
errors/IMAGES007/DOJ-OGR-00019612.json
Normal file
11
errors/IMAGES007/DOJ-OGR-00019612.json
Normal file
File diff suppressed because one or more lines are too long
38
errors/IMAGES007/DOJ-OGR-00020066.json
Normal file
38
errors/IMAGES007/DOJ-OGR-00020066.json
Normal file
@ -0,0 +1,38 @@
|
||||
```json
|
||||
{
|
||||
"document_metadata": {
|
||||
"page_number": "3",
|
||||
"document_number": "Case 1:20-cr-00800-LJL Document 11 Filed 07/23/20 Page 6 of 36",
|
||||
"date": "July 2, 2020, July 14, 2020",
|
||||
"document_type": "Court Document",
|
||||
"has_handwriting": false,
|
||||
"has_stamps": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
"full_text": "On July 2, 2020, the Federal Bureau of Investigation (“FBI”) arrested the defendant. Following extensive briefing, on July 14, 2020, the Court held a lengthy bail hearing. In its written and oral submissions, the defense urged the Court to release the defendant on bail. Among other things, the defense emphasized the defendant’s family ties and residence in the United States (Dkt. 18 at 2, 3, 12), offered to hire a private security company to monitor the defendant (Id. at 20), noted that the defendant remained in the country and was in touch with the Government through counsel following Epstein’s arrest (Dkt. 18 at 12-13; Tr. 49, 52-55), argued that the defendant went into hiding to avoid a media frenzy (Dkt. 18 at 14-16; Tr. 55-56), and argued that detention would hamper the ability to prepare a defense (Tr. 42, 67-69). Responding to the Government’s concerns about the lack of transparency about the defendant’s finances and six proposed co-signers, the defense specifically asked the Court to keep the proceedings open if the Court believed additional information or a more fulsome bond would be useful to the bail determination. (Tr. 52 (“And if the court determines that the conditions that we have proffered are insufficient or need further verification, as long as we can have some assurance of safety and confidentiality, we would recommend that the court keep the proceeding open, and we should be able to get whatever the court needs to satisfy it.”); Tr. 59 (“Even if the court were to assume for purposes of today’s proceeding that she has the means that the government claims she does, it does not affect the analysis. That is to be addressed in conditions, to be addressed if the court requires it, through verifications and further proceedings before the court.”); Tr. 66 (“If the court desires to leave the proceeding open for a week and allow us to come back, if the court has concerns about the number of suretors, for example, verification information, information about financial issues, we think that, now that we have some ability to breathe a little bit, that we should be able to pull this together for the court’s consideration.”); Tr. 70 (“And if the court needs more information"),
|
||||
"text_blocks": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"type": "printed",
|
||||
"content": "On July 2, 2020, the Federal Bureau of Investigation (“FBI”) arrested the defendant. Following extensive briefing, on July 14, 2020, the Court held a lengthy bail hearing. In its written and oral submissions, the defense urged the Court to release the defendant on bail. Among other things, the defense emphasized the defendant’s family ties and residence in the United States (Dkt. 18 at 2, 3, 12), offered to hire a private security company to monitor the defendant (Id. at 20), noted that the defendant remained in the country and was in touch with the Government through counsel following Epstein’s arrest (Dkt. 18 at 12-13; Tr. 49, 52-55), argued that the defendant went into hiding to avoid a media frenzy (Dkt. 18 at 14-16; Tr. 55-56), and argued that detention would hamper the ability to prepare a defense (Tr. 42, 67-69). Responding to the Government’s concerns about the lack of transparency about the defendant’s finances and six proposed co-signers, the defense specifically asked the Court to keep the proceedings open if the Court believed additional information or a more fulsome bond would be useful to the bail determination. (Tr. 52 (“And if the court determines that the conditions that we have proffered are insufficient or need further verification, as long as we can have some assurance of safety and confidentiality, we would recommend that the court keep the proceeding open, and we should be able to get whatever the court needs to satisfy it.”); Tr. 59 (“Even if the court were to assume for purposes of today’s proceeding that she has the means that the government claims she does, it does not affect the analysis. That is to be addressed in conditions, to be addressed if the court requires it, through verifications and further proceedings before the court.”); Tr. 66 (“If the court desires to leave the proceeding open for a week and allow us to come back, if the court has concerns about the number of suretors, for example, verification information, information about financial issues, we think that, now that we have some ability to breathe a little bit, that we should be able to pull this together for the court’s consideration.”); Tr. 70 (“And if the court needs more information",
|
||||
"position": "main body"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"type": "printed",
|
||||
"content": "3",
|
||||
"position": "footer"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"type": "printed",
|
||||
"content": "DOJ-OGR-00020066",
|
||||
"position": "footer"
|
||||
}
|
||||
],
|
||||
"entities": {
|
||||
"people": ["defendant", "Epstein"],
|
||||
"organizations": ["Federal Bureau of Investigation", "Government"],
|
||||
"locations": ["United States"],
|
||||
"dates": ["July 2, 2020", "July 14, 2020"],
|
||||
"reference_numbers": ["Dkt. 18", "Tr. 49", "Tr. 52-55", "Tr. 55-56", "Tr. 42", "Tr. 67-69", "Tr. 52", "Tr. 59", "Tr. 66", "Tr. 70", "Case 1:20-cr-00800-LJL Document 11 Filed 07/23/20 Page 6 of 36"]
|
||||
},
|
||||
"additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript or legal document related to a bail hearing. The text is well-formatted and clear, with no visible redactions or damage."
|
||||
}
|
||||
```
|
||||
11
errors/IMAGES008/DOJ-OGR-00020456.json
Normal file
11
errors/IMAGES008/DOJ-OGR-00020456.json
Normal file
File diff suppressed because one or more lines are too long
11
errors/IMAGES008/DOJ-OGR-00020557.json
Normal file
11
errors/IMAGES008/DOJ-OGR-00020557.json
Normal file
File diff suppressed because one or more lines are too long
11
errors/IMAGES008/DOJ-OGR-00020736.json
Normal file
11
errors/IMAGES008/DOJ-OGR-00020736.json
Normal file
File diff suppressed because one or more lines are too long
11
errors/IMAGES008/DOJ-OGR-00021151.json
Normal file
11
errors/IMAGES008/DOJ-OGR-00021151.json
Normal file
File diff suppressed because one or more lines are too long
11
errors/IMAGES008/DOJ-OGR-00021650.json
Normal file
11
errors/IMAGES008/DOJ-OGR-00021650.json
Normal file
File diff suppressed because one or more lines are too long
11
errors/IMAGES008/DOJ-OGR-00021652.json
Normal file
11
errors/IMAGES008/DOJ-OGR-00021652.json
Normal file
File diff suppressed because one or more lines are too long
11
errors/IMAGES008/DOJ-OGR-00021908.json
Normal file
11
errors/IMAGES008/DOJ-OGR-00021908.json
Normal file
File diff suppressed because one or more lines are too long
11
errors/IMAGES008/DOJ-OGR-00021954.json
Normal file
11
errors/IMAGES008/DOJ-OGR-00021954.json
Normal file
File diff suppressed because one or more lines are too long
11
errors/IMAGES008/DOJ-OGR-00021972.json
Normal file
11
errors/IMAGES008/DOJ-OGR-00021972.json
Normal file
File diff suppressed because one or more lines are too long
11
errors/IMAGES009/DOJ-OGR-00024076.json
Normal file
11
errors/IMAGES009/DOJ-OGR-00024076.json
Normal file
File diff suppressed because one or more lines are too long
11
errors/IMAGES010/DOJ-OGR-00025804.json
Normal file
11
errors/IMAGES010/DOJ-OGR-00025804.json
Normal file
File diff suppressed because one or more lines are too long
11
errors/IMAGES010/DOJ-OGR-00025896.json
Normal file
11
errors/IMAGES010/DOJ-OGR-00025896.json
Normal file
File diff suppressed because one or more lines are too long
11
errors/IMAGES010/DOJ-OGR-00025898.json
Normal file
11
errors/IMAGES010/DOJ-OGR-00025898.json
Normal file
File diff suppressed because one or more lines are too long
11
errors/IMAGES010/DOJ-OGR-00026069.json
Normal file
11
errors/IMAGES010/DOJ-OGR-00026069.json
Normal file
File diff suppressed because one or more lines are too long
11
errors/IMAGES010/DOJ-OGR-00026542.json
Normal file
11
errors/IMAGES010/DOJ-OGR-00026542.json
Normal file
File diff suppressed because one or more lines are too long
11
errors/IMAGES010/DOJ-OGR-00026557.json
Normal file
11
errors/IMAGES010/DOJ-OGR-00026557.json
Normal file
File diff suppressed because one or more lines are too long
11
errors/IMAGES010/DOJ-OGR-00026598.json
Normal file
11
errors/IMAGES010/DOJ-OGR-00026598.json
Normal file
File diff suppressed because one or more lines are too long
50
errors/IMAGES011/DOJ-OGR-00030574.json
Normal file
50
errors/IMAGES011/DOJ-OGR-00030574.json
Normal file
@ -0,0 +1,50 @@
|
||||
```json
|
||||
{
|
||||
"document_metadata": {
|
||||
"page_number": "27",
|
||||
"document_number": "17-295",
|
||||
"date": "07/26/17",
|
||||
"document_type": "Public Records Request",
|
||||
"has_handwriting": false,
|
||||
"has_stamps": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
"full_text": "Page 27\n\nA\nAbsolutely 18:11\naction 26:14,14\nAdam 8:11\naddress 5:20\nadults 9:15\naffirmed 4:8\nago 6:5 14:8 16:18 18:1,2,2,20\nagreement 4:15\nAlessi 1:6 3:2 4:7 4:12,18 19:8 25:6 26:6\nAllison 21:17,17 23:3\nallow 7:8\namicable 14:15\nand/or 26:16\nAnnie 8:20\nanybody 7:8 17:12 18:22 19:6\nanymore 14:9\napartment 7:14 7:15,16,20 15:24 16:3\nApparently 10:22\nappear 11:7,18\nAPPEARANCES 2:1\nappeared 25:6\napply 26:16\nappreciate 23:22 24:1\narea 16:13\nArizona 22:6\narrangements 6:24\nasked 9:20 17:22 18:9 22:23,25\nassistant 2:3 8:5 8:18,19,22\nassistants 8:3,4 17:13\nAssociates 1:24\nattorney 2:3 17:14,16,17,17 17:18,21 23:13 26:12,13\nauthority 25:5\n\nauthorized 26:7\nB 3:5\nback 7:22 9:7 12:3 15:15 18:25 20:9,15\n20:15,19\nBad 14:5\nbalcony 10:1,2,3 10:8\nballs 20:20\nBased 11:23,24\nbasically 6:7 8:24\n10:15 17:22 19:8 22:24\nbasis 5:6,8\nbasket 13:1,2\nbathroom 10:4,4 10:7,8 13:8,9\nbattery 20:19\nBeach 1:4,11\n2:4,8,11 4:19 22:5 26:3\nbed 12:1,4\nbedroom 10:7 16:1,5\nbeds 12:1\nbeginning 5:22 21:1\nbehalf 2:2,5\nbelieve 4:13\nbig 13:1 20:11,12 20:12\nBlack's 17:20\nblame 5:17\nblood 13:24\nboss 6:14 8:25\nbothering 17:4\nbride 7:15\nBrillo 5:21\nbring 12:8 15:5,5\nbuild 15:21\nbuilding 15:20,21\nbutler 5:9\nbuy 12:16\n\nC 26:1,1\ncall 18:25 19:6,18 23:23\ncalled 16:20,24,25\n17:6 19:15\ncancer 13:23,24\ncard 16:18 17:2,3\nCaribbean 22:10\nCarrabas 20:7,8\ncause 4:4\nCenter 2:7\ncertification 26:15\ncertify 25:5 26:6\ncertifying 26:17\ncetera 23:19\nchance 23:8\ncharge 5:11\nchef 8:7,7,13,15\nchef's 8:9\nchoice 18:15\nchores 5:11 7:2\nclean 11:4 12:3 15:13 22:2,16 22:19\ncleaned 11:16 22:20\ncleaning 5:12 7:3 7:10\ncleanup 11:6,23 11:24\nclean-up 7:6\nclosed 10:24 11:3 11:22\ncloset 13:1\ncolor 20:16\ncome 6:21 7:22 8:17,17 9:2,7 10:16 15:1,1,3\ncoming 6:22 21:21\ncommenced 26:11\nCommission 25:15,16 26:22\ncomplaint 14:24\ncomplete 19:12\ncompleted 26:11\nconcluded 24:4\nconducting 4:20\nconnected 26:13\nconsequence 16:20\n\nConsor 1:24\nConstantly 13:21\ncontact 19:3,5 20:1 23:12,24\ncontacted 17:12 18:4,23 19:15 23:8\ncontrol 26:16\ncooking 7:11\ncorrect 6:19 26:8\ncorridor 11:2\ncounsel 26:13,13\nCounty 1:1 25:2\n26:3\ncouple 14:7\ncourse 5:19\ncover 13:2\ncrew 5:12 7:6\ncrying 14:24\n\nD 3:1,5\nDALIAH 2:2\ndate 18:2,4\ndated 4:13\nday 9:5 11:14 12:2 14:20 25:9 26:18\ndays 18:1,2\nDD 25:15 26:22\ndeal 6:8,14\nDecember 5:3 25:10 26:18\ndecision 18:15,17\ndeliver 23:10\ndelivery 23:15\ndemanding 13:19\ndepartment 2:11\nDepends 7:7\ndescribe 20:10\nDET 3:3 4:17\ndiagnosed 13:23\ndick 20:13\nDidier 8:13\ndifferent 9:11 10:12,18 12:11\ndinner 15:11,11\ndirect 26:16\ndirection 26:16\ndirectly 6:8,15\ndiscuss 19:10\nDixie 1:10 2:3\ndoing 7:10 20:1\ndomo 5:9,14\nDonna 21:5\nDONNIE 2:6\ndoor 10:24,25 11:1\ndoors 11:22\ndouble 10:24\ndownstairs 15:7,9\ndrain 13:23\ndressed 16:11,12 16:14\nDrive 2:7\ndriver 5:10\ndriving 7:11\nduly 4:8 25:6 26:6\ndump 13:3\ndays 18:1,2\n\nE 3:1,5,5 26:1,1\neight 4:23,24\neither 12:5\nEl 5:21\nElaine 6:17\nElaine's 10:8\neleven 5:4 6:21 9:10 21:19\nemployee 26:13\nemployer 4:21\nEnglish 8:15,20\nentertainment 16:13\nenvironment 14:21\nEpstein 4:23 5:18 6:9 16:16,17 17:13 19:16\nespecially 14:25\nEsquire 2:2,6\net 23:19\nexactly 5:4 17:23 18:9 23:1\n\n12:12,13,14,15 12:16,17 15:16 20:18\nDina 21:18\n\ndinner 15:11,11\ndirect 26:16\ndirection 26:16\ndirectly 6:8,15\ndiscuss 19:10\nDixie 1:10 2:3\ndoing 7:10 20:1\ndomo 5:9,14\nDonna 21:5\nDONNIE 2:6\ndoor 10:24,25 11:1\ndoors 11:22\ndouble 10:24\ndownstairs 15:7,9\ndrain 13:23\ndressed 16:11,12 16:14\nDrive 2:7\ndriver 5:10\ndriving 7:11\nduly 4:8 25:6 26:6\ndump 13:3\n\nJ. CONSOR & ASSOCIATES REPORTING & TRANSCRIPTION 561.835.9738\nPage 107 of 131\nPublic Records Request No.: 17-295\nDOJ-OGR-00030574",
|
||||
"text_blocks": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"type": "printed",
|
||||
"content": "Page 27",
|
||||
"position": "header"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"type": "printed",
|
||||
"content": "A\nAbsolutely 18:11\naction 26:14,14\nAdam 8:11\naddress 5:20\nadults 9:15\naffirmed 4:8\nago 6:5 14:8 16:18 18:1,2,2,20\nagreement 4:15\nAlessi 1:6 3:2 4:7 4:12,18 19:8 25:6 26:6\nAllison 21:17,17 23:3\nallow 7:8\namicable 14:15\nand/or 26:16\nAnnie 8:20\nanybody 7:8 17:12 18:22 19:6\nanymore 14:9\napartment 7:14 7:15,16,20 15:24 16:3\nApparently 10:22\nappear 11:7,18\nAPPEARANCES 2:1\nappeared 25:6\napply 26:16\nappreciate 23:22 24:1\narea 16:13\nArizona 22:6\narrangements 6:24\nasked 9:20 17:22 18:9 22:23,25\nassistant 2:3 8:5 8:18,19,22\nassistants 8:3,4 17:13\nAssociates 1:24\nattorney 2:3 17:14,16,17,17 17:18,21 23:13 26:12,13\nauthority 25:5",
|
||||
"position": "left"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"type": "printed",
|
||||
"content": "authorized 26:7\nB 3:5\nback 7:22 9:7 12:3 15:15 18:25 20:9,15\n20:15,19\nBad 14:5\nbalcony 10:1,2,3 10:8\nballs 20:20\nBased 11:23,24\nbasically 6:7 8:24\n10:15 17:22 19:8 22:24\nbasis 5:6,8\nbasket 13:1,2\nbathroom 10:4,4 10:7,8 13:8,9\nbattery 20:19\nBeach 1:4,11\n2:4,8,11 4:19 22:5 26:3\nbed 12:1,4\nbedroom 10:7 16:1,5\nbeds 12:1\nbeginning 5:22 21:1\nbehalf 2:2,5\nbelieve 4:13\nbig 13:1 20:11,12 20:12\nBlack's 17:20\nblame 5:17\nblood 13:24\nboss 6:14 8:25\nbothering 17:4\nbride 7:15\nBrillo 5:21\nbring 12:8 15:5,5\nbuild 15:21\nbuilding 15:20,21\nbutler 5:9\nbuy 12:16",
|
||||
"position": "left-middle"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"type": "printed",
|
||||
"content": "C 26:1,1\ncall 18:25 19:6,18 23:23\ncalled 16:20,24,25",
|
||||
"position": "left-bottom"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"type": "printed",
|
||||
"content": "17:6 19:15\ncancer 13:23,24\ncard 16:18 17:2,3\nCaribbean 22:10\nCarrabas 20:7,8\ncause 4:4\nCenter 2:7\ncertification 26:15\ncertify 25:5 26:6\ncertifying 26:17\ncetera 23:19\nchance 23:8\ncharge 5:11\nchef 8:7,7,13,15\nchef's 8:9\nchoice 18:15\nchores 5:11 7:2\nclean 11:4 12:3 15:13 22:2,16 22:19\ncleaned 11:16 22:20\ncleaning 5:12 7:3 7:10\ncleanup 11:6,23 11:24\nclean-up 7:6\nclosed 10:24 11:3 11:22\ncloset 13:1\ncolor 20:16\ncome 6:21 7:22 8:17,17 9:2,7 10:16 15:1,1,3\ncoming 6:22 21:21\ncommenced 26:11\nCommission 25:15,16 26:22\ncomplaint 14:24\ncomplete 19:12\ncompleted 26:11\nconcluded 24:4\nconducting 4:20\nconnected 26:13\nconsequence 16:20",
|
||||
"position": "middle"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"type": "printed",
|
||||
"content": "Consor 1:24\nConstantly 13:21\ncontact 19:3,5 20:1 23:12,24\ncontacted 17:12 18:4,23 19:15 23:8\ncontrol 26:16\ncooking 7:11\ncorrect 6:19 26:8\ncorridor 11:2\ncounsel 26:13,13\nCounty 1:1 25:2\n26:3\ncouple 14:7\ncourse 5:19\ncover 13:2\ncrew 5:12 7:6\ncrying 14:24",
|
||||
"position": "middle-right"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"type": "printed",
|
||||
"content": "D 3:1,5\nDALIAH 2:2\ndate 18:2,4\ndated 4:13\nday 9:5 11:14 12:2 14:20 25:9 26:18\ndays 18:1,2\nDD 25:15 26:22\ndeal 6:8,14\nDecember 5:3 25:10 26:18\ndecision 18:15,17\ndeliver 23:10\ndelivery 23:15\ndemanding 13:19\ndepartment 2:11\nDepends 7:7\ndescribe 20:10\nDET 3:3 4:17\ndiagnosed 13:23\ndick 20:13\nDidier 8:13\ndifferent 9:11 10:12,18 12:11\ndinner 15:11,11\ndirect 26:16\ndirection 26:16\ndirectly 6:8,15\ndiscuss 19:10\nDixie 1:10 2:3\ndoing 7:10 20:1\ndomo 5:9,14\nDonna 21:5\nDONNIE 2:6\ndoor 10:24,25 11:1\ndoors 11:22\ndouble 10:24\ndownstairs 15:7,9\ndrain 13:23\ndressed 16:11,12 16:14\nDrive 2:7\ndriver 5:10\ndriving 7:11\nduly 4:8 25:6 26:6\ndump 13:3",
|
||||
"position": "right"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"type": "printed",
|
||||
"content": "12:12,13,14,15 12:16,17 15:16 20:18\nDina 21:18\ndinner 15:11,11\ndirect 26:16\ndirection 26:16\ndirectly 6:8,15\ndiscuss 19:10\nDixie 1:10 2:3\ndoing 7:10 20:1\ndomo 5:9,14\nDonna 21:5\nDONNIE 2:6\ndoor 10:24,25 11:1\ndoors 11:22\ndouble 10
|
||||
11
errors/IMAGES012/DOJ-OGR-00031438.json
Normal file
11
errors/IMAGES012/DOJ-OGR-00031438.json
Normal file
File diff suppressed because one or more lines are too long
11
errors/IMAGES012/DOJ-OGR-00031466.json
Normal file
11
errors/IMAGES012/DOJ-OGR-00031466.json
Normal file
File diff suppressed because one or more lines are too long
@ -137,6 +137,56 @@ Return ONLY valid JSON in this exact structure:
|
||||
"additional_notes": "Any observations about document quality, redactions, damage, etc."
|
||||
}"""
|
||||
|
||||
def fix_json_with_llm(self, base64_image: str, broken_json: str, error_msg: str) -> dict:
|
||||
"""Ask the LLM to fix its own broken JSON"""
|
||||
response = self.client.chat.completions.create(
|
||||
model=self.model,
|
||||
messages=[
|
||||
{
|
||||
"role": "system",
|
||||
"content": self.get_system_prompt()
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"role": "user",
|
||||
"content": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"type": "text",
|
||||
"text": "Extract all text and entities from this image. Return only valid JSON."
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"type": "image_url",
|
||||
"image_url": {
|
||||
"url": f"data:image/jpeg;base64,{base64_image}"
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"role": "assistant",
|
||||
"content": broken_json
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"role": "user",
|
||||
"content": f"Your JSON response has an error: {error_msg}\n\nPlease fix the JSON and return ONLY the corrected valid JSON. Do not explain, just return the fixed JSON."
