epstein-docs/epstein-docs.github.io
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/epstein-docs/epstein-docs.github.io.git synced 2025-12-09 19:46:33 -06:00
Code Issues 3 Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity
epstein-docs.github.io/processed_results.json
nickp 017ff274cb its done
2025-10-07 14:47:55 +11:00

3321 lines
538 KiB
JSON
Raw Permalink Blame History

This file contains ambiguous Unicode characters

This file contains Unicode characters that might be confused with other characters. If you think that this is intentional, you can safely ignore this warning. Use the Escape button to reveal them.

{
"total_processed": 91,
"successful": 34,
"failed": 57,
"results": [
{
"filename": "IMAGES001/DOJ-OGR-00001648.jpg",
"success": false,
"data": null,
"error": "Expecting ',' delimiter: line 9 column 4 (char 208)"
},
{
"filename": "IMAGES001/DOJ-OGR-00000258.jpg",
"success": false,
"data": null,
"error": "Expecting ',' delimiter: line 9 column 4 (char 200)"
},
{
"filename": "IMAGES001/DOJ-OGR-00000628.jpg",
"success": false,
"data": null,
"error": "Expecting ',' delimiter: line 9 column 4 (char 202)"
},
{
"filename": "IMAGES001/DOJ-OGR-00001100.jpg",
"success": false,
"data": null,
"error": "Expecting ',' delimiter: line 9 column 4 (char 263)"
},
{
"filename": "IMAGES001/DOJ-OGR-00001671.jpg",
"success": false,
"data": null,
"error": "Expecting ',' delimiter: line 9 column 4 (char 202)"
},
{
"filename": "IMAGES002/DOJ-OGR-00003600.jpg",
"success": false,
"data": null,
"error": "Expecting ',' delimiter: line 9 column 4 (char 204)"
},
{
"filename": "IMAGES001/DOJ-OGR-00001690.jpg",
"success": false,
"data": null,
"error": "Expecting ',' delimiter: line 9 column 4 (char 201)"
},
{
"filename": "IMAGES002/DOJ-OGR-00004922.jpg",
"success": false,
"data": null,
"error": "Expecting ',' delimiter: line 9 column 4 (char 205)"
},
{
"filename": "IMAGES002/DOJ-OGR-00005566.jpg",
"success": false,
"data": null,
"error": "Expecting ',' delimiter: line 9 column 4 (char 208)"
},
{
"filename": "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00005935.jpg",
"success": false,
"data": null,
"error": "Expecting ',' delimiter: line 46 column 6 (char 12104)"
},
{
"filename": "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006860.jpg",
"success": true,
"data": {
"document_metadata": {
"page_number": "25 of 45",
"document_number": "Document 452-2",
"date": "Filed 11/12/21",
"document_type": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
"has_handwriting": false,
"has_stamps": false
},
"full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 452-2 Filed 11/12/21 Page 25 of 45\n283\nAlaggia et al.\nMcElvaney, R., Greene, S., & Hogan, D. (2014). To tell or not to tell? Factors influencing young people's informal disclosures of child sexual abuse. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 29, 928 947.\nMaier, T., Mohler Kuo, M., Landholt, M. A., Schnyder, U., & Jud, A. (2013). The tip of the iceberg. Incidence of disclosed cases of child sexual abuse in Switzerland: Results from a Nationwide Agency Survey. International Journal of Public Health, 58, 875 883.\nPaine, M. L., & Hansen, D. J. (2002). Factors influencing children to self disclose sexual abuse. Clinical Psychology Review, 22, 271 295. doi:10.1016/S0272 7358(01)00091 5\nPereda, N., Guilera, G., Forns, M., & Gómez Benito, J. (2009). The international epidemiology of child sexual abuse: A continuation of Finkelhor (1994). Child Abuse & Neglect, 33, 331. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/230158315?accountid=14771\nPriebe, G., & Svedin, C. G. (2008). Child sexual abuse is largely hidden from the adult society: An epidemiological study of ado lescents' disclosures. Child Abuse & Neglect, 32, 1095 1108.\nReitsema, A. M., & Grietens, H. (2015). Is anybody listening? The literature on the dialogical process of child sexual abuse disclosure reviewed. Trauma Violence Abuse. doi:10.1177/1524838015584368\nRosenthal, P., & Rosenthal, W. (2004). The analysis of narrative biographical interviews in U Flick. In E. von Kardorff & I. Steinke (Eds.), A Companion to Qualitative Research (pp. 259 265). London, UK: Sage.\nSchaeffer, P., Leventhal, J. M., & Asnes, A. G. (2011). Children's disclosures of sexual abuse: Learning from direct inquiry. Child Abuse & Neglect, 35, 343 352. doi:10.1016/j.chiabu.2011.01.014\nSchönbucher, V., Maier, T., Mohler Kuo, M., Schnyder, U., & Land olt, M. (2012). Disclosure of child sexual abuse by adolescents: A qualitative in depth study. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 27, 3486 3513. doi:10.1177/0886260512445380\nSmith, D. W., Letourneau, E. J., Saunders, B. E., Kilpatrick, D. G., Resnick, H. S., & Best, C. L. (2000). Delay in disclosure of child hood rape: Results from a national survey. Child Abuse & Neglect, 24, 273 287. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/70933344?accountid=14771\nSorsoli, L., Kia Keating, M., & Grossman, F. K. (2008). \"I keep that hush hush\": Male survivors of sexual abuse and the challenges of disclosure. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 55, 333 345. doi: 10.1037/0022 0167.55.3.333\nStaller, K. M., & Nelson Gardell, D. (2005). \"A burden in your heart\": Lessons from disclosure from female preadolescent and adolescent survivors of sexual abuse. Child Abuse & Neglect, 29, 1415 1432.\nStatistics Canada. (2013). Police reported crime statistics in Canada, 2012 (Catalogue number 85 002 X). Retrieved from the Statistics Canada website http://www.statcan.gc.ca/pub/85 002 x/2013001/article/11854 eng.htm#n2\nStoltenborgh, M., van IJzendoorn, M. H., Euser, E. M., & Bakermans Kranenburg, M. (2011). A global perspective on child sexual abuse: Meta analysis of prevalence around the world. Child Maltreatment, 16, 79 101. doi:10.1177/1077559511403920\nSummit, R. C. (1983). The sexual abuse accommodation syndrome. Child Abuse & Neglect, 7, 177 193.\nTener, D., & Murphy, S. (2015). Adult disclosure of child sexual abuse. Trauma, Violence & Abuse, 16, 391 400.\nTrocmé, N., Fallon, B., MacLaurin, B., Daciuk, J., Felstiner, C., Black, T., ... Cloutier, R. (2005). Canadian incidence study of reported child abuse and neglect 2003: Major findings. Ottawa: Minister of Public Works and Government Services Canada.\nTrocmé, N., Fallon, B., MacLaurin, B., Sinha, V., Black, T., Fast, E., ... Holroyd, J. (2008). Characteristics of substantiated maltreatment. Canadian incidence study of reported child abuse and neglect: Major findings (Chapter 4). Retrieved from http://www.phac aspc.gc.ca/cm vee/public eng.php\nUngar, M., Barter, K., McConnell, S. M., Tutty, L. M., & Fairholm, J. (2009a). Patterns of abuse disclosure among youth. Qualitative Social Work, 8, 341 356.\nUngar, M., Tutty, L. M., McConnell, S., Barter, K., & Fairholm, J. (2009b). What Canadian youth tell us about disclosing abuse. Child Abuse & Neglect, 33, 699 708.\nWilliams, L. M. (2003). Understanding child abuse and violence against women: A life course perspective. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 18, 441 451.\n\nAuthor Biographies\nRamona Alaggia, MSW, PhD, is an associate professor in social work and the Factor Inwentash Chair in Children's Mental Health at the University of Toronto. Her teaching and research focuses on gender and violence, sexual abuse disclosures, domestic violence exposure, and resilience processes.\nDelphine Collin-Vézina, PhD, is an associate professor for School of Social Work, McGill University and director for Centre for Research on Children and Families. She holds the Nicolas Steinmetz and Gilles Julien Chair in Social Pediatrics in Community and the Canada Research Chair (Tier II) in Child Welfare. Her work focuses on research and clinical topics related to child maltreatment, child sexual abuse, and trauma.\nRusan Lateef, MSW, is a social worker employed in the criminal justice system with adult male offenders in Ontario, Canada. She specializes in the intersection of health and mental health, child sexual abuse disclosures, and she is a researcher on the \"Make Resilience Matter\" project examining childhood exposure to domestic violence with Dr. Alaggia at the Factor Inwentash Faculty of Social Work, University of Toronto.\nDOJ-OGR-00006860",
"text_blocks": [
{
"type": "printed",
"content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 452-2 Filed 11/12/21 Page 25 of 45",
"position": "header"
},
{
"type": "printed",
"content": "283\nAlaggia et al.",
"position": "header"
},
{
"type": "printed",
"content": "McElvaney, R., Greene, S., & Hogan, D. (2014). To tell or not to tell? Factors influencing young people's informal disclosures of child sexual abuse. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 29, 928 947.",
"position": "main"
},
{
"type": "printed",
"content": "Author Biographies",
"position": "main"
},
{
"type": "printed",
"content": "Ramona Alaggia, MSW, PhD, is an associate professor in social work and the Factor Inwentash Chair in Children's Mental Health at the University of Toronto. Her teaching and research focuses on gender and violence, sexual abuse disclosures, domestic violence exposure, and resilience processes.",
"position": "main"
},
{
"type": "printed",
"content": "DOJ-OGR-00006860",
"position": "footer"
}
],
"entities": {
"people": [
"McElvaney, R.",
"Greene, S.",
"Hogan, D.",
"Maier, T.",
"Mohler Kuo, M.",
"Landholt, M. A.",
"Schnyder, U.",
"Jud, A.",
"Paine, M. L.",
"Hansen, D. J.",
"Pereda, N.",
"Guilera, G.",
"Forns, M.",
"Gómez Benito, J.",
"Priebe, G.",
"Svedin, C. G.",
"Reitsema, A. M.",
"Grietens, H.",
"Rosenthal, P.",
"Rosenthal, W.",
"Schaeffer, P.",
"Leventhal, J. M.",
"Asnes, A. G.",
"Schönbucher, V.",
"Maier, T.",
"Mohler Kuo, M.",
"Schnyder, U.",
"Land olt, M.",
"Smith, D. W.",
"Letourneau, E. J.",
"Saunders, B. E.",
"Kilpatrick, D. G.",
"Resnick, H. S.",
"Best, C. L.",
"Sorsoli, L.",
"Kia Keating, M.",
"Grossman, F. K.",
"Staller, K. M.",
"Nelson Gardell, D.",
"Stoltenborgh, M.",
"van IJzendoorn, M. H.",
"Euser, E. M.",
"Bakermans Kranenburg, M.",
"Summit, R. C.",
"Tener, D.",
"Murphy, S.",
"Trocmé, N.",
"Fallon, B.",
"MacLaurin, B.",
"Daciuk, J.",
"Felstiner, C.",
"Black, T.",
"Cloutier, R.",
"Trocmé, N.",
"Fallon, B.",
"MacLaurin, B.",
"Sinha, V.",
"Black, T.",
"Fast, E.",
"Holroyd, J.",
"Ungar, M.",
"Barter, K.",
"McConnell, S. M.",
"Tutty, L. M.",
"Fairholm, J.",
"Ungar, M.",
"Tutty, L. M.",
"McConnell, S.",
"Barter, K.",
"Fairholm, J.",
"Williams, L. M.",
"Ramona Alaggia",
"Delphine Collin-Vézina",
"Rusan Lateef"
],
"organizations": [
"University of Toronto",
"McGill University",
"Statistics Canada",
"Public Works and Government Services Canada",
"Factor Inwentash Faculty of Social Work"
],
"locations": [
"Canada",
"Ontario",
"Switzerland",
"Ottawa",
"London, UK"
],
"dates": [
"2014",
"2013",
"2002",
"2009",
"2008",
"2015",
"2004",
"2011",
"2012",
"2000",
"2008",
"2005",
"2013",
"2011",
"1983",
"2015",
"2005",
"2008",
"2009",
"2009",
"2003"
],
"reference_numbers": [
"Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
"Document 452-2",
"DOJ-OGR-00006860"
]
},
"additional_notes": "The document appears to be a page from a legal or academic document, likely related to a court case involving child sexual abuse. The text includes references to various studies and research papers on the topic, as well as author biographies. The document is well-formatted and free of significant damage or redactions."