|
||||
}
|
||||
],
|
||||
max_tokens=4096,
|
||||
temperature=0.1
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
content = response.choices[0].message.content.strip()
|
||||
|
||||
# Extract JSON using same logic
|
||||
json_match = re.search(r'```(?:json)?\s*\n(.*?)\n```', content, re.DOTALL)
|
||||
if json_match:
|
||||
content = json_match.group(1).strip()
|
||||
else:
|
||||
json_match = re.search(r'\{.*\}', content, re.DOTALL)
|
||||
if json_match:
|
||||
content = json_match.group(0).strip()
|
||||
|
||||
return json.loads(content)
|
||||
|
||||
def process_image(self, image_path: Path) -> ProcessingResult:
|
||||
"""Process a single image through the API"""
|
||||
try:
|
||||
@ -173,6 +223,7 @@ Return ONLY valid JSON in this exact structure:
|
||||
|
||||
# Parse response
|
||||
content = response.choices[0].message.content
|
||||
original_content = content # Keep original for retry
|
||||
|
||||
# Robust JSON extraction
|
||||
content = content.strip()
|
||||
@ -224,8 +275,14 @@ Return ONLY valid JSON in this exact structure:
|
||||
else:
|
||||
raise ValueError("Could not find complete JSON object")
|
||||
except Exception:
|
||||
# If we can't salvage it, raise the original error
|
||||
raise e
|
||||
# Last resort: Ask LLM to fix its JSON
|
||||
try:
|
||||
extracted_data = self.fix_json_with_llm(base64_image, original_content, str(e))
|
||||
except Exception:
|
||||
# Save ORIGINAL LLM response to errors directory (not our extracted version)
|
||||
self.save_broken_json(self.get_relative_path(image_path), original_content)
|
||||
# If even that fails, raise the original error
|
||||
raise e
|
||||
|
||||
return ProcessingResult(
|
||||
filename=self.get_relative_path(image_path),
|
||||
@ -309,6 +366,18 @@ Return ONLY valid JSON in this exact structure:
|
||||
with open(result_path, 'w', encoding='utf-8') as f:
|
||||
json.dump(result.data, f, indent=2, ensure_ascii=False)
|
||||
|
||||
def save_broken_json(self, filename: str, broken_content: str):
|
||||
"""Save broken JSON to errors directory"""
|
||||
error_path = Path("./errors") / filename
|
||||
error_path = error_path.with_suffix('.json')
|
||||
|
||||
# Create parent directories
|
||||
error_path.parent.mkdir(parents=True, exist_ok=True)
|
||||
|
||||
# Save the broken content as-is
|
||||
with open(error_path, 'w', encoding='utf-8') as f:
|
||||
f.write(broken_content)
|
||||
|
||||
def save_results(self, results: List[ProcessingResult], output_file: str = "processed_results.json"):
|
||||
"""Save summary results to JSON file"""
|
||||
output_data = {
|
||||
|
||||
1479467
processed_results.json
1479467
processed_results.json
File diff suppressed because one or more lines are too long
@ -31,6 +31,7 @@
|
||||
"IMAGES001/DOJ-OGR-00000215.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES001/DOJ-OGR-00000216.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES001/DOJ-OGR-00000241.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES001/DOJ-OGR-00000258.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES001/DOJ-OGR-00000259.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES001/DOJ-OGR-00000260.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES001/DOJ-OGR-00000261.jpg",
|
||||
@ -400,6 +401,7 @@
|
||||
"IMAGES001/DOJ-OGR-00000625.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES001/DOJ-OGR-00000626.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES001/DOJ-OGR-00000627.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES001/DOJ-OGR-00000628.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES001/DOJ-OGR-00000629.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES001/DOJ-OGR-00000630.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES001/DOJ-OGR-00000631.jpg",
|
||||
@ -408,6 +410,7 @@
|
||||
"IMAGES001/DOJ-OGR-00000634.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES001/DOJ-OGR-00000635.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES001/DOJ-OGR-00000636.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES001/DOJ-OGR-00000637.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES001/DOJ-OGR-00000638.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES001/DOJ-OGR-00000639.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES001/DOJ-OGR-00000640.jpg",
|
||||
@ -632,6 +635,7 @@
|
||||
"IMAGES001/DOJ-OGR-00000859.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES001/DOJ-OGR-00000860.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES001/DOJ-OGR-00000861.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES001/DOJ-OGR-00000862.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES001/DOJ-OGR-00000863.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES001/DOJ-OGR-00000864.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES001/DOJ-OGR-00000865.jpg",
|
||||
@ -669,6 +673,7 @@
|
||||
"IMAGES001/DOJ-OGR-00000897.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES001/DOJ-OGR-00000898.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES001/DOJ-OGR-00000899.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES001/DOJ-OGR-00000900.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES001/DOJ-OGR-00000901.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES001/DOJ-OGR-00000902.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES001/DOJ-OGR-00000903.jpg",
|
||||
@ -868,6 +873,7 @@
|
||||
"IMAGES001/DOJ-OGR-00001097.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES001/DOJ-OGR-00001098.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES001/DOJ-OGR-00001099.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES001/DOJ-OGR-00001100.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES001/DOJ-OGR-00001101.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES001/DOJ-OGR-00001102.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES001/DOJ-OGR-00001103.jpg",
|
||||
@ -1415,6 +1421,7 @@
|
||||
"IMAGES001/DOJ-OGR-00001645.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES001/DOJ-OGR-00001646.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES001/DOJ-OGR-00001647.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES001/DOJ-OGR-00001648.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES001/DOJ-OGR-00001649.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES001/DOJ-OGR-00001650.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES001/DOJ-OGR-00001651.jpg",
|
||||
@ -1437,6 +1444,7 @@
|
||||
"IMAGES001/DOJ-OGR-00001668.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES001/DOJ-OGR-00001669.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES001/DOJ-OGR-00001670.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES001/DOJ-OGR-00001671.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES001/DOJ-OGR-00001672.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES001/DOJ-OGR-00001673.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES001/DOJ-OGR-00001674.jpg",
|
||||
@ -1455,6 +1463,7 @@
|
||||
"IMAGES001/DOJ-OGR-00001687.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES001/DOJ-OGR-00001688.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES001/DOJ-OGR-00001689.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES001/DOJ-OGR-00001690.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES001/DOJ-OGR-00001691.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES001/DOJ-OGR-00001692.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES001/DOJ-OGR-00001693.jpg",
|
||||
@ -2443,6 +2452,7 @@
|
||||
"IMAGES001/DOJ-OGR-00002676.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES001/DOJ-OGR-00002677.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES001/DOJ-OGR-00002678.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES001/DOJ-OGR-00002679.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES001/DOJ-OGR-00002680.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES001/DOJ-OGR-00002681.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES001/DOJ-OGR-00002682.jpg",
|
||||
@ -3363,6 +3373,7 @@
|
||||
"IMAGES002/DOJ-OGR-00003597.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES002/DOJ-OGR-00003598.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES002/DOJ-OGR-00003599.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES002/DOJ-OGR-00003600.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES002/DOJ-OGR-00003601.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES002/DOJ-OGR-00003602.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES002/DOJ-OGR-00003603.jpg",
|
||||
@ -3994,6 +4005,7 @@
|
||||
"IMAGES002/DOJ-OGR-00004229.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES002/DOJ-OGR-00004230.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES002/DOJ-OGR-00004231.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES002/DOJ-OGR-00004232.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES002/DOJ-OGR-00004233.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES002/DOJ-OGR-00004234.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES002/DOJ-OGR-00004235.jpg",
|
||||
@ -4683,6 +4695,7 @@
|
||||
"IMAGES002/DOJ-OGR-00004919.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES002/DOJ-OGR-00004920.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES002/DOJ-OGR-00004921.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES002/DOJ-OGR-00004922.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES002/DOJ-OGR-00004923.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES002/DOJ-OGR-00004924.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES002/DOJ-OGR-00004925.jpg",
|
||||
@ -5326,6 +5339,7 @@
|
||||
"IMAGES002/DOJ-OGR-00005563.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES002/DOJ-OGR-00005564.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES002/DOJ-OGR-00005565.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES002/DOJ-OGR-00005566.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES002/DOJ-OGR-00005567.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES002/DOJ-OGR-00005568.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES002/DOJ-OGR-00005569.jpg",
|
||||
@ -5685,6 +5699,7 @@
|
||||
"IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00005923.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00005924.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00005925.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00005926.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00005927.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00005928.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00005929.jpg",
|
||||
@ -5693,6 +5708,7 @@
|
||||
"IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00005932.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00005933.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00005934.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00005935.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00005936.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00005937.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00005938.jpg",
|
||||
@ -5711,6 +5727,7 @@
|
||||
"IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00005951.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00005952.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00005953.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00005954.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00005955.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00005956.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00005957.jpg",
|
||||
@ -6284,6 +6301,7 @@
|
||||
"IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006525.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006526.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006527.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006528.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006529.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006530.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006531.jpg",
|
||||
@ -6615,6 +6633,7 @@
|
||||
"IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006857.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006858.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006859.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006860.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006861.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006862.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006863.jpg",
|
||||
@ -6633,6 +6652,7 @@
|
||||
"IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006876.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006877.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006878.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006879.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006880.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006881.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006882.jpg",
|
||||
@ -6800,6 +6820,8 @@
|
||||
"IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00007044.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00007045.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00007046.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00007047.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00007048.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00007049.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00007050.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00007051.jpg",
|
||||
@ -7092,7 +7114,9 @@
|
||||
"IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00007338.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00007339.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00007340.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00007341.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00007342.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00007343.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00007344.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00007345.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00007346.jpg",
|
||||
@ -7778,8 +7802,10 @@
|
||||
"IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00008026.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00008027.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00008028.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00008029.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00008030.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00008031.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00008032.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00008033.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00008034.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00008035.jpg",
|
||||
@ -8030,6 +8056,7 @@
|
||||
"IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00008280.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00008281.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00008282.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00008283.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00008284.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00008285.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00008286.jpg",
|
||||
@ -8773,6 +8800,7 @@
|
||||
"IMAGES004/DOJ-OGR-00009025.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES004/DOJ-OGR-00009026.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES004/DOJ-OGR-00009027.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES004/DOJ-OGR-00009028.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES004/DOJ-OGR-00009029.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES004/DOJ-OGR-00009030.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES004/DOJ-OGR-00009031.jpg",
|
||||
@ -9021,6 +9049,7 @@
|
||||
"IMAGES004/DOJ-OGR-00009274.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES004/DOJ-OGR-00009275.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES004/DOJ-OGR-00009276.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES004/DOJ-OGR-00009277.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES004/DOJ-OGR-00009278.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES004/DOJ-OGR-00009279.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES004/DOJ-OGR-00009280.jpg",
|
||||
@ -9036,10 +9065,12 @@
|
||||
"IMAGES004/DOJ-OGR-00009290.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES004/DOJ-OGR-00009291.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES004/DOJ-OGR-00009292.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES004/DOJ-OGR-00009293.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES004/DOJ-OGR-00009294.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES004/DOJ-OGR-00009295.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES004/DOJ-OGR-00009296.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES004/DOJ-OGR-00009297.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES004/DOJ-OGR-00009298.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES004/DOJ-OGR-00009299.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES004/DOJ-OGR-00009300.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES004/DOJ-OGR-00009301.jpg",
|
||||
@ -9713,7 +9744,9 @@
|
||||
"IMAGES004/DOJ-OGR-00009969.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES004/DOJ-OGR-00009970.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES004/DOJ-OGR-00009971.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES004/DOJ-OGR-00009972.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES004/DOJ-OGR-00009973.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES004/DOJ-OGR-00009974.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES004/DOJ-OGR-00009975.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES004/DOJ-OGR-00009976.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES004/DOJ-OGR-00009977.jpg",
|
||||
@ -10099,6 +10132,7 @@
|
||||
"IMAGES004/DOJ-OGR-00010357.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES004/DOJ-OGR-00010358.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES004/DOJ-OGR-00010359.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES004/DOJ-OGR-00010360.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES004/DOJ-OGR-00010361.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES004/DOJ-OGR-00010362.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES004/DOJ-OGR-00010363.jpg",
|
||||
@ -11087,6 +11121,7 @@
|
||||
"IMAGES004/DOJ-OGR-00011346.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES004/DOJ-OGR-00011347.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES004/DOJ-OGR-00011348.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES004/DOJ-OGR-00011349.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES004/DOJ-OGR-00011350.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES004/DOJ-OGR-00011351.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES004/DOJ-OGR-00011352.jpg",
|
||||
@ -11508,6 +11543,7 @@
|
||||
"IMAGES004/DOJ-OGR-00011768.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES004/DOJ-OGR-00011769.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES004/DOJ-OGR-00011770.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES004/DOJ-OGR-00011771.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES004/DOJ-OGR-00011772.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES005/DOJ-OGR-00011773.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES005/DOJ-OGR-00011774.jpg",
|
||||
@ -12747,6 +12783,7 @@
|
||||
"IMAGES005/DOJ-OGR-00013008.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES005/DOJ-OGR-00013009.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES005/DOJ-OGR-00013010.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES005/DOJ-OGR-00013011.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES005/DOJ-OGR-00013012.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES005/DOJ-OGR-00013013.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES005/DOJ-OGR-00013014.jpg",
|
||||
@ -13275,6 +13312,7 @@
|
||||
"IMAGES005/DOJ-OGR-00013537.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES005/DOJ-OGR-00013538.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES005/DOJ-OGR-00013539.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES005/DOJ-OGR-00013540.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES005/DOJ-OGR-00013541.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES005/DOJ-OGR-00013542.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES005/DOJ-OGR-00013543.jpg",
|
||||
@ -13324,6 +13362,7 @@
|
||||
"IMAGES005/DOJ-OGR-00013587.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES005/DOJ-OGR-00013588.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES005/DOJ-OGR-00013589.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES005/DOJ-OGR-00013590.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES005/DOJ-OGR-00013591.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES005/DOJ-OGR-00013592.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES005/DOJ-OGR-00013593.jpg",
|
||||
@ -14036,6 +14075,7 @@
|
||||
"IMAGES005/DOJ-OGR-00014300.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES005/DOJ-OGR-00014301.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES005/DOJ-OGR-00014302.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES005/DOJ-OGR-00014303.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES005/DOJ-OGR-00014304.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES005/DOJ-OGR-00014305.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES005/DOJ-OGR-00014306.jpg",
|
||||
@ -14981,6 +15021,7 @@
|
||||
"IMAGES006/DOJ-OGR-00015305.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES006/DOJ-OGR-00015306.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES006/DOJ-OGR-00015307.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES006/DOJ-OGR-00015308.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES006/DOJ-OGR-00015309.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES006/DOJ-OGR-00015310.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES006/DOJ-OGR-00015311.jpg",
|
||||
@ -15454,8 +15495,10 @@
|
||||
"IMAGES006/DOJ-OGR-00015819.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES006/DOJ-OGR-00015820.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES006/DOJ-OGR-00015821.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES006/DOJ-OGR-00015822.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES006/DOJ-OGR-00015823.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES006/DOJ-OGR-00015824.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES006/DOJ-OGR-00015825.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES006/DOJ-OGR-00015826.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES006/DOJ-OGR-00015827.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES006/DOJ-OGR-00015828.jpg",
|
||||
@ -15802,6 +15845,7 @@
|
||||
"IMAGES006/DOJ-OGR-00016213.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES006/DOJ-OGR-00016214.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES006/DOJ-OGR-00016215.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES006/DOJ-OGR-00016216.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES006/DOJ-OGR-00016217.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES006/DOJ-OGR-00016218.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES006/DOJ-OGR-00016219.jpg",
|
||||
@ -16511,6 +16555,7 @@
|
||||
"IMAGES006/DOJ-OGR-00016923.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES006/DOJ-OGR-00016924.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES006/DOJ-OGR-00016925.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES006/DOJ-OGR-00016926.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES006/DOJ-OGR-00016927.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES006/DOJ-OGR-00016928.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES006/DOJ-OGR-00016929.jpg",
|
||||
@ -18181,6 +18226,7 @@
|
||||
"IMAGES007/DOJ-OGR-00018594.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES007/DOJ-OGR-00018595.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES007/DOJ-OGR-00018596.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES007/DOJ-OGR-00018597.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES007/DOJ-OGR-00018598.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES007/DOJ-OGR-00018599.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES007/DOJ-OGR-00018600.jpg",
|
||||
@ -18707,6 +18753,7 @@
|
||||
"IMAGES007/DOJ-OGR-00019121.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES007/DOJ-OGR-00019122.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES007/DOJ-OGR-00019123.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES007/DOJ-OGR-00019124.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES007/DOJ-OGR-00019125.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES007/DOJ-OGR-00019126.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES007/DOJ-OGR-00019127.jpg",
|
||||
@ -18755,6 +18802,7 @@
|
||||
"IMAGES007/DOJ-OGR-00019170.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES007/DOJ-OGR-00019171.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES007/DOJ-OGR-00019172.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES007/DOJ-OGR-00019173.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES007/DOJ-OGR-00019174.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES007/DOJ-OGR-00019175.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES007/DOJ-OGR-00019176.jpg",
|
||||
@ -18992,6 +19040,7 @@
|
||||
"IMAGES007/DOJ-OGR-00019408.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES007/DOJ-OGR-00019409.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES007/DOJ-OGR-00019410.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES007/DOJ-OGR-00019411.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES007/DOJ-OGR-00019412.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES007/DOJ-OGR-00019413.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES007/DOJ-OGR-00019414.jpg",
|
||||
@ -19083,6 +19132,7 @@
|
||||
"IMAGES007/DOJ-OGR-00019500.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES007/DOJ-OGR-00019501.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES007/DOJ-OGR-00019502.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES007/DOJ-OGR-00019503.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES007/DOJ-OGR-00019504.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES007/DOJ-OGR-00019505.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES007/DOJ-OGR-00019506.jpg",
|
||||
@ -19151,6 +19201,7 @@
|
||||
"IMAGES007/DOJ-OGR-00019569.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES007/DOJ-OGR-00019570.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES007/DOJ-OGR-00019571.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES007/DOJ-OGR-00019572.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES007/DOJ-OGR-00019573.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES007/DOJ-OGR-00019574.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES007/DOJ-OGR-00019575.jpg",
|
||||
@ -19190,6 +19241,7 @@
|
||||
"IMAGES007/DOJ-OGR-00019609.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES007/DOJ-OGR-00019610.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES007/DOJ-OGR-00019611.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES007/DOJ-OGR-00019612.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES007/DOJ-OGR-00019613.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES007/DOJ-OGR-00019614.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES007/DOJ-OGR-00019615.jpg",
|
||||
@ -19302,12 +19354,16 @@
|
||||
"IMAGES007/DOJ-OGR-00019722.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES007/DOJ-OGR-00019723.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES007/DOJ-OGR-00019724.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES007/DOJ-OGR-00019725.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES007/DOJ-OGR-00019726.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES007/DOJ-OGR-00019727.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES007/DOJ-OGR-00019728.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES007/DOJ-OGR-00019729.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES007/DOJ-OGR-00019730.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES007/DOJ-OGR-00019731.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES007/DOJ-OGR-00019732.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES007/DOJ-OGR-00019733.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES007/DOJ-OGR-00019734.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES007/DOJ-OGR-00019735.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES007/DOJ-OGR-00019736.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES007/DOJ-OGR-00019737.jpg",
|
||||
@ -19329,9 +19385,12 @@
|
||||
"IMAGES007/DOJ-OGR-00019753.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES007/DOJ-OGR-00019754.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES007/DOJ-OGR-00019755.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES007/DOJ-OGR-00019756.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES007/DOJ-OGR-00019757.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES007/DOJ-OGR-00019758.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES007/DOJ-OGR-00019759.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES007/DOJ-OGR-00019760.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES007/DOJ-OGR-00019761.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES007/DOJ-OGR-00019762.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES007/DOJ-OGR-00019763.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES007/DOJ-OGR-00019764.jpg",
|
||||
@ -19357,6 +19416,7 @@
|
||||
"IMAGES007/DOJ-OGR-00019784.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES007/DOJ-OGR-00019785.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES007/DOJ-OGR-00019786.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES007/DOJ-OGR-00019787.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES007/DOJ-OGR-00019788.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES007/DOJ-OGR-00019789.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES007/DOJ-OGR-00019790.jpg",
|
||||
@ -19379,6 +19439,7 @@
|
||||
"IMAGES007/DOJ-OGR-00019807.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES007/DOJ-OGR-00019808.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES007/DOJ-OGR-00019809.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES007/DOJ-OGR-00019810.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES007/DOJ-OGR-00019811.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES007/DOJ-OGR-00019812.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES007/DOJ-OGR-00019813.jpg",
|
||||
@ -19386,6 +19447,7 @@
|
||||
"IMAGES007/DOJ-OGR-00019815.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES007/DOJ-OGR-00019816.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES007/DOJ-OGR-00019817.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES007/DOJ-OGR-00019818.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES007/DOJ-OGR-00019819.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES007/DOJ-OGR-00019820.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES007/DOJ-OGR-00019821.jpg",
|
||||
@ -19633,6 +19695,7 @@
|
||||
"IMAGES007/DOJ-OGR-00020063.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES007/DOJ-OGR-00020064.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES007/DOJ-OGR-00020065.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES007/DOJ-OGR-00020066.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES007/DOJ-OGR-00020067.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES007/DOJ-OGR-00020068.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES007/DOJ-OGR-00020069.jpg",
|
||||
@ -19978,6 +20041,8 @@
|
||||
"IMAGES008/DOJ-OGR-00020409.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES008/DOJ-OGR-00020410.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES008/DOJ-OGR-00020411.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES008/DOJ-OGR-00020412.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES008/DOJ-OGR-00020413.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES008/DOJ-OGR-00020414.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES008/DOJ-OGR-00020415.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES008/DOJ-OGR-00020416.jpg",
|
||||
@ -20002,8 +20067,10 @@
|
||||
"IMAGES008/DOJ-OGR-00020435.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES008/DOJ-OGR-00020436.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES008/DOJ-OGR-00020437.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES008/DOJ-OGR-00020438.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES008/DOJ-OGR-00020439.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES008/DOJ-OGR-00020440.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES008/DOJ-OGR-00020441.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES008/DOJ-OGR-00020442.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES008/DOJ-OGR-00020443.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES008/DOJ-OGR-00020444.jpg",
|
||||
@ -20018,6 +20085,7 @@
|
||||
"IMAGES008/DOJ-OGR-00020453.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES008/DOJ-OGR-00020454.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES008/DOJ-OGR-00020455.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES008/DOJ-OGR-00020456.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES008/DOJ-OGR-00020457.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES008/DOJ-OGR-00020458.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES008/DOJ-OGR-00020459.jpg",
|
||||
@ -20031,6 +20099,7 @@
|
||||
"IMAGES008/DOJ-OGR-00020467.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES008/DOJ-OGR-00020468.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES008/DOJ-OGR-00020469.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES008/DOJ-OGR-00020470.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES008/DOJ-OGR-00020471.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES008/DOJ-OGR-00020472.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES008/DOJ-OGR-00020473.jpg",
|
||||
@ -20073,6 +20142,7 @@
|
||||
"IMAGES008/DOJ-OGR-00020510.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES008/DOJ-OGR-00020511.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES008/DOJ-OGR-00020512.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES008/DOJ-OGR-00020513.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES008/DOJ-OGR-00020514.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES008/DOJ-OGR-00020515.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES008/DOJ-OGR-00020516.jpg",
|
||||
@ -20095,6 +20165,7 @@
|
||||
"IMAGES008/DOJ-OGR-00020533.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES008/DOJ-OGR-00020534.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES008/DOJ-OGR-00020535.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES008/DOJ-OGR-00020536.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES008/DOJ-OGR-00020537.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES008/DOJ-OGR-00020538.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES008/DOJ-OGR-00020539.jpg",
|
||||
@ -20115,7 +20186,9 @@
|
||||
"IMAGES008/DOJ-OGR-00020554.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES008/DOJ-OGR-00020555.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES008/DOJ-OGR-00020556.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES008/DOJ-OGR-00020557.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES008/DOJ-OGR-00020558.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES008/DOJ-OGR-00020559.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES008/DOJ-OGR-00020560.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES008/DOJ-OGR-00020561.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES008/DOJ-OGR-00020562.jpg",
|
||||
@ -20292,6 +20365,7 @@
|
||||
"IMAGES008/DOJ-OGR-00020733.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES008/DOJ-OGR-00020734.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES008/DOJ-OGR-00020735.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES008/DOJ-OGR-00020736.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES008/DOJ-OGR-00020737.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES008/DOJ-OGR-00020738.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES008/DOJ-OGR-00020739.jpg",
|
||||
@ -20706,6 +20780,7 @@
|
||||
"IMAGES008/DOJ-OGR-00021148.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES008/DOJ-OGR-00021149.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES008/DOJ-OGR-00021150.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES008/DOJ-OGR-00021151.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES008/DOJ-OGR-00021152.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES008/DOJ-OGR-00021153.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES008/DOJ-OGR-00021154.jpg",
|
||||
@ -21204,7 +21279,9 @@
|
||||
"IMAGES008/DOJ-OGR-00021647.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES008/DOJ-OGR-00021648.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES008/DOJ-OGR-00021649.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES008/DOJ-OGR-00021650.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES008/DOJ-OGR-00021651.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES008/DOJ-OGR-00021652.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES008/DOJ-OGR-00021653.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES008/DOJ-OGR-00021654.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES008/DOJ-OGR-00021655.jpg",
|
||||
@ -21460,6 +21537,7 @@
|
||||
"IMAGES008/DOJ-OGR-00021905.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES008/DOJ-OGR-00021906.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES008/DOJ-OGR-00021907.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES008/DOJ-OGR-00021908.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES008/DOJ-OGR-00021909.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES008/DOJ-OGR-00021910.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES008/DOJ-OGR-00021911.jpg",
|
||||
@ -21505,6 +21583,7 @@
|
||||
"IMAGES008/DOJ-OGR-00021951.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES008/DOJ-OGR-00021952.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES008/DOJ-OGR-00021953.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES008/DOJ-OGR-00021954.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES008/DOJ-OGR-00021955.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES008/DOJ-OGR-00021956.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES008/DOJ-OGR-00021957.jpg",
|
||||
@ -21522,6 +21601,7 @@
|
||||
"IMAGES008/DOJ-OGR-00021969.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES008/DOJ-OGR-00021970.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES008/DOJ-OGR-00021971.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES008/DOJ-OGR-00021972.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES008/DOJ-OGR-00021973.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES008/DOJ-OGR-00021974.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES008/DOJ-OGR-00021975.jpg",
|
||||
@ -22321,6 +22401,7 @@
|
||||
"IMAGES009/DOJ-OGR-00023955.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES009/DOJ-OGR-00023998.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES009/DOJ-OGR-00023999.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES009/DOJ-OGR-00024000.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES009/DOJ-OGR-00024001.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES009/DOJ-OGR-00024002.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES009/DOJ-OGR-00024004.jpg",
|
||||
@ -22394,6 +22475,7 @@
|
||||
"IMAGES009/DOJ-OGR-00024073.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES009/DOJ-OGR-00024074.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES009/DOJ-OGR-00024075.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES009/DOJ-OGR-00024076.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES009/DOJ-OGR-00024077.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES009/DOJ-OGR-00024078.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES009/DOJ-OGR-00024079.jpg",
|
||||
@ -23457,6 +23539,7 @@
|
||||
"IMAGES009/DOJ-OGR-00025165.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES009/DOJ-OGR-00025166.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES009/DOJ-OGR-00025167.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES009/DOJ-OGR-00025168.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES009/DOJ-OGR-00025169.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES009/DOJ-OGR-00025170.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES009/DOJ-OGR-00025171.jpg",
|
||||
@ -24026,6 +24109,7 @@
|
||||
"IMAGES010/DOJ-OGR-00025735.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES010/DOJ-OGR-00025736.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES010/DOJ-OGR-00025737.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES010/DOJ-OGR-00025738.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES010/DOJ-OGR-00025739.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES010/DOJ-OGR-00025740.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES010/DOJ-OGR-00025741.jpg",
|
||||
@ -24091,6 +24175,7 @@
|
||||
"IMAGES010/DOJ-OGR-00025801.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES010/DOJ-OGR-00025802.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES010/DOJ-OGR-00025803.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES010/DOJ-OGR-00025804.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES010/DOJ-OGR-00025805.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES010/DOJ-OGR-00025806.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES010/DOJ-OGR-00025807.jpg",
|
||||
@ -24181,7 +24266,10 @@
|
||||
"IMAGES010/DOJ-OGR-00025892.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES010/DOJ-OGR-00025893.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES010/DOJ-OGR-00025894.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES010/DOJ-OGR-00025895.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES010/DOJ-OGR-00025896.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES010/DOJ-OGR-00025897.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES010/DOJ-OGR-00025898.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES010/DOJ-OGR-00025899.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES010/DOJ-OGR-00025900.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES010/DOJ-OGR-00025901.jpg",
|
||||
@ -24352,6 +24440,7 @@
|
||||
"IMAGES010/DOJ-OGR-00026066.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES010/DOJ-OGR-00026067.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES010/DOJ-OGR-00026068.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES010/DOJ-OGR-00026069.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES010/DOJ-OGR-00026070.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES010/DOJ-OGR-00026071.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES010/DOJ-OGR-00026072.jpg",
|
||||
@ -24822,6 +24911,7 @@
|
||||
"IMAGES010/DOJ-OGR-00026539.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES010/DOJ-OGR-00026540.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES010/DOJ-OGR-00026541.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES010/DOJ-OGR-00026542.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES010/DOJ-OGR-00026543.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES010/DOJ-OGR-00026544.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES010/DOJ-OGR-00026545.jpg",
|
||||
@ -24836,6 +24926,7 @@
|
||||
"IMAGES010/DOJ-OGR-00026554.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES010/DOJ-OGR-00026555.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES010/DOJ-OGR-00026556.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES010/DOJ-OGR-00026557.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES010/DOJ-OGR-00026558.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES010/DOJ-OGR-00026559.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES010/DOJ-OGR-00026560.jpg",
|
||||
@ -24867,6 +24958,7 @@
|
||||
"IMAGES010/DOJ-OGR-00026586.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES010/DOJ-OGR-00026587.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES010/DOJ-OGR-00026588.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES010/DOJ-OGR-00026589.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES010/DOJ-OGR-00026590.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES010/DOJ-OGR-00026591.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES010/DOJ-OGR-00026592.jpg",
|
||||
@ -24875,6 +24967,7 @@
|
||||
"IMAGES010/DOJ-OGR-00026595.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES010/DOJ-OGR-00026596.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES010/DOJ-OGR-00026597.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES010/DOJ-OGR-00026598.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES010/DOJ-OGR-00026599.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES010/DOJ-OGR-00026600.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES010/DOJ-OGR-00026601.jpg",
|
||||
@ -24908,6 +25001,7 @@
|
||||
"IMAGES010/DOJ-OGR-00026629.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES010/DOJ-OGR-00026630.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES010/DOJ-OGR-00026631.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES010/DOJ-OGR-00026632.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES010/DOJ-OGR-00026633.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES010/DOJ-OGR-00026634.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES010/DOJ-OGR-00026635.jpg",
|
||||
@ -25332,6 +25426,7 @@
|
||||
"IMAGES010/DOJ-OGR-00027078.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES010/DOJ-OGR-00027079.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES010/DOJ-OGR-00027080.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES010/DOJ-OGR-00027081.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES010/DOJ-OGR-00027082.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES010/DOJ-OGR-00027083.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES010/DOJ-OGR-00027084.jpg",
|
||||
@ -26811,6 +26906,7 @@
|
||||
"IMAGES011/DOJ-OGR-00030571.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES011/DOJ-OGR-00030572.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES011/DOJ-OGR-00030573.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES011/DOJ-OGR-00030574.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES011/DOJ-OGR-00030575.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES011/DOJ-OGR-00030576.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES011/DOJ-OGR-00030577.jpg",
|
||||
@ -27075,6 +27171,7 @@
|
||||
"IMAGES011/DOJ-OGR-00030836.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES011/DOJ-OGR-00030837.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES011/DOJ-OGR-00030838.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES011/DOJ-OGR-00030839.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES011/DOJ-OGR-00030840.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES011/DOJ-OGR-00030841.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES011/DOJ-OGR-00030842.jpg",
|
||||
@ -27236,6 +27333,7 @@
|
||||
"IMAGES011/DOJ-OGR-00030998.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES011/DOJ-OGR-00030999.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES011/DOJ-OGR-00031000.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES011/DOJ-OGR-00031001.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES011/DOJ-OGR-00031002.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES011/DOJ-OGR-00031003.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES011/DOJ-OGR-00031004.jpg",
|
||||
@ -27672,6 +27770,7 @@
|
||||
"IMAGES012/DOJ-OGR-00031435.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES012/DOJ-OGR-00031436.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES012/DOJ-OGR-00031437.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES012/DOJ-OGR-00031438.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES012/DOJ-OGR-00031439.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES012/DOJ-OGR-00031440.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES012/DOJ-OGR-00031441.jpg",
|
||||
@ -27699,6 +27798,7 @@
|
||||
"IMAGES012/DOJ-OGR-00031463.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES012/DOJ-OGR-00031464.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES012/DOJ-OGR-00031465.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES012/DOJ-OGR-00031466.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES012/DOJ-OGR-00031467.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES012/DOJ-OGR-00031468.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES012/DOJ-OGR-00031469.jpg",
|
||||
@ -28199,6 +28299,7 @@
|
||||
"IMAGES012/DOJ-OGR-00031964.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES012/DOJ-OGR-00031965.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES012/DOJ-OGR-00031966.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES012/DOJ-OGR-00031967.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES012/DOJ-OGR-00031968.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES012/DOJ-OGR-00031969.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES012/DOJ-OGR-00031970.jpg",
|
||||
@ -28861,6 +28962,7 @@
|
||||
"IMAGES012/DOJ-OGR-00032627.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES012/DOJ-OGR-00032628.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES012/DOJ-OGR-00032629.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES012/DOJ-OGR-00032630.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES012/DOJ-OGR-00032631.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES012/DOJ-OGR-00032632.jpg",
|
||||
"IMAGES012/DOJ-OGR-00032633.jpg",
|
||||
@ -29396,5 +29498,234 @@
|
||||
"IMAGES012/DOJ-OGR-00033220.jpg"
|
||||
],
|
||||
"last_updated": "/Users/nickp/code/files",
|
||||
"failed_files": []
|
||||
"failed_files": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"filename": "IMAGES001/DOJ-OGR-00001648.jpg",
|
||||
"error": "Expecting ',' delimiter: line 9 column 4 (char 208)"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"filename": "IMAGES001/DOJ-OGR-00000258.jpg",
|
||||
"error": "Expecting ',' delimiter: line 9 column 4 (char 200)"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"filename": "IMAGES001/DOJ-OGR-00000628.jpg",
|
||||
"error": "Expecting ',' delimiter: line 9 column 4 (char 202)"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"filename": "IMAGES001/DOJ-OGR-00001100.jpg",
|
||||
"error": "Expecting ',' delimiter: line 9 column 4 (char 263)"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"filename": "IMAGES001/DOJ-OGR-00001671.jpg",
|
||||
"error": "Expecting ',' delimiter: line 9 column 4 (char 202)"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"filename": "IMAGES002/DOJ-OGR-00003600.jpg",
|
||||
"error": "Expecting ',' delimiter: line 9 column 4 (char 204)"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"filename": "IMAGES001/DOJ-OGR-00001690.jpg",
|
||||
"error": "Expecting ',' delimiter: line 9 column 4 (char 201)"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"filename": "IMAGES002/DOJ-OGR-00004922.jpg",
|
||||
"error": "Expecting ',' delimiter: line 9 column 4 (char 205)"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"filename": "IMAGES002/DOJ-OGR-00005566.jpg",
|
||||
"error": "Expecting ',' delimiter: line 9 column 4 (char 208)"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"filename": "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00005935.jpg",
|
||||
"error": "Expecting ',' delimiter: line 46 column 6 (char 12104)"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"filename": "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006528.jpg",
|
||||
"error": "Expecting ',' delimiter: line 9 column 4 (char 208)"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"filename": "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00007047.jpg",
|
||||
"error": "Expecting ',' delimiter: line 9 column 4 (char 213)"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"filename": "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006879.jpg",
|
||||
"error": "Expecting ',' delimiter: line 147 column 4 (char 15715)"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"filename": "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00007341.jpg",
|
||||
"error": "Expecting ',' delimiter: line 9 column 4 (char 200)"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"filename": "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00008029.jpg",
|
||||
"error": "Expecting ',' delimiter: line 9 column 4 (char 203)"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"filename": "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00007343.jpg",
|
||||
"error": "Expecting ',' delimiter: line 9 column 4 (char 200)"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"filename": "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00008032.jpg",
|
||||
"error": "Expecting ',' delimiter: line 9 column 4 (char 203)"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"filename": "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00008283.jpg",
|
||||
"error": "Expecting ',' delimiter: line 9 column 4 (char 209)"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"filename": "IMAGES004/DOJ-OGR-00009277.jpg",
|
||||
"error": "Expecting ',' delimiter: line 41 column 6 (char 7444)"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"filename": "IMAGES004/DOJ-OGR-00009972.jpg",
|
||||
"error": "Expecting ',' delimiter: line 31 column 6 (char 6796)"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"filename": "IMAGES004/DOJ-OGR-00009974.jpg",
|
||||
"error": "Expecting ',' delimiter: line 31 column 6 (char 6156)"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"filename": "IMAGES004/DOJ-OGR-00011771.jpg",
|
||||
"error": "Expecting ',' delimiter: line 9 column 4 (char 209)"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"filename": "IMAGES004/DOJ-OGR-00011349.jpg",
|
||||
"error": "Expecting ',' delimiter: line 9 column 4 (char 201)"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"filename": "IMAGES005/DOJ-OGR-00013011.jpg",
|
||||
"error": "Expecting ',' delimiter: line 9 column 4 (char 216)"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"filename": "IMAGES005/DOJ-OGR-00013590.jpg",
|
||||
"error": "Expecting ',' delimiter: line 9 column 4 (char 214)"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"filename": "IMAGES005/DOJ-OGR-00013540.jpg",
|
||||
"error": "Expecting ',' delimiter: line 9 column 4 (char 209)"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"filename": "IMAGES005/DOJ-OGR-00014303.jpg",
|
||||
"error": "Expecting ',' delimiter: line 9 column 4 (char 203)"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"filename": "IMAGES006/DOJ-OGR-00015308.jpg",
|
||||
"error": "Expecting ',' delimiter: line 31 column 6 (char 8938)"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"filename": "IMAGES006/DOJ-OGR-00016216.jpg",
|
||||
"error": "Expecting ',' delimiter: line 9 column 4 (char 203)"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"filename": "IMAGES006/DOJ-OGR-00016926.jpg",
|
||||
"error": "Expecting ',' delimiter: line 9 column 4 (char 203)"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"filename": "IMAGES007/DOJ-OGR-00018597.jpg",
|
||||
"error": "Expecting ',' delimiter: line 9 column 4 (char 216)"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"filename": "IMAGES007/DOJ-OGR-00019124.jpg",
|
||||
"error": "Expecting ',' delimiter: line 9 column 4 (char 209)"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"filename": "IMAGES007/DOJ-OGR-00019173.jpg",
|
||||
"error": "Expecting ',' delimiter: line 9 column 4 (char 208)"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"filename": "IMAGES007/DOJ-OGR-00019572.jpg",
|
||||
"error": "Expecting ',' delimiter: line 9 column 4 (char 267)"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"filename": "IMAGES007/DOJ-OGR-00019503.jpg",
|
||||
"error": "Expecting ',' delimiter: line 9 column 4 (char 214)"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"filename": "IMAGES007/DOJ-OGR-00019612.jpg",
|
||||
"error": "Expecting ',' delimiter: line 9 column 4 (char 202)"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"filename": "IMAGES007/DOJ-OGR-00020066.jpg",
|
||||
"error": "Expecting ',' delimiter: line 10 column 2234 (char 2514)"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"filename": "IMAGES008/DOJ-OGR-00020456.jpg",
|
||||
"error": "Expecting ',' delimiter: line 9 column 4 (char 209)"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"filename": "IMAGES008/DOJ-OGR-00020557.jpg",
|
||||
"error": "Expecting ',' delimiter: line 9 column 4 (char 204)"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"filename": "IMAGES008/DOJ-OGR-00020736.jpg",
|
||||
"error": "Expecting ',' delimiter: line 9 column 4 (char 209)"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"filename": "IMAGES008/DOJ-OGR-00021151.jpg",
|
||||
"error": "Expecting ',' delimiter: line 9 column 4 (char 198)"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"filename": "IMAGES008/DOJ-OGR-00021650.jpg",
|
||||
"error": "Expecting ',' delimiter: line 9 column 4 (char 202)"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"filename": "IMAGES008/DOJ-OGR-00021652.jpg",
|
||||
"error": "Expecting ',' delimiter: line 9 column 4 (char 202)"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"filename": "IMAGES008/DOJ-OGR-00021908.jpg",
|
||||
"error": "Expecting ',' delimiter: line 9 column 4 (char 208)"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"filename": "IMAGES008/DOJ-OGR-00021954.jpg",
|
||||
"error": "Expecting ',' delimiter: line 9 column 4 (char 204)"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"filename": "IMAGES008/DOJ-OGR-00021972.jpg",
|
||||
"error": "Expecting ',' delimiter: line 9 column 4 (char 203)"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"filename": "IMAGES009/DOJ-OGR-00024076.jpg",
|
||||
"error": "Expecting ',' delimiter: line 9 column 4 (char 201)"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"filename": "IMAGES010/DOJ-OGR-00025804.jpg",
|
||||
"error": "Expecting ',' delimiter: line 9 column 4 (char 210)"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"filename": "IMAGES010/DOJ-OGR-00025896.jpg",
|
||||
"error": "Expecting ',' delimiter: line 9 column 4 (char 211)"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"filename": "IMAGES010/DOJ-OGR-00025898.jpg",
|
||||
"error": "Expecting ',' delimiter: line 9 column 4 (char 211)"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"filename": "IMAGES010/DOJ-OGR-00026069.jpg",
|
||||
"error": "Expecting ',' delimiter: line 9 column 4 (char 210)"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"filename": "IMAGES010/DOJ-OGR-00026542.jpg",
|
||||
"error": "Expecting ',' delimiter: line 9 column 4 (char 229)"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"filename": "IMAGES010/DOJ-OGR-00026557.jpg",
|
||||
"error": "Expecting ',' delimiter: line 9 column 4 (char 229)"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"filename": "IMAGES010/DOJ-OGR-00026598.jpg",
|
||||
"error": "Expecting ',' delimiter: line 9 column 4 (char 229)"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"filename": "IMAGES011/DOJ-OGR-00030574.jpg",
|
||||
"error": "Expecting ',' delimiter: line 46 column 6 (char 7515)"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"filename": "IMAGES012/DOJ-OGR-00031438.jpg",
|
||||
"error": "Expecting ',' delimiter: line 9 column 4 (char 210)"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"filename": "IMAGES012/DOJ-OGR-00031466.jpg",
|
||||
"error": "Expecting ',' delimiter: line 9 column 4 (char 213)"
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
63
results/IMAGES001/DOJ-OGR-00000637.json
Normal file
63
results/IMAGES001/DOJ-OGR-00000637.json
Normal file
@ -0,0 +1,63 @@
|
||||
{
|
||||
"document_metadata": {
|
||||
"page_number": "1 of 2",
|
||||
"document_number": "52",
|
||||
"date": "08/29/19",
|
||||
"document_type": "NOLLE PROSEQUI",
|
||||
"has_handwriting": false,
|
||||
"has_stamps": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
"full_text": "Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB Document 52 Filed 08/29/19 Page 1 of 2 Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB Document 47-1 Filed 08/19/19 Page 1 of 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK UNITED STATES OF AMERICA -v.- JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. NOLLE PROSEQUI 19 Cr. 490 (RMB) USDC SDNY DOCUMENT ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOC #: DATE FILED: 8/29/19 1. The filing of this nolle prosequi will dispose of this case with respect to JEFFREY EPSTEIN, the defendant. 2. On July 2, 2019, Indictment 19 Cr. 490 (the \"Indictment\") was returned, charging JEFFREY EPSTEIN, the defendant, with one count of conspiracy to commit sex trafficking of minors, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 371, and one count of sex trafficking of minors, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1591. 3. On or about August 10, 2019, while the above-captioned case was pending, but prior to any trial or other disposition, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, the defendant, died. 4. Because JEFFREY EPSTEIN, the defendant, died while this case was pending, and therefore before a final judgment was issued, the Indictment must be dismissed under the rule of abatement. See United States v. Wright, 160 F.3d 905, 908 (2d Cir. 1998). DOJ-OGR-00000637",
|
||||
"text_blocks": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"type": "printed",
|
||||
"content": "Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB Document 52 Filed 08/29/19 Page 1 of 2",
|
||||
"position": "header"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"type": "printed",
|
||||
"content": "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK UNITED STATES OF AMERICA -v.- JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant.",
|
||||
"position": "top"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"type": "stamp",
|
||||
"content": "NOLLE PROSEQUI 19 Cr. 490 (RMB) USDC SDNY DOCUMENT ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOC #: DATE FILED: 8/29/19",
|
||||
"position": "margin"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"type": "printed",
|
||||
"content": "1. The filing of this nolle prosequi will dispose of this case with respect to JEFFREY EPSTEIN, the defendant. 2. On July 2, 2019, Indictment 19 Cr. 490 (the \"Indictment\") was returned, charging JEFFREY EPSTEIN, the defendant, with one count of conspiracy to commit sex trafficking of minors, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 371, and one count of sex trafficking of minors, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1591. 3. On or about August 10, 2019, while the above-captioned case was pending, but prior to any trial or other disposition, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, the defendant, died. 4. Because JEFFREY EPSTEIN, the defendant, died while this case was pending, and therefore before a final judgment was issued, the Indictment must be dismissed under the rule of abatement. See United States v. Wright, 160 F.3d 905, 908 (2d Cir. 1998).",
|
||||
"position": "middle"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"type": "printed",
|
||||
"content": "DOJ-OGR-00000637",
|
||||
"position": "footer"
|
||||
}
|
||||
],
|
||||
"entities": {
|
||||
"people": [
|
||||
"JEFFREY EPSTEIN"
|
||||
],
|
||||
"organizations": [
|
||||
"UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT",
|
||||
"UNITED STATES OF AMERICA"
|
||||
],
|
||||
"locations": [
|
||||
"NEW YORK"
|
||||
],
|
||||
"dates": [
|
||||
"July 2, 2019",
|
||||
"August 10, 2019",
|
||||
"08/29/19"
|
||||
],
|
||||
"reference_numbers": [
|
||||
"19 Cr. 490",
|
||||
"18 U.S.C. § 371",
|
||||
"18 U.S.C. § 1591",
|
||||
"160 F.3d 905",
|
||||
"DOJ-OGR-00000637"
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
"additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court filing with a stamp indicating electronic filing. The text is clear and legible, with no visible redactions or damage."
|
||||
}
|
||||
63
results/IMAGES001/DOJ-OGR-00000862.json
Normal file
63
results/IMAGES001/DOJ-OGR-00000862.json
Normal file
File diff suppressed because one or more lines are too long
62
results/IMAGES001/DOJ-OGR-00000900.json
Normal file
62
results/IMAGES001/DOJ-OGR-00000900.json
Normal file
File diff suppressed because one or more lines are too long
61
results/IMAGES001/DOJ-OGR-00002679.json
Normal file
61
results/IMAGES001/DOJ-OGR-00002679.json
Normal file
@ -0,0 +1,61 @@
|
||||
{
|
||||
"document_metadata": {
|
||||
"page_number": "4",
|
||||
"document_number": "146",
|
||||
"date": "02/04/21",
|
||||
"document_type": "court document",
|
||||
"has_handwriting": false,
|
||||
"has_stamps": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
"full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 146 Filed 02/04/21 Page 4 of 16\n\nOther Authorities\nSexual Offences Act 2003 § 9 (Eng.), 2003, c. 42............................................................................................................................4\nTelecommunications Act of 1996, PL 104-104, Feb. 8, 1996, Title V, § 508, 110 Stat. 56...........................................................3\nViolent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act of 1994, PL 103-322, Sept. 13, 1994, Title XVI, § 160001(g), 108 Stat. 1796................6",
|
||||
"text_blocks": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"type": "printed",
|
||||
"content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 146 Filed 02/04/21 Page 4 of 16",
|
||||
"position": "header"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"type": "printed",
|
||||
"content": "Other Authorities",
|
||||
"position": "top"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"type": "printed",
|
||||
"content": "Sexual Offences Act 2003 § 9 (Eng.), 2003, c. 42............................................................................................................................4",
|
||||
"position": "top"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"type": "printed",
|
||||
"content": "Telecommunications Act of 1996, PL 104-104, Feb. 8, 1996, Title V, § 508, 110 Stat. 56...........................................................3",
|
||||
"position": "top"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"type": "printed",
|
||||
"content": "Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act of 1994, PL 103-322, Sept. 13, 1994, Title XVI, § 160001(g), 108 Stat. 1796................6",
|
||||
"position": "top"
|
||||
}
|
||||
],
|
||||
"entities": {
|
||||
"people": [],
|
||||
"organizations": [],
|
||||
"locations": [],
|
||||
"dates": [
|
||||
"Feb. 8, 1996",
|
||||
"Sept. 13, 1994",
|
||||
"02/04/21"
|
||||
],
|
||||
"reference_numbers": [
|
||||
"1:20-cr-00330-AJN",
|
||||
"Document 146",
|
||||
"PL 104-104",
|
||||
"PL 103-322",
|
||||
"§ 9",
|
||||
"§ 508",
|
||||
"§ 160001(g)",
|
||||
"c. 42",
|
||||
"110 Stat. 56",
|
||||
"108 Stat. 1796"
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
"additional_notes": ""
|
||||
}
|
||||
80
results/IMAGES002/DOJ-OGR-00004232.json
Normal file
80
results/IMAGES002/DOJ-OGR-00004232.json
Normal file
@ -0,0 +1,80 @@
|
||||
{
|
||||
"document_metadata": {
|
||||
"page_number": "5",
|
||||
"document_number": "287",
|
||||
"date": "05/20/21",
|
||||
"document_type": "Court Document",
|
||||
"has_handwriting": false,
|
||||
"has_stamps": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
"full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 287 Filed 05/20/21 Page 5 of 16\nher of the crimes charged in the Indictment. A bill of particulars is therefore necessary to prevent unfair surprise at trial and to allow Ms. Maxwell to adequately prepare her defense.\n\nIt is also critical that Ms. Maxwell receive accelerated disclosure of the government's witness list, Jencks Act material, Brady/Giglio material, Rule 404(b) evidence, and any co-conspirator statements. The government predictably argues that there is nothing unusual about the circumstances of Ms. Maxwell's case that would justify a deviation from customary production deadlines for the materials she requests. But Ms. Maxwell's case is not a typical case and presents unique circumstances that warrant the relief she seeks. The Indictment alleges vague conduct that is over 25 years old and involves conduct that allegedly took place over a four-year period in multiple locations across the country and in at least one foreign jurisdiction.\n\nAny relevant documents that may still exist will take time to retrieve. The investigation of witness statements and any Rule 404(b) evidence will similarly take significant time and potentially also involve foreign travel and depositions under Rule 15 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. For these reasons, and the others set forth below, the Court should order the production of these materials by March 22, 2021.2\n\nMs. Maxwell has also provided specific reasons supporting her requests for the production and inspection of certain FBI reports and other documents, such as a complete copy of the handwritten diary, which are not included in the discovery. There is ample evidence to conclude that these documents contain material inconsistencies in the prior statements of key government witnesses, as well as other exculpatory information for Ms. Maxwell. The Court should therefore order the government to produce them.\n\n2 Ms. Maxwell originally requested that the government produce the requested witness materials by March 12, 2021 (Dkt. 148 at 15, 17), the same deadline as the Court imposed on the government to produce documents related to certain non-testifying witnesses. (Dkt. 73). Because the Court granted Ms. Maxwell's request to extend the filing deadline for the reply motions by 10 days from March 5, 2021 to March 15, 2021, we have moved forward our requested deadline for the production of witness materials by 10 days to March 22, 2021.\n\n2\nDOJ-OGR-00004232",
|
||||
"text_blocks": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"type": "printed",
|
||||
"content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 287 Filed 05/20/21 Page 5 of 16",
|
||||
"position": "header"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"type": "printed",
|
||||
"content": "her of the crimes charged in the Indictment. A bill of particulars is therefore necessary to prevent unfair surprise at trial and to allow Ms. Maxwell to adequately prepare her defense.",
|
||||
"position": "top"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"type": "printed",
|
||||
"content": "It is also critical that Ms. Maxwell receive accelerated disclosure of the government's witness list, Jencks Act material, Brady/Giglio material, Rule 404(b) evidence, and any co-conspirator statements. The government predictably argues that there is nothing unusual about the circumstances of Ms. Maxwell's case that would justify a deviation from customary production deadlines for the materials she requests. But Ms. Maxwell's case is not a typical case and presents unique circumstances that warrant the relief she seeks. The Indictment alleges vague conduct that is over 25 years old and involves conduct that allegedly took place over a four-year period in multiple locations across the country and in at least one foreign jurisdiction.",
|
||||
"position": "middle"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"type": "printed",
|
||||
"content": "Any relevant documents that may still exist will take time to retrieve. The investigation of witness statements and any Rule 404(b) evidence will similarly take significant time and potentially also involve foreign travel and depositions under Rule 15 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. For these reasons, and the others set forth below, the Court should order the production of these materials by March 22, 2021.2",
|
||||
"position": "middle"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"type": "printed",
|
||||
"content": "Ms. Maxwell has also provided specific reasons supporting her requests for the production and inspection of certain FBI reports and other documents, such as a complete copy of the handwritten diary, which are not included in the discovery. There is ample evidence to conclude that these documents contain material inconsistencies in the prior statements of key government witnesses, as well as other exculpatory information for Ms. Maxwell. The Court should therefore order the government to produce them.",
|
||||
"position": "middle"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"type": "printed",
|
||||
"content": "2 Ms. Maxwell originally requested that the government produce the requested witness materials by March 12, 2021 (Dkt. 148 at 15, 17), the same deadline as the Court imposed on the government to produce documents related to certain non-testifying witnesses. (Dkt. 73). Because the Court granted Ms. Maxwell's request to extend the filing deadline for the reply motions by 10 days from March 5, 2021 to March 15, 2021, we have moved forward our requested deadline for the production of witness materials by 10 days to March 22, 2021.",
|
||||
"position": "bottom"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"type": "printed",
|
||||
"content": "2",
|
||||
"position": "footer"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"type": "printed",
|
||||
"content": "DOJ-OGR-00004232",
|
||||
"position": "footer"
|
||||
}
|
||||
],
|
||||
"entities": {
|
||||
"people": [
|
||||
"Ms. Maxwell"
|
||||
],
|
||||
"organizations": [
|
||||
"FBI"
|
||||
],
|
||||
"locations": [
|
||||
"country",
|
||||
"foreign jurisdiction"
|
||||
],
|
||||
"dates": [
|
||||
"March 22, 2021",
|
||||
"March 12, 2021",
|
||||
"March 5, 2021",
|
||||
"March 15, 2021",
|
||||
"05/20/21"
|
||||
],
|
||||
"reference_numbers": [
|
||||
"1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
|
||||
"287",
|
||||
"Dkt. 148",
|
||||
"Dkt. 73",
|
||||
"DOJ-OGR-00004232"
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
"additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court filing related to the case of Ms. Maxwell. The text is mostly printed, with no visible handwriting or stamps. The document is well-formatted and easy to read."
|
||||
}
|
||||
73
results/IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00005926.json
Normal file
73
results/IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00005926.json
Normal file
@ -0,0 +1,73 @@
|
||||
{
|
||||
"document_metadata": {
|
||||
"page_number": "16 of 45",
|
||||
"document_number": "397-2",
|
||||
"date": "10/29/21",
|
||||
"document_type": "Case document",
|
||||
"has_handwriting": false,
|
||||
"has_stamps": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
"full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 397-2 Filed 10/29/21 Page 16 of 45 (continued) Table I. (continued) Study | Design | Sample | Findings | Summary Kogan (2004) | The purpose of this study was to identify factors that influence the disclosure made by female survivors of childhood sexual abuse and to assess the representativeness of structured phone interviews USEs. The receipt of both the disclosure and the management of the disclosure were investigated. | A subsample of 263 adolescent females between 12 and 17 years old, mean age of 15.2 years, who reported at least one experience of sexual contact with an adult in the NSA, was assessed using a modified CSA Incident Classification Interview. They asked a series of questions about each episode of unwanted sexual contact and character of the perpetrator. | Sample consisted of 218 child disclosure 'constructors' of CSA, referred to CSA 'offenders' for a 'legged' CSA. A total of 218 child disclosure 'constructors' of CSA, referred to CSA 'offenders' for a 'legged' CSA. Five factors were tested: (1) age of child disclosure, (2) type of abuse, (3) mode of disclosure, and (4) characteristics of the perpetrator. | This study examined factors associated with disclosure and the essence of USEs. Surveys noted that Y represent the sample (14-17). Ado escents who experienced sexual abuse were more likely to disclose to an adult (64%) than children aged 7-10 years. Children under 11 were at risk for delayed disclosure beyond 1-13 months. Children aged 11-13 tended to disclose to a family member or a friend. Immediate disclosure was associated with a stranger perpetrator. Fear of not being believed was a major reason for not disclosing. Family factors linked to disclosure were (1) drug abuse in the household and (2) prompt intervention. This study represents a higher rate of disclosure than previous studies. These cases had been reported to the authorities and were in process of prosecution, which may explain the higher rate of disclosure. Legal samples with higher rates of extrafamilial abuse (52%) may account for earlier disclosure. | This study does not own for defining the cause and effect on the actual onset of disclosure. D isclosure outcomes of the 26 women who did not disclose during ongoing abuse were continuously abused after disclosure. Children under the age of 7 were at risk for delayed disclosure. Participants whose USE occurred between the ages of 7 and 13 were more likely to disclose to an adult. Ado escents who experienced sexual abuse were more likely to disclose to an adult (64%) than children aged 7-10 years. Children under 11 were at risk for delayed disclosure beyond 1-13 months. Children aged 11-13 tended to disclose to a family member or a friend. Immediate disclosure was associated with a stranger perpetrator. Fear of not being believed was a major reason for not disclosing. Family factors linked to disclosure were (1) drug abuse in the household and (2) prompt intervention. This study represents a higher rate of disclosure than previous studies. These cases had been reported to the authorities and were in process of prosecution, which may explain the higher rate of disclosure. Legal samples with higher rates of extrafamilial abuse (52%) may account for earlier disclosure. Goodman-Brown, Edelstein, Goodman, Jones, and Gordon (2003) | The purpose of this study was to investigate variables associated with disclosure of CSA and to test a model of CSA disclosure. | Case file reviews of data obtained from prosecutors, as well as structured interviews with the child disclosure constructors and caretaker, were conducted. Trained graduate students and one victim advocate completed the Saxtona 274 DOJ-OGR-00005926",
|
||||
"text_blocks": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"type": "printed",
|
||||
"content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 397-2 Filed 10/29/21 Page 16 of 45 (continued)",
|
||||
"position": "header"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"type": "printed",
|
||||
"content": "Table I. (continued)",
|
||||
"position": "header"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"type": "printed",
|
||||
"content": "Study | Design | Sample | Findings | Summary",
|
||||
"position": "header"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"type": "printed",
|
||||
"content": "Kogan (2004) | The purpose of this study was to identify factors that influence the disclosure made by female survivors of childhood sexual abuse and to assess the representativeness of structured phone interviews USEs. The receipt of both the disclosure and the management of the disclosure were investigated. | A subsample of 263 adolescent females between 12 and 17 years old, mean age of 15.2 years, who reported at least one experience of sexual contact with an adult in the NSA, was assessed using a modified CSA Incident Classification Interview. They asked a series of questions about each episode of unwanted sexual contact and character of the perpetrator. | Sample consisted of 218 child disclosure 'constructors' of CSA, referred to CSA 'offenders' for a 'legged' CSA. A total of 218 child disclosure 'constructors' of CSA, referred to CSA 'offenders' for a 'legged' CSA. Five factors were tested: (1) age of child disclosure, (2) type of abuse, (3) mode of disclosure, and (4) characteristics of the perpetrator. | This study examined factors associated with disclosure and the essence of USEs. Surveys noted that Y represent the sample (14-17). Ado escents who experienced sexual abuse were more likely to disclose to an adult (64%) than children aged 7-10 years. Children under 11 were at risk for delayed disclosure beyond 1-13 months. Children aged 11-13 tended to disclose to a family member or a friend. Immediate disclosure was associated with a stranger perpetrator. Fear of not being believed was a major reason for not disclosing. Family factors linked to disclosure were (1) drug abuse in the household and (2) prompt intervention. This study represents a higher rate of disclosure than previous studies. These cases had been reported to the authorities and were in process of prosecution, which may explain the higher rate of disclosure. Legal samples with higher rates of extrafamilial abuse (52%) may account for earlier disclosure. | This study does not own for defining the cause and effect on the actual onset of disclosure. D isclosure outcomes of the 26 women who did not disclose during ongoing abuse were continuously abused after disclosure. Children under the age of 7 were at risk for delayed disclosure. Participants whose USE occurred between the ages of 7 and 13 were more likely to disclose to an adult. Ado escents who experienced sexual abuse were more likely to disclose to an adult (64%) than children aged 7-10 years. Children under 11 were at risk for delayed disclosure beyond 1-13 months. Children aged 11-13 tended to disclose to a family member or a friend. Immediate disclosure was associated with a stranger perpetrator. Fear of not being believed was a major reason for not disclosing. Family factors linked to disclosure were (1) drug abuse in the household and (2) prompt intervention. This study represents a higher rate of disclosure than previous studies. These cases had been reported to the authorities and were in process of prosecution, which may explain the higher rate of disclosure. Legal samples with higher rates of extrafamilial abuse (52%) may account for earlier disclosure.",
|
||||
"position": "body"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"type": "printed",
|
||||
"content": "Goodman-Brown, Edelstein, Goodman, Jones, and Gordon (2003) | The purpose of this study was to investigate variables associated with disclosure of CSA and to test a model of CSA disclosure. | Case file reviews of data obtained from prosecutors, as well as structured interviews with the child disclosure constructors and caretaker, were conducted. Trained graduate students and one victim advocate completed the Saxtona",
|
||||
"position": "body"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"type": "printed",
|
||||
"content": "274",
|
||||
"position": "footer"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"type": "printed",
|
||||
"content": "DOJ-OGR-00005926",
|
||||
"position": "footer"
|
||||
}
|
||||
],
|
||||
"entities": {
|
||||
"people": [
|
||||
"Kogan",
|
||||
"Goodman-Brown",
|
||||
"Edelstein",
|
||||
"Goodman",
|
||||
"Jones",
|
||||
"Gordon"
|
||||
],
|
||||
"organizations": [
|
||||
"DOJ"
|
||||
],
|
||||
"locations": [],
|
||||
"dates": [
|
||||
"10/29/21",
|
||||
"2003",
|
||||
"2004"
|
||||
],
|
||||
"reference_numbers": [
|
||||
"1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
|
||||
"397-2",
|
||||
"DOJ-OGR-00005926"
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
"additional_notes": "The document appears to be a page from a legal case document, specifically a table summarizing various studies related to child sexual abuse disclosure. The text is mostly printed, with no handwritten content or stamps visible. The document is well-formatted, but the quality is not perfect, with some minor blurriness."
|
||||
}
|
||||
149
results/IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00005954.json
Normal file
149
results/IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00005954.json
Normal file
File diff suppressed because one or more lines are too long
164
results/IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006860.json
Normal file
164
results/IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006860.json
Normal file
File diff suppressed because one or more lines are too long
49
results/IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00007048.json
Normal file
49
results/IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00007048.json
Normal file
@ -0,0 +1,49 @@
|
||||
{
|
||||
"document_metadata": {
|
||||
"page_number": "32 of 32",
|
||||
"document_number": "462",
|
||||
"date": "11/15/21",
|
||||
"document_type": "court document",
|
||||
"has_handwriting": false,
|
||||
"has_stamps": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
"full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 462 Filed 11/15/21 Page 32 of 32 Juror ID: -31- DOJ-OGR-00007048",
|
||||
"text_blocks": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"type": "printed",
|
||||
"content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 462 Filed 11/15/21 Page 32 of 32",
|
||||
"position": "header"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"type": "printed",
|
||||
"content": "Juror ID:",
|
||||
"position": "top"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"type": "printed",
|
||||
"content": "-31-",
|
||||
"position": "footer"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"type": "printed",
|
||||
"content": "DOJ-OGR-00007048",
|
||||
"position": "footer"
|
||||
}
|
||||
],
|
||||
"entities": {
|
||||
"people": [],
|
||||
"organizations": [
|
||||
"DOJ"
|
||||
],
|
||||
"locations": [],
|
||||
"dates": [
|
||||
"11/15/21"
|
||||
],
|
||||
"reference_numbers": [
|
||||
"1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
|
||||
"462",
|
||||
"DOJ-OGR-00007048"
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
"additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court filing with a juror ID section. The page is mostly blank with lines for notes or comments. The footer contains a page number and a reference number."