},
"error": null
},
{
"filename": "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00005954.jpg",
"success": true,
"data": {
"document_metadata": {
"page_number": "44 of 45",
"document_number": "397-2",
"date": "10/29/21",
"document_type": "court document",
"has_handwriting": false,
"has_stamps": false
},
"full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 397-2 Filed 10/29/21 Page 44 of 45\nIva A. E. Bicanic et al.\nsomeone close are at increased risk for delayed disclosure, and that delayed disclosers are less likely to use medical services and to report to the police. These findings may assist clinicians and policymakers in understanding rape and help to develop interventions (Unterhitzenberger & Rosner, 2014), specifically targeted to support adolescents and young adults to disclose in an early-phase post-rape. Although the vast majority of the participants was living at their parental home, many of the sample did not first disclose to their parents. Therefore, it could be argued that in prevention programs specific attention should be given to the strengthening of the child–parent relationship, to facilitate disclosure to parents (Schönbucher et al., 2012). Next, as victims tend to disclose mostly to peers, prevention programmes may need to aim at teaching adolescents how they can help a peer victim if they become a recipient of disclosure (Schönbucher et al., 2012). In addition, education may increase victims’ willingness to disclose early, thereby increasing opportunities for access to health and police services. It is more likely to reach adolescents with direct, active, and online outreach programs via communication channels that are frequently used by adolescents and young adults particularly social media (i.e., Facebook, Twitter, YouTube, etc.), forums, and mobile apps. Such programmes, whereby adolescents and young adults are being treated as agents and decision makers (Hlavka, 2014), should focus on information concerning what rape actually is—not only the stereotypical idea of rape and what (not) to do in the aftermath of rape especially in the first week post-rape. Another way to help improve the support of victims of rape is the implementation of multidisciplinary sexual assault centres (Bicanic, Snetselaar, De Jongh, & Van de Putte, 2014; Bramsen, Elklit, & Nielsen, 2009), as these may be the most suitable places to organize education campaigns and offer integrated post-rape services in one location. Future research should investigate whether the availability of such centres increases the prevalence of police reporting and use of medical care. Moreover, as discussed, previous research concerning the topic of disclosure has focused on the disclosure process, mainly the effect of negative social reactions, and not the latency. In future research, social reactions in relation to disclosure (latency) should be assessed by using the Social Reactions Questionnaire, as well as the victim's perception of their own experience being defined as rape, as many girls and women do not report or seek help because they regard sexual violence against them as normal (Hlavka, 2014).\n\nConflict of interest and funding\nThere is no conflict of interest in the present study for any of the authors.\n8\n(page number not for citation purpose)\n\nReferences\nAchenbach, T. M., & Rescorla, L. A. (2001). Manual for the ASEBA school age forms & profiles. Burlington, VT: University of Vermont, Research Centre for Children, Youth, and Families.\nAhrens, C. E., Stansell, J., & Jennings, A. (2010). To tell or not to tell: The impact of disclosure on sexual assault survivors' recovery. Violence and Victims, 25(5), 631–648.\nAlisic, E., Eland, J., Huijbregts, R. A. D., & Kleber, R. J. (2012). Schokverwerkingslijst voor kinderen [Children's responses to trauma inventory revised version]. Amsterdam: Boom test uitgevers.\nAlisic, E., Eland, J., & Kleber, R. J. (2006). Schokverwerkingslijst voor Kinderen herziene versie [Children's responses to trauma inventory revised version]. Utrecht: Institute for Psychotrauma in collaboration with Clinical Psychology (University of Utrecht) and Psychotrauma Centre for Children and Youth (University Medical Centre Utrecht).\nAlisic, E., & Kleber, R. J. (2010). Measuring posttraumatic stress reactions in children: A preliminary validation of the children's responses to trauma inventory. Journal of Child & Adolescent Trauma, 3(3), 192–204.\nArata, C. M. (1998). To tell or not to tell: Current functioning of child sexual abuse survivors who disclosed their victimization. Child Maltreatment, 3(1), 63–71.\nArrindell, W. A., & Ettema, J. H. M. (1986). SCL-90: Handleiding bij een multidimensionele psychopathologie indicator [SCL-90: manual for a multidimensional measure of psychopathology]. Lisse: Swets Test.\nBasile, K. C., Chen, J., Black, M. C., & Saltzman, L. E. (2007). Prevalence and characteristics of sexual violence victimization among U.S. adults. Violence & Victims, 22, 437–448.\nBérubé, R. L., & Achenbach, T. M. (2006). Bibliography of published studies using ASEBA: 2006 edition. Burlington, VT: University of Vermont, Research Centre for Children, Youth and Families.\nBicanic, I., Snetselaar, H., De Jongh, A., & Van de Putte, E. (2014). Victims' use of professional services in a Dutch sexual assault centre. European Journal of Psychotraumatology, 5, 23645, doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.3402/ejpt.v5.23645\nBramsen, R. H., Elklit, A., & Nielsen, L. H. (2009). A Danish model for treating victims of rape and sexual assault: The multidisciplinary public approach, Journal of Aggression, Maltreatment & Trauma, 1(8), 886–905.\nBroman Fulks, J. J., Ruggiero, K. J., Hanson, R. F., Smith, D. W., Resnick, H. S., Kilpatrick, D. G., et al. (2007). Sexual assault disclosure in relation to adolescent mental health: Results from the National Survey of Adolescents. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, 36(2), 260–266.\nCrisma, M., Bascelli, E., Paci, D., & Romito, P. (2004). Adolescents who experienced sexual abuse: Fears, needs and impediments to disclosure. Child Abuse & Neglect, 28(10), 1035–1048.\nDe Haas, S., Van Berlo, W., Bakker, F., & Vanwesenbeeck, I. (2012). Prevalence and characteristics of sexual violence in the Netherlands, the risk of revictimization and pregnancy: Results from a national population survey. Violence and Victims, 27(4), 592–608.\nElwood, L. S., Smith, D. W., Resnick, H. S., Gudmundsdottir, B., Amstadter, A. B., Hanson, R. F., et al. (2011). Predictors of rape: Findings from the National Survey of Adolescents. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 24(2), 166–173.\nFisher, B. S., Cullen, F. T., & Turner, M. G. (2000). The sexual victimization of college women. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice, and Bureau of Justice Statistics.",
"text_blocks": [
{
"type": "printed",
"content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 397-2 Filed 10/29/21 Page 44 of 45",
"position": "header"
},
{
"type": "printed",
"content": "Iva A. E. Bicanic et al.",
"position": "header"
},
{
"type": "printed",
"content": "someone close are at increased risk for delayed disclosure, and that delayed disclosers are less likely to use medical services and to report to the police. These findings may assist clinicians and policymakers in understanding rape and help to develop interventions (Unterhitzenberger & Rosner, 2014), specifically targeted to support adolescents and young adults to disclose in an early-phase post-rape. Although the vast majority of the participants was living at their parental home, many of the sample did not first disclose to their parents. Therefore, it could be argued that in prevention programs specific attention should be given to the strengthening of the child–parent relationship, to facilitate disclosure to parents (Schönbucher et al., 2012). Next, as victims tend to disclose mostly to peers, prevention programmes may need to aim at teaching adolescents how they can help a peer victim if they become a recipient of disclosure (Schönbucher et al., 2012). In addition, education may increase victims’ willingness to disclose early, thereby increasing opportunities for access to health and police services. It is more likely to reach adolescents with direct, active, and online outreach programs via communication channels that are frequently used by adolescents and young adults particularly social media (i.e., Facebook, Twitter, YouTube, etc.), forums, and mobile apps. Such programmes, whereby adolescents and young adults are being treated as agents and decision makers (Hlavka, 2014), should focus on information concerning what rape actually is—not only the stereotypical idea of rape and what (not) to do in the aftermath of rape especially in the first week post-rape. Another way to help improve the support of victims of rape is the implementation of multidisciplinary sexual assault centres (Bicanic, Snetselaar, De Jongh, & Van de Putte, 2014; Bramsen, Elklit, & Nielsen, 2009), as these may be the most suitable places to organize education campaigns and offer integrated post-rape services in one location. Future research should investigate whether the availability of such centres increases the prevalence of police reporting and use of medical care. Moreover, as discussed, previous research concerning the topic of disclosure has focused on the disclosure process, mainly the effect of negative social reactions, and not the latency. In future research, social reactions in relation to disclosure (latency) should be assessed by using the Social Reactions Questionnaire, as well as the victim's perception of their own experience being defined as rape, as many girls and women do not report or seek help because they regard sexual violence against them as normal (Hlavka, 2014).",
"position": "main body"
},
{
"type": "printed",
"content": "Conflict of interest and funding",
"position": "subsection header"
},
{
"type": "printed",
"content": "There is no conflict of interest in the present study for any of the authors.",