|
||||
}
|
||||
42
results/IMAGES004/DOJ-OGR-00009028.json
Normal file
42
results/IMAGES004/DOJ-OGR-00009028.json
Normal file
@ -0,0 +1,42 @@
|
||||
{
|
||||
"document_metadata": {
|
||||
"page_number": "27",
|
||||
"document_number": "613",
|
||||
"date": "02/24/22",
|
||||
"document_type": "court document",
|
||||
"has_handwriting": false,
|
||||
"has_stamps": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
"full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 613 Filed 02/24/22 Page 27 of 66\n\n8:00 THISBEARTRAVELS Posts\nthisbeartravels New York City, N.Y.\n590 likes\nthisbeartravels I can now tell everyone that I was a juror on the Ghislaine Maxwell trial. Been an incredible, surreal experience and an... more\nView all 98 comments\nthisbeartravels @rutter.gram the state does not offer therapy, unfortunately. But I see a therapist regularly so have had some help dealing with the stress from this case.\nnicolejcornes We thank you from around the world for your brilliant service\n5 days ago\nthisbeartravels Manhattan, New York\nShortly thereafter, Juror No. 50 predictably deleted his Twitter account and his Instagram account. He also appears to have deleted his Facebook and LinkedIn accounts.",
|
||||
"text_blocks": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"type": "printed",
|
||||
"content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 613 Filed 02/24/22 Page 27 of 66",
|
||||
"position": "header"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"type": "printed",
|
||||
"content": "Shortly thereafter, Juror No. 50 predictably deleted his Twitter account and his Instagram account. He also appears to have deleted his Facebook and LinkedIn accounts.",
|
||||
"position": "bottom"
|
||||
}
|
||||
],
|
||||
"entities": {
|
||||
"people": [
|
||||
"Ghislaine Maxwell"
|
||||
],
|
||||
"organizations": [],
|
||||
"locations": [
|
||||
"New York City",
|
||||
"Manhattan"
|
||||
],
|
||||
"dates": [
|
||||
"02/24/22",
|
||||
"5 days ago"
|
||||
],
|
||||
"reference_numbers": [
|
||||
"1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
|
||||
"613"
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
"additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court filing related to the Ghislaine Maxwell trial, with screenshots of a juror's social media posts."
|
||||
}
|
||||
58
results/IMAGES004/DOJ-OGR-00009293.json
Normal file
58
results/IMAGES004/DOJ-OGR-00009293.json
Normal file
@ -0,0 +1,58 @@
|
||||
{
|
||||
"document_metadata": {
|
||||
"page_number": "46",
|
||||
"document_number": "A-5689",
|
||||
"date": "February 15, 2012",
|
||||
"document_type": "Court Document",
|
||||
"has_handwriting": false,
|
||||
"has_stamps": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
"full_text": "Case 1:20-cv-00380-PAE Document 616 Filed 02/24/22 Page 46 of 130 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v PAUL M. DAUGERDAS, ET AL., February 15, 2012 otherwise (2) 101:1;167:14 ourselves (1) 101:5 out (44) 24:17;28:24;39:19; 41:10;50:6;51:13;55:24, 25;60:1;69:9,24;71:15; 80:9;83:12;84:16;86:15; 92:13;100:14,15; 101:12;107:24;118:1; 126:5;129:25;133:17; 137:22;141:4,11;146:2; 2;153:25;170:5,9,14; 174:13;179:9;190:7; 199:6,15;206:25;212:1; 218:10;221:15;240:4 outcome (1) 214:24 outright (1) 181:11 outset (1) 141:2 outside (5) 34:11;36:7;58:13; 164:18;170:17 outstanding (3) 89:17;202:3;210:14 over (28) 28:24;29:4;35:7;40:7; 43:24;49:16;59:18;70:4, 6,7;77:3;92:6;96:8; 116:15;129:9;135:17; 165:4;177:4;178:21; 184:15;193:21;206:5; 208:1;230:7 overriding (2) 99:21;100:8 overrule (1) 106:22 Overruled (16) 113:3;119:14;122:8; 135:10;141:6;154:9; 155:9;156:21;162:9; 177:23;183:24;192:20; 199:14;202:9;226:6; 235:18 overseeing (1) 11:16 oversight (1) 155:6 overstated (1) 91:4 overstates (1) 87:11 overwhelming (1) 159:5 own (16) 15:13;29:24;44:17; 47:16;78:3;100:11; 112:15;123:15;136:23; 138:11;160:8,14,15; 162:16,22;164:12 owned (10) 138:3;162:2,5,14,25; 163:21,23,25;164:12; 207:8 ownership (1) 138:15 owning (1) 168:3 owns (2) 162:22;163:19 Pacer (2) 114:20,22 page (59) 17:6;18:19;19:3; 20:11;21:23;22:1,10; 24:2;26:18;31:3,4; 33:12;39:11,11;40:19; 21:42;12,13,19;48:11; 50:24;51:16,23;53:21; 54:7;55:10;66:7;73:3; 78:13;82:15,16,21; 107:4;125:10,11; 126:13,13;130:21; 131:10,13,15;132:5; 138:10;145:7;149:15; 151:9,9;157:18;172:8; 176:11;178:10,16; 180:3;186:25;199:22; 220:23;226:23 pages (4) 18:23;19:10;20:5; 63:15 paid (1) 25:16 pancreatitis (2) 176:14,18 panel (9) 17:20;23:15;28:24; 29:5;172:5;173:22; 188:20;191:3;208:6 panels (1) 208:6 panic (1) 6:23 paper (2) 10:11;65:9 papers (3) 74:19;102:16;177:3 paragraph (7) 77:5;178:11,14,15,15; 181:3;202:1 partly (2) 124:10;232:10 partner (6) 9:6,8,8;12:1;42:2; 43:12 partners (1) 9:18 party (6) 72:23;83:19;98:12; 99:20;212:15;215:23 past (2) 32:23;147:19 paste (1) 199:2 pasted (5) 42:17;45:18;198:18, 21,25 pathological (1) 239:6 Paul (4) 4:7,19;212:17;219:17 Pauley (84) 33:6;34:10,16;37:3, 17:74;17:21;75:2;77:25; 104:1;105:12,19; 107:13;109:20;110:23, 25;112:22;113:7; 114:17;23;115:21; 116:19,20;117:6,10,23; 118:7;124:2,11;126:14, 22;128:4;13;130:15; 131:5;132:9,12;133:3; 138:23;139:3;140:10; 16:141;8;143:5;144:4,8, 8,11,15;19;145:9;151:6, 21:214;3,8;216:20; 217:23;219:24;220:7, 18;222:18;223:5; 224:18;226:7 Pauley's (14) 68:2;98:12;167:15 permitted (3) 35:8 perpendicular (1) 35:8 person (53) 11:13,15;14:7;16:25; 18:3;34:9;43:17,21; 46:5,15;47:21;50:3,5;10; 54:13;55:2;56:15;61:21, 92:9;94:7;106:13; 119:10;120:4;134:15; 135:1;154:22;158:16; 193:13;200:25;201:1; 210:16 personal (25) 38:16,20;23;39:1; 51:13;60:8,10;98:1; 131:25;132:6,12,13,18, 22;133:10;159:10,15; 11:25;13:21,25;15:24; 45:5,8,13;56:12;77:19; 82:17;87:4;91:23;93:2, 3;122:5;128:7;168:17, 20,23;179:17;181:23; 12:206;19;209:9; 210:22;238:13 people's (1) 171:6;191:9 petit (1) otherwise - petit (18) SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v PAUL M. DAUGERDAS, ET AL., 148:23;152:25 parents' (2) 196:3,9,11,23;198:10 parlance (1) 116:25 parochial (1) 100:11 Paroled (1) 190:7 Parse (28) 4:20;8:21,22;11:1,14; 28:4;30:7;15:35;10; 39:17;18,22;24;40:3; 42:22;63:19;40:23; 136:13;199:7,16;20,25; 203:3;213:12;24;214:7; 220:3,17 Parse's (3) 4:22;15:206:12 part (26) 11:16,17;26:25;28:12; 40:4;45:9;53:21;54:8; 120:12;124:1;140:5; 154:18;20;178:1;180:9; 188:15;218;6;224:15; 15;230;10;231:3 partial (1) 220:16 partially (2) 222:16;231:25 participants (1) 58:2 participated (5) 67:2;74:11;79:11; 191:12,16 participating (1) 67:8 participation (1) 67:14 particular (9) 4:17;15;11;30:14; 33:6;44:7;54:25;177:17; 216:24;222:1 particularly (3) 28:4;30:23;43:3 parties (6) 7:15;74:12;97:5,16; 98:7;129:16 Pause (1) 130:25 pay (5) 124:18,21;137:14,18, 219:9 paying (1) 131:19 penance (1) 192:5 pending (7) 38:17;51:14;52:18; 53:1;16:60;8;98:9,16 penetrate (1) 128:6 penitentiary (1) 163:14 people (30) 11:25;13:21,25;15:24; 45:5,8,13;56:12;77:19; 82:17;87:4;91:23;93:2, 3;122:5;128:7;168:17, 20,23;179:17;181:23; 12:206;19;209:9; 210:22;238:13 personally (5) 25:7:8;214:6;219:2,5 perspective (1) 229:15 pertinent (2) 171:6;191:9 petit (1) per (1) 231:3 percent (3) 199:8,17;214:10 peremptory (3) 30:3;32:13;86:8 perfect (2) 62:7;239:4 perfectly (1) 100:24 performed (1) 192:7 Perhaps (5) 5:10;45:13;56:7,11; 209:10 period (7) 5:11;12;53:19; 88:13,18;181:9;182:13 perjure (2) 192:9;231:6 perjured (5) 192:16;227:21; 232:23;235:9;236:20 perjuring (1) 239:9 perjury (7) 228:21;231:11;233:3; 234:3,14;235:11;237:1 permanent (4) 158:4,6;159:20;160:7",
|
||||
"text_blocks": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"type": "printed",
|
||||
"content": "Case 1:20-cv-00380-PAE Document 616 Filed 02/24/22 Page 46 of 130",
|
||||
"position": "header"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"type": "printed",
|
||||
"content": "UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v PAUL M. DAUGERDAS, ET AL.,",
|
||||
"position": "header"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"type": "printed",
|
||||
"content": "February 15, 2012",
|
||||
"position": "header"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"type": "printed",
|
||||
"content": "otherwise (2) 101:1;167:14 ...",
|
||||
"position": "main"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"type": "printed",
|
||||
"content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS",
|
||||
"position": "footer"
|
||||
}
|
||||
],
|
||||
"entities": {
|
||||
"people": [
|
||||
"Paul M. Daugerdas"
|
||||
],
|
||||
"organizations": [
|
||||
"UNITED STATES OF AMERICA",
|
||||
"SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS"
|
||||
],
|
||||
"locations": [],
|
||||
"dates": [
|
||||
"February 15, 2012",
|
||||
"02/24/22"
|
||||
],
|
||||
"reference_numbers": [
|
||||
"Case 1:20-cv-00380-PAE",
|
||||
"Document 616",
|
||||
"A-5689"
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
"additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript or legal document. The text is dense and contains many legal terms and references. There are no visible redactions or damage to the document."
|
||||
}
|
||||
59
results/IMAGES004/DOJ-OGR-00009298.json
Normal file
59
results/IMAGES004/DOJ-OGR-00009298.json
Normal file
@ -0,0 +1,59 @@
|
||||
{
|
||||
"document_metadata": {
|
||||
"page_number": "96",
|
||||
"document_number": "A-5694",
|
||||
"date": "February 15, 2012",
|
||||
"document_type": "Court Document",
|
||||
"has_handwriting": false,
|
||||
"has_stamps": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
"full_text": "Case 1:20-cf-00338-PAE Document 616 Filed 02/24/22 Page 96 of 130\nUNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v PAUL M. DAUGERDAS, ET AL.,\nset (2) 13:19,20 sets (1) 132:25 setting (1) 73:22 seven (8) 74:14;172:2;190:5,5, 6,6;207:3;210:13 seventh (1) 12:4 several (4) 89:14;95:12;155:7; 203:23 severe (1) 94:17 severely (1) 239:7 shades (1) 120:16 Shambron (1) 169:24 Shanbrom (4) 169:23;219:11,13,17 share (2) 60:21;68:2 shared (6) 21:15,18;68:12,13,15; 77:6 sharing (1) 67:23 Sharon (1) 4:15 Shechtman (38) 4:19,19,21;7:4,9,14, 21,23;11:5;17:12;19:14; 81:25;82:3;84:4,5,21,22, 24:88;14,17,89:22;90:3; 94:12;95:22,24;96:4,21; 229:20,21,23;236:8; 237:21;239:19,20,25; 240:2,5,13 shed (1) 71:8 shelter (2) 154:1;166:1 shelters (3) 215:19;221:19;222:3 shield (1) 100:3 shock (1) 91:9 shocking (2) 173:10,25 shoplifting (3) 181:13,16;215:8 short (2) 53:19;239:21 show (4) 6:12;120:11;187:18, 21 showed (1) 143:3 showing (3) 67:17;120:10;129:20 shown (1) 239:6 shows (1) 108:11 side (10) 26:5;30:23;125:11; 140:24,24;205:4;9; 210:21;214:9;237:11 sidebar (1) 34:14 sides (3) 153:23,24;155:15 sign (1) 102:17 signed (6) 6:20;76:22;102:19; 150:25;151:1;177:4 silly (1) 158:20 similarly (1) 212:7 simple (3) 6:15;134:3;227:8 simply (4) 43:15;47:20;186:9; 227:20 single (2) 30:2;225:8 sit (10) 35:3;112:7;132:10,11; 166:11;204:22;233:2; 234:19,24;235:7 sitting (7) 43:6;80:3;166:16; 185:4;188:20;195:24; 235:24 situation (1) 138:25 Six (2) 108:2,3 skip (1) 160:16 skipped (1) 187:25 Sklansky (8) 4:6;6:11;7:17;13; 19:13,21;84:9;96:20 slanting (1) 202:22 sleep (2) 148:23,24 sliding (1) 135:5 slightly (1) 31:16 slowly (2) 8:6;101:20 small (3) 35:8;70:4;181:16 smaller (2) 29:6,14 smart (7) 116:3,4,5,6;206:22,22; 207:11 Socially (2) 179:24;193:9 solely (5) 199:6,15;217:10,21; 220:10 somebody (4) 101:2;116:21;128:9; 229:15 somehow (3) 43:16;55:22;192:1 someone (15) 8:17;25:17;31:18; 34:23;39:23;45:23;47:7; 55:8;61:4;67:17;69:7; 71:1;96:13;157:2; 232:23 someone's (1) 14:5 sometime (1) 80:1 sometimes (8) 30:2;225:8 9:12;28:9;147:2; 148:19,22,24;153:1; 179:23 somewhat (1) 216:25 somewhere (6) 21:9;81:21,22;139:6; 162:18;187:14 soon (5) 5:4;6:7;7:3,7;137:20 sorry (15) 62:14;65:1;89:1; 107:1;112:17;131:14; 136:17;139:7;157:19; 172:22;173:1;201:20; 210:10;221:2;230:14 sort (6) 112:1;182:14;192:5; 205:19,21;223:6 sounds (1) 17:21 sources (1) 13:13 South (1) 196:2 Southern (3) 203:17,19;235:24 sovereign (1) 187:2 space (1) 201:8,11,19,21 speak (14) 5:2;6:8,77;17;86:6; 140:14,18;143:5;194:21, 22,24;195:1;225:20; 233:11;237:11 speaking (6) 70:17;87:7;136:6; 141:3,9;238:24 special (2) 16:19;117:9 specially (3) 201:8,12,21 specific (10) 20:10;25:12;61:6; 131:10;158:16;171:17; 176:10;188:5;206:10; 223:3 specifically (26) 22:6;24:5;61:2;74:21; 118:10,16;121:15; 124:13,17;126:1,1; 130:17;138:7,17;139:7, 12,23;147:17;150:13; 151:8;153:6;156:10; 170:17;179:11;181:3; 190:25 speculation (1) 38:22 speeching (1) 209:19 spell (2) 8:5;101:20 spite (1) 220:14 split (1) 200:15 Splitting (2) 226:2,3 spoke (4) 5:3;71:6;77:19;220:15 spoken (2) 100:18;223:21 sports (1) 205:12 spot (2) 80:3;90:11 spouse (4) 43:6;66:4,5;188:18 spreadsheet (2) 52:7;88:15;147:2; 170:17;209:16,22 Square (1) 58:12 St (1) 180:9 stability (1) 224:8 stamp (4) 180:9 stamps (4) 201:15,23,25,25 stand (3) 93:18;169:23;219:22 standard (3) 164:4,14;210:8 standards (1) 136:24 standing (2) 9:21;105:12 Stanley (1) 4:3 Stapp (8) 11:20;12:3,7;14:13; 18:8;26:22;27:4,9 start (12) 16:24;17:23;18:11; 21:20;24:17;25:9;48:11; 140:9;160:23;161:2; 225:19;227:5 started (5) 28:24;154:14;165:25; 185:5;213:1 starting (2) 51:16;91:8 starts (4) 24:2;42:19;57:10; 90:22 State (14) 8:5;9:14;81:4;89:17; 94:18;101:19;112:15; 132:8,24;136:2;144:6; 179:17;209:22;223:7 stated (1) 106:24 statement (14) 35:1;72:24;113:21; 127:12;133:23;151:2; 153:10;160:3,4;200,20, 22:21;14,20;230:4 statements (3) 69:15;111:3;128:23 States (12) 4:4,4;8:21;102:6,10; 103:8;105:4,6;116:11; 118:9;128:7;148:17 stating (1) 98:11 stationery (1) 195:18 status (2) 212:13;221:6 stay (6) 52:7;88:15;147:2; 164:19 stay-at-home (1) 164:19 steal (3) 182:1,8,11 stealing (1) 182:4 step (5) 4:24;13:14;84:19; 90:22 SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS (23) set - step",
|
||||
"text_blocks": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"type": "printed",
|
||||
"content": "Case 1:20-cf-00338-PAE Document 616 Filed 02/24/22 Page 96 of 130",
|
||||
"position": "header"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"type": "printed",
|
||||
"content": "UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v PAUL M. DAUGERDAS, ET AL.,",
|
||||
"position": "header"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"type": "printed",
|
||||
"content": "set (2) 13:19,20 sets (1) 132:25 setting (1) 73:22 seven (8) 74:14;172:2;190:5,5, 6,6;207:3;210:13 seventh (1) 12:4 several (4) 89:14;95:12;155:7; 203:23 severe (1) 94:17 severely (1) 239:7 shades (1) 120:16 Shambron (1) 169:24 Shanbrom (4) 169:23;219:11,13,17 share (2) 60:21;68:2 shared (6) 21:15,18;68:12,13,15; 77:6 sharing (1) 67:23 Sharon (1) 4:15 Shechtman (38) 4:19,19,21;7:4,9,14, 21,23;11:5;17:12;19:14; 81:25;82:3;84:4,5,21,22, 24:88;14,17,89:22;90:3; 94:12;95:22,24;96:4,21; 229:20,21,23;236:8; 237:21;239:19,20,25; 240:2,5,13 shed (1) 71:8 shelter (2) 154:1;166:1 shelters (3) 215:19;221:19;222:3 shield (1) 100:3 shock (1) 91:9 shocking (2) 173:10,25 shoplifting (3) 181:13,16;215:8 short (2) 53:19;239:21 show (4) 6:12;120:11;187:18, 21 showed (1) 143:3",
|
||||
"position": "body"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"type": "printed",
|
||||
"content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS (23) set - step",
|
||||
"position": "footer"
|
||||
}
|
||||
],
|
||||
"entities": {
|
||||
"people": [
|
||||
"PAUL M. DAUGERDAS",
|
||||
"Shechtman",
|
||||
"Shambron",
|
||||
"Shanbrom",
|
||||
"Sharon",
|
||||
"Sklansky",
|
||||
"Stapp"
|
||||
],
|
||||
"organizations": [
|
||||
"UNITED STATES OF AMERICA",
|
||||
"SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS"
|
||||
],
|
||||
"locations": [],
|
||||
"dates": [
|
||||
"February 15, 2012",
|
||||
"02/24/22"
|
||||
],
|
||||
"reference_numbers": [
|
||||
"Case 1:20-cf-00338-PAE",
|
||||
"Document 616",
|
||||
"A-5694"
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
"additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript or legal document. The text is mostly printed, with no handwritten content or stamps visible. The document is well-formatted and easy to read."
|
||||
}
|
||||
68
results/IMAGES004/DOJ-OGR-00010360.json
Normal file
68
results/IMAGES004/DOJ-OGR-00010360.json
Normal file
@ -0,0 +1,68 @@
|
||||
{
|
||||
"document_metadata": {
|
||||
"page_number": "37",
|
||||
"document_number": "653",
|
||||
"date": "04/01/22",
|
||||
"document_type": "court document",
|
||||
"has_handwriting": false,
|
||||
"has_stamps": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
"full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 653 Filed 04/01/22 Page 37 of 40\n\nwould prevent him from being fair or impartial. As discussed above, the minor discrepancies raised by the Defendant do not alter this assessment.9\n\nNor was Juror 50's inaccurate answer to Question 25 unreasonable. He testified that he understood the question to ask whether he \"was robbed or mugged or some sort of crime like that,\" and that he did not think of his history of \"sexual abuse as being a victim of a crime.\" Hearing Tr. at 10. Because neither he nor a friend or family member had been robbed or mugged or been the victim of a similar type of crime, he testified, he answered \"No\" to Question 25. That interpretation of what it means to be a victim of a crime, while technically incorrect, does not evince intentional deception or partiality. Cf. United States v. Fell, No. 2:01-CR-12, 2014 WL 3697810, at *7, *13 (D. Vt. July 24, 2014) (crediting the explanation of a juror that was sexually abused as a child that she \"ha[d] not considered [herself] a victim of a crime in all these years\" in part because the abuser was \"not convicted of any crime\"); McDonough, 464 U.S at 555 (\"[J]urors are not necessarily experts in English usage. Called as they are from all walks of life, many may be uncertain as to the meaning of terms which are relatively easily understood by lawyers and judges.\"). Evidently, other prospective jurors similarly interpreted Question 25 to not refer to uncharged incidents of sexual abuse. For example, Juror C disclosed being \"redacted,\" in response to Question 48, but in response to Question 25, reported only that a family member was mugged. See Juror C Questionnaire.\n\nIn sum, the Court concludes that Juror 50 is not impliedly or inferably biased.\n\n9 The Defendant also notes that Juror 50 apparently posted on social media about attending therapy to help \"deal[] with the stress of the [Maxwell] case.\" Maxwell Post-Hearing Br. at 9; see also Maxwell Br. at 20. It is perfectly reasonable for a juror to go to therapy and use of such services does not disqualify a citizen from service. In fact, courts in this district routinely make counseling services available to jurors following the completion of a trial.",
|
||||
"text_blocks": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"type": "printed",
|
||||
"content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 653 Filed 04/01/22 Page 37 of 40",
|
||||
"position": "header"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"type": "printed",
|
||||
"content": "would prevent him from being fair or impartial. As discussed above, the minor discrepancies raised by the Defendant do not alter this assessment.9",
|
||||
"position": "top"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"type": "printed",
|
||||
"content": "Nor was Juror 50's inaccurate answer to Question 25 unreasonable. He testified that he understood the question to ask whether he \"was robbed or mugged or some sort of crime like that,\" and that he did not think of his history of \"sexual abuse as being a victim of a crime.\" Hearing Tr. at 10. Because neither he nor a friend or family member had been robbed or mugged or been the victim of a similar type of crime, he testified, he answered \"No\" to Question 25. That interpretation of what it means to be a victim of a crime, while technically incorrect, does not evince intentional deception or partiality. Cf. United States v. Fell, No. 2:01-CR-12, 2014 WL 3697810, at *7, *13 (D. Vt. July 24, 2014) (crediting the explanation of a juror that was sexually abused as a child that she \"ha[d] not considered [herself] a victim of a crime in all these years\" in part because the abuser was \"not convicted of any crime\"); McDonough, 464 U.S at 555 (\"[J]urors are not necessarily experts in English usage. Called as they are from all walks of life, many may be uncertain as to the meaning of terms which are relatively easily understood by lawyers and judges.\"). Evidently, other prospective jurors similarly interpreted Question 25 to not refer to uncharged incidents of sexual abuse. For example, Juror C disclosed being \"redacted,\" in response to Question 48, but in response to Question 25, reported only that a family member was mugged. See Juror C Questionnaire.",
|
||||
"position": "middle"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"type": "printed",
|
||||
"content": "In sum, the Court concludes that Juror 50 is not impliedly or inferably biased.",
|
||||
"position": "middle"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"type": "printed",
|
||||
"content": "9 The Defendant also notes that Juror 50 apparently posted on social media about attending therapy to help \"deal[] with the stress of the [Maxwell] case.\" Maxwell Post-Hearing Br. at 9; see also Maxwell Br. at 20. It is perfectly reasonable for a juror to go to therapy and use of such services does not disqualify a citizen from service. In fact, courts in this district routinely make counseling services available to jurors following the completion of a trial.",
|
||||
"position": "bottom"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"type": "printed",
|
||||
"content": "DOJ-OGR-00010360",
|
||||
"position": "footer"
|
||||
}
|
||||
],
|
||||
"entities": {
|
||||
"people": [
|
||||
"Juror 50",
|
||||
"Juror C",
|
||||
"Maxwell"
|
||||
],
|
||||
"organizations": [
|
||||
"Court",
|
||||
"Defendant"
|
||||
],
|
||||
"locations": [
|
||||
"D. Vt."
|
||||
],
|
||||
"dates": [
|
||||
"July 24, 2014",
|
||||
"04/01/22"
|
||||
],
|
||||
"reference_numbers": [
|
||||
"1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
|
||||
"653",
|
||||
"2:01-CR-12",
|
||||
"2014 WL 3697810"
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
"additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript or legal brief. The text is mostly printed, with no handwritten content or stamps visible. The document quality is clear and legible."
|
||||
}
|
||||
106
results/IMAGES006/DOJ-OGR-00015822.json
Normal file
106
results/IMAGES006/DOJ-OGR-00015822.json
Normal file
@ -0,0 +1,106 @@
|
||||
{
|
||||
"document_metadata": {
|
||||
"page_number": "25",
|
||||
"document_number": "DOJ-OGR-00015822",
|
||||
"date": "1943-11",
|
||||
"document_type": "Pilot's Flight Log",
|
||||
"has_handwriting": true,
|
||||
"has_stamps": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
"full_text": "DATE 1943 NOV AIRCRAFT MAKE AND MODEL AIRCRAFT IDENTIFICATION MARK POINTS OF DEPARTURE & ARRIVAL FROM TO MILES FLOWN FLT. NO. REMARKS, PROCEDURES, MANEUVERS, ENDORSEMENTS NO. Ldg. AIRPLANE COMPLEX TURE AIRCRAFT CATEGORY 26 HS125-1a2 N908K BGS-CMH-M19-PBI 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 PAGE TOTAL 16 AMT. FORWARD 5447 5447 5447 5447 TOTAL TO DATE 2563 2563 2563 2563 I certify that the statements made by me on this form are true. PILOT'S SIGNATURE",
|
||||
"text_blocks": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"type": "printed",
|
||||
"content": "DATE 1943 NOV AIRCRAFT MAKE AND MODEL AIRCRAFT IDENTIFICATION MARK POINTS OF DEPARTURE & ARRIVAL FROM TO MILES FLOWN FLT. NO. REMARKS, PROCEDURES, MANEUVERS, ENDORSEMENTS NO. Ldg. AIRPLANE COMPLEX TURE AIRCRAFT CATEGORY",
|
||||
"position": "header"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"type": "handwritten",
|
||||
"content": "26 HS125-1a2 N908K BGS-CMH-M19-PBI 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461",
|
||||
"position": "body"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"type": "handwritten",
|
||||
"content": "I certify that the statements made by me on this form are true. PILOT'S SIGNATURE",
|
||||
"position": "footer"
|
||||
}
|
||||
],
|
||||
"entities": {
|
||||
"people": [],
|
||||
"organizations": [],
|
||||
"locations": [
|
||||
"BGS",
|
||||
"CMH",
|
||||
"M19",
|
||||
"PBI",
|
||||
"IAD",
|
||||
"TGB",
|
||||
"EWR",
|
||||
"SAL",
|
||||
"DCA",
|
||||
"ASC",
|
||||
"MMZ",
|
||||
"BED",
|
||||
"OFA",
|
||||
"SFF",
|
||||
"TPA"
|
||||
],
|
||||
"dates": [
|
||||
"1943-11-26",
|
||||
"1943-11-04",
|
||||
"1943-11-05",
|
||||
"1943-11-06",
|
||||
"1943-11-08",
|
||||
"1943-11-16",
|
||||
"1943-11-17",
|
||||
"1943-11-20",
|
||||
"1943-11-24",
|
||||
"1943-11-30",
|
||||
"1944-01-02",
|
||||
"1944-01-06",
|
||||
"1944-01-08",
|
||||
"1944-01-15",
|
||||
"1944-01-16",
|
||||
"1944-01-18",
|
||||
"1944-01-20",
|
||||
"1944-01-23"
|
||||
],
|
||||
"reference_numbers": [
|
||||
"N908K",
|
||||
"HS125-1a2",
|
||||
"430",
|
||||
"431",
|
||||
"432",
|
||||
"433",
|
||||
"434",
|
||||
"435",
|
||||
"436",
|
||||
"437",
|
||||
"438",
|
||||
"439",
|
||||
"440",
|
||||
"441",
|
||||
"442",
|
||||
"443",
|
||||
"444",
|
||||
"445",
|
||||
"446",
|
||||
"447",
|
||||
"448",
|
||||
"449",
|
||||
"450",
|
||||
"451",
|
||||
"452",
|
||||
"453",
|
||||
"454",
|
||||
"455",
|
||||
"456",
|
||||
"457",
|
||||
"458",
|
||||
"459",
|
||||
"460",
|
||||
"461"
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
"additional_notes": "The document is a pilot's flight log from November 1943 to January 1944. The log contains handwritten entries detailing flight information, including dates, aircraft make and model, identification marks, points of departure and arrival, miles flown, and flight numbers. The document has been partially redacted with a black box covering the 'REMARKS, PROCEDURES, MANEUVERS, ENDORSEMENTS' section. The pilot has signed the document at the bottom."