"position": "main body"
},
{
"type": "printed",
"content": "8",
"position": "footer"
},
{
"type": "printed",
"content": "(page number not for citation purpose)",
"position": "footer"
},
{
"type": "printed",
"content": "References",
"position": "subsection header"
},
{
"type": "printed",
"content": "Achenbach, T. M., & Rescorla, L. A. (2001). Manual for the ASEBA school age forms & profiles. Burlington, VT: University of Vermont, Research Centre for Children, Youth, and Families.\nAhrens, C. E., Stansell, J., & Jennings, A. (2010). To tell or not to tell: The impact of disclosure on sexual assault survivors' recovery. Violence and Victims, 25(5), 631–648.\nAlisic, E., Eland, J., Huijbregts, R. A. D., & Kleber, R. J. (2012). Schokverwerkingslijst voor kinderen [Children's responses to trauma inventory revised version]. Amsterdam: Boom test uitgevers.\nAlisic, E., Eland, J., & Kleber, R. J. (2006). Schokverwerkingslijst voor Kinderen herziene versie [Children's responses to trauma inventory revised version]. Utrecht: Institute for Psychotrauma in collaboration with Clinical Psychology (University of Utrecht) and Psychotrauma Centre for Children and Youth (University Medical Centre Utrecht).\nAlisic, E., & Kleber, R. J. (2010). Measuring posttraumatic stress reactions in children: A preliminary validation of the children's responses to trauma inventory. Journal of Child & Adolescent Trauma, 3(3), 192–204.\nArata, C. M. (1998). To tell or not to tell: Current functioning of child sexual abuse survivors who disclosed their victimization. Child Maltreatment, 3(1), 63–71.\nArrindell, W. A., & Ettema, J. H. M. (1986). SCL-90: Handleiding bij een multidimensionele psychopathologie indicator [SCL-90: manual for a multidimensional measure of psychopathology]. Lisse: Swets Test.\nBasile, K. C., Chen, J., Black, M. C., & Saltzman, L. E. (2007). Prevalence and characteristics of sexual violence victimization among U.S. adults. Violence & Victims, 22, 437–448.\nBérubé, R. L., & Achenbach, T. M. (2006). Bibliography of published studies using ASEBA: 2006 edition. Burlington, VT: University of Vermont, Research Centre for Children, Youth and Families.\nBicanic, I., Snetselaar, H., De Jongh, A., & Van de Putte, E. (2014). Victims' use of professional services in a Dutch sexual assault centre. European Journal of Psychotraumatology, 5, 23645, doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.3402/ejpt.v5.23645\nBramsen, R. H., Elklit, A., & Nielsen, L. H. (2009). A Danish model for treating victims of rape and sexual assault: The multidisciplinary public approach, Journal of Aggression, Maltreatment & Trauma, 18(8), 886–905.\nBroman Fulks, J. J., Ruggiero, K. J., Hanson, R. F., Smith, D. W., Resnick, H. S., Kilpatrick, D. G., et al. (2007). Sexual assault disclosure in relation to adolescent mental health: Results from the National Survey of Adolescents. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, 36(2), 260–266.\nCrisma, M., Bascelli, E., Paci, D., & Romito, P. (2004). Adolescents who experienced sexual abuse: Fears, needs and impediments to disclosure. Child Abuse & Neglect, 28(10), 1035–1048.\nDe Haas, S., Van Berlo, W., Bakker, F., & Vanwesenbeeck, I. (2012). Prevalence and characteristics of sexual violence in the Netherlands, the risk of revictimization and pregnancy: Results from a national population survey. Violence and Victims, 27(4), 592–608.\nElwood, L. S., Smith, D. W., Resnick, H. S., Gudmundsdottir, B., Amstadter, A. B., Hanson, R. F., et al. (2011). Predictors of rape: Findings from the National Survey of Adolescents. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 24(2), 166–173.\nFisher, B. S., Cullen, F. T., & Turner, M. G. (2000). The sexual victimization of college women. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice, and Bureau of Justice Statistics.",
"position": "main body"
}
],
"entities": {
"people": [
"Iva A. E. Bicanic",
"Achenbach",
"Rescorla",
"Ahrens",
"Stansell",
"Jennings",
"Alisic",
"Eland",
"Huijbregts",
"Kleber",
"Arata",
"Arrindell",
"Ettema",
"Basile",
"Chen",
"Black",
"Saltzman",
"Bérubé",
"Snetselaar",
"De Jongh",
"Van de Putte",
"Bramsen",
"Elklit",
"Nielsen",
"Broman Fulks",
"Ruggiero",
"Hanson",
"Smith",
"Resnick",
"Kilpatrick",
"Crisma",
"Bascelli",
"Paci",
"Romito",
"De Haas",
"Van Berlo",
"Bakker",
"Vanwesenbeeck",
"Elwood",
"Gudmundsdottir",
"Amstadter",
"Fisher",
"Cullen",
"Turner",
"Unterhitzenberger",
"Rosner",
"Schönbucher",
"Hlavka"
],
"organizations": [
"University of Vermont",
"Institute for Psychotrauma",
"University of Utrecht",
"Psychotrauma Centre for Children and Youth",
"University Medical Centre Utrecht",
"Swets Test",
"U.S. Department of Justice",
"National Institute of Justice",
"Bureau of Justice Statistics"
],
"locations": [
"Burlington",
"VT",
"Utrecht",
"Amsterdam",
"Netherlands",
"Washington, DC"
],
"dates": [
"10/29/21",
"2001",
"2010",
"2012",
"2006",
"1998",
"1986",
"2007",
"2014",
"2009",
"2004",
"2011",
"2000"
],
"reference_numbers": [
"1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
"397-2"
]
},
"additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court document related to a case involving sexual assault."
},
"error": null
},
{
"filename": "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006528.jpg",
"success": false,
"data": null,
"error": "Expecting ',' delimiter: line 9 column 4 (char 208)"
},
{
"filename": "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00007047.jpg",
"success": false,
"data": null,
"error": "Expecting ',' delimiter: line 9 column 4 (char 213)"
},
{
"filename": "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00006879.jpg",
"success": false,
"data": null,
"error": "Expecting ',' delimiter: line 147 column 4 (char 15715)"
},
{
"filename": "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00007341.jpg",
"success": false,
"data": null,
"error": "Expecting ',' delimiter: line 9 column 4 (char 200)"
},
{
"filename": "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00008029.jpg",
"success": false,
"data": null,
"error": "Expecting ',' delimiter: line 9 column 4 (char 203)"
},
{
"filename": "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00007343.jpg",
"success": false,
"data": null,
"error": "Expecting ',' delimiter: line 9 column 4 (char 200)"
},
{
"filename": "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00008032.jpg",
"success": false,
"data": null,
"error": "Expecting ',' delimiter: line 9 column 4 (char 203)"
},
{
"filename": "IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00008283.jpg",
"success": false,
"data": null,
"error": "Expecting ',' delimiter: line 9 column 4 (char 209)"
},
{
"filename": "IMAGES004/DOJ-OGR-00009277.jpg",
"success": false,
"data": null,
"error": "Expecting ',' delimiter: line 41 column 6 (char 7444)"
},
{
"filename": "IMAGES004/DOJ-OGR-00009972.jpg",
"success": false,
"data": null,
"error": "Expecting ',' delimiter: line 31 column 6 (char 6796)"
},
{
"filename": "IMAGES004/DOJ-OGR-00009974.jpg",
"success": false,
"data": null,
"error": "Expecting ',' delimiter: line 31 column 6 (char 6156)"
},
{
"filename": "IMAGES004/DOJ-OGR-00011771.jpg",
"success": false,
"data": null,
"error": "Expecting ',' delimiter: line 9 column 4 (char 209)"
},
{
"filename": "IMAGES004/DOJ-OGR-00011349.jpg",
"success": false,
"data": null,
"error": "Expecting ',' delimiter: line 9 column 4 (char 201)"
},
{
"filename": "IMAGES005/DOJ-OGR-00013011.jpg",
"success": false,
"data": null,
"error": "Expecting ',' delimiter: line 9 column 4 (char 216)"
},
{
"filename": "IMAGES006/DOJ-OGR-00015822.jpg",
"success": true,
"data": {
"document_metadata": {
"page_number": "25",
"document_number": "DOJ-OGR-00015822",
"date": "1943-11",
"document_type": "Pilot's Flight Log",
"has_handwriting": true,
"has_stamps": false
},
"full_text": "DATE 1943 NOV AIRCRAFT MAKE AND MODEL AIRCRAFT IDENTIFICATION MARK POINTS OF DEPARTURE & ARRIVAL FROM TO MILES FLOWN FLT. NO. REMARKS, PROCEDURES, MANEUVERS, ENDORSEMENTS NO. Ldg. AIRPLANE COMPLEX TURE AIRCRAFT CATEGORY 26 HS125-1a2 N908K BGS-CMH-M19-PBI 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 PAGE TOTAL 16 AMT. FORWARD 5447 5447 5447 5447 TOTAL TO DATE 2563 2563 2563 2563 I certify that the statements made by me on this form are true. PILOT'S SIGNATURE",
"text_blocks": [
{
"type": "printed",
"content": "DATE 1943 NOV AIRCRAFT MAKE AND MODEL AIRCRAFT IDENTIFICATION MARK POINTS OF DEPARTURE & ARRIVAL FROM TO MILES FLOWN FLT. NO. REMARKS, PROCEDURES, MANEUVERS, ENDORSEMENTS NO. Ldg. AIRPLANE COMPLEX TURE AIRCRAFT CATEGORY",
"position": "header"
},
{
"type": "handwritten",
"content": "26 HS125-1a2 N908K BGS-CMH-M19-PBI 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461",
"position": "body"
},
{
"type": "handwritten",
"content": "I certify that the statements made by me on this form are true. PILOT'S SIGNATURE",
"position": "footer"
}
],
"entities": {
"people": [],
"organizations": [],
"locations": [
"BGS",
"CMH",
"M19",
"PBI",
"IAD",
"TGB",
"EWR",
"SAL",
"DCA",
"ASC",
"MMZ",
"BED",
"OFA",
"SFF",
"TPA"
],
"dates": [
"1943-11-26",
"1943-11-04",
"1943-11-05",
"1943-11-06",
"1943-11-08",
"1943-11-16",
"1943-11-17",
"1943-11-20",
"1943-11-24",
"1943-11-30",
"1944-01-02",
"1944-01-06",
"1944-01-08",
"1944-01-15",
"1944-01-16",
"1944-01-18",
"1944-01-20",
"1944-01-23"
],
"reference_numbers": [
"N908K",
"HS125-1a2",
"430",
"431",
"432",
"433",
"434",
"435",
"436",
"437",
"438",
"439",
"440",
"441",
"442",
"443",
"444",
"445",
"446",
"447",
"448",
"449",
"450",
"451",
"452",
"453",
"454",
"455",
"456",
"457",
"458",
"459",
"460",
"461"
]
},
"additional_notes": "The document is a pilot's flight log from November 1943 to January 1944. The log contains handwritten entries detailing flight information, including dates, aircraft make and model, identification marks, points of departure and arrival, miles flown, and flight numbers. The document has been partially redacted with a black box covering the 'REMARKS, PROCEDURES, MANEUVERS, ENDORSEMENTS' section. The pilot has signed the document at the bottom."
},
"error": null
},
{
"filename": "IMAGES006/DOJ-OGR-00015825.jpg",
"success": true,
"data": {
"document_metadata": {
"page_number": "28",
"document_number": "DOJ-OGR-00015825",
"date": "1994 APR 10-30",
"document_type": "Pilot's Flight Log",
"has_handwriting": true,
"has_stamps": false
},
"full_text": "DATE 1994 APR 10-30 | AIRCRAFT MAKE AND MODEL Cessna 172 | AIRCRAFT IDENTIFICATION MARK N9853K | POINTS OF DEPARTURE & ARRIVAL | MILES FLOWN | FLT. NO. | REMARKS, PROCEDURES, MANEUVERS, ENDORSEMENTS | AIRCRAFT CATEGORY | NO. LDG. | DAY/NIGHT | COMPLEX | TURBINE\n10-30 APR | Cessna 172 | N9853K | MOW | PBI | 523 | 523 | | | 16 | 0 | 160 | 16\n26 | HS125-700 | \" | PBE | MOW | 524 | 524 | | | 25 | 2 | 25 | 2\n30 | \" | \" | MOW | TEB | 525 | 525 | | | 27 | 2 | 27 | 2\n31 | \" | \" | TEB | SAF | 526 | 526 | | | 16 | 1 | 16 | 1\nMAY 2 | \" | \" | SAF | PBE | 527 | 527 | | | 45 | 4 | 45 | 4\n3 | \" | \" | PBE | TEB | 528 | 528 | | | 36 | 3 | 36 | 3\n5 | \" | \" | TEB | DCA | 529 | 529 | | | 25 | 2 | 25 | 2\n7 | \" | \" | DCA | TEB | 530 | 530 | | | 7 | | 7 | \n7 | \" | \" | TEB | BOS | 531 | | | | 8 | | 8 | \n8 | \" | \" | BOS | TEB | 532 | | | | 6 | | 6 | \n8 | \" | \" | TEB | CRS | 533 | | | | 6 | | 6 | \n10 | \" | \" | TEBCRS | Regus | 535 | | | | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1\n18 | \" | \" | CMH | SAV | 538 | | | | 14 | 1 | 14 | 1\n18 | \" | \" | SAV | PBI | 539 | | | | 10 | 1 | 10 | 1\n20 | \" | \" | PBI | TEB | 540 | | | | 27 | 2 | 27 | 2\n22 | \" | \" | TEB | PBE | 541 | | | | 25 | 2 | 25 | 2\n26 | \" | \" | PBI | TEB | 542 | | | | 24 | 2 | 24 | 2\nJUL 27 | \" | \" | PBI | TEB | 554 | | | | 25 | 2 | 25 | 2\nI certify that the statements made by me on this form are true.\nPILOT'S SIGNATURE David hidgins\nPAGE TOTAL | 497 | 497 | 49 | AMT. FORWARD 5451 | 6146 | 4515 | 12506 | TOTAL TO DATE 5183 | 6196 | 4564 | 32506",
"text_blocks": [
{
"type": "printed",
"content": "DATE 1994 APR 10-30 | AIRCRAFT MAKE AND MODEL | AIRCRAFT IDENTIFICATION MARK | POINTS OF DEPARTURE & ARRIVAL | MILES FLOWN | FLT. NO. | REMARKS, PROCEDURES, MANEUVERS, ENDORSEMENTS | AIRCRAFT CATEGORY | NO. LDG. | DAY/NIGHT | COMPLEX | TURBINE",
"position": "header"
},
{
"type": "handwritten",
"content": "Cessna 172 | N9853K | MOW | PBI | 523 | 523 | | | 16 | 0 | 160 | 16",
"position": "body"
},
{
"type": "handwritten",
"content": "David hidgins",
"position": "footer"
}
],
"entities": {
"people": [
"David hidgins"
],
"organizations": [],
"locations": [
"MOW",
"PBI",
"PBE",
"TEB",
"SAF",
"DCA",
"BOS",
"CRS",
"CMH",
"SAV"
],
"dates": [
"1994 APR 10-30",
"APR 26",
"APR 30",
"MAY 2",
"MAY 3",
"MAY 5",
"MAY 7",
"MAY 8",
"MAY 10",
"MAY 18",
"MAY 20",
"MAY 22",
"MAY 26",
"JUL 27"
],
"reference_numbers": [
"N9853K",
"DOJ-OGR-00015825"
]
},
"additional_notes": "The document is a pilot's flight log with handwritten entries. The log includes details such as aircraft make and model, identification mark, points of departure and arrival, miles flown, and flight numbers. The document is signed by the pilot, David hidgins."
},
"error": null
},
{
"filename": "IMAGES005/DOJ-OGR-00013590.jpg",
"success": false,
"data": null,
"error": "Expecting ',' delimiter: line 9 column 4 (char 214)"
},
{
"filename": "IMAGES005/DOJ-OGR-00013540.jpg",
"success": false,
"data": null,
"error": "Expecting ',' delimiter: line 9 column 4 (char 209)"
},
{
"filename": "IMAGES005/DOJ-OGR-00014303.jpg",
"success": false,
"data": null,
"error": "Expecting ',' delimiter: line 9 column 4 (char 203)"
},
{
"filename": "IMAGES006/DOJ-OGR-00015308.jpg",
"success": false,
"data": null,
"error": "Expecting ',' delimiter: line 31 column 6 (char 8938)"
},
{
"filename": "IMAGES006/DOJ-OGR-00016216.jpg",
"success": false,
"data": null,
"error": "Expecting ',' delimiter: line 9 column 4 (char 203)"
},
{
"filename": "IMAGES006/DOJ-OGR-00016926.jpg",
"success": false,
"data": null,
"error": "Expecting ',' delimiter: line 9 column 4 (char 203)"
},
{
"filename": "IMAGES007/DOJ-OGR-00018597.jpg",
"success": false,
"data": null,
"error": "Expecting ',' delimiter: line 9 column 4 (char 216)"
},
{
"filename": "IMAGES007/DOJ-OGR-00019124.jpg",
"success": false,
"data": null,
"error": "Expecting ',' delimiter: line 9 column 4 (char 209)"
},
{
"filename": "IMAGES007/DOJ-OGR-00019173.jpg",
"success": false,
"data": null,
"error": "Expecting ',' delimiter: line 9 column 4 (char 208)"
},
{
"filename": "IMAGES007/DOJ-OGR-00019411.jpg",
"success": true,
"data": {
"document_metadata": {
"page_number": "12",
"document_number": "60",
"date": "09/24/2020",
"document_type": "court document",
"has_handwriting": false,
"has_stamps": false
},
"full_text": "Case 20-3061, Document 60, 09/24/2020, 2938278, Page12 of 58\nMs. Maxwell asked Judge Preska to briefly stay the\n7\nDOJ-OGR-00019411",
"text_blocks": [
{
"type": "printed",
"content": "Case 20-3061, Document 60, 09/24/2020, 2938278, Page12 of 58",
"position": "header"
},
{
"type": "printed",
"content": "Ms. Maxwell asked Judge Preska to briefly stay the",
"position": "middle"
},
{
"type": "printed",
"content": "7",
"position": "middle"
},
{
"type": "printed",
"content": "DOJ-OGR-00019411",
"position": "footer"
}
],
"entities": {
"people": [
"Maxwell",
"Preska"
],
"organizations": [],
"locations": [],
"dates": [
"09/24/2020"
],
"reference_numbers": [
"20-3061",
"60",
"2938278",
"DOJ-OGR-00019411"
]
},
"additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript with redactions."