|
||||
}
|
||||
67
results/IMAGES006/DOJ-OGR-00015825.json
Normal file
67
results/IMAGES006/DOJ-OGR-00015825.json
Normal file
@ -0,0 +1,67 @@
|
||||
{
|
||||
"document_metadata": {
|
||||
"page_number": "28",
|
||||
"document_number": "DOJ-OGR-00015825",
|
||||
"date": "1994 APR 10-30",
|
||||
"document_type": "Pilot's Flight Log",
|
||||
"has_handwriting": true,
|
||||
"has_stamps": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
"full_text": "DATE 1994 APR 10-30 | AIRCRAFT MAKE AND MODEL Cessna 172 | AIRCRAFT IDENTIFICATION MARK N9853K | POINTS OF DEPARTURE & ARRIVAL | MILES FLOWN | FLT. NO. | REMARKS, PROCEDURES, MANEUVERS, ENDORSEMENTS | AIRCRAFT CATEGORY | NO. LDG. | DAY/NIGHT | COMPLEX | TURBINE\n10-30 APR | Cessna 172 | N9853K | MOW | PBI | 523 | 523 | | | 16 | 0 | 160 | 16\n26 | HS125-700 | \" | PBE | MOW | 524 | 524 | | | 25 | 2 | 25 | 2\n30 | \" | \" | MOW | TEB | 525 | 525 | | | 27 | 2 | 27 | 2\n31 | \" | \" | TEB | SAF | 526 | 526 | | | 16 | 1 | 16 | 1\nMAY 2 | \" | \" | SAF | PBE | 527 | 527 | | | 45 | 4 | 45 | 4\n3 | \" | \" | PBE | TEB | 528 | 528 | | | 36 | 3 | 36 | 3\n5 | \" | \" | TEB | DCA | 529 | 529 | | | 25 | 2 | 25 | 2\n7 | \" | \" | DCA | TEB | 530 | 530 | | | 7 | | 7 | \n7 | \" | \" | TEB | BOS | 531 | | | | 8 | | 8 | \n8 | \" | \" | BOS | TEB | 532 | | | | 6 | | 6 | \n8 | \" | \" | TEB | CRS | 533 | | | | 6 | | 6 | \n10 | \" | \" | TEBCRS | Regus | 535 | | | | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1\n18 | \" | \" | CMH | SAV | 538 | | | | 14 | 1 | 14 | 1\n18 | \" | \" | SAV | PBI | 539 | | | | 10 | 1 | 10 | 1\n20 | \" | \" | PBI | TEB | 540 | | | | 27 | 2 | 27 | 2\n22 | \" | \" | TEB | PBE | 541 | | | | 25 | 2 | 25 | 2\n26 | \" | \" | PBI | TEB | 542 | | | | 24 | 2 | 24 | 2\nJUL 27 | \" | \" | PBI | TEB | 554 | | | | 25 | 2 | 25 | 2\nI certify that the statements made by me on this form are true.\nPILOT'S SIGNATURE David hidgins\nPAGE TOTAL | 497 | 497 | 49 | AMT. FORWARD 5451 | 6146 | 4515 | 12506 | TOTAL TO DATE 5183 | 6196 | 4564 | 32506",
|
||||
"text_blocks": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"type": "printed",
|
||||
"content": "DATE 1994 APR 10-30 | AIRCRAFT MAKE AND MODEL | AIRCRAFT IDENTIFICATION MARK | POINTS OF DEPARTURE & ARRIVAL | MILES FLOWN | FLT. NO. | REMARKS, PROCEDURES, MANEUVERS, ENDORSEMENTS | AIRCRAFT CATEGORY | NO. LDG. | DAY/NIGHT | COMPLEX | TURBINE",
|
||||
"position": "header"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"type": "handwritten",
|
||||
"content": "Cessna 172 | N9853K | MOW | PBI | 523 | 523 | | | 16 | 0 | 160 | 16",
|
||||
"position": "body"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"type": "handwritten",
|
||||
"content": "David hidgins",
|
||||
"position": "footer"
|
||||
}
|
||||
],
|
||||
"entities": {
|
||||
"people": [
|
||||
"David hidgins"
|
||||
],
|
||||
"organizations": [],
|
||||
"locations": [
|
||||
"MOW",
|
||||
"PBI",
|
||||
"PBE",
|
||||
"TEB",
|
||||
"SAF",
|
||||
"DCA",
|
||||
"BOS",
|
||||
"CRS",
|
||||
"CMH",
|
||||
"SAV"
|
||||
],
|
||||
"dates": [
|
||||
"1994 APR 10-30",
|
||||
"APR 26",
|
||||
"APR 30",
|
||||
"MAY 2",
|
||||
"MAY 3",
|
||||
"MAY 5",
|
||||
"MAY 7",
|
||||
"MAY 8",
|
||||
"MAY 10",
|
||||
"MAY 18",
|
||||
"MAY 20",
|
||||
"MAY 22",
|
||||
"MAY 26",
|
||||
"JUL 27"
|
||||
],
|
||||
"reference_numbers": [
|
||||
"N9853K",
|
||||
"DOJ-OGR-00015825"
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
"additional_notes": "The document is a pilot's flight log with handwritten entries. The log includes details such as aircraft make and model, identification mark, points of departure and arrival, miles flown, and flight numbers. The document is signed by the pilot, David hidgins."
|
||||
}
|
||||
51
results/IMAGES007/DOJ-OGR-00019411.json
Normal file
51
results/IMAGES007/DOJ-OGR-00019411.json
Normal file
@ -0,0 +1,51 @@
|
||||
{
|
||||
"document_metadata": {
|
||||
"page_number": "12",
|
||||
"document_number": "60",
|
||||
"date": "09/24/2020",
|
||||
"document_type": "court document",
|
||||
"has_handwriting": false,
|
||||
"has_stamps": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
"full_text": "Case 20-3061, Document 60, 09/24/2020, 2938278, Page12 of 58\nMs. Maxwell asked Judge Preska to briefly stay the\n7\nDOJ-OGR-00019411",
|
||||
"text_blocks": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"type": "printed",
|
||||
"content": "Case 20-3061, Document 60, 09/24/2020, 2938278, Page12 of 58",
|
||||
"position": "header"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"type": "printed",
|
||||
"content": "Ms. Maxwell asked Judge Preska to briefly stay the",
|
||||
"position": "middle"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"type": "printed",
|
||||
"content": "7",
|
||||
"position": "middle"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"type": "printed",
|
||||
"content": "DOJ-OGR-00019411",
|
||||
"position": "footer"
|
||||
}
|
||||
],
|
||||
"entities": {
|
||||
"people": [
|
||||
"Maxwell",
|
||||
"Preska"
|
||||
],
|
||||
"organizations": [],
|
||||
"locations": [],
|
||||
"dates": [
|
||||
"09/24/2020"
|
||||
],
|
||||
"reference_numbers": [
|
||||
"20-3061",
|
||||
"60",
|
||||
"2938278",
|
||||
"DOJ-OGR-00019411"
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
"additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript with redactions."
|
||||
}
|
||||
69
results/IMAGES007/DOJ-OGR-00019725.json
Normal file
69
results/IMAGES007/DOJ-OGR-00019725.json
Normal file
File diff suppressed because one or more lines are too long
77
results/IMAGES007/DOJ-OGR-00019729.json
Normal file
77
results/IMAGES007/DOJ-OGR-00019729.json
Normal file
@ -0,0 +1,77 @@
|
||||
{
|
||||
"document_metadata": {
|
||||
"page_number": "14",
|
||||
"document_number": "3-2",
|
||||
"date": "01/12/2021",
|
||||
"document_type": "Court Document",
|
||||
"has_handwriting": false,
|
||||
"has_stamps": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
"full_text": "Case 21-58, Document 3-2, 01/12/2021, 3011691, Page14 of 20\n\n| 11/06/2020 | 69 | LETTER by USA as to Ghislaine Maxwell addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan from AUSAs Maurene Comey, Alison Moe, and Lara Pomerantz dated November 6, 2020 re: Request to Extend Discovery Deadline for Portion of Electronic Discovery Document filed by USA. (Comey, Maurene) (Entered: 11/06/2020)\n| 11/06/2020 | 70 | AFFIDAVIT of Maurene Comey by USA as to Ghislaine Maxwell. (Comey, Maurene) (Entered: 11/06/2020)\n| 11/09/2020 | 71 | MANDATE of USCA (Certified Copy) as to Ghislaine Maxwell re: 55 Notice of Appeal. USCA Case Number 20-3061-cr. UPON DUE CONSIDERATION WHEREOF, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the motion to consolidate is DENIED and the appeal is DISMISSED for want of jurisdiction.. Catherine O'Hagan Wolfe, Clerk USCA for the Second Circuit. Issued As Mandate: 11/09/2020. (nd) (Entered: 11/09/2020)\n| 11/09/2020 | 72 | MEMO ENDORSEMENT as to Ghislaine Maxwell on 69 LETTER by USA as to Ghislaine Maxwell addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan from AUSAs Maurene Comey, Alison Moe, and Lara Pomerantz dated November 6, 2020 re: Request to Extend Discovery Deadline for Portion of Electronic Discovery. ENDORSEMENT: The Court hereby extends the deadline for the Government's production of electronic discovery from November 9, 2020 to November 23, 2020. The Court also grants parties' request for an extension of the motions deadlines as follows: the Defendant's motions are due by January 11, 2021, the Government's responses are due by February 12, 2021, and any replies are due by February 19, 2021. SO ORDERED. (Discovery due by 11/23/2020. Motions due by 1/11/2021. Responses due by 2/12/2021. Replies due by 2/19/2021.) (Signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan on 11/9/2020) (Inl) (Entered: 11/10/2020)\n| 11/18/2020 | 73 | MEMO ENDORSEMENT as to Ghislaine Maxwell on re: 70 Letter filed by USA as the Government's request to delay disclosure of these Materials...ENDORSEMENT...There is no dispute that the materials referenced in the Government's letter will be turned over to the defense. The Government has indicated that it will do so. The only dispute, then, relates to the timing of such disclosure. See Dkt. Nos. 64, 65. Because the Government has articulated plausible reasons for some delay of disclosure, see Dkt. No. 65 at 4, the Court grants the Government's request to delay disclosure. However, the Governments proposal to delay disclosure until 8 weeks in advance of trial is insufficient. In order to ensure that the defense can adequately prepare for trial, the Government shall produce the referenced materials, which are not voluminous, to the defense by March 12, 2021. Disclosure of the materials will of course be subject to the protective order entered by the Court, see Dkt. No. 36. (Government Responses due by 3/12/2021) (Signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan on 11/18/20)(jw) (Entered: 11/18/2020)\n| 11/23/2020 | 74 | LETTER by USA as to Ghislaine Maxwell addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan from AUSAs Maurene Comey, Alison Moe, and Lara Pomerantz dated November 23, 2020 re: Update Regarding Conditions of Confinement Document filed by USA. (Comey, Maurene) (Entered: 11/23/2020)\n| 11/24/2020 | 75 | LETTER by Ghislaine Maxwell addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan from Bobbi C. Sternheim dated 11/24/2020 re: Response to 90-day MDC conditions report (Sternheim, Bobbi) (Entered: 11/24/2020)\n| 11/24/2020 | 76 | MEMO ENDORSEMENT as to Ghislaine Maxwell on re: 75 LETTER by Ghislaine Maxwell addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan from Bobbi C. Sternheim dated 11/24/2020 re: Response to 90-day MDC conditions report. ENDORSEMENT: The parties are hereby ORDERED to meet and confer regarding Defendant's request that Warden Heriberto Tellez directly address Defendant's concerns regarding the conditions of her detention. The parties shall jointly submit a status update within one week of this Order. (Signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan on 11/24/2020) (ap) (Entered: 11/24/2020)\n| 12/01/2020 | 77 | ORDER as to Ghislaine Maxwell. On November 25, 2020, the Defendant filed a letter request under seal. On November 30, 2020, she filed a second letter request in which she proposed redactions on both letters. The Government is hereby ORDERED to respond to the Defendant's November 25, 2020 letter request and to the request for proposed redactions by no later than December 2, 2020. The letters shall be...\n\nDOJ-OGR-00019729",
|
||||
"text_blocks": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"type": "printed",
|
||||
"content": "Case 21-58, Document 3-2, 01/12/2021, 3011691, Page14 of 20",
|
||||
"position": "header"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"type": "printed",
|
||||
"content": "The table containing court documents and their descriptions",
|
||||
"position": "main"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"type": "printed",
|
||||
"content": "DOJ-OGR-00019729",
|
||||
"position": "footer"
|
||||
}
|
||||
],
|
||||
"entities": {
|
||||
"people": [
|
||||
"Ghislaine Maxwell",
|
||||
"Alison J. Nathan",
|
||||
"Maurene Comey",
|
||||
"Alison Moe",
|
||||
"Lara Pomerantz",
|
||||
"Bobbi C. Sternheim",
|
||||
"Catherine O'Hagan Wolfe",
|
||||
"Heriberto Tellez"
|
||||
],
|
||||
"organizations": [
|
||||
"USA",
|
||||
"USCA",
|
||||
"MDC"
|
||||
],
|
||||
"locations": [],
|
||||
"dates": [
|
||||
"11/06/2020",
|
||||
"11/09/2020",
|
||||
"11/18/2020",
|
||||
"11/23/2020",
|
||||
"11/24/2020",
|
||||
"12/01/2020",
|
||||
"01/11/2021",
|
||||
"02/12/2021",
|
||||
"02/19/2021",
|
||||
"03/12/2021"
|
||||
],
|
||||
"reference_numbers": [
|
||||
"20-3061-cr",
|
||||
"55",
|
||||
"64",
|
||||
"65",
|
||||
"36",
|
||||
"69",
|
||||
"70",
|
||||
"71",
|
||||
"72",
|
||||
"73",
|
||||
"74",
|
||||
"75",
|
||||
"76",
|
||||
"77",
|
||||
"3-2",
|
||||
"3011691"
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
"additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court docket sheet from a case involving Ghislaine Maxwell. The entries are mostly printed and detail various filings and court actions. There are no visible redactions or damage to the document."
|
||||
}
|
||||
101
results/IMAGES007/DOJ-OGR-00019732.json
Normal file
101
results/IMAGES007/DOJ-OGR-00019732.json
Normal file
@ -0,0 +1,101 @@
|
||||
{
|
||||
"document_metadata": {
|
||||
"page_number": "17",
|
||||
"document_number": "3-2",
|
||||
"date": "01/12/2021",
|
||||
"document_type": "Court Document",
|
||||
"has_handwriting": false,
|
||||
"has_stamps": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
"full_text": "Case 21-58, Document 3-2, 01/12/2021, 3011691, Page17 of 20 necessary steps to ensure that the Defendant continues to receive adequate access to her legal materials and her ability to communicate with defense counsel. (Signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan on 12/8/2020) (ap) (Entered: 12/08/2020) 12/10/2020 93 TRANSCRIPT of Proceedings as to Ghislaine Maxwell re: Conference held on 7/14/2020 before Judge Alison J. Nathan. Court Reporter/Transcriber: Kristen Carannante, (212) 805-0300, Transcript may be viewed at the court public terminal or purchased through the Court Reporter/Transcriber before the deadline for Release of Transcript Restriction. After that date it may be obtained through PACER. Redaction Request due 12/31/2020. Redacted Transcript Deadline set for 1/11/2021. Release of Transcript Restriction set for 3/10/2021. (McGuirk, Kelly) (Entered: 12/10/2020) 12/10/2020 94 NOTICE OF FILING OF OFFICIAL TRANSCRIPT as to Ghislaine Maxwell. Notice is hereby given that an official transcript of a Conference proceeding held on 7/14/2020 has been filed by the court reporter/transcriber in the above-captioned matter. The parties have seven (7) calendar days to file with the court a Notice of Intent to Request Redaction of this transcript. If no such Notice is filed, the transcript may be made remotely electronically available to the public without redaction after 90 calendar days.... (McGuirk, Kelly) (Entered: 12/10/2020) 12/14/2020 95 ORDER as to Ghislaine Maxwell: On December 8, 2020, Defendant Ghislaine Maxwell filed her renewed application for bail under seal with proposed redactions, in accordance with this Court's December 7, 2020 Order, see Dkt. No. 89. The Government did not file any opposition to the Defendant's proposed redactions. After due consideration, the Court will adopt the Defendant's proposed redactions. The Court's decision to adopt those redactions is guided by the three-part test articulated by the Second Circuit in Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of Onondaga, 435 F.3d 110 (2d Cir. 2006). Under this test, the Court must: (i) determine whether the documents in question are \"judicial documents;\" (ii) assess the weight of the common law presumption of access to the materials; and (iii) balance competing considerations against the presumption of access. Id. at 11920. \"Such countervailing factors include but are not limited to the danger of impairing law enforcement or judicial efficiency' and 'the privacy interests of those resisting disclosure.'\" Id. at 120 (quoting United States v. Amodeo, 71 F.3d 1044, 1048 (2d Cir.1995) (\"Amodeo II\")). The proposed redactions satisfy this test. The Court finds that Defendant's letter motions are \"relevant to the performance of the judicial function and useful in the judicial process,' thereby qualifying as a \"judicial document\" for purposes of the first element of the Lugosch test. United States v. Amodeo (\"Amodeo I\"), 44 F.3d 141, 145 (2d Cir. 1995). And the Court also finds that the common law presumption of access attaches. Id. at 146; see also Nixon v. Warner Commc'ns, Inc., 435 U.S. 589, 602 (1978). Nevertheless, in balancing competing considerations against the presumption of access, the Court finds that the redactions are narrowly tailored to properly guard the privacy interests of the individuals referenced in the Defendant's submission and in the corresponding exhibits The Defendant is hereby ORDERED to docket the redacted documents and corresponding exhibits dated 12/14/2020) (ap) (Entered: 12/14/2020) 12/14/2020 96 LETTER by Ghislaine Maxwell addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan from Christian R. Everdell dated December 8, 2020 re: Cover Letter for Renewed Bail Application (Everdell, Christian) (Entered: 12/14/2020) 12/14/2020 97 MEMORANDUM OF LAW in Support by Ghislaine Maxwell re: Renewed Motion for Bail. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B, # 3 Exhibit C, # 4 Exhibit D, # 5 Exhibit E, # 6 Exhibit F, # 7 Exhibit G, # 8 Exhibit H, # 9 Exhibit I, # 10 Exhibit J, # 11 Exhibit K, # 12 Exhibit L, # 13 Exhibit M, # 14 Exhibit N, # 15 Exhibit O, # 16 Exhibit P, # 17 Exhibit Q, # 18 Exhibit R, # 19 Exhibit S, # 20 Exhibit T, # 21 Exhibit U, # 22 Exhibit V, # 23 Exhibit W, # 24 Exhibit X)(Everdell, Christian) (Entered: 12/14/2020) 12/17/2020 98 NOTICE OF ATTORNEY APPEARANCE Andrew Rohrbach appearing for USA. (Rohrbach, Andrew) (Entered: 12/17/2020) 12/18/2020 99 ORDER as to Ghislaine Maxwell: On December 16, 2020, the Government filed its opposition to Defendant Ghislaine Maxwell's renewed application for bail. In accordance with this Court's December 7, 2020 Order, see Dkt. No. 89, the Government filed its materials under seal and proposed narrowly tailored redactions on DOJ-OGR-00019732",
|
||||
"text_blocks": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"type": "printed",
|
||||
"content": "Case 21-58, Document 3-2, 01/12/2021, 3011691, Page17 of 20",
|
||||
"position": "header"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"type": "printed",
|
||||
"content": "necessary steps to ensure that the Defendant continues to receive adequate access to her legal materials and her ability to communicate with defense counsel. (Signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan on 12/8/2020) (ap) (Entered: 12/08/2020)",
|
||||
"position": "top"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"type": "printed",
|
||||
"content": "12/10/2020 93 TRANSCRIPT of Proceedings as to Ghislaine Maxwell re: Conference held on 7/14/2020 before Judge Alison J. Nathan. Court Reporter/Transcriber: Kristen Carannante, (212) 805-0300, Transcript may be viewed at the court public terminal or purchased through the Court Reporter/Transcriber before the deadline for Release of Transcript Restriction. After that date it may be obtained through PACER. Redaction Request due 12/31/2020. Redacted Transcript Deadline set for 1/11/2021. Release of Transcript Restriction set for 3/10/2021. (McGuirk, Kelly) (Entered: 12/10/2020)",
|
||||
"position": "middle"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"type": "printed",
|
||||
"content": "12/10/2020 94 NOTICE OF FILING OF OFFICIAL TRANSCRIPT as to Ghislaine Maxwell. Notice is hereby given that an official transcript of a Conference proceeding held on 7/14/2020 has been filed by the court reporter/transcriber in the above-captioned matter. The parties have seven (7) calendar days to file with the court a Notice of Intent to Request Redaction of this transcript. If no such Notice is filed, the transcript may be made remotely electronically available to the public without redaction after 90 calendar days.... (McGuirk, Kelly) (Entered: 12/10/2020)",
|
||||
"position": "middle"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"type": "printed",
|
||||
"content": "12/14/2020 95 ORDER as to Ghislaine Maxwell: On December 8, 2020, Defendant Ghislaine Maxwell filed her renewed application for bail under seal with proposed redactions, in accordance with this Court's December 7, 2020 Order, see Dkt. No. 89. The Government did not file any opposition to the Defendant's proposed redactions. After due consideration, the Court will adopt the Defendant's proposed redactions. The Court's decision to adopt those redactions is guided by the three-part test articulated by the Second Circuit in Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of Onondaga, 435 F.3d 110 (2d Cir. 2006). Under this test, the Court must: (i) determine whether the documents in question are \"judicial documents;\" (ii) assess the weight of the common law presumption of access to the materials; and (iii) balance competing considerations against the presumption of access. Id. at 11920. \"Such countervailing factors include but are not limited to the danger of impairing law enforcement or judicial efficiency' and 'the privacy interests of those resisting disclosure.'\" Id. at 120 (quoting United States v. Amodeo, 71 F.3d 1044, 1048 (2d Cir.1995) (\"Amodeo II\")). The proposed redactions satisfy this test. The Court finds that Defendant's letter motions are \"relevant to the performance of the judicial function and useful in the judicial process,' thereby qualifying as a \"judicial document\" for purposes of the first element of the Lugosch test. United States v. Amodeo (\"Amodeo I\"), 44 F.3d 141, 145 (2d Cir. 1995). And the Court also finds that the common law presumption of access attaches. Id. at 146; see also Nixon v. Warner Commc'ns, Inc., 435 U.S. 589, 602 (1978). Nevertheless, in balancing competing considerations against the presumption of access, the Court finds that the redactions are narrowly tailored to properly guard the privacy interests of the individuals referenced in the Defendant's submission and in the corresponding exhibits The Defendant is hereby ORDERED to docket the redacted documents and corresponding exhibits dated 12/14/2020) (ap) (Entered: 12/14/2020)",
|
||||
"position": "middle"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"type": "printed",
|
||||
"content": "12/14/2020 96 LETTER by Ghislaine Maxwell addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan from Christian R. Everdell dated December 8, 2020 re: Cover Letter for Renewed Bail Application (Everdell, Christian) (Entered: 12/14/2020)",
|
||||
"position": "middle"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"type": "printed",
|
||||
"content": "12/14/2020 97 MEMORANDUM OF LAW in Support by Ghislaine Maxwell re: Renewed Motion for Bail. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B, # 3 Exhibit C, # 4 Exhibit D, # 5 Exhibit E, # 6 Exhibit F, # 7 Exhibit G, # 8 Exhibit H, # 9 Exhibit I, # 10 Exhibit J, # 11 Exhibit K, # 12 Exhibit L, # 13 Exhibit M, # 14 Exhibit N, # 15 Exhibit O, # 16 Exhibit P, # 17 Exhibit Q, # 18 Exhibit R, # 19 Exhibit S, # 20 Exhibit T, # 21 Exhibit U, # 22 Exhibit V, # 23 Exhibit W, # 24 Exhibit X)(Everdell, Christian) (Entered: 12/14/2020)",
|
||||
"position": "middle"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"type": "printed",
|
||||
"content": "12/17/2020 98 NOTICE OF ATTORNEY APPEARANCE Andrew Rohrbach appearing for USA. (Rohrbach, Andrew) (Entered: 12/17/2020)",
|
||||
"position": "middle"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"type": "printed",
|
||||
"content": "12/18/2020 99 ORDER as to Ghislaine Maxwell: On December 16, 2020, the Government filed its opposition to Defendant Ghislaine Maxwell's renewed application for bail. In accordance with this Court's December 7, 2020 Order, see Dkt. No. 89, the Government filed its materials under seal and proposed narrowly tailored redactions on DOJ-OGR-00019732",
|
||||
"position": "bottom"
|
||||
}
|
||||
],
|
||||
"entities": {
|
||||
"people": [
|
||||
"Ghislaine Maxwell",
|
||||
"Alison J. Nathan",
|
||||
"Kristen Carannante",
|
||||
"Kelly McGuirk",
|
||||
"Christian R. Everdell",
|
||||
"Andrew Rohrbach"
|
||||
],
|
||||
"organizations": [
|
||||
"USA"
|
||||
],
|
||||
"locations": [],
|
||||
"dates": [
|
||||
"01/12/2021",
|
||||
"12/10/2020",
|
||||
"7/14/2020",
|
||||
"12/8/2020",
|
||||
"12/31/2020",
|
||||
"1/11/2021",
|
||||
"3/10/2021",
|
||||
"12/14/2020",
|
||||
"12/7/2020",
|
||||
"12/16/2020",
|
||||
"12/17/2020",
|
||||
"12/18/2020"
|
||||
],
|
||||
"reference_numbers": [
|
||||
"3011691",
|
||||
"Case 21-58",
|
||||
"Document 3-2",
|
||||
"93",
|
||||
"94",
|
||||
"95",
|
||||
"96",
|
||||
"97",
|
||||
"98",
|
||||
"99",
|
||||
"Dkt. No. 89",
|
||||
"DOJ-OGR-00019732"
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
"additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court docket sheet with various entries related to the case of Ghislaine Maxwell. The entries include transcripts, notices, orders, and other documents filed with the court. The document is well-formatted and easy to read."
|
||||
}
|
||||
130
results/IMAGES007/DOJ-OGR-00019734.json
Normal file
130
results/IMAGES007/DOJ-OGR-00019734.json
Normal file
@ -0,0 +1,130 @@
|
||||
{
|
||||
"document_metadata": {
|
||||
"page_number": "19 of 20",
|
||||
"document_number": "3-2",
|
||||
"date": "01/12/2021",
|
||||
"document_type": "Court Document",
|
||||
"has_handwriting": false,
|
||||
"has_stamps": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
"full_text": "Case 21-58, Document 3-2, 01/12/2021, 3011691, Page19 of 20\n\nmotion. In light of the fact that the Opinion includes potentially confidential information that should not be filed on the public docket, the Court will permit the parties 48 hours to propose any redactions to the Courts Opinion and Order and to justify those redactions by reference to the Second Circuits decision in Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of Onondaga, 435 F.3d 110(2d Cir. 2006). After determining which, if any, portions of the Opinion and Order should be redacted, the Court will file the Opinion and Order on the public docket. As a result, the Court concludes that the Government has met its burden of persuasion that the Defendant poses a flight risk and that pretrial detention continues to be warranted. On or before December 30, 2020, the parties are ORDERED to submit a joint letter indicating whether they propose any redactions and the justification for any such proposal. This resolves Dkt No. 97. (Signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan on 12/28/20)(jw) (Entered: 12/28/2020)\n\n12/30/2020 105 LETTER by USA as to Ghislaine Maxwell addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan from AUSAs Maurene Comey, Alison Moe, and Lara Pomerantz dated December 30, 2020 re: Joint Letter re December 28, 2020 Opinion and Order Document filed by USA. (Comey, Maurene) (Entered: 12/30/2020)\n\n12/30/2020 106 OPINION AND ORDER as to Ghislaine Maxwell. Defendant Ghislaine Maxwell has been indicted by a grand jury on charges of conspiracy to entice minors to travel to engage in illegal sex acts, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 371; enticing a minor to travel to engage in illegal sex acts, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 2422 and 2; conspiracy to transport minors to participate in illegal sex acts, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 371; transporting minors to participate in illegal sex acts, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 2423 and 2; and two charges of perjury, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1623. The Court held a lengthy bail hearing on July 14, 2020. After extensive briefing and argument at the hearing, the Court concluded that the Defendant was a clear risk of flight and that no conditions or combination of conditions would ensure her appearance. Defendant Ghislaine Maxwells renewed motion for release on bail, Dkt. No. 97, is DENIED. (Signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan on 12/28/20)(jw) (Entered: 12/30/2020)\n\n12/31/2020 107 LETTER MOTION addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan from Christian R. Everdell dated December 31, 2020 re: Extension of Time . Document filed by Ghislaine Maxwell. (Everdell, Christian) (Entered: 12/31/2020)\n\n01/05/2021 108 MEMO ENDORSEMENT as to Ghislaine Maxwell (1) on 107 LETTER MOTION addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan from Christian R. Everdell dated December 31, 2020 re: Extension of Time. ENDORSEMENT: SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan on 1/5/2021) (ap) (Entered: 01/05/2021)\n\n01/05/2021 Set/Reset Deadlines as to Ghislaine Maxwell: Motions due by 1/25/2021. Responses due by 2/26/2021. Replies due by 3/5/2021. (ap) (Entered: 01/05/2021)\n\n01/08/2021 109 LETTER MOTION addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan from Christian R. Everdell dated January 8, 2021 re: Extension of Time to File Notice of Appeal . Document filed by Ghislaine Maxwell. (Everdell, Christian) (Entered: 01/08/2021)\n\n01/11/2021 110 SEALED DOCUMENT placed in vault. (jus) (Entered: 01/11/2021)\n\n01/11/2021 111 SEALED DOCUMENT placed in vault. (jus) (Entered: 01/11/2021)\n\n01/11/2021 112 MEMO ENDORSEMENT as to Ghislaine Maxwell (1) denying 109 LETTER MOTION addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan from Christian R. Everdell dated January 8, 2021 re: Extension of Time to File Notice of Appeal. ENDORSEMENT: The request is denied. Good cause for an extension of time to file a notice of appeal has not been provided. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan on 1/11/2021) (lnl) (Entered: 01/11/2021)\n\n01/11/2021 113 NOTICE OF APPEAL by Ghislaine Maxwell from 104 Order. (nd) (Entered: 01/12/2021)\n\n01/11/2021 Appeal Remark as to re: 113 Notice of Appeal by Ghislaine Maxwell. $505.00 Appeal filing fee due. (nd) (Entered: 01/12/2021)\n\n01/12/2021 Transmission of Notice of Appeal and Certified Copy of Docket Sheet as to Ghislaine Maxwell to US Court of Appeals re: 113 Notice of Appeal. (nd) (Entered: 01/12/2021)\n\nDOJ-OGR-00019734",
|
||||
"text_blocks": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"type": "printed",
|
||||
"content": "Case 21-58, Document 3-2, 01/12/2021, 3011691, Page19 of 20",
|
||||
"position": "header"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"type": "printed",
|
||||
"content": "motion. In light of the fact that the Opinion includes potentially confidential information that should not be filed on the public docket, the Court will permit the parties 48 hours to propose any redactions to the Courts Opinion and Order and to justify those redactions by reference to the Second Circuits decision in Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of Onondaga, 435 F.3d 110(2d Cir. 2006). After determining which, if any, portions of the Opinion and Order should be redacted, the Court will file the Opinion and Order on the public docket. As a result, the Court concludes that the Government has met its burden of persuasion that the Defendant poses a flight risk and that pretrial detention continues to be warranted. On or before December 30, 2020, the parties are ORDERED to submit a joint letter indicating whether they propose any redactions and the justification for any such proposal. This resolves Dkt No. 97. (Signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan on 12/28/20)(jw) (Entered: 12/28/2020)",
|
||||
"position": "main"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"type": "printed",
|
||||
"content": "12/30/2020 105 LETTER by USA as to Ghislaine Maxwell addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan from AUSAs Maurene Comey, Alison Moe, and Lara Pomerantz dated December 30, 2020 re: Joint Letter re December 28, 2020 Opinion and Order Document filed by USA. (Comey, Maurene) (Entered: 12/30/2020)",
|
||||
"position": "main"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"type": "printed",
|
||||
"content": "12/30/2020 106 OPINION AND ORDER as to Ghislaine Maxwell. Defendant Ghislaine Maxwell has been indicted by a grand jury on charges of conspiracy to entice minors to travel to engage in illegal sex acts, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 371; enticing a minor to travel to engage in illegal sex acts, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 2422 and 2; conspiracy to transport minors to participate in illegal sex acts, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 371; transporting minors to participate in illegal sex acts, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 2423 and 2; and two charges of perjury, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1623. The Court held a lengthy bail hearing on July 14, 2020. After extensive briefing and argument at the hearing, the Court concluded that the Defendant was a clear risk of flight and that no conditions or combination of conditions would ensure her appearance. Defendant Ghislaine Maxwells renewed motion for release on bail, Dkt. No. 97, is DENIED. (Signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan on 12/28/20)(jw) (Entered: 12/30/2020)",
|
||||
"position": "main"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"type": "printed",
|
||||
"content": "12/31/2020 107 LETTER MOTION addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan from Christian R. Everdell dated December 31, 2020 re: Extension of Time . Document filed by Ghislaine Maxwell. (Everdell, Christian) (Entered: 12/31/2020)",
|
||||
"position": "main"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"type": "printed",
|
||||
"content": "01/05/2021 108 MEMO ENDORSEMENT as to Ghislaine Maxwell (1) on 107 LETTER MOTION addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan from Christian R. Everdell dated December 31, 2020 re: Extension of Time. ENDORSEMENT: SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan on 1/5/2021) (ap) (Entered: 01/05/2021)",
|
||||
"position": "main"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"type": "printed",
|
||||
"content": "01/05/2021 Set/Reset Deadlines as to Ghislaine Maxwell: Motions due by 1/25/2021. Responses due by 2/26/2021. Replies due by 3/5/2021. (ap) (Entered: 01/05/2021)",
|
||||
"position": "main"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"type": "printed",
|
||||
"content": "01/08/2021 109 LETTER MOTION addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan from Christian R. Everdell dated January 8, 2021 re: Extension of Time to File Notice of Appeal . Document filed by Ghislaine Maxwell. (Everdell, Christian) (Entered: 01/08/2021)",
|
||||
"position": "main"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"type": "printed",
|
||||
"content": "01/11/2021 110 SEALED DOCUMENT placed in vault. (jus) (Entered: 01/11/2021)",
|
||||
"position": "main"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"type": "printed",
|
||||
"content": "01/11/2021 111 SEALED DOCUMENT placed in vault. (jus) (Entered: 01/11/2021)",
|
||||
"position": "main"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"type": "printed",
|
||||
"content": "01/11/2021 112 MEMO ENDORSEMENT as to Ghislaine Maxwell (1) denying 109 LETTER MOTION addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan from Christian R. Everdell dated January 8, 2021 re: Extension of Time to File Notice of Appeal. ENDORSEMENT: The request is denied. Good cause for an extension of time to file a notice of appeal has not been provided. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan on 1/11/2021) (lnl) (Entered: 01/11/2021)",
|
||||
"position": "main"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"type": "printed",
|
||||
"content": "01/11/2021 113 NOTICE OF APPEAL by Ghislaine Maxwell from 104 Order. (nd) (Entered: 01/12/2021)",
|
||||
"position": "main"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"type": "printed",
|
||||
"content": "01/11/2021 Appeal Remark as to re: 113 Notice of Appeal by Ghislaine Maxwell. $505.00 Appeal filing fee due. (nd) (Entered: 01/12/2021)",
|
||||
"position": "main"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"type": "printed",
|
||||
"content": "01/12/2021 Transmission of Notice of Appeal and Certified Copy of Docket Sheet as to Ghislaine Maxwell to US Court of Appeals re: 113 Notice of Appeal. (nd) (Entered: 01/12/2021)",
|
||||
"position": "main"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"type": "printed",
|
||||
"content": "DOJ-OGR-00019734",
|
||||
"position": "footer"
|
||||
}
|
||||
],
|
||||
"entities": {
|
||||
"people": [
|
||||
"Ghislaine Maxwell",
|
||||
"Alison J. Nathan",
|
||||
"Christian R. Everdell",
|
||||
"Maurene Comey",
|
||||
"Alison Moe",
|
||||
"Lara Pomerantz"
|
||||
],
|
||||
"organizations": [
|
||||
"USA",
|
||||
"US Court of Appeals"
|
||||
],
|
||||
"locations": [],
|
||||
"dates": [
|
||||
"12/30/2020",
|
||||
"12/31/2020",
|
||||
"01/05/2021",
|
||||
"01/08/2021",
|
||||
"01/11/2021",
|
||||
"01/12/2021",
|
||||
"12/28/2020",
|
||||
"July 14, 2020"
|
||||
],
|
||||
"reference_numbers": [
|
||||
"3011691",
|
||||
"Dkt No. 97",
|
||||
"Dkt. No. 97",
|
||||
"104",
|
||||
"105",
|
||||
"106",
|
||||
"107",
|
||||
"108",
|
||||
"109",
|
||||
"110",
|
||||
"111",
|
||||
"112",
|
||||
"113",
|
||||
"DOJ-OGR-00019734"
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
"additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court docket sheet with various entries related to the case of Ghislaine Maxwell. The document is well-formatted and legible, with clear headings and concise descriptions of each entry."
|
||||
}
|
||||
132
results/IMAGES007/DOJ-OGR-00019756.json
Normal file
132
results/IMAGES007/DOJ-OGR-00019756.json
Normal file
@ -0,0 +1,132 @@
|
||||
{
|
||||
"document_metadata": {
|
||||
"page_number": "11",
|
||||
"document_number": "20-2",
|
||||
"date": "03/24/2021",
|
||||
"document_type": "Court Document",
|
||||
"has_handwriting": false,
|
||||
"has_stamps": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
"full_text": "Case 21-58, Document 20-2, 03/24/2021, 3065965, Page11 of 24\n\n21 at 12 p.m. The Defendant's reply is due on Monday, August 24 at 12 p.m. The parties shall propose redactions to the letter briefing on this issue. Alternatively, the parties shall provide support and argument for why the letter motions should be sealed in their entirety. SO ORDERED. (Responses due by 8/21/2020. Replies due by 8/24/2020.) (Signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan on 8/18/2020) (lnl) (Entered: 08/18/2020)\n\n08/20/2020 45 NOTICE OF ATTORNEY APPEARANCE Lara Elizabeth Pomerantz appearing for USA. (Pomerantz, Lara) (Entered: 08/20/2020)\n\n08/20/2020 50 SEALED DOCUMENT placed in vault. (mhe) (Entered: 08/27/2020)\n\n08/21/2020 46 LETTER RESPONSE in Opposition by USA as to Ghislaine Maxwell addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan from Maurene Comey dated August 21, 2020 re: 43 LETTER MOTION addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan from Jeffrey S. Pagliuca dated August 17, 2020 re: Request for Permission to Submit Letter Motion in Excess of Three Pages .. (Rossmiller, Alex) (Entered: 08/21/2020)\n\n08/21/2020 47 LETTER by USA as to Ghislaine Maxwell addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan from Maurene Comey dated August 21, 2020 re: Proposed redactions to letter briefing, in response to the Court's Order of August 18, 2020 Document filed by USA. (Rossmiller, Alex) (Entered: 08/21/2020)\n\n08/24/2020 48 LETTER MOTION addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan from Laura A. Menninger dated August 24, 2020 re: Request to File Under Seal: Proposed Redactions to Request to Modify Protective Order and Reply in Support Thereof . Document filed by Ghislaine Maxwell. (Menninger, Laura) (Entered: 08/24/2020)\n\n08/25/2020 49 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: denying without prejudice 38 LETTER MOTION as to Ghislaine Maxwell (1). On August 10, 2020, the Defendant filed a letter motion related to two issues. Dkt. No. 38. First, the Defendant seeks an order directing the Government to disclose to defense counsel immediately the identities of the three alleged victims referenced in the indictment. Second, the Defendant seeks an order directing the Bureau of Prisons (\"BOP\") to release the Defendant into the general population and to provide her with increased access to the discovery materials. For the reasons that follow, Defendant's requests are DENIED without prejudice....[See this Memorandum Opinion And Order]... III. Conclusion: For the reasons stated above, Defendant's requests contained in Dkt. No. 38 are DENIED without prejudice. Following the close of discovery, the parties shall meet and confer on an appropriate schedule for pre-trial disclosures, including the disclosure of § 3500 material, exhibit lists, and witness lists, taking into account all relevant factors. The Government is hereby ORDERED to submit written status updates every 90 days detailing any material changes to the conditions of Ms. Maxwell's confinement, with particular emphasis on her access to legal materials and ability to communicate with defense counsel. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan on 8/25/2020) (bw) (Entered: 08/25/2020)\n\n09/02/2020 51 MEMORANDUMOPINION AND ORDER as to Ghislaine Maxwell: On August 17, 2020, Defendant Ghislaine Maxwell filed a sealed letter motion seeking an Order modifying the protective order in this case. Specifically, she sought a Court order allowing her to file under seal in certain civil cases (\"Civil Cases\") materials (\"Documents\") that she received in discovery from the Government in this case. She also sought permission to reference, but not file, other discovery material that the Government produced in this case. For the reasons that follow, Defendant's requests are DENIED. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan on 9/2/2020)(See MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER as set forth) (lnl) (Entered: 09/02/2020)\n\n09/02/2020 52 LETTER by Ghislaine Maxwell addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan, from Jeffrey S. Pagliuca dated 8/17/2020 re: Defense counsel writes with redacted request to modify protective order (ap) (Entered: 09/02/2020)\n\n09/04/2020 55 NOTICE OF APPEAL by Ghislaine Maxwell from 51 Memorandum & Opinion. Filing fee $ 505.00, receipt number 465401266036. (tp) (Entered: 09/09/2020)\n\n09/08/2020 53 LETTER by Ghislaine Maxwell addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan dated 8/24/2020 re: Proposed Redactions to Request to Modify Protective Order. (jbo) (Entered: 09/08/2020)\n\nDOJ-OGR-00019756",
|
||||
"text_blocks": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"type": "printed",
|
||||
"content": "Case 21-58, Document 20-2, 03/24/2021, 3065965, Page11 of 24",
|
||||
"position": "header"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"type": "printed",
|
||||
"content": "21 at 12 p.m. The Defendant's reply is due on Monday, August 24 at 12 p.m. The parties shall propose redactions to the letter briefing on this issue. Alternatively, the parties shall provide support and argument for why the letter motions should be sealed in their entirety. SO ORDERED. (Responses due by 8/21/2020. Replies due by 8/24/2020.) (Signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan on 8/18/2020) (lnl) (Entered: 08/18/2020)",
|
||||
"position": "top"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"type": "printed",
|
||||
"content": "08/20/2020 45 NOTICE OF ATTORNEY APPEARANCE Lara Elizabeth Pomerantz appearing for USA. (Pomerantz, Lara) (Entered: 08/20/2020)",
|
||||
"position": "top"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"type": "printed",
|
||||
"content": "08/20/2020 50 SEALED DOCUMENT placed in vault. (mhe) (Entered: 08/27/2020)",
|
||||
"position": "top"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"type": "printed",
|
||||
"content": "08/21/2020 46 LETTER RESPONSE in Opposition by USA as to Ghislaine Maxwell addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan from Maurene Comey dated August 21, 2020 re: 43 LETTER MOTION addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan from Jeffrey S. Pagliuca dated August 17, 2020 re: Request for Permission to Submit Letter Motion in Excess of Three Pages .. (Rossmiller, Alex) (Entered: 08/21/2020)",
|
||||
"position": "top"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"type": "printed",
|
||||
"content": "08/21/2020 47 LETTER by USA as to Ghislaine Maxwell addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan from Maurene Comey dated August 21, 2020 re: Proposed redactions to letter briefing, in response to the Court's Order of August 18, 2020 Document filed by USA. (Rossmiller, Alex) (Entered: 08/21/2020)",
|
||||
"position": "top"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"type": "printed",
|
||||
"content": "08/24/2020 48 LETTER MOTION addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan from Laura A. Menninger dated August 24, 2020 re: Request to File Under Seal: Proposed Redactions to Request to Modify Protective Order and Reply in Support Thereof . Document filed by Ghislaine Maxwell. (Menninger, Laura) (Entered: 08/24/2020)",
|
||||
"position": "top"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"type": "printed",
|
||||
"content": "08/25/2020 49 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: denying without prejudice 38 LETTER MOTION as to Ghislaine Maxwell (1). On August 10, 2020, the Defendant filed a letter motion related to two issues. Dkt. No. 38. First, the Defendant seeks an order directing the Government to disclose to defense counsel immediately the identities of the three alleged victims referenced in the indictment. Second, the Defendant seeks an order directing the Bureau of Prisons (\"BOP\") to release the Defendant into the general population and to provide her with increased access to the discovery materials. For the reasons that follow, Defendant's requests are DENIED without prejudice....[See this Memorandum Opinion And Order]... III. Conclusion: For the reasons stated above, Defendant's requests contained in Dkt. No. 38 are DENIED without prejudice. Following the close of discovery, the parties shall meet and confer on an appropriate schedule for pre-trial disclosures, including the disclosure of § 3500 material, exhibit lists, and witness lists, taking into account all relevant factors. The Government is hereby ORDERED to submit written status updates every 90 days detailing any material changes to the conditions of Ms. Maxwell's confinement, with particular emphasis on her access to legal materials and ability to communicate with defense counsel. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan on 8/25/2020) (bw) (Entered: 08/25/2020)",
|
||||
"position": "top"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"type": "printed",
|
||||
"content": "09/02/2020 51 MEMORANDUMOPINION AND ORDER as to Ghislaine Maxwell: On August 17, 2020, Defendant Ghislaine Maxwell filed a sealed letter motion seeking an Order modifying the protective order in this case. Specifically, she sought a Court order allowing her to file under seal in certain civil cases (\"Civil Cases\") materials (\"Documents\") that she received in discovery from the Government in this case. She also sought permission to reference, but not file, other discovery material that the Government produced in this case. For the reasons that follow, Defendant's requests are DENIED. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan on 9/2/2020)(See MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER as set forth) (lnl) (Entered: 09/02/2020)",
|
||||
"position": "top"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"type": "printed",
|
||||
"content": "09/02/2020 52 LETTER by Ghislaine Maxwell addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan, from Jeffrey S. Pagliuca dated 8/17/2020 re: Defense counsel writes with redacted request to modify protective order (ap) (Entered: 09/02/2020)",
|
||||
"position": "top"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"type": "printed",
|
||||
"content": "09/04/2020 55 NOTICE OF APPEAL by Ghislaine Maxwell from 51 Memorandum & Opinion. Filing fee $ 505.00, receipt number 465401266036. (tp) (Entered: 09/09/2020)",
|
||||
"position": "top"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"type": "printed",
|
||||
"content": "09/08/2020 53 LETTER by Ghislaine Maxwell addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan dated 8/24/2020 re: Proposed Redactions to Request to Modify Protective Order. (jbo) (Entered: 09/08/2020)",
|
||||
"position": "top"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"type": "printed",
|
||||
"content": "DOJ-OGR-00019756",
|
||||
"position": "footer"
|
||||
}
|
||||
],
|
||||
"entities": {
|
||||
"people": [
|
||||
"Ghislaine Maxwell",
|
||||
"Alison J. Nathan",
|
||||
"Lara Elizabeth Pomerantz",
|
||||
"Maurene Comey",
|
||||
"Jeffrey S. Pagliuca",
|
||||
"Laura A. Menninger",
|
||||
"Alex Rossmiller"
|
||||
],
|
||||
"organizations": [
|
||||
"USA",
|
||||
"Bureau of Prisons"
|
||||
],
|
||||
"locations": [],
|
||||
"dates": [
|
||||
"03/24/2021",
|
||||
"08/18/2020",
|
||||
"08/20/2020",
|
||||
"08/21/2020",
|
||||
"08/24/2020",
|
||||
"08/25/2020",
|
||||
"08/27/2020",
|
||||
"09/02/2020",
|
||||
"09/04/2020",
|
||||
"09/08/2020",
|
||||
"09/09/2020",
|
||||
"August 10, 2020",
|
||||
"August 17, 2020",
|
||||
"August 21, 2020",
|
||||
"August 24, 2020"
|
||||
],
|
||||
"reference_numbers": [
|
||||
"21-58",
|
||||
"20-2",
|
||||
"3065965",
|
||||
"45",
|
||||
"50",
|
||||
"46",
|
||||
"47",
|
||||
"48",
|
||||
"49",
|
||||
"51",
|
||||
"52",
|
||||
"55",
|
||||
"53",
|
||||
"38",
|
||||
"43",
|
||||
"Dkt. No. 38",
|
||||
"465401266036",
|
||||
"DOJ-OGR-00019756"
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
"additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court docket sheet with various entries related to the case of Ghislaine Maxwell. The entries include notices of appearance, sealed documents, letter motions, and memorandum opinions and orders. The document is well-formatted and easy to read."
|
||||
}
|
||||
58
results/IMAGES007/DOJ-OGR-00019758.json
Normal file
58
results/IMAGES007/DOJ-OGR-00019758.json
Normal file
File diff suppressed because one or more lines are too long
93
results/IMAGES007/DOJ-OGR-00019761.json
Normal file
93
results/IMAGES007/DOJ-OGR-00019761.json
Normal file
@ -0,0 +1,93 @@
|
||||
{
|
||||
"document_metadata": {
|
||||
"page_number": "16 of 24",
|
||||
"document_number": "20-2",
|
||||
"date": "03/24/2021",
|
||||
"document_type": "Court Document",
|
||||
"has_handwriting": false,
|
||||
"has_stamps": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
"full_text": "Case 21-58, Document 20-2, 03/24/2021, 3065965, Page16 of 24 necessary steps to ensure that the Defendant continues to receive adequate access to her legal materials and her ability to communicate with defense counsel. (Signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan on 12/8/2020) (ap) (Entered: 12/08/2020) 12/10/2020 93 TRANSCRIPT of Proceedings as to Ghislaine Maxwell re: Conference held on 7/14/2020 before Judge Alison J. Nathan. Court Reporter/Transcriber: Kristen Carannante, (212) 805-0300, Transcript may be viewed at the court public terminal or purchased through the Court Reporter/Transcriber before the deadline for Release of Transcript Restriction. After that date it may be obtained through PACER. Redaction Request due 12/31/2020. Redacted Transcript Deadline set for 1/11/2021. Release of Transcript Restriction set for 3/10/2021. (McGuirk, Kelly) (Entered: 12/10/2020) 12/10/2020 94 NOTICE OF FILING OF OFFICIAL TRANSCRIPT as to Ghislaine Maxwell. Notice is hereby given that an official transcript of a Conference proceeding held on 7/14/2020 has been filed by the court reporter/transcriber in the above-captioned matter. The parties have seven (7) calendar days to file with the court a Notice of Intent to Request Redaction of this transcript. If no such Notice is filed, the transcript may be made remotely electronically available to the public without redaction after 90 calendar days.... (McGuirk, Kelly) (Entered: 12/10/2020) 12/14/2020 95 ORDER as to Ghislaine Maxwell: On December 8, 2020, Defendant Ghislaine Maxwell filed her renewed application for bail under seal with proposed redactions, in accordance with this Court's December 7, 2020 Order, see Dkt. No. 89. The Government did not file any opposition to the Defendant's proposed redactions. After due consideration, the Court will adopt the Defendant's proposed redactions. The Court's decision to adopt those redactions is guided by the three-part test articulated by the Second Circuit in Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of Onondaga, 435 F.3d 110 (2d Cir. 2006). Under this test, the Court must: (i) determine whether the documents in question are \"judicial documents;\" (ii) assess the weight of the common law presumption of access to the materials; and (iii) balance competing considerations against the presumption of access. Id. at 11920. \"Such countervailing factors include but are not limited to the danger of impairing law enforcement or judicial efficiency' and 'the privacy interests of those resisting disclosure.'\" Id. at 120 (quoting United States v. Amodeo, 71 F.3d 1044, 1048 (2d Cir.1995) (\"Amodeo II\")). The proposed redactions satisfy this test. The Court finds that Defendant's letter motions are \"relevant to the performance of the judicial function and useful in the judicial process,' thereby qualifying as a \"judicial document\" for purposes of the first element of the Lugosch test. United States v. Amodeo (\"Amodeo I\"), 44 F.3d 141, 145 (2d Cir. 1995). And the Court also finds that the common law presumption of access attaches. Id. at 146; see also Nixon v. Warner Commc'ns, Inc., 435 U.S. 589, 602 (1978). Nevertheless, in balancing competing considerations against the presumption of access, the Court finds that the redactions are narrowly tailored to properly guard the privacy interests of the individuals referenced in the Defendant's submission and in the corresponding exhibits The Defendant is hereby ORDERED to docket the redacted documents and corresponding exhibits dated 12/14/2020) (ap) (Entered: 12/14/2020) 12/14/2020 96 LETTER by Ghislaine Maxwell addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan from Christian R. Everdell dated December 8, 2020 re: Cover Letter for Renewed Bail Application (Everdell, Christian) (Entered: 12/14/2020) 12/14/2020 97 MEMORANDUM OF LAW in Support by Ghislaine Maxwell re: Renewed Motion for Bail. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B, # 3 Exhibit C, # 4 Exhibit D, # 5 Exhibit E, # 6 Exhibit F, # 7 Exhibit G, # 8 Exhibit H, # 9 Exhibit I, # 10 Exhibit J, # 11 Exhibit K, # 12 Exhibit L, # 13 Exhibit M, # 14 Exhibit N, # 15 Exhibit O, # 16 Exhibit P, # 17 Exhibit Q, # 18 Exhibit R, # 19 Exhibit S, # 20 Exhibit T, # 21 Exhibit U, # 22 Exhibit V, # 23 Exhibit W, # 24 Exhibit X)(Everdell, Christian) (Entered: 12/14/2020) 12/17/2020 98 NOTICE OF ATTORNEY APPEARANCE Andrew Rohrbach appearing for USA. (Rohrbach, Andrew) (Entered: 12/17/2020) 12/18/2020 99 ORDER as to Ghislaine Maxwell: On December 16, 2020, the Government filed its opposition to Defendant Ghislaine Maxwell's renewed application for bail. In accordance with this Court's December 7, 2020 Order, see Dkt. No. 89, the Government filed its materials under seal and proposed narrowly tailored redactions on DOJ-OGR-00019761",
|
||||
"text_blocks": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"type": "printed",
|
||||
"content": "Case 21-58, Document 20-2, 03/24/2021, 3065965, Page16 of 24",
|
||||
"position": "header"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"type": "printed",
|
||||
"content": "necessary steps to ensure that the Defendant continues to receive adequate access to her legal materials and her ability to communicate with defense counsel. (Signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan on 12/8/2020) (ap) (Entered: 12/08/2020)",
|
||||
"position": "top"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"type": "printed",
|
||||
"content": "12/10/2020 93 TRANSCRIPT of Proceedings as to Ghislaine Maxwell re: Conference held on 7/14/2020 before Judge Alison J. Nathan. Court Reporter/Transcriber: Kristen Carannante, (212) 805-0300, Transcript may be viewed at the court public terminal or purchased through the Court Reporter/Transcriber before the deadline for Release of Transcript Restriction. After that date it may be obtained through PACER. Redaction Request due 12/31/2020. Redacted Transcript Deadline set for 1/11/2021. Release of Transcript Restriction set for 3/10/2021. (McGuirk, Kelly) (Entered: 12/10/2020)",
|
||||
"position": "middle"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"type": "printed",
|
||||
"content": "12/10/2020 94 NOTICE OF FILING OF OFFICIAL TRANSCRIPT as to Ghislaine Maxwell. Notice is hereby given that an official transcript of a Conference proceeding held on 7/14/2020 has been filed by the court reporter/transcriber in the above-captioned matter. The parties have seven (7) calendar days to file with the court a Notice of Intent to Request Redaction of this transcript. If no such Notice is filed, the transcript may be made remotely electronically available to the public without redaction after 90 calendar days.... (McGuirk, Kelly) (Entered: 12/10/2020)",
|
||||
"position": "middle"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"type": "printed",
|
||||
"content": "12/14/2020 95 ORDER as to Ghislaine Maxwell: On December 8, 2020, Defendant Ghislaine Maxwell filed her renewed application for bail under seal with proposed redactions, in accordance with this Court's December 7, 2020 Order, see Dkt. No. 89. The Government did not file any opposition to the Defendant's proposed redactions. After due consideration, the Court will adopt the Defendant's proposed redactions. The Court's decision to adopt those redactions is guided by the three-part test articulated by the Second Circuit in Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of Onondaga, 435 F.3d 110 (2d Cir. 2006). Under this test, the Court must: (i) determine whether the documents in question are \"judicial documents;\" (ii) assess the weight of the common law presumption of access to the materials; and (iii) balance competing considerations against the presumption of access. Id. at 11920. \"Such countervailing factors include but are not limited to the danger of impairing law enforcement or judicial efficiency' and 'the privacy interests of those resisting disclosure.'\" Id. at 120 (quoting United States v. Amodeo, 71 F.3d 1044, 1048 (2d Cir.1995) (\"Amodeo II\")). The proposed redactions satisfy this test. The Court finds that Defendant's letter motions are \"relevant to the performance of the judicial function and useful in the judicial process,' thereby qualifying as a \"judicial document\" for purposes of the first element of the Lugosch test. United States v. Amodeo (\"Amodeo I\"), 44 F.3d 141, 145 (2d Cir. 1995). And the Court also finds that the common law presumption of access attaches. Id. at 146; see also Nixon v. Warner Commc'ns, Inc., 435 U.S. 589, 602 (1978). Nevertheless, in balancing competing considerations against the presumption of access, the Court finds that the redactions are narrowly tailored to properly guard the privacy interests of the individuals referenced in the Defendant's submission and in the corresponding exhibits The Defendant is hereby ORDERED to docket the redacted documents and corresponding exhibits dated 12/14/2020) (ap) (Entered: 12/14/2020)",
|
||||
"position": "middle"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"type": "printed",
|
||||
"content": "12/14/2020 96 LETTER by Ghislaine Maxwell addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan from Christian R. Everdell dated December 8, 2020 re: Cover Letter for Renewed Bail Application (Everdell, Christian) (Entered: 12/14/2020)",
|
||||
"position": "middle"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"type": "printed",
|
||||
"content": "12/14/2020 97 MEMORANDUM OF LAW in Support by Ghislaine Maxwell re: Renewed Motion for Bail. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B, # 3 Exhibit C, # 4 Exhibit D, # 5 Exhibit E, # 6 Exhibit F, # 7 Exhibit G, # 8 Exhibit H, # 9 Exhibit I, # 10 Exhibit J, # 11 Exhibit K, # 12 Exhibit L, # 13 Exhibit M, # 14 Exhibit N, # 15 Exhibit O, # 16 Exhibit P, # 17 Exhibit Q, # 18 Exhibit R, # 19 Exhibit S, # 20 Exhibit T, # 21 Exhibit U, # 22 Exhibit V, # 23 Exhibit W, # 24 Exhibit X)(Everdell, Christian) (Entered: 12/14/2020)",
|
||||
"position": "middle"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"type": "printed",
|
||||
"content": "12/17/2020 98 NOTICE OF ATTORNEY APPEARANCE Andrew Rohrbach appearing for USA. (Rohrbach, Andrew) (Entered: 12/17/2020)",
|
||||
"position": "middle"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"type": "printed",
|
||||
"content": "12/18/2020 99 ORDER as to Ghislaine Maxwell: On December 16, 2020, the Government filed its opposition to Defendant Ghislaine Maxwell's renewed application for bail. In accordance with this Court's December 7, 2020 Order, see Dkt. No. 89, the Government filed its materials under seal and proposed narrowly tailored redactions on DOJ-OGR-00019761",
|
||||
"position": "bottom"
|
||||
}
|
||||
],
|
||||
"entities": {
|
||||
"people": [
|
||||
"Ghislaine Maxwell",
|
||||
"Alison J. Nathan",
|
||||
"Kristen Carannante",
|
||||
"Kelly McGuirk",
|
||||
"Christian R. Everdell",
|
||||
"Andrew Rohrbach"
|
||||
],
|
||||
"organizations": [
|
||||
"USA"
|
||||
],
|
||||
"locations": [],
|
||||
"dates": [
|
||||
"12/8/2020",
|
||||
"7/14/2020",
|
||||
"12/10/2020",
|
||||
"12/31/2020",
|
||||
"1/11/2021",
|
||||
"3/10/2021",
|
||||
"12/14/2020",
|
||||
"12/7/2020",
|
||||
"12/16/2020",
|
||||
"12/17/2020",
|
||||
"12/18/2020"
|
||||
],
|
||||
"reference_numbers": [
|
||||
"Case 21-58",
|
||||
"Document 20-2",
|
||||
"3065965",
|
||||
"Dkt. No. 89",
|
||||
"DOJ-OGR-00019761"
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
"additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court docket sheet with various entries related to the case of Ghislaine Maxwell."