},
"error": null
},
{
"filename": "IMAGES007/DOJ-OGR-00019729.jpg",
"success": true,
"data": {
"document_metadata": {
"page_number": "14",
"document_number": "3-2",
"date": "01/12/2021",
"document_type": "Court Document",
"has_handwriting": false,
"has_stamps": false
},
"full_text": "Case 21-58, Document 3-2, 01/12/2021, 3011691, Page14 of 20\n\n| 11/06/2020 | 69 | LETTER by USA as to Ghislaine Maxwell addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan from AUSAs Maurene Comey, Alison Moe, and Lara Pomerantz dated November 6, 2020 re: Request to Extend Discovery Deadline for Portion of Electronic Discovery Document filed by USA. (Comey, Maurene) (Entered: 11/06/2020)\n| 11/06/2020 | 70 | AFFIDAVIT of Maurene Comey by USA as to Ghislaine Maxwell. (Comey, Maurene) (Entered: 11/06/2020)\n| 11/09/2020 | 71 | MANDATE of USCA (Certified Copy) as to Ghislaine Maxwell re: 55 Notice of Appeal. USCA Case Number 20-3061-cr. UPON DUE CONSIDERATION WHEREOF, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the motion to consolidate is DENIED and the appeal is DISMISSED for want of jurisdiction.. Catherine O'Hagan Wolfe, Clerk USCA for the Second Circuit. Issued As Mandate: 11/09/2020. (nd) (Entered: 11/09/2020)\n| 11/09/2020 | 72 | MEMO ENDORSEMENT as to Ghislaine Maxwell on 69 LETTER by USA as to Ghislaine Maxwell addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan from AUSAs Maurene Comey, Alison Moe, and Lara Pomerantz dated November 6, 2020 re: Request to Extend Discovery Deadline for Portion of Electronic Discovery. ENDORSEMENT: The Court hereby extends the deadline for the Government's production of electronic discovery from November 9, 2020 to November 23, 2020. The Court also grants parties' request for an extension of the motions deadlines as follows: the Defendant's motions are due by January 11, 2021, the Government's responses are due by February 12, 2021, and any replies are due by February 19, 2021. SO ORDERED. (Discovery due by 11/23/2020. Motions due by 1/11/2021. Responses due by 2/12/2021. Replies due by 2/19/2021.) (Signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan on 11/9/2020) (Inl) (Entered: 11/10/2020)\n| 11/18/2020 | 73 | MEMO ENDORSEMENT as to Ghislaine Maxwell on re: 70 Letter filed by USA as the Government's request to delay disclosure of these Materials...ENDORSEMENT...There is no dispute that the materials referenced in the Government's letter will be turned over to the defense. The Government has indicated that it will do so. The only dispute, then, relates to the timing of such disclosure. See Dkt. Nos. 64, 65. Because the Government has articulated plausible reasons for some delay of disclosure, see Dkt. No. 65 at 4, the Court grants the Government's request to delay disclosure. However, the Governments proposal to delay disclosure until 8 weeks in advance of trial is insufficient. In order to ensure that the defense can adequately prepare for trial, the Government shall produce the referenced materials, which are not voluminous, to the defense by March 12, 2021. Disclosure of the materials will of course be subject to the protective order entered by the Court, see Dkt. No. 36. (Government Responses due by 3/12/2021) (Signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan on 11/18/20)(jw) (Entered: 11/18/2020)\n| 11/23/2020 | 74 | LETTER by USA as to Ghislaine Maxwell addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan from AUSAs Maurene Comey, Alison Moe, and Lara Pomerantz dated November 23, 2020 re: Update Regarding Conditions of Confinement Document filed by USA. (Comey, Maurene) (Entered: 11/23/2020)\n| 11/24/2020 | 75 | LETTER by Ghislaine Maxwell addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan from Bobbi C. Sternheim dated 11/24/2020 re: Response to 90-day MDC conditions report (Sternheim, Bobbi) (Entered: 11/24/2020)\n| 11/24/2020 | 76 | MEMO ENDORSEMENT as to Ghislaine Maxwell on re: 75 LETTER by Ghislaine Maxwell addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan from Bobbi C. Sternheim dated 11/24/2020 re: Response to 90-day MDC conditions report. ENDORSEMENT: The parties are hereby ORDERED to meet and confer regarding Defendant's request that Warden Heriberto Tellez directly address Defendant's concerns regarding the conditions of her detention. The parties shall jointly submit a status update within one week of this Order. (Signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan on 11/24/2020) (ap) (Entered: 11/24/2020)\n| 12/01/2020 | 77 | ORDER as to Ghislaine Maxwell. On November 25, 2020, the Defendant filed a letter request under seal. On November 30, 2020, she filed a second letter request in which she proposed redactions on both letters. The Government is hereby ORDERED to respond to the Defendant's November 25, 2020 letter request and to the request for proposed redactions by no later than December 2, 2020. The letters shall be...\n\nDOJ-OGR-00019729",
"text_blocks": [
{
"type": "printed",
"content": "Case 21-58, Document 3-2, 01/12/2021, 3011691, Page14 of 20",
"position": "header"
},
{
"type": "printed",
"content": "The table containing court documents and their descriptions",
"position": "main"
},
{
"type": "printed",
"content": "DOJ-OGR-00019729",
"position": "footer"
}
],
"entities": {
"people": [
"Ghislaine Maxwell",
"Alison J. Nathan",
"Maurene Comey",
"Alison Moe",
"Lara Pomerantz",
"Bobbi C. Sternheim",
"Catherine O'Hagan Wolfe",
"Heriberto Tellez"
],
"organizations": [
"USA",
"USCA",
"MDC"
],
"locations": [],
"dates": [
"11/06/2020",
"11/09/2020",
"11/18/2020",
"11/23/2020",
"11/24/2020",
"12/01/2020",
"01/11/2021",
"02/12/2021",
"02/19/2021",
"03/12/2021"
],
"reference_numbers": [
"20-3061-cr",
"55",
"64",
"65",
"36",
"69",
"70",
"71",
"72",
"73",
"74",
"75",
"76",
"77",
"3-2",
"3011691"
]
},
"additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court docket sheet from a case involving Ghislaine Maxwell. The entries are mostly printed and detail various filings and court actions. There are no visible redactions or damage to the document."
},
"error": null
},
{
"filename": "IMAGES007/DOJ-OGR-00019572.jpg",
"success": false,
"data": null,
"error": "Expecting ',' delimiter: line 9 column 4 (char 267)"
},
{
"filename": "IMAGES007/DOJ-OGR-00019725.jpg",
"success": true,
"data": {
"document_metadata": {
"page_number": "10",
"document_number": "3-2",
"date": "01/12/2021",
"document_type": "Court Document",
"has_handwriting": false,
"has_stamps": false
},
"full_text": "Case 21-58, Document 3-2, 01/12/2021, 3011691, Page10 of 20\n(Entered: 07/27/2020)\n| | | (Entered: 07/27/2020) |\n|----------|------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|\n| 07/27/2020 | 32 | MEMO ENDORSEMENT as to Ghislaine Maxwell on 31 LETTER by USA as to Ghislaine Maxwell addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan from Alison Moe dated July 27, 2020 re: requesting until 5 p.m. tomorrow to respond to defense counsel's letter, filed July 27, 2020. ENDORSEMENT: The Government's response to the Defense's letter is due by 5 p.m. on July 28, 2020. The Defense may file a reply by 5 p.m. on July 29, 2020. Before the Government's response is filed, the parties must meet and confer by phone regarding this issue, and any response from the Government must contain an affirmation that the parties have done so. SO ORDERED. (Responses due by 7/28/2020. Replies due by 7/29/2020.) (Signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan on 7/27/2020) (lnl) (Entered: 07/27/2020) |\n| 07/28/2020 | 33 | LETTER RESPONSE to Motion by USA as to Ghislaine Maxwell addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan from Alex Rossmiller dated July 28, 2020 re: 29 LETTER MOTION addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan from Christian R. Everdell dated July 27, 2020 re: Proposed Protective Order .. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A (proposed protective order))(Rossmiller, Alex) (Entered: 07/28/2020) |\n| 07/28/2020 | 34 | AFFIDAVIT of Alex Rossmiller by USA as to Ghislaine Maxwell. (Rossmiller, Alex) (Entered: 07/28/2020)",
"text_blocks": [
{
"type": "printed",
"content": "Case 21-58, Document 3-2, 01/12/2021, 3011691, Page10 of 20",
"position": "header"
},
{
"type": "printed",
"content": "(Entered: 07/27/2020)",
"position": "header"
},
{
"type": "printed",
"content": "| | | (Entered: 07/27/2020)",
"position": "table header"
},
{
"type": "printed",
"content": "| 07/27/2020 | 32 | MEMO ENDORSEMENT as to Ghislaine Maxwell on 31 LETTER by USA as to Ghislaine Maxwell addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan from Alison Moe dated July 27, 2020 re: requesting until 5 p.m. tomorrow to respond to defense counsel's letter, filed July 27, 2020. ENDORSEMENT: The Government's response to the Defense's letter is due by 5 p.m. on July 28, 2020. The Defense may file a reply by 5 p.m. on July 29, 2020. Before the Government's response is filed, the parties must meet and confer by phone regarding this issue, and any response from the Government must contain an affirmation that the parties have done so. SO ORDERED. (Responses due by 7/28/2020. Replies due by 7/29/2020.) (Signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan on 7/27/2020) (lnl) (Entered: 07/27/2020)",
"position": "table row"
},
{
"type": "printed",
"content": "| 07/28/2020 | 33 | LETTER RESPONSE to Motion by USA as to Ghislaine Maxwell addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan from Alex Rossmiller dated July 28, 2020 re: 29 LETTER MOTION addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan from Christian R. Everdell dated July 27, 2020 re: Proposed Protective Order .. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A (proposed protective order))(Rossmiller, Alex) (Entered: 07/28/2020)",
"position": "table row"
},
{
"type": "printed",
"content": "| 07/28/2020 | 34 | AFFIDAVIT of Alex Rossmiller by USA as to Ghislaine Maxwell. (Rossmiller, Alex) (Entered: 07/28/2020)",
"position": "table row"
}
],
"entities": {
"people": [
"Ghislaine Maxwell",
"Alison J. Nathan",
"Alison Moe",
"Alex Rossmiller",
"Christian R. Everdell",
"Jeffrey Epstein"
],
"organizations": [
"USA"
],
"locations": [],
"dates": [
"07/27/2020",
"07/28/2020",
"07/29/2020",
"01/12/2021"
],
"reference_numbers": [
"Case 21-58",
"Document 3-2",
"3011691"
]
},
"additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court docket sheet with various entries related to the case of Ghislaine Maxwell. The entries include memo endorsements, letter responses, and affidavits. The document is well-formatted and easy to read."