|
||||
}
|
||||
100
results/IMAGES007/DOJ-OGR-00019787.json
Normal file
100
results/IMAGES007/DOJ-OGR-00019787.json
Normal file
@ -0,0 +1,100 @@
|
||||
{
|
||||
"document_metadata": {
|
||||
"page_number": "17",
|
||||
"document_number": "21-2",
|
||||
"date": "03/24/2021",
|
||||
"document_type": "Court Document",
|
||||
"has_handwriting": false,
|
||||
"has_stamps": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
"full_text": "Case 21-58, Document 21-2, 03/24/2021, 3065978, Page17 of 25 necessary steps to ensure that the Defendant continues to receive adequate access to her legal materials and her ability to communicate with defense counsel. (Signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan on 12/8/2020) (ap) (Entered: 12/08/2020) 12/10/2020 93 TRANSCRIPT of Proceedings as to Ghislaine Maxwell re: Conference held on 7/14/2020 before Judge Alison J. Nathan. Court Reporter/Transcriber: Kristen Carannante, (212) 805-0300, Transcript may be viewed at the court public terminal or purchased through the Court Reporter/Transcriber before the deadline for Release of Transcript Restriction. After that date it may be obtained through PACER. Redaction Request due 12/31/2020. Redacted Transcript Deadline set for 1/11/2021. Release of Transcript Restriction set for 3/10/2021. (McGuirk, Kelly) (Entered: 12/10/2020) 12/10/2020 94 NOTICE OF FILING OF OFFICIAL TRANSCRIPT as to Ghislaine Maxwell. Notice is hereby given that an official transcript of a Conference proceeding held on 7/14/2020 has been filed by the court reporter/transcriber in the above-captioned matter. The parties have seven (7) calendar days to file with the court a Notice of Intent to Request Redaction of this transcript. If no such Notice is filed, the transcript may be made remotely electronically available to the public without redaction after 90 calendar days.... (McGuirk, Kelly) (Entered: 12/10/2020) 12/14/2020 95 ORDER as to Ghislaine Maxwell: On December 8, 2020, Defendant Ghislaine Maxwell filed her renewed application for bail under seal with proposed redactions, in accordance with this Court's December 7, 2020 Order, see Dkt. No. 89. The Government did not file any opposition to the Defendant's proposed redactions. After due consideration, the Court will adopt the Defendant's proposed redactions. The Court's decision to adopt those redactions is guided by the three-part test articulated by the Second Circuit in Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of Onondaga, 435 F.3d 110 (2d Cir. 2006). Under this test, the Court must: (i) determine whether the documents in question are \"judicial documents;\" (ii) assess the weight of the common law presumption of access to the materials; and (iii) balance competing considerations against the presumption of access. Id. at 11920. \"Such countervailing factors include but are not limited to the danger of impairing law enforcement or judicial efficiency' and 'the privacy interests of those resisting disclosure.'\" Id. at 120 (quoting United States v. Amodeo, 71 F.3d 1044, 1048 (2d Cir.1995) (\"Amodeo II\")). The proposed redactions satisfy this test. The Court finds that Defendant's letter motions are \"relevant to the performance of the judicial function and useful in the judicial process,' thereby qualifying as a \"judicial document\" for purposes of the first element of the Lugosch test. United States v. Amodeo (\"Amodeo I\"), 44 F.3d 141, 145 (2d Cir. 1995). And the Court also finds that the common law presumption of access attaches. Id. at 146; see also Nixon v. Warner Commc'ns, Inc., 435 U.S. 589, 602 (1978). Nevertheless, in balancing competing considerations against the presumption of access, the Court finds that the redactions are narrowly tailored to properly guard the privacy interests of the individuals referenced in the Defendant's submission and in the corresponding exhibits The Defendant is hereby ORDERED to docket the redacted documents and corresponding exhibits dated 12/14/2020) (ap) (Entered: 12/14/2020) 12/14/2020 96 LETTER by Ghislaine Maxwell addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan from Christian R. Everdell dated December 8, 2020 re: Cover Letter for Renewed Bail Application (Everdell, Christian) (Entered: 12/14/2020) 12/14/2020 97 MEMORANDUM OF LAW in Support by Ghislaine Maxwell re: Renewed Motion for Bail. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B, # 3 Exhibit C, # 4 Exhibit D, # 5 Exhibit E, # 6 Exhibit F, # 7 Exhibit G, # 8 Exhibit H, # 9 Exhibit I, # 10 Exhibit J, # 11 Exhibit K, # 12 Exhibit L, # 13 Exhibit M, # 14 Exhibit N, # 15 Exhibit O, # 16 Exhibit P, # 17 Exhibit Q, # 18 Exhibit R, # 19 Exhibit S, # 20 Exhibit T, # 21 Exhibit U, # 22 Exhibit V, # 23 Exhibit W, # 24 Exhibit X)(Everdell, Christian) (Entered: 12/14/2020) 12/17/2020 98 NOTICE OF ATTORNEY APPEARANCE Andrew Rohrbach appearing for USA. (Rohrbach, Andrew) (Entered: 12/17/2020) 12/18/2020 99 ORDER as to Ghislaine Maxwell: On December 16, 2020, the Government filed its opposition to Defendant Ghislaine Maxwell's renewed application for bail. In accordance with this Court's December 7, 2020 Order, see Dkt. No. 89, the Government filed its materials under seal and proposed narrowly tailored redactions on DOJ-OGR-00019787",
|
||||
"text_blocks": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"type": "printed",
|
||||
"content": "Case 21-58, Document 21-2, 03/24/2021, 3065978, Page17 of 25",
|
||||
"position": "header"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"type": "printed",
|
||||
"content": "necessary steps to ensure that the Defendant continues to receive adequate access to her legal materials and her ability to communicate with defense counsel. (Signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan on 12/8/2020) (ap) (Entered: 12/08/2020)",
|
||||
"position": "top"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"type": "printed",
|
||||
"content": "12/10/2020 93 TRANSCRIPT of Proceedings as to Ghislaine Maxwell re: Conference held on 7/14/2020 before Judge Alison J. Nathan. Court Reporter/Transcriber: Kristen Carannante, (212) 805-0300, Transcript may be viewed at the court public terminal or purchased through the Court Reporter/Transcriber before the deadline for Release of Transcript Restriction. After that date it may be obtained through PACER. Redaction Request due 12/31/2020. Redacted Transcript Deadline set for 1/11/2021. Release of Transcript Restriction set for 3/10/2021. (McGuirk, Kelly) (Entered: 12/10/2020)",
|
||||
"position": "middle"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"type": "printed",
|
||||
"content": "12/10/2020 94 NOTICE OF FILING OF OFFICIAL TRANSCRIPT as to Ghislaine Maxwell. Notice is hereby given that an official transcript of a Conference proceeding held on 7/14/2020 has been filed by the court reporter/transcriber in the above-captioned matter. The parties have seven (7) calendar days to file with the court a Notice of Intent to Request Redaction of this transcript. If no such Notice is filed, the transcript may be made remotely electronically available to the public without redaction after 90 calendar days.... (McGuirk, Kelly) (Entered: 12/10/2020)",
|
||||
"position": "middle"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"type": "printed",
|
||||
"content": "12/14/2020 95 ORDER as to Ghislaine Maxwell: On December 8, 2020, Defendant Ghislaine Maxwell filed her renewed application for bail under seal with proposed redactions, in accordance with this Court's December 7, 2020 Order, see Dkt. No. 89. The Government did not file any opposition to the Defendant's proposed redactions. After due consideration, the Court will adopt the Defendant's proposed redactions. The Court's decision to adopt those redactions is guided by the three-part test articulated by the Second Circuit in Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of Onondaga, 435 F.3d 110 (2d Cir. 2006). Under this test, the Court must: (i) determine whether the documents in question are \"judicial documents;\" (ii) assess the weight of the common law presumption of access to the materials; and (iii) balance competing considerations against the presumption of access. Id. at 11920. \"Such countervailing factors include but are not limited to the danger of impairing law enforcement or judicial efficiency' and 'the privacy interests of those resisting disclosure.'\" Id. at 120 (quoting United States v. Amodeo, 71 F.3d 1044, 1048 (2d Cir.1995) (\"Amodeo II\")). The proposed redactions satisfy this test. The Court finds that Defendant's letter motions are \"relevant to the performance of the judicial function and useful in the judicial process,' thereby qualifying as a \"judicial document\" for purposes of the first element of the Lugosch test. United States v. Amodeo (\"Amodeo I\"), 44 F.3d 141, 145 (2d Cir. 1995). And the Court also finds that the common law presumption of access attaches. Id. at access; see also Nixon v. Warner Commc'ns, Inc., 435 U.S. 589, 602 (1978). Nevertheless, in balancing competing considerations against the presumption of access, the Court finds that the redactions are narrowly tailored to properly guard the privacy interests of the individuals referenced in the Defendant's submission and in the corresponding exhibits The Defendant is hereby ORDERED to docket the redacted documents and corresponding exhibits dated 12/14/2020) (ap) (Entered: 12/14/2020)",
|
||||
"position": "middle"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"type": "printed",
|
||||
"content": "12/14/2020 96 LETTER by Ghislaine Maxwell addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan from Christian R. Everdell dated December 8, 2020 re: Cover Letter for Renewed Bail Application (Everdell, Christian) (Entered: 12/14/2020)",
|
||||
"position": "middle"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"type": "printed",
|
||||
"content": "12/14/2020 97 MEMORANDUM OF LAW in Support by Ghislaine Maxwell re: Renewed Motion for Bail. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B, # 3 Exhibit C, # 4 Exhibit D, # 5 Exhibit E, # 6 Exhibit F, # 7 Exhibit G, # 8 Exhibit H, # 9 Exhibit I, # 10 Exhibit J, # 11 Exhibit K, # 12 Exhibit L, # 13 Exhibit M, # 14 Exhibit N, # 15 Exhibit O, # 16 Exhibit P, # 17 Exhibit Q, # 18 Exhibit R, # 19 Exhibit S, # 20 Exhibit T, # 21 Exhibit U, # 22 Exhibit V, # 23 Exhibit W, # 24 Exhibit X)(Everdell, Christian) (Entered: 12/14/2020)",
|
||||
"position": "middle"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"type": "printed",
|
||||
"content": "12/17/2020 98 NOTICE OF ATTORNEY APPEARANCE Andrew Rohrbach appearing for USA. (Rohrbach, Andrew) (Entered: 12/17/2020)",
|
||||
"position": "middle"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"type": "printed",
|
||||
"content": "12/18/2020 99 ORDER as to Ghislaine Maxwell: On December 16, 2020, the Government filed its opposition to Defendant Ghislaine Maxwell's renewed application for bail. In accordance with this Court's December 7, 2020 Order, see Dkt. No. 89, the Government filed its materials under seal and proposed narrowly tailored redactions on DOJ-OGR-00019787",
|
||||
"position": "bottom"
|
||||
}
|
||||
],
|
||||
"entities": {
|
||||
"people": [
|
||||
"Ghislaine Maxwell",
|
||||
"Alison J. Nathan",
|
||||
"Kristen Carannante",
|
||||
"Kelly McGuirk",
|
||||
"Christian R. Everdell",
|
||||
"Andrew Rohrbach"
|
||||
],
|
||||
"organizations": [
|
||||
"USA"
|
||||
],
|
||||
"locations": [],
|
||||
"dates": [
|
||||
"12/8/2020",
|
||||
"7/14/2020",
|
||||
"12/10/2020",
|
||||
"12/31/2020",
|
||||
"1/11/2021",
|
||||
"3/10/2021",
|
||||
"12/14/2020",
|
||||
"12/7/2020",
|
||||
"12/16/2020",
|
||||
"12/17/2020",
|
||||
"12/18/2020"
|
||||
],
|
||||
"reference_numbers": [
|
||||
"21-58",
|
||||
"21-2",
|
||||
"3065978",
|
||||
"93",
|
||||
"94",
|
||||
"95",
|
||||
"96",
|
||||
"97",
|
||||
"98",
|
||||
"99",
|
||||
"Dkt. No. 89",
|
||||
"DOJ-OGR-00019787"
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
"additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court docket sheet with various entries related to the case of Ghislaine Maxwell. The entries include transcripts, notices, orders, and other documents filed with the court. The document is well-formatted and easy to read."
|
||||
}
|
||||
70
results/IMAGES007/DOJ-OGR-00019810.json
Normal file
70
results/IMAGES007/DOJ-OGR-00019810.json
Normal file
File diff suppressed because one or more lines are too long
63
results/IMAGES007/DOJ-OGR-00019818.json
Normal file
63
results/IMAGES007/DOJ-OGR-00019818.json
Normal file
File diff suppressed because one or more lines are too long
76
results/IMAGES008/DOJ-OGR-00020412.json
Normal file
76
results/IMAGES008/DOJ-OGR-00020412.json
Normal file
@ -0,0 +1,76 @@
|
||||
{
|
||||
"document_metadata": {
|
||||
"page_number": "26",
|
||||
"document_number": "1-2",
|
||||
"date": "07/08/2022",
|
||||
"document_type": "Court Document",
|
||||
"has_handwriting": false,
|
||||
"has_stamps": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
"full_text": "Case 22-1426, Document 1-2, 07/08/2022, 3344417, Page26 of 91\n\n| Date | Number | Description |\n|------------|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|\n| 03/26/2021 | | >>>NOTICE REGARDING PRO HAC VICE MOTION. Regarding Document No. 182 MOTION for Sigrid S. McCawley to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number ANYSDC-24312691. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. The document has been reviewed and there are no deficiencies. (wb) (Entered: 03/26/2021) |\n| 03/26/2021 | 183 | LETTER by Boies Schiller Flexner LLP as to Ghislaine Maxwell addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan from Sigrid S. McCawley dated March 22, 2021 re: Objection to subpoena. Document filed by Boies Schiller Flexner LLP. (McCawley, Sigrid) (Entered: 03/26/2021) |\n| 03/26/2021 | 184 | LETTER by Boies Schiller Flexner LLP as to Ghislaine Maxwell addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan from Sigrid S. McCawley dated March 26, 2021 re: Proposed redactions to March 22, 2021 Letter (ECF No. 183) Document filed by Boies Schiller Flexner LLP. (McCawley, Sigrid) (Entered: 03/26/2021) |\n| 03/26/2021 | 185 | LETTER by USA as to Ghislaine Maxwell addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan from AUSAs Maurene Comey, Alison Moe, Lara Pomerantz, and Andrew Rohrbach dated March 26, 2021 re: Recent decision in United States v. Schulte, 17 Cr. 548 (PAC) Document filed by USA. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1)(Comey, Maurene) (Entered: 03/26/2021) |\n| 03/26/2021 | 186 | ORDER as to Ghislaine Maxwell: The Court sees no reason to maintain the redactions on Boies Schiller Flexner LLP's March 26, 2021 letter. Dkt. No. 183. Unless the Government indicates an objection to removing those redactions by March 29, 2021, BSF shall file the unredacted version on the docket on March 30, 2021. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan on 3/26/2021) (lnl) (Entered: 03/26/2021) |\n| 03/29/2021 | 187 | (S2) SUPERSEDING INDICTMENT FILED as to Ghislaine Maxwell (1) count(s) 1ss, 2ss, 3ss, 4ss, 5ss, 6ss, 7ss–8ss. (jm) (Entered: 03/29/2021) |\n| 03/29/2021 | 188 | LETTER by USA as to Ghislaine Maxwell addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan from AUSAs Maurene Comey, Alison Moe, Lara Pomerantz, and Andrew Rohrbach dated March 29, 2021 re: S2 Superseding Indictment Document filed by USA. (Comey, Maurene) (Entered: 03/29/2021) |\n| 03/29/2021 | 189 | ORDER as to Ghislaine Maxwell. The Court is in receipt of the Government's letter memorandum of law in opposition to the Defendant's twelve pretrial motions. Dkt. No. 170. the Court ORDERS that the information contained on pages 129134 of the Governments brief be unredacted. With respect to the proposed redactions to pages 118119 and Exhibit 11, the Court now understands that the parties seek redactions on the basis that the material has been maintained under seal in Giuffre v. Maxwell, Case No 15-cv-7433 (S.D.N.Y.). By April 1, 2021, the parties must meet and confer and either submit to the Court justification for those redactionsbeyond that it has been ordered redacted in the civil matteror, in the alternative, notify the Court that the parties are no longer seeking those redactions. If the parties disagree, they shall indicate their separate views in the joint letter. (Signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan on 3/29/21) (jw) (Entered: 03/29/2021) |\n| 03/29/2021 | 190 | LETTER by USA as to Ghislaine Maxwell addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan from AUSAs Maurene Comey, Alison Moe, and Lara Pomerantz dated March 29, 2021 re: Clarification re October 7, 2020 Letter Document filed by USA. (Comey, Maurene) (Entered: 03/29/2021) |\n| 03/29/2021 | | USCA Appeal Fees received $ 505.00, receipt number 465401276762 as to Ghislaine Maxwell on 3/25/2021 re: 173 Notice of Appeal - Final Judgment filed by Ghislaine Maxwell. (tp) (Entered: 04/01/2021) |\n| 03/30/2021 | 191 | LETTER by Boies Schiller Flexner LLP as to Ghislaine Maxwell addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan from Sigrid S. McCawley dated March 22,2021 re: Unredacted Objection to Defendant Ghislaine Maxwell's motion for an order authorizing a Rule 17(c) subpoena. Document filed by Boies Schiller Flexner LLP. (McCawley, Sigrid) (Entered: 03/30/2021) |\n\nDOJ-OGR-00020412",
|
||||
"text_blocks": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"type": "printed",
|
||||
"content": "Case 22-1426, Document 1-2, 07/08/2022, 3344417, Page26 of 91",
|
||||
"position": "header"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"type": "printed",
|
||||
"content": "The table contains court documents related to Ghislaine Maxwell's case, including dates, document numbers, and descriptions of the documents.",
|
||||
"position": "main"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"type": "printed",
|
||||
"content": "DOJ-OGR-00020412",
|
||||
"position": "footer"
|
||||
}
|
||||
],
|
||||
"entities": {
|
||||
"people": [
|
||||
"Ghislaine Maxwell",
|
||||
"Sigrid S. McCawley",
|
||||
"Alison J. Nathan",
|
||||
"Maurene Comey",
|
||||
"Alison Moe",
|
||||
"Lara Pomerantz",
|
||||
"Andrew Rohrbach",
|
||||
"Schulte"
|
||||
],
|
||||
"organizations": [
|
||||
"Boies Schiller Flexner LLP",
|
||||
"USA",
|
||||
"USCA"
|
||||
],
|
||||
"locations": [
|
||||
"S.D.N.Y."
|
||||
],
|
||||
"dates": [
|
||||
"03/26/2021",
|
||||
"03/22/2021",
|
||||
"03/29/2021",
|
||||
"03/30/2021",
|
||||
"03/25/2021",
|
||||
"04/01/2021",
|
||||
"07/08/2022",
|
||||
"October 7, 2020"
|
||||
],
|
||||
"reference_numbers": [
|
||||
"182",
|
||||
"183",
|
||||
"184",
|
||||
"185",
|
||||
"186",
|
||||
"187",
|
||||
"188",
|
||||
"189",
|
||||
"190",
|
||||
"191",
|
||||
"173",
|
||||
"24312691",
|
||||
"465401276762",
|
||||
"15-cv-7433",
|
||||
"17 Cr. 548 (PAC)"
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
"additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court docket sheet with a table listing various court documents related to Ghislaine Maxwell's case. The table includes dates, document numbers, and descriptions of the documents. The document is well-formatted and legible."
|
||||
}
|
||||
73
results/IMAGES008/DOJ-OGR-00020413.json
Normal file
73
results/IMAGES008/DOJ-OGR-00020413.json
Normal file
File diff suppressed because one or more lines are too long
74
results/IMAGES008/DOJ-OGR-00020438.json
Normal file
74
results/IMAGES008/DOJ-OGR-00020438.json
Normal file
File diff suppressed because one or more lines are too long
74
results/IMAGES008/DOJ-OGR-00020441.json
Normal file
74
results/IMAGES008/DOJ-OGR-00020441.json
Normal file
@ -0,0 +1,74 @@
|
||||
{
|
||||
"document_metadata": {
|
||||
"page_number": "55",
|
||||
"document_number": "1-2",
|
||||
"date": "07/08/2022",
|
||||
"document_type": "Court Document",
|
||||
"has_handwriting": false,
|
||||
"has_stamps": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
"full_text": "Case 22-1426, Document 1-2, 07/08/2022, 3344417, Page55 of 91\n\n| 11/03/2021 | 413 | ORDER as to Ghislaine Maxwell. The Court is in receipt of the Defendant's motions for reconsideration. See Dkt. Nos. 407, 408. The Government is hereby ORDERED to respond to Defendant's motion for reconsideration, Dkt. No. 408, on or before November 8, 2021. As to the motion for reconsideration regarding the disclosure of juror names, the Court reminds counsel of the following. First, as the Court previously indicated, the lawyers will be provided the names of jurors on November 16, prior to the commencement of the voir dire process. Second, the Court has now resolved the logistical issues regarding the ability to conduct peremptory challenges on November 29 and the Court can now confirm that peremptory strikes will not be exercised until November 29. Finally, as previously indicated, although only 40 qualified jurors are needed for the exercise of peremptory strikes, the Court will seek to qualify approximately 50 to 60 prospective jurors to return on November 29 for the exercise of peremptory strikes. If counsel for either side learns of any additional information that would be a basis for a strike for cause prior to November 29, they shall immediately raise the issue with the Court. Bearing in mind this information, the Government is ORDERED to respond to Defendant's motion for reconsideration, Dkt. No. 407, on or before November 4, 2021. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan on 11/3/2021)(bw) (Entered: 11/04/2021) |\n| 11/04/2021 | 410 | LETTER by USA as to Ghislaine Maxwell addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan from AUSAs Alison Moe, Lara Pomerantz, and Andrew Rohrbach dated November 3, 2021 re: RTC and Verdict Sheet Document filed by USA. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Request to Charge, # 2 Exhibit Verdict sheet)(Rohrbach, Andrew) (Entered: 11/04/2021) |\n| 11/04/2021 | 411 | LETTER MOTION addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan from AUSAs Alison Moe, Lara Pomerantz, and Andrew Rohrbach dated November 4, 2021 re: Reconsideration of Court Order (Dkt. 409) . Document filed by USA as to Ghislaine Maxwell. (Pomerantz, Lara) (Entered: 11/04/2021) |\n| 11/04/2021 | 414 | MEMO ENDORSEMENT as to Ghislaine Maxwell on re: 411 LETTER MOTION filed by USA addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan from AUSAs Alison Moe, Lara Pomerantz, and Andrew Rohrbach dated November 4, 2021 re: Reconsideration of Court Order (Dkt. 409). ENDORSEMENT: The Court hereby DENIES the Government's request as to Dr. Park Dietz and Dr. Elizabeth Loftus. Pursuant to this Court's Order, if the Government seeks to exclude these anticipated witnesses, briefing must be submitted by November 8, 2021. Dkt. No. 409. As to the remaining individuals disclosed in Defendant's notice, the Court GRANTS the Government's request. If the Government seeks to exclude those anticipated witnesses, briefing must be submitted by November 15, 2021, with a response by Defendant due November 19, 2021. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan on 11/4/2021)(bw) (Entered: 11/04/2021) |\n| 11/04/2021 | 415 | LETTER by USA as to Ghislaine Maxwell addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan from AUSAs Alison Moe, Lara Pomerantz, and Andrew Rohrbach dated November 4, 2021 re: Reply to Defendant's Motion for Reconsideration regarding Disclosure of Juror Names Document filed by USA. (Pomerantz, Lara) (Entered: 11/04/2021) |\n| 11/05/2021 | 416 | MEMO ENDORSEMENT as to Ghislaine Maxwell on re: 415 LETTER by USA as to Ghislaine Maxwell addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan from AUSAs Alison Moe, Lara Pomerantz, and Andrew Rohrbach dated November 4, 2021 re: Reply to Defendant's Motion for Reconsideration regarding Disclosure of Juror Names. ENDORSEMENT: For the reasons stated in the Government's letter, the motion for reconsideration, Dkt. No. 407, is DENIED. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan on 11/5/2021) (ap) (Entered: 11/05/2021) |\n| 11/08/2021 | 417 | ORDER as to Ghislaine Maxwell: The Court is in receipt of the Government's supplemental letter regarding its opposition to the defense motion to exclude evidence of Minor Victim-3. See Dkt. No. 387. The letter is submitted temporarily under seal to allow defense counsel the opportunity to propose any additional redactions beyond what the Government proposes. At the November 1, 2021 conference, the Court asked the Government to provide its position as to whether Alleged \"Victim-3\" could be considered a \"victim\" of the crimes charged in the indictment for any legal purpose, including for purposes of restitution under 18 U.S.C. § 3663(a)(2). See Transcript at 71–72. The Government's supplemental letter does not address this issue. While acknowledging that the Court's request may have been unclear, the Government is now |\nDOJ-OGR-00020441",
|
||||
"text_blocks": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"type": "printed",
|
||||
"content": "Case 22-1426, Document 1-2, 07/08/2022, 3344417, Page55 of 91",
|
||||
"position": "header"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"type": "printed",
|
||||
"content": "The table contains court documents related to Ghislaine Maxwell's case, including orders, letters, and endorsements.",
|
||||
"position": "main"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"type": "printed",
|
||||
"content": "DOJ-OGR-00020441",
|
||||
"position": "footer"
|
||||
}
|
||||
],
|
||||
"entities": {
|
||||
"people": [
|
||||
"Ghislaine Maxwell",
|
||||
"Alison J. Nathan",
|
||||
"Alison Moe",
|
||||
"Lara Pomerantz",
|
||||
"Andrew Rohrbach",
|
||||
"Dr. Park Dietz",
|
||||
"Dr. Elizabeth Loftus"
|
||||
],
|
||||
"organizations": [
|
||||
"USA"
|
||||
],
|
||||
"locations": [],
|
||||
"dates": [
|
||||
"11/03/2021",
|
||||
"11/04/2021",
|
||||
"11/05/2021",
|
||||
"11/08/2021",
|
||||
"07/08/2022",
|
||||
"November 8, 2021",
|
||||
"November 16, 2021",
|
||||
"November 29, 2021",
|
||||
"November 3, 2021",
|
||||
"November 4, 2021",
|
||||
"November 15, 2021",
|
||||
"November 19, 2021",
|
||||
"November 1, 2021"
|
||||
],
|
||||
"reference_numbers": [
|
||||
"Dkt. Nos. 407, 408",
|
||||
"Dkt. No. 408",
|
||||
"Dkt. No. 407",
|
||||
"Dkt. 409",
|
||||
"Dkt. No. 409",
|
||||
"Dkt. No. 387",
|
||||
"413",
|
||||
"410",
|
||||
"411",
|
||||
"414",
|
||||
"415",
|
||||
"416",
|
||||
"417"
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
"additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court filing related to Ghislaine Maxwell's case. The table contains various court documents, including orders, letters, and endorsements. The documents are related to motions for reconsideration, disclosure of juror names, and other legal matters."