},
"error": null
},
{
"filename": "IMAGES007/DOJ-OGR-00019503.jpg",
"success": false,
"data": null,
"error": "Expecting ',' delimiter: line 9 column 4 (char 214)"
},
{
"filename": "IMAGES007/DOJ-OGR-00019612.jpg",
"success": false,
"data": null,
"error": "Expecting ',' delimiter: line 9 column 4 (char 202)"
},
{
"filename": "IMAGES007/DOJ-OGR-00019734.jpg",
"success": true,
"data": {
"document_metadata": {
"page_number": "19 of 20",
"document_number": "3-2",
"date": "01/12/2021",
"document_type": "Court Document",
"has_handwriting": false,
"has_stamps": false
},
"full_text": "Case 21-58, Document 3-2, 01/12/2021, 3011691, Page19 of 20\n\nmotion. In light of the fact that the Opinion includes potentially confidential information that should not be filed on the public docket, the Court will permit the parties 48 hours to propose any redactions to the Courts Opinion and Order and to justify those redactions by reference to the Second Circuits decision in Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of Onondaga, 435 F.3d 110(2d Cir. 2006). After determining which, if any, portions of the Opinion and Order should be redacted, the Court will file the Opinion and Order on the public docket. As a result, the Court concludes that the Government has met its burden of persuasion that the Defendant poses a flight risk and that pretrial detention continues to be warranted. On or before December 30, 2020, the parties are ORDERED to submit a joint letter indicating whether they propose any redactions and the justification for any such proposal. This resolves Dkt No. 97. (Signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan on 12/28/20)(jw) (Entered: 12/28/2020)\n\n12/30/2020 105 LETTER by USA as to Ghislaine Maxwell addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan from AUSAs Maurene Comey, Alison Moe, and Lara Pomerantz dated December 30, 2020 re: Joint Letter re December 28, 2020 Opinion and Order Document filed by USA. (Comey, Maurene) (Entered: 12/30/2020)\n\n12/30/2020 106 OPINION AND ORDER as to Ghislaine Maxwell. Defendant Ghislaine Maxwell has been indicted by a grand jury on charges of conspiracy to entice minors to travel to engage in illegal sex acts, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 371; enticing a minor to travel to engage in illegal sex acts, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 2422 and 2; conspiracy to transport minors to participate in illegal sex acts, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 371; transporting minors to participate in illegal sex acts, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 2423 and 2; and two charges of perjury, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1623. The Court held a lengthy bail hearing on July 14, 2020. After extensive briefing and argument at the hearing, the Court concluded that the Defendant was a clear risk of flight and that no conditions or combination of conditions would ensure her appearance. Defendant Ghislaine Maxwells renewed motion for release on bail, Dkt. No. 97, is DENIED. (Signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan on 12/28/20)(jw) (Entered: 12/30/2020)\n\n12/31/2020 107 LETTER MOTION addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan from Christian R. Everdell dated December 31, 2020 re: Extension of Time . Document filed by Ghislaine Maxwell. (Everdell, Christian) (Entered: 12/31/2020)\n\n01/05/2021 108 MEMO ENDORSEMENT as to Ghislaine Maxwell (1) on 107 LETTER MOTION addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan from Christian R. Everdell dated December 31, 2020 re: Extension of Time. ENDORSEMENT: SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan on 1/5/2021) (ap) (Entered: 01/05/2021)\n\n01/05/2021 Set/Reset Deadlines as to Ghislaine Maxwell: Motions due by 1/25/2021. Responses due by 2/26/2021. Replies due by 3/5/2021. (ap) (Entered: 01/05/2021)\n\n01/08/2021 109 LETTER MOTION addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan from Christian R. Everdell dated January 8, 2021 re: Extension of Time to File Notice of Appeal . Document filed by Ghislaine Maxwell. (Everdell, Christian) (Entered: 01/08/2021)\n\n01/11/2021 110 SEALED DOCUMENT placed in vault. (jus) (Entered: 01/11/2021)\n\n01/11/2021 111 SEALED DOCUMENT placed in vault. (jus) (Entered: 01/11/2021)\n\n01/11/2021 112 MEMO ENDORSEMENT as to Ghislaine Maxwell (1) denying 109 LETTER MOTION addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan from Christian R. Everdell dated January 8, 2021 re: Extension of Time to File Notice of Appeal. ENDORSEMENT: The request is denied. Good cause for an extension of time to file a notice of appeal has not been provided. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan on 1/11/2021) (lnl) (Entered: 01/11/2021)\n\n01/11/2021 113 NOTICE OF APPEAL by Ghislaine Maxwell from 104 Order. (nd) (Entered: 01/12/2021)\n\n01/11/2021 Appeal Remark as to re: 113 Notice of Appeal by Ghislaine Maxwell. $505.00 Appeal filing fee due. (nd) (Entered: 01/12/2021)\n\n01/12/2021 Transmission of Notice of Appeal and Certified Copy of Docket Sheet as to Ghislaine Maxwell to US Court of Appeals re: 113 Notice of Appeal. (nd) (Entered: 01/12/2021)\n\nDOJ-OGR-00019734",
"text_blocks": [
{
"type": "printed",
"content": "Case 21-58, Document 3-2, 01/12/2021, 3011691, Page19 of 20",
"position": "header"
},
{
"type": "printed",
"content": "motion. In light of the fact that the Opinion includes potentially confidential information that should not be filed on the public docket, the Court will permit the parties 48 hours to propose any redactions to the Courts Opinion and Order and to justify those redactions by reference to the Second Circuits decision in Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of Onondaga, 435 F.3d 110(2d Cir. 2006). After determining which, if any, portions of the Opinion and Order should be redacted, the Court will file the Opinion and Order on the public docket. As a result, the Court concludes that the Government has met its burden of persuasion that the Defendant poses a flight risk and that pretrial detention continues to be warranted. On or before December 30, 2020, the parties are ORDERED to submit a joint letter indicating whether they propose any redactions and the justification for any such proposal. This resolves Dkt No. 97. (Signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan on 12/28/20)(jw) (Entered: 12/28/2020)",
"position": "main"
},
{
"type": "printed",
"content": "12/30/2020 105 LETTER by USA as to Ghislaine Maxwell addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan from AUSAs Maurene Comey, Alison Moe, and Lara Pomerantz dated December 30, 2020 re: Joint Letter re December 28, 2020 Opinion and Order Document filed by USA. (Comey, Maurene) (Entered: 12/30/2020)",
"position": "main"
},
{
"type": "printed",
"content": "12/30/2020 106 OPINION AND ORDER as to Ghislaine Maxwell. Defendant Ghislaine Maxwell has been indicted by a grand jury on charges of conspiracy to entice minors to travel to engage in illegal sex acts, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 371; enticing a minor to travel to engage in illegal sex acts, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 2422 and 2; conspiracy to transport minors to participate in illegal sex acts, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 371; transporting minors to participate in illegal sex acts, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 2423 and 2; and two charges of perjury, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1623. The Court held a lengthy bail hearing on July 14, 2020. After extensive briefing and argument at the hearing, the Court concluded that the Defendant was a clear risk of flight and that no conditions or combination of conditions would ensure her appearance. Defendant Ghislaine Maxwells renewed motion for release on bail, Dkt. No. 97, is DENIED. (Signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan on 12/28/20)(jw) (Entered: 12/30/2020)",
"position": "main"
},
{
"type": "printed",
"content": "12/31/2020 107 LETTER MOTION addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan from Christian R. Everdell dated December 31, 2020 re: Extension of Time . Document filed by Ghislaine Maxwell. (Everdell, Christian) (Entered: 12/31/2020)",
"position": "main"
},
{
"type": "printed",
"content": "01/05/2021 108 MEMO ENDORSEMENT as to Ghislaine Maxwell (1) on 107 LETTER MOTION addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan from Christian R. Everdell dated December 31, 2020 re: Extension of Time. ENDORSEMENT: SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan on 1/5/2021) (ap) (Entered: 01/05/2021)",
"position": "main"
},
{
"type": "printed",
"content": "01/05/2021 Set/Reset Deadlines as to Ghislaine Maxwell: Motions due by 1/25/2021. Responses due by 2/26/2021. Replies due by 3/5/2021. (ap) (Entered: 01/05/2021)",
"position": "main"
},
{
"type": "printed",
"content": "01/08/2021 109 LETTER MOTION addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan from Christian R. Everdell dated January 8, 2021 re: Extension of Time to File Notice of Appeal . Document filed by Ghislaine Maxwell. (Everdell, Christian) (Entered: 01/08/2021)",
"position": "main"
},
{
"type": "printed",
"content": "01/11/2021 110 SEALED DOCUMENT placed in vault. (jus) (Entered: 01/11/2021)",
"position": "main"
},
{
"type": "printed",
"content": "01/11/2021 111 SEALED DOCUMENT placed in vault. (jus) (Entered: 01/11/2021)",
"position": "main"
},
{
"type": "printed",
"content": "01/11/2021 112 MEMO ENDORSEMENT as to Ghislaine Maxwell (1) denying 109 LETTER MOTION addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan from Christian R. Everdell dated January 8, 2021 re: Extension of Time to File Notice of Appeal. ENDORSEMENT: The request is denied. Good cause for an extension of time to file a notice of appeal has not been provided. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan on 1/11/2021) (lnl) (Entered: 01/11/2021)",
"position": "main"
},
{
"type": "printed",
"content": "01/11/2021 113 NOTICE OF APPEAL by Ghislaine Maxwell from 104 Order. (nd) (Entered: 01/12/2021)",
"position": "main"
},
{
"type": "printed",
"content": "01/11/2021 Appeal Remark as to re: 113 Notice of Appeal by Ghislaine Maxwell. $505.00 Appeal filing fee due. (nd) (Entered: 01/12/2021)",
"position": "main"
},
{
"type": "printed",
"content": "01/12/2021 Transmission of Notice of Appeal and Certified Copy of Docket Sheet as to Ghislaine Maxwell to US Court of Appeals re: 113 Notice of Appeal. (nd) (Entered: 01/12/2021)",
"position": "main"
},
{
"type": "printed",
"content": "DOJ-OGR-00019734",
"position": "footer"
}
],
"entities": {
"people": [
"Ghislaine Maxwell",
"Alison J. Nathan",
"Christian R. Everdell",
"Maurene Comey",
"Alison Moe",
"Lara Pomerantz"
],
"organizations": [
"USA",
"US Court of Appeals"
],
"locations": [],
"dates": [
"12/30/2020",
"12/31/2020",
"01/05/2021",
"01/08/2021",
"01/11/2021",
"01/12/2021",
"12/28/2020",
"July 14, 2020"
],
"reference_numbers": [
"3011691",
"Dkt No. 97",
"Dkt. No. 97",
"104",
"105",
"106",
"107",
"108",
"109",
"110",
"111",
"112",
"113",
"DOJ-OGR-00019734"
]
},
"additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court docket sheet with various entries related to the case of Ghislaine Maxwell. The document is well-formatted and legible, with clear headings and concise descriptions of each entry."