|
||||
}
|
||||
73
results/IMAGES008/DOJ-OGR-00020470.json
Normal file
73
results/IMAGES008/DOJ-OGR-00020470.json
Normal file
File diff suppressed because one or more lines are too long
76
results/IMAGES008/DOJ-OGR-00020513.json
Normal file
76
results/IMAGES008/DOJ-OGR-00020513.json
Normal file
@ -0,0 +1,76 @@
|
||||
{
|
||||
"document_metadata": {
|
||||
"page_number": "27",
|
||||
"document_number": "3-2",
|
||||
"date": "07/08/2022",
|
||||
"document_type": "Court Document",
|
||||
"has_handwriting": false,
|
||||
"has_stamps": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
"full_text": "Case 22-1426, Document 3-2, 07/08/2022, 3344434, Page27 of 92\n\n| Date | Number | Description |\n|------------|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|\n| 03/26/2021 | | >>>NOTICE REGARDING PRO HAC VICE MOTION. Regarding Document No. 182 MOTION for Sigrid S. McCawley to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Filing fee $200.00, receipt number ANYSDC-24312691. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. The document has been reviewed and there are no deficiencies. (wb) (Entered: 03/26/2021) |\n| 03/26/2021 | 183 | LETTER by Boies Schiller Flexner LLP as to Ghislaine Maxwell addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan from Sigrid S. McCawley dated March 22, 2021 re: Objection to Defendant Ghislaine Maxwell's motion for an order authorizing a Rule 17(c) subpoena. Document filed by Boies Schiller Flexner LLP. (McCawley, Sigrid) (Entered: 03/26/2021) |\n| 03/26/2021 | 184 | LETTER by Boies Schiller Flexner LLP as to Ghislaine Maxwell addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan from Sigrid S. McCawley dated March 26, 2021 re: Proposed redactions to March 22, 2021 Letter (ECF No. 183) Document filed by Boies Schiller Flexner LLP. (McCawley, Sigrid) (Entered: 03/26/2021) |\n| 03/26/2021 | 185 | LETTER by USA as to Ghislaine Maxwell addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan from AUSAs Maurene Comey, Alison Moe, Lara Pomerantz, and Andrew Rohrbach dated March 26, 2021 re: Recent decision in United States v. Schulte, 17 Cr. 548 (PAC) Document filed by USA. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1)(Comey, Maurene) (Entered: 03/26/2021) |\n| 03/26/2021 | 186 | ORDER as to Ghislaine Maxwell: The Court sees no reason to maintain the redactions on Boies Schiller Flexner LLP's March 26, 2021 letter. Dkt. No. 183. Unless the Government indicates an objection to removing those redactions by March 29, 2021, BSF shall file the unredacted version on the docket on March 30, 2021. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan on 3/26/2021) (lnl) (Entered: 03/26/2021) |\n| 03/29/2021 | 187 | (S2) SUPERSEDING INDICTMENT FILED as to Ghislaine Maxwell (1) count(s) 1ss, 2ss, 3ss, 4ss, 5ss, 6ss, 7ss–8ss. (jm) (Entered: 03/29/2021) |\n| 03/29/2021 | 188 | LETTER by USA as to Ghislaine Maxwell addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan from AUSAs Maurene Comey, Alison Moe, Lara Pomerantz, and Andrew Rohrbach dated March 29, 2021 re: S2 Superseding Indictment Document filed by USA. (Comey, Maurene) (Entered: 03/29/2021) |\n| 03/29/2021 | 189 | ORDER as to Ghislaine Maxwell. The Court is in receipt of the Government's letter responding to its March 18, 2021 order regarding redactions to its omnibus memorandum of law in opposition to the Defendant's twelve pretrial motions. Dkt. No. 170. the Court ORDERS that the information contained on pages 129134 of the Governments brief be unredacted. With respect to the proposed redactions to pages 118119 and Exhibit 11, the Court now understands that the parties seek redactions on the basis that the material has been maintained under seal in Giuffre v. Maxwell, Case No 15-cv-7433 (S.D.N.Y.). By April 1, 2021, the parties must meet and confer and either submit to the Court justification for those redactionsbeyond that it has been ordered redacted in the civil matter, or notify the Court that the parties are no longer seeking those redactions. If the parties disagree, they shall indicate their separate views in the joint letter. (Signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan on 3/29/21)(jw) (Entered: 03/29/2021) |\n| 03/29/2021 | 190 | LETTER by USA as to Ghislaine Maxwell addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan from AUSAs Maurene Comey, Alison Moe, and Lara Pomerantz dated March 29, 2021 re: Clarification re October 7, 2020 Letter Document filed by USA. (Comey, Maurene) (Entered: 03/29/2021) |\n| 03/29/2021 | | USCAppeal Fees received $ 505.00, receipt number 465401276762 as to Ghislaine Maxwell on 3/25/2021 re: 173 Notice of Appeal - Final Judgment filed by Ghislaine Maxwell. (tp) (Entered: 04/01/2021) |\n| 03/30/2021 | 191 | LETTER by Boies Schiller Flexner LLP as to Ghislaine Maxwell addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan from Sigrid S. McCawley dated March 22,2021 re: Unredacted Objection to Defendant Ghislaine Maxwell's motion for an order authorizing a Rule 17(c) subpoena. Document filed by Boies Schiller Flexner LLP. (McCawley, Sigrid) (Entered: 03/30/2021) |\n\nDOJ-OGR-00020513",
|
||||
"text_blocks": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"type": "printed",
|
||||
"content": "Case 22-1426, Document 3-2, 07/08/2022, 3344434, Page27 of 92",
|
||||
"position": "header"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"type": "printed",
|
||||
"content": "The table contents",
|
||||
"position": "middle"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"type": "printed",
|
||||
"content": "DOJ-OGR-00020513",
|
||||
"position": "footer"
|
||||
}
|
||||
],
|
||||
"entities": {
|
||||
"people": [
|
||||
"Sigrid S. McCawley",
|
||||
"Ghislaine Maxwell",
|
||||
"Alison J. Nathan",
|
||||
"Maurene Comey",
|
||||
"Alison Moe",
|
||||
"Lara Pomerantz",
|
||||
"Andrew Rohrbach",
|
||||
"Schulte"
|
||||
],
|
||||
"organizations": [
|
||||
"Boies Schiller Flexner LLP",
|
||||
"USA"
|
||||
],
|
||||
"locations": [
|
||||
"S.D.N.Y."
|
||||
],
|
||||
"dates": [
|
||||
"03/26/2021",
|
||||
"03/22/2021",
|
||||
"03/29/2021",
|
||||
"03/18/2021",
|
||||
"03/30/2021",
|
||||
"03/25/2021",
|
||||
"07/08/2022",
|
||||
"October 7, 2020",
|
||||
"April 1, 2021"
|
||||
],
|
||||
"reference_numbers": [
|
||||
"182",
|
||||
"183",
|
||||
"184",
|
||||
"185",
|
||||
"186",
|
||||
"187",
|
||||
"188",
|
||||
"189",
|
||||
"190",
|
||||
"191",
|
||||
"173",
|
||||
"24312691",
|
||||
"465401276762",
|
||||
"15-cv-7433",
|
||||
"17 Cr. 548 (PAC)"
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
"additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court docket sheet with various entries related to the case against Ghislaine Maxwell. The entries include letters, orders, and other documents filed by the parties involved. The document is well-formatted and legible."
|
||||
}
|
||||
92
results/IMAGES008/DOJ-OGR-00020536.json
Normal file
92
results/IMAGES008/DOJ-OGR-00020536.json
Normal file
File diff suppressed because one or more lines are too long
99
results/IMAGES008/DOJ-OGR-00020559.json
Normal file
99
results/IMAGES008/DOJ-OGR-00020559.json
Normal file
@ -0,0 +1,99 @@
|
||||
{
|
||||
"document_metadata": {
|
||||
"page_number": "73 of 92",
|
||||
"document_number": "3-2",
|
||||
"date": "07/08/2022",
|
||||
"document_type": "Case document",
|
||||
"has_handwriting": false,
|
||||
"has_stamps": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
"full_text": "Case 22-1426, Document 3-2, 07/08/2022, 3344434, Page73 of 92\n\n| | | 12/09/2021)\n\n12/09/2021 | 533 | LETTER MOTION addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan from AUSAs Maurene Comey, Alison Moe, Lara Pomerantz, and Andrew Rohrbach dated December 8, 2021 re: Admission of GX 52. Document filed by USA as to Ghislaine Maxwell. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B)(Rohrbach, Andrew) (Entered: 12/09/2021)\n\n12/09/2021 | 534 | LETTER MOTION addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan from AUSAs Maurene Comey, Alison Moe, Lara Pomerantz, and Andrew Rohrbach dated December 9, 2021 re: Proposed redactions to Dkt. No. 533. Document filed by USA as to Ghislaine Maxwell. (Rohrbach, Andrew) (Entered: 12/09/2021)\n\n12/09/2021 | 535 | MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER as to Ghislaine Maxwell. The Government seeks to admit what has been identified as Government Exhibit 52 (\"GX 52\"), and submit to the jury a redacted version of GX 52. The Defense objects to the admission of GX 52 on authentication and hearsay grounds. The admissibility of the exhibit has been the subject of pretrial motion in limine briefing and extensive supplemental briefing. See Dkt. Nos. 390, 397, 398, 457, 476, 490. This includes supplemental briefing received on December 8, 2021, after the authenticating witness, Mr. Juan Alessi, underwent direct examination by the Government and voir dire by the Defense. The Court reserved ruling on the exhibit, pending what was anticipated to be additional testimony. Trial Tr. at 876. The Court now overrules the Defenses objections. The parties are ORDERED to confer and propose a limiting instruction consistent with this ruling on or before today, December 9, 2021, at 7:00 p.m. The parties are FURTHER ORDERED to confer and prepare a stipulation that Government Exhibits 52A, 52D, 52E, 52F, 52G, and 52H are true and correct photocopies of five pages from GX 52. See Trial Tr. at 858. (Signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan on 12/9/21)(jw) (Entered: 12/10/2021)\n\n12/09/2021 | | Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Alison J. Nathan:Jury Trial as to Ghislaine Maxwell present with attorney Bobbi Sternheim, Jeff Pagliuca, Christian Everdell and Laura Menninger. AUSA Lara Pomerantz, Maurene Comey, Alison Moe and Andrew Rohrbach for the government. Court Reporters Martha Martin and George Malinowski. See transcript. (jw) (Entered: 12/13/2021)\n\n12/10/2021 | 536 | TRANSCRIPT of Proceedings as to Ghislaine Maxwell re: Conference held on 11/23/21 before Judge Alison J. Nathan. Court Reporter/Transcriber: Paula Speer, (212) 805-0300, Transcript may be viewed at the court public terminal or purchased through the Court Reporter/Transcriber before the deadline for Release of Transcript Restriction. After that date it may be obtained through PACER. Redaction Request due 1/3/2022. Redacted Transcript Deadline set for 1/10/2022. Release of Transcript Restriction set for 3/10/2022. (Moya, Goretti) (Entered: 12/10/2021)\n\n12/10/2021 | 537 | NOTICE OF FILING OF OFFICIAL TRANSCRIPT as to Ghislaine Maxwell. Notice is hereby given that an official transcript of a Conference proceeding held on 11/23/21 has been filed by the court reporter/transcriber in the above-captioned matter. The parties have seven (7) calendar days to file with the court a Notice of Intent to Request Redaction of this transcript. If no such Notice is filed, the transcript may be made remotely electronically available to the public without redaction after 90 calendar days.... (Moya, Goretti) (Entered: 12/10/2021)\n\n12/10/2021 | | Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Alison J. Nathan: Jury Trial as to Ghislaine Maxwell held on 12/10/2021. Defendant Ghislaine Maxwell present with attorney Bobbi Sternheim, Jeff Pagliuca, Christian Everdell and Laura Menninger. AUSA Lara Pomerantz, Maurene Comey, Alison Moe and Andrew Rohrbach for the government. Court Reporters Martha Martin and George Malinowski Jury trial held. See Transcript. (jbo) (Entered: 12/20/2021)\n\n12/11/2021 | 538 | LETTER by USA as to Ghislaine Maxwell addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan from AUSAs Maurene Comey, Alison Moe, Lara Pomerantz, and Andrew Rohrbach dated December 9, 2021 re: Limiting instruction for GX 52 Document filed by USA. (Rohrbach, Andrew) (Entered: 12/11/2021)\n\n12/12/2021 | 539 | LETTER MOTION addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan from AUSAs Maurene Comey, Alison Moe, Lara Pomerantz, and Andrew Rohrbach dated December 12, 2021 re: Defense witness order. Document filed by USA as to Ghislaine Maxwell. (Rohrbach, Andrew) (Entered: 12/12/2021)\n\nDOJ-OGR-00020559",
|
||||
"text_blocks": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"type": "printed",
|
||||
"content": "Case 22-1426, Document 3-2, 07/08/2022, 3344434, Page73 of 92",
|
||||
"position": "header"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"type": "printed",
|
||||
"content": "The rest of the document content",
|
||||
"position": "body"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"type": "printed",
|
||||
"content": "DOJ-OGR-00020559",
|
||||
"position": "footer"
|
||||
}
|
||||
],
|
||||
"entities": {
|
||||
"people": [
|
||||
"Alison J. Nathan",
|
||||
"Maurene Comey",
|
||||
"Alison Moe",
|
||||
"Lara Pomerantz",
|
||||
"Andrew Rohrbach",
|
||||
"Ghislaine Maxwell",
|
||||
"Bobbi Sternheim",
|
||||
"Jeff Pagliuca",
|
||||
"Christian Everdell",
|
||||
"Laura Menninger",
|
||||
"Martha Martin",
|
||||
"George Malinowski",
|
||||
"Paula Speer",
|
||||
"Juan Alessi",
|
||||
"Moya Goretti",
|
||||
"jbo",
|
||||
"jw"
|
||||
],
|
||||
"organizations": [
|
||||
"USA"
|
||||
],
|
||||
"locations": [],
|
||||
"dates": [
|
||||
"12/09/2021",
|
||||
"12/08/2021",
|
||||
"12/09/2021",
|
||||
"12/09/2021",
|
||||
"12/10/2021",
|
||||
"11/23/21",
|
||||
"1/3/2022",
|
||||
"1/10/2022",
|
||||
"3/10/2022",
|
||||
"12/10/2021",
|
||||
"12/10/2021",
|
||||
"12/11/2021",
|
||||
"12/09/2021",
|
||||
"12/12/2021",
|
||||
"12/12/2021",
|
||||
"07/08/2022"
|
||||
],
|
||||
"reference_numbers": [
|
||||
"22-1426",
|
||||
"3-2",
|
||||
"3344434",
|
||||
"533",
|
||||
"534",
|
||||
"535",
|
||||
"536",
|
||||
"537",
|
||||
"538",
|
||||
"539",
|
||||
"390",
|
||||
"397",
|
||||
"398",
|
||||
"457",
|
||||
"476",
|
||||
"490",
|
||||
"52",
|
||||
"52A",
|
||||
"52D",
|
||||
"52E",
|
||||
"52F",
|
||||
"52G",
|
||||
"52H",
|
||||
"805-0300",
|
||||
"DOJ-OGR-00020559"
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
"additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court docket sheet from a case involving Ghislaine Maxwell. The document is a table with various columns including date, docket number, and description of the document filed. The document contains various legal terms and procedures."
|
||||
}
|
||||
56
results/IMAGES009/DOJ-OGR-00024000.json
Normal file
56
results/IMAGES009/DOJ-OGR-00024000.json
Normal file
@ -0,0 +1,56 @@
|
||||
{
|
||||
"document_metadata": {
|
||||
"page_number": null,
|
||||
"document_number": "DOJ-OGR-00024000",
|
||||
"date": null,
|
||||
"document_type": "Annual Data Summary",
|
||||
"has_handwriting": false,
|
||||
"has_stamps": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
"full_text": "ANNUAL DATA SUMMARY 1990 - 1999\nAverage Daily Population\nNumber of Suicides\nRate per 100,000\nNumber of Attempts\nRate per 100,000\nNumber of Suicide Watches\nRate per 100,000\nNumber of Risk Assessments\nRate per 100,000\nType of Institution\nUSP/ADX/SMU\nFCI\nContract Facility\nFDC/MCC/MDC\nFMC\nFPC\nFTC\nRRC/Home Confinement\nFurlough\nLocation\nSHU\nGeneral Population\nSeclusion (FMC)\nOther\nHistory of Mental Illness\nFY 1990\n64,936\n11\n16.9\n186\n286.4\n534\n822.3\n1069\n1,646.2\n1\n4\n0\n2\n1\n0\n0\n0\n0\n5 (63%)\nFY 1991\n79,678\n8\n10.0\n198\n248.5\n516\n647.6\n1321\n1,657.9\n5\n2\n0\n1\n1\n0\n0\n0\n0\n4 (44%)\nFY 1992\n79,602\n6\n7.5\n232\n291.4\n577\n724.9\n1611\n2,023.8\n1\n0\n0\n3\n1\n1\n0\n0\n0\n3 (50%)\nFY 1993\n89,060\n9\n10.1\n412\n462.6\n1046\n1,174.5\n2698\n3,029.4\n2\n1\n0\n5\n3\n0\n0\n0\n0\n6 (55%)\nFY 1994\n92,445\n12\n13.0\n383\n414.3\n753\n814.5\n2049\n2,216.5\n2\n9\n0\n3\n1\n1\n0\n0\n0\n2 (13%)\nFY 1995\n97,934\n15\n15.3\n426\n435.0\n1033\n1,054.8\n2728\n2,785.5\n5\n4\n0\n1\n0\n0\n0\n0\n0\n3 (30%)\nFY 1996\n103,211\n9\n8.7\n342\n331.4\n998\n967.0\n2853\n2,764.2\n1\n3\n0\n4\n1\n0\n1\n0\n0\n4 (40%)\nFY 1997\n109,199\n10\n9.2\n294\n269.2\n1001\n916.7\n3393\n3,107.2\n6\n4\n0\n2\n1\n1\n1\n0\n0\n2 (13%)\nFY 1998\n117,422\n17\n14.5\n515\n438.6\n1067\n908.7\n2839\n2,417.8\n3\n3\n0\n4\n2\n0\n0\n0\n0\n5 (42%)\nFY 1999\n128,427\n7\n5.5\n559\n435.3\n1247\n971.0\n2921\n2,274.4\n4\n1\n0\n2\n0\n0\n0\n0\n0\n2 (29%)\n6\n7\n5 (465)\n7\n0\n0\n4 (103)\n3\n0\n0\n9\n4\n0\n0\n6\n103\nDOJ-OGR-00024000",
|
||||
"text_blocks": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"type": "printed",
|
||||
"content": "ANNUAL DATA SUMMARY 1990 - 1999",
|
||||
"position": "header"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"type": "printed",
|
||||
"content": "Average Daily Population\nNumber of Suicides\nRate per 100,000\nNumber of Attempts\nRate per 100,000\nNumber of Suicide Watches\nRate per 100,000\nNumber of Risk Assessments\nRate per 100,000\nType of Institution\nUSP/ADX/SMU\nFCI\nContract Facility\nFDC/MCC/MDC\nFMC\nFPC\nFTC\nRRC/Home Confinement\nFurlough\nLocation\nSHU\nGeneral Population\nSeclusion (FMC)\nOther\nHistory of Mental Illness",
|
||||
"position": "left margin"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"type": "printed",
|
||||
"content": "FY 1990\n64,936\n11\n16.9\n186\n286.4\n534\n822.3\n1069\n1,646.2\n1\n4\n0\n2\n1\n0\n0\n0\n0\n5 (63%)\nFY 1991\n79,678\n8\n10.0\n198\n248.5\n516\n647.6\n1321\n1,657.9\n5\n2\n0\n1\n1\n0\n0\n0\n0\n4 (44%)\nFY 1992\n79,602\n6\n7.5\n232\n291.4\n577\n724.9\n1611\n2,023.8\n1\n0\n0\n3\n1\n1\n0\n0\n0\n3 (50%)\nFY 1993\n89,060\n9\n10.1\n412\n462.6\n1046\n1,174.5\n2698\n3,029.4\n2\n1\n0\n5\n3\n0\n0\n0\n0\n6 (55%)\nFY 1994\n92,445\n12\n13.0\n383\n414.3\n753\n814.5\n2049\n2,216.5\n2\n9\n0\n3\n1\n1\n0\n0\n0\n2 (13%)\nFY 1995\n97,934\n15\n15.3\n426\n435.0\n1033\n1,054.8\n2728\n2,785.5\n5\n4\n0\n1\n0\n0\n0\n0\n0\n3 (30%)\nFY 1996\n103,211\n9\n8.7\n342\n331.4\n998\n967.0\n2853\n2,764.2\n1\n3\n0\n4\n1\n0\n1\n0\n0\n4 (40%)\nFY 1997\n109,199\n10\n9.2\n294\n269.2\n1001\n916.7\n3393\n3,107.2\n6\n4\n0\n2\n1\n1\n1\n0\n0\n2 (13%)\nFY 1998\n117,422\n17\n14.5\n515\n438.6\n1067\n908.7\n2839\n2,417.8\n3\n3\n0\n4\n2\n0\n0\n0\n0\n5 (42%)\nFY 1999\n128,427\n7\n5.5\n559\n435.3\n1247\n971.0\n2921\n2,274.4\n4\n1\n0\n2\n0\n0\n0\n0\n0\n2 (29%)\n6\n7\n5 (465)\n7\n0\n0\n4 (103)\n3\n0\n0\n9\n4\n0\n0\n6\n103",
|
||||
"position": "main content"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"type": "printed",
|
||||
"content": "DOJ-OGR-00024000",
|
||||
"position": "footer"
|
||||
}
|
||||
],
|
||||
"entities": {
|
||||
"people": [],
|
||||
"organizations": [
|
||||
"DOJ"
|
||||
],
|
||||
"locations": [],
|
||||
"dates": [
|
||||
"1990",
|
||||
"1991",
|
||||
"1992",
|
||||
"1993",
|
||||
"1994",
|
||||
"1995",
|
||||
"1996",
|
||||
"1997",
|
||||
"1998",
|
||||
"1999"
|
||||
],
|
||||
"reference_numbers": [
|
||||
"DOJ-OGR-00024000"
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
"additional_notes": "The document appears to be a table summarizing annual data on suicides and related statistics within a correctional or penal institution from FY 1990 to FY 1999. The data includes various metrics such as average daily population, number of suicides, suicide attempts, suicide watches, and risk assessments, categorized by type of institution and other factors."
|
||||
}
|
||||
86
results/IMAGES009/DOJ-OGR-00025168.json
Normal file
86
results/IMAGES009/DOJ-OGR-00025168.json
Normal file
@ -0,0 +1,86 @@
|
||||
{
|
||||
"document_metadata": {
|
||||
"page_number": "868",
|
||||
"document_number": "DOJ-OGR-00025168",
|
||||
"date": "2019/07/24",
|
||||
"document_type": "email",
|
||||
"has_handwriting": false,
|
||||
"has_stamps": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
"full_text": "Page 868\nRe: Epstein\nFrom Shirley V. Skipper-Scott\nTo Lamine N'Diaye\nDate 2019/07/24 11:54\nSubject: Re: Epstein\nAttachments: TEXT.htm\nHe is pending a Code 228, Tattooing or Self-Mutilation and I spoke with [redacted] who indicated that most likely he will be found competent because he is not mentally ill. Therefore, he will be pending a UDC hearing. I am looking at the SHU Roster now to see who can be a good cell mate.\nShirley Skipper-Scott\nAssociate Warden\nMCC New York\n150 Park Row\nNew York, New York 10007\nOffice: 646-836 [redacted]\nBlack Berry: 646-423 [redacted] @bop.gov\n>>> Lamine N'Diaye [redacted] @bop.gov> 7/24/2019 10:47 AM >>>\nLooks good\nSent from my Verizon, Samsung Galaxy smartphone\n------- Original message ---------\nFrom: \"Shirley V. Skipper-Scott\" [redacted] @bop.gov>\nDate: 7/24/19 10:10 AM (GMT-05:00)\nTo: Lamine N'Diaye [redacted] @bop.gov>\nSubject: Re: Epstein\n>>> \"Shirley V. Skipper-Scott\" 7/24/2019 10:10 >>>\nThis is the response I am sending the RD. Are you ok with this?\nBelow is the definition of Psychological Observation provided by [redacted] Chief Psychologist. He will remain on Psychological Observation until tomorrow, where he will be reassessed.\nDEFINITION: A Psychological Observation occurs when an inmate who suffers from a mental illness, a serious personality disorder, a medical problem (impairing their mental status), or drug intoxication and/or withdrawal symptoms begins to deteriorate. The inmate is no longer mentally stable and therefore, it is inappropriate for s/he to remain in general population or the Special Housing Unit (SHU). Inmates placed on psychological observation differ from inmates placed on suicide watch as they are not imminently suicidal (e.g., have not expressed self-harm or engaged in self-harming behavior), but rather, due to his/her impairment in mental status or functioning (e.g., not eating, not sleeping, disorganized/unusual thinking, poor self-care), his/her behavior can be unpredictable. Psychological Observation status is intended as a temporary status.\nPage 1685",
|
||||
"text_blocks": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"type": "printed",
|
||||
"content": "Re: Epstein",
|
||||
"position": "header"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"type": "printed",
|
||||
"content": "From: Shirley V. Skipper-Scott\nTo: Lamine N'Diaye\nDate: 2019/07/24 11:54\nSubject: Re: Epstein\nAttachments: TEXT.htm",
|
||||
"position": "header"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"type": "printed",
|
||||
"content": "He is pending a Code 228, Tattooing or Self-Mutilation and I spoke with [redacted] who indicated that most likely he will be found competent because he is not mentally ill. Therefore, he will be pending a UDC hearing. I am looking at the SHU Roster now to see who can be a good cell mate.",
|
||||
"position": "body"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"type": "printed",
|
||||
"content": "Shirley Skipper-Scott\nAssociate Warden\nMCC New York\n150 Park Row\nNew York, New York 10007\nOffice: 646-836 [redacted]\nBlack Berry: 646-423 [redacted] @bop.gov",
|
||||
"position": "footer"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"type": "printed",
|
||||
"content": ">>> Lamine N'Diaye [redacted] @bop.gov> 7/24/2019 10:47 AM >>>\nLooks good",
|
||||
"position": "body"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"type": "printed",
|
||||
"content": "Sent from my Verizon, Samsung Galaxy smartphone",
|
||||
"position": "footer"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"type": "printed",
|
||||
"content": "------- Original message ---------\nFrom: \"Shirley V. Skipper-Scott\" [redacted] @bop.gov>\nDate: 7/24/19 10:10 AM (GMT-05:00)\nTo: Lamine N'Diaye [redacted] @bop.gov>\nSubject: Re: Epstein",
|
||||
"position": "body"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"type": "printed",
|
||||
"content": ">>> \"Shirley V. Skipper-Scott\" 7/24/2019 10:10 >>>\nThis is the response I am sending the RD. Are you ok with this?",
|
||||
"position": "body"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"type": "printed",
|
||||
"content": "Below is the definition of Psychological Observation provided by [redacted] Chief Psychologist. He will remain on Psychological Observation until tomorrow, where he will be reassessed.",
|
||||
"position": "body"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"type": "printed",
|
||||
"content": "DEFINITION: A Psychological Observation occurs when an inmate who suffers from a mental illness, a serious personality disorder, a medical problem (impairing their mental status), or drug intoxication and/or withdrawal symptoms begins to deteriorate. The inmate is no longer mentally stable and therefore, it is inappropriate for s/he to remain in general population or the Special Housing Unit (SHU). Inmates placed on psychological observation differ from inmates placed on suicide watch as they are not imminently suicidal (e.g., have not expressed self-harm or engaged in self-harming behavior), but rather, due to his/her impairment in mental status or functioning (e.g., not eating, not sleeping, disorganized/unusual thinking, poor self-care), his/her behavior can be unpredictable. Psychological Observation status is intended as a temporary status.",
|
||||
"position": "body"
|
||||
}
|
||||
],
|
||||
"entities": {
|
||||
"people": [
|
||||
"Shirley V. Skipper-Scott",
|
||||
"Lamine N'Diaye"
|
||||
],
|
||||
"organizations": [
|
||||
"MCC New York",
|
||||
"BOP"
|
||||
],
|
||||
"locations": [
|
||||
"New York"
|
||||
],
|
||||
"dates": [
|
||||
"2019/07/24",
|
||||
"7/24/19",
|
||||
"7/24/2019"
|
||||
],
|
||||
"reference_numbers": [
|
||||
"DOJ-OGR-00025168",
|
||||
"228"
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
"additional_notes": "The document is an email chain discussing an inmate's status and the definition of Psychological Observation. The email contains redactions."
|
||||
}
|
||||
65
results/IMAGES010/DOJ-OGR-00025738.json
Normal file
65
results/IMAGES010/DOJ-OGR-00025738.json
Normal file
@ -0,0 +1,65 @@
|
||||
{
|
||||
"document_metadata": {
|
||||
"page_number": "1695",
|
||||
"document_number": "DOJ-OGR-00025738",
|
||||
"date": "2019/11/13",
|
||||
"document_type": "email",
|
||||
"has_handwriting": false,
|
||||
"has_stamps": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
"full_text": "Re: Epstein Response\nFrom\nTo\nDate\nSubject:\nAttachments:\nWill do.\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\nIf you are emailing about an inmate that may be at risk for suicide or self-harm, this is an emergency situation. Please make sure that you make contact (verbally) to Psychology Staff or the on-call psychologist. Please ensure to maintain constant visual observation of the inmate until formal steps can be taken to ensure his/her safety pending a formal assessment by a Psychologist.\n\n>>> Charisma Edge 11/13/2019 9:00 AM >>>\nYes, I signed it and placed it in the warden's out-box. Double check w him, please so we can have it during the reconstruction meeting. Thanks\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\ngreat, thanks! I put the corrected Psy Alert memo in your box yesterday\n\n\n\n\n\nPage 8724",
|
||||
"text_blocks": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"type": "printed",
|
||||
"content": "Re: Epstein Response",
|
||||
"position": "header"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"type": "printed",
|
||||
"content": "From\nTo\nDate\nSubject:\nAttachments:",
|
||||
"position": "header"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"type": "handwritten",
|
||||
"content": "Will do.",
|
||||
"position": "middle"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"type": "printed",
|
||||
"content": "If you are emailing about an inmate that may be at risk for suicide or self-harm, this is an emergency situation. Please make sure that you make contact (verbally) to Psychology Staff or the on-call psychologist. Please ensure to maintain constant visual observation of the inmate until formal steps can be taken to ensure his/her safety pending a formal assessment by a Psychologist.",
|
||||
"position": "middle"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"type": "handwritten",
|
||||
"content": ">>> Charisma Edge 11/13/2019 9:00 AM >>>\nYes, I signed it and placed it in the warden's out-box. Double check w him, please so we can have it during the reconstruction meeting. Thanks",
|
||||
"position": "middle"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"type": "handwritten",
|
||||
"content": "great, thanks! I put the corrected Psy Alert memo in your box yesterday",
|
||||
"position": "middle"
|
||||
}
|
||||
],
|
||||
"entities": {
|
||||
"people": [
|
||||
"Charisma Edge"
|
||||
],
|
||||
"organizations": [
|
||||
"U.S. Department of Justice",
|
||||
"Federal Bureau of Prisons",
|
||||
"Metropolitan Correctional Center"
|
||||
],
|
||||
"locations": [
|
||||
"New York",
|
||||
"150 Park Row"
|
||||
],
|
||||
"dates": [
|
||||
"2019/11/13",
|
||||
"11/13/2019"
|
||||
],
|
||||
"reference_numbers": [
|
||||
"DOJ-OGR-00025738"
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
"additional_notes": "The document appears to be an email chain related to the Epstein case, with redactions of personal information. The email discusses an inmate at risk for suicide or self-harm and includes instructions for handling such situations. The tone is professional, and the content suggests an official or institutional context."
|
||||
}
|
||||
Some files were not shown because too many files have changed in this diff Show More
Loading…
x
Reference in New Issue
Block a user