},
"error": null
},
{
"filename": "IMAGES007/DOJ-OGR-00019756.jpg",
"success": true,
"data": {
"document_metadata": {
"page_number": "11",
"document_number": "20-2",
"date": "03/24/2021",
"document_type": "Court Document",
"has_handwriting": false,
"has_stamps": false
},
"full_text": "Case 21-58, Document 20-2, 03/24/2021, 3065965, Page11 of 24\n\n21 at 12 p.m. The Defendant's reply is due on Monday, August 24 at 12 p.m. The parties shall propose redactions to the letter briefing on this issue. Alternatively, the parties shall provide support and argument for why the letter motions should be sealed in their entirety. SO ORDERED. (Responses due by 8/21/2020. Replies due by 8/24/2020.) (Signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan on 8/18/2020) (lnl) (Entered: 08/18/2020)\n\n08/20/2020 45 NOTICE OF ATTORNEY APPEARANCE Lara Elizabeth Pomerantz appearing for USA. (Pomerantz, Lara) (Entered: 08/20/2020)\n\n08/20/2020 50 SEALED DOCUMENT placed in vault. (mhe) (Entered: 08/27/2020)\n\n08/21/2020 46 LETTER RESPONSE in Opposition by USA as to Ghislaine Maxwell addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan from Maurene Comey dated August 21, 2020 re: 43 LETTER MOTION addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan from Jeffrey S. Pagliuca dated August 17, 2020 re: Request for Permission to Submit Letter Motion in Excess of Three Pages .. (Rossmiller, Alex) (Entered: 08/21/2020)\n\n08/21/2020 47 LETTER by USA as to Ghislaine Maxwell addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan from Maurene Comey dated August 21, 2020 re: Proposed redactions to letter briefing, in response to the Court's Order of August 18, 2020 Document filed by USA. (Rossmiller, Alex) (Entered: 08/21/2020)\n\n08/24/2020 48 LETTER MOTION addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan from Laura A. Menninger dated August 24, 2020 re: Request to File Under Seal: Proposed Redactions to Request to Modify Protective Order and Reply in Support Thereof . Document filed by Ghislaine Maxwell. (Menninger, Laura) (Entered: 08/24/2020)\n\n08/25/2020 49 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: denying without prejudice 38 LETTER MOTION as to Ghislaine Maxwell (1). On August 10, 2020, the Defendant filed a letter motion related to two issues. Dkt. No. 38. First, the Defendant seeks an order directing the Government to disclose to defense counsel immediately the identities of the three alleged victims referenced in the indictment. Second, the Defendant seeks an order directing the Bureau of Prisons (\"BOP\") to release the Defendant into the general population and to provide her with increased access to the discovery materials. For the reasons that follow, Defendant's requests are DENIED without prejudice....[See this Memorandum Opinion And Order]... III. Conclusion: For the reasons stated above, Defendant's requests contained in Dkt. No. 38 are DENIED without prejudice. Following the close of discovery, the parties shall meet and confer on an appropriate schedule for pre-trial disclosures, including the disclosure of § 3500 material, exhibit lists, and witness lists, taking into account all relevant factors. The Government is hereby ORDERED to submit written status updates every 90 days detailing any material changes to the conditions of Ms. Maxwell's confinement, with particular emphasis on her access to legal materials and ability to communicate with defense counsel. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan on 8/25/2020) (bw) (Entered: 08/25/2020)\n\n09/02/2020 51 MEMORANDUMOPINION AND ORDER as to Ghislaine Maxwell: On August 17, 2020, Defendant Ghislaine Maxwell filed a sealed letter motion seeking an Order modifying the protective order in this case. Specifically, she sought a Court order allowing her to file under seal in certain civil cases (\"Civil Cases\") materials (\"Documents\") that she received in discovery from the Government in this case. She also sought permission to reference, but not file, other discovery material that the Government produced in this case. For the reasons that follow, Defendant's requests are DENIED. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan on 9/2/2020)(See MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER as set forth) (lnl) (Entered: 09/02/2020)\n\n09/02/2020 52 LETTER by Ghislaine Maxwell addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan, from Jeffrey S. Pagliuca dated 8/17/2020 re: Defense counsel writes with redacted request to modify protective order (ap) (Entered: 09/02/2020)\n\n09/04/2020 55 NOTICE OF APPEAL by Ghislaine Maxwell from 51 Memorandum & Opinion. Filing fee $ 505.00, receipt number 465401266036. (tp) (Entered: 09/09/2020)\n\n09/08/2020 53 LETTER by Ghislaine Maxwell addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan dated 8/24/2020 re: Proposed Redactions to Request to Modify Protective Order. (jbo) (Entered: 09/08/2020)\n\nDOJ-OGR-00019756",
"text_blocks": [
{
"type": "printed",
"content": "Case 21-58, Document 20-2, 03/24/2021, 3065965, Page11 of 24",
"position": "header"
},
{
"type": "printed",
"content": "21 at 12 p.m. The Defendant's reply is due on Monday, August 24 at 12 p.m. The parties shall propose redactions to the letter briefing on this issue. Alternatively, the parties shall provide support and argument for why the letter motions should be sealed in their entirety. SO ORDERED. (Responses due by 8/21/2020. Replies due by 8/24/2020.) (Signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan on 8/18/2020) (lnl) (Entered: 08/18/2020)",
"position": "top"
},
{
"type": "printed",
"content": "08/20/2020 45 NOTICE OF ATTORNEY APPEARANCE Lara Elizabeth Pomerantz appearing for USA. (Pomerantz, Lara) (Entered: 08/20/2020)",
"position": "top"
},
{
"type": "printed",
"content": "08/20/2020 50 SEALED DOCUMENT placed in vault. (mhe) (Entered: 08/27/2020)",
"position": "top"
},
{
"type": "printed",
"content": "08/21/2020 46 LETTER RESPONSE in Opposition by USA as to Ghislaine Maxwell addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan from Maurene Comey dated August 21, 2020 re: 43 LETTER MOTION addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan from Jeffrey S. Pagliuca dated August 17, 2020 re: Request for Permission to Submit Letter Motion in Excess of Three Pages .. (Rossmiller, Alex) (Entered: 08/21/2020)",
"position": "top"
},
{
"type": "printed",
"content": "08/21/2020 47 LETTER by USA as to Ghislaine Maxwell addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan from Maurene Comey dated August 21, 2020 re: Proposed redactions to letter briefing, in response to the Court's Order of August 18, 2020 Document filed by USA. (Rossmiller, Alex) (Entered: 08/21/2020)",
"position": "top"
},
{
"type": "printed",
"content": "08/24/2020 48 LETTER MOTION addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan from Laura A. Menninger dated August 24, 2020 re: Request to File Under Seal: Proposed Redactions to Request to Modify Protective Order and Reply in Support Thereof . Document filed by Ghislaine Maxwell. (Menninger, Laura) (Entered: 08/24/2020)",
"position": "top"
},
{
"type": "printed",
"content": "08/25/2020 49 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: denying without prejudice 38 LETTER MOTION as to Ghislaine Maxwell (1). On August 10, 2020, the Defendant filed a letter motion related to two issues. Dkt. No. 38. First, the Defendant seeks an order directing the Government to disclose to defense counsel immediately the identities of the three alleged victims referenced in the indictment. Second, the Defendant seeks an order directing the Bureau of Prisons (\"BOP\") to release the Defendant into the general population and to provide her with increased access to the discovery materials. For the reasons that follow, Defendant's requests are DENIED without prejudice....[See this Memorandum Opinion And Order]... III. Conclusion: For the reasons stated above, Defendant's requests contained in Dkt. No. 38 are DENIED without prejudice. Following the close of discovery, the parties shall meet and confer on an appropriate schedule for pre-trial disclosures, including the disclosure of § 3500 material, exhibit lists, and witness lists, taking into account all relevant factors. The Government is hereby ORDERED to submit written status updates every 90 days detailing any material changes to the conditions of Ms. Maxwell's confinement, with particular emphasis on her access to legal materials and ability to communicate with defense counsel. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan on 8/25/2020) (bw) (Entered: 08/25/2020)",
"position": "top"
},
{
"type": "printed",
"content": "09/02/2020 51 MEMORANDUMOPINION AND ORDER as to Ghislaine Maxwell: On August 17, 2020, Defendant Ghislaine Maxwell filed a sealed letter motion seeking an Order modifying the protective order in this case. Specifically, she sought a Court order allowing her to file under seal in certain civil cases (\"Civil Cases\") materials (\"Documents\") that she received in discovery from the Government in this case. She also sought permission to reference, but not file, other discovery material that the Government produced in this case. For the reasons that follow, Defendant's requests are DENIED. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan on 9/2/2020)(See MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER as set forth) (lnl) (Entered: 09/02/2020)",
"position": "top"
},
{
"type": "printed",
"content": "09/02/2020 52 LETTER by Ghislaine Maxwell addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan, from Jeffrey S. Pagliuca dated 8/17/2020 re: Defense counsel writes with redacted request to modify protective order (ap) (Entered: 09/02/2020)",
"position": "top"
},
{
"type": "printed",
"content": "09/04/2020 55 NOTICE OF APPEAL by Ghislaine Maxwell from 51 Memorandum & Opinion. Filing fee $ 505.00, receipt number 465401266036. (tp) (Entered: 09/09/2020)",
"position": "top"
},
{
"type": "printed",
"content": "09/08/2020 53 LETTER by Ghislaine Maxwell addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan dated 8/24/2020 re: Proposed Redactions to Request to Modify Protective Order. (jbo) (Entered: 09/08/2020)",
"position": "top"
},
{
"type": "printed",
"content": "DOJ-OGR-00019756",
"position": "footer"
}
],
"entities": {
"people": [
"Ghislaine Maxwell",
"Alison J. Nathan",
"Lara Elizabeth Pomerantz",
"Maurene Comey",
"Jeffrey S. Pagliuca",
"Laura A. Menninger",
"Alex Rossmiller"
],
"organizations": [
"USA",
"Bureau of Prisons"
],
"locations": [],
"dates": [
"03/24/2021",
"08/18/2020",
"08/20/2020",
"08/21/2020",
"08/24/2020",
"08/25/2020",
"08/27/2020",
"09/02/2020",
"09/04/2020",
"09/08/2020",
"09/09/2020",
"August 10, 2020",
"August 17, 2020",
"August 21, 2020",
"August 24, 2020"
],
"reference_numbers": [
"21-58",
"20-2",
"3065965",
"45",
"50",
"46",
"47",
"48",
"49",
"51",
"52",
"55",
"53",
"38",
"43",
"Dkt. No. 38",
"465401266036",
"DOJ-OGR-00019756"
]
},
"additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court docket sheet with various entries related to the case of Ghislaine Maxwell. The entries include notices of appearance, sealed documents, letter motions, and memorandum opinions and orders. The document is well-formatted and easy to read."
},
"error": null
},
{
"filename": "IMAGES007/DOJ-OGR-00019732.jpg",
"success": true,
"data": {
"document_metadata": {
"page_number": "17",
"document_number": "3-2",
"date": "01/12/2021",
"document_type": "Court Document",
"has_handwriting": false,
"has_stamps": false
},
"full_text": "Case 21-58, Document 3-2, 01/12/2021, 3011691, Page17 of 20 necessary steps to ensure that the Defendant continues to receive adequate access to her legal materials and her ability to communicate with defense counsel. (Signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan on 12/8/2020) (ap) (Entered: 12/08/2020) 12/10/2020 93 TRANSCRIPT of Proceedings as to Ghislaine Maxwell re: Conference held on 7/14/2020 before Judge Alison J. Nathan. Court Reporter/Transcriber: Kristen Carannante, (212) 805-0300, Transcript may be viewed at the court public terminal or purchased through the Court Reporter/Transcriber before the deadline for Release of Transcript Restriction. After that date it may be obtained through PACER. Redaction Request due 12/31/2020. Redacted Transcript Deadline set for 1/11/2021. Release of Transcript Restriction set for 3/10/2021. (McGuirk, Kelly) (Entered: 12/10/2020) 12/10/2020 94 NOTICE OF FILING OF OFFICIAL TRANSCRIPT as to Ghislaine Maxwell. Notice is hereby given that an official transcript of a Conference proceeding held on 7/14/2020 has been filed by the court reporter/transcriber in the above-captioned matter. The parties have seven (7) calendar days to file with the court a Notice of Intent to Request Redaction of this transcript. If no such Notice is filed, the transcript may be made remotely electronically available to the public without redaction after 90 calendar days.... (McGuirk, Kelly) (Entered: 12/10/2020) 12/14/2020 95 ORDER as to Ghislaine Maxwell: On December 8, 2020, Defendant Ghislaine Maxwell filed her renewed application for bail under seal with proposed redactions, in accordance with this Court's December 7, 2020 Order, see Dkt. No. 89. The Government did not file any opposition to the Defendant's proposed redactions. After due consideration, the Court will adopt the Defendant's proposed redactions. The Court's decision to adopt those redactions is guided by the three-part test articulated by the Second Circuit in Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of Onondaga, 435 F.3d 110 (2d Cir. 2006). Under this test, the Court must: (i) determine whether the documents in question are \"judicial documents;\" (ii) assess the weight of the common law presumption of access to the materials; and (iii) balance competing considerations against the presumption of access. Id. at 11920. \"Such countervailing factors include but are not limited to the danger of impairing law enforcement or judicial efficiency' and 'the privacy interests of those resisting disclosure.'\" Id. at 120 (quoting United States v. Amodeo, 71 F.3d 1044, 1048 (2d Cir.1995) (\"Amodeo II\")). The proposed redactions satisfy this test. The Court finds that Defendant's letter motions are \"relevant to the performance of the judicial function and useful in the judicial process,' thereby qualifying as a \"judicial document\" for purposes of the first element of the Lugosch test. United States v. Amodeo (\"Amodeo I\"), 44 F.3d 141, 145 (2d Cir. 1995). And the Court also finds that the common law presumption of access attaches. Id. at 146; see also Nixon v. Warner Commc'ns, Inc., 435 U.S. 589, 602 (1978). Nevertheless, in balancing competing considerations against the presumption of access, the Court finds that the redactions are narrowly tailored to properly guard the privacy interests of the individuals referenced in the Defendant's submission and in the corresponding exhibits The Defendant is hereby ORDERED to docket the redacted documents and corresponding exhibits dated 12/14/2020) (ap) (Entered: 12/14/2020) 12/14/2020 96 LETTER by Ghislaine Maxwell addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan from Christian R. Everdell dated December 8, 2020 re: Cover Letter for Renewed Bail Application (Everdell, Christian) (Entered: 12/14/2020) 12/14/2020 97 MEMORANDUM OF LAW in Support by Ghislaine Maxwell re: Renewed Motion for Bail. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B, # 3 Exhibit C, # 4 Exhibit D, # 5 Exhibit E, # 6 Exhibit F, # 7 Exhibit G, # 8 Exhibit H, # 9 Exhibit I, # 10 Exhibit J, # 11 Exhibit K, # 12 Exhibit L, # 13 Exhibit M, # 14 Exhibit N, # 15 Exhibit O, # 16 Exhibit P, # 17 Exhibit Q, # 18 Exhibit R, # 19 Exhibit S, # 20 Exhibit T, # 21 Exhibit U, # 22 Exhibit V, # 23 Exhibit W, # 24 Exhibit X)(Everdell, Christian) (Entered: 12/14/2020) 12/17/2020 98 NOTICE OF ATTORNEY APPEARANCE Andrew Rohrbach appearing for USA. (Rohrbach, Andrew) (Entered: 12/17/2020) 12/18/2020 99 ORDER as to Ghislaine Maxwell: On December 16, 2020, the Government filed its opposition to Defendant Ghislaine Maxwell's renewed application for bail. In accordance with this Court's December 7, 2020 Order, see Dkt. No. 89, the Government filed its materials under seal and proposed narrowly tailored redactions on DOJ-OGR-00019732",
"text_blocks": [
{
"type": "printed",
"content": "Case 21-58, Document 3-2, 01/12/2021, 3011691, Page17 of 20",
"position": "header"
},
{
"type": "printed",
"content": "necessary steps to ensure that the Defendant continues to receive adequate access to her legal materials and her ability to communicate with defense counsel. (Signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan on 12/8/2020) (ap) (Entered: 12/08/2020)",
"position": "top"
},
{
"type": "printed",
"content": "12/10/2020 93 TRANSCRIPT of Proceedings as to Ghislaine Maxwell re: Conference held on 7/14/2020 before Judge Alison J. Nathan. Court Reporter/Transcriber: Kristen Carannante, (212) 805-0300, Transcript may be viewed at the court public terminal or purchased through the Court Reporter/Transcriber before the deadline for Release of Transcript Restriction. After that date it may be obtained through PACER. Redaction Request due 12/31/2020. Redacted Transcript Deadline set for 1/11/2021. Release of Transcript Restriction set for 3/10/2021. (McGuirk, Kelly) (Entered: 12/10/2020)",
"position": "middle"
},
{
"type": "printed",
"content": "12/10/2020 94 NOTICE OF FILING OF OFFICIAL TRANSCRIPT as to Ghislaine Maxwell. Notice is hereby given that an official transcript of a Conference proceeding held on 7/14/2020 has been filed by the court reporter/transcriber in the above-captioned matter. The parties have seven (7) calendar days to file with the court a Notice of Intent to Request Redaction of this transcript. If no such Notice is filed, the transcript may be made remotely electronically available to the public without redaction after 90 calendar days.... (McGuirk, Kelly) (Entered: 12/10/2020)",
"position": "middle"
},
{
"type": "printed",
"content": "12/14/2020 95 ORDER as to Ghislaine Maxwell: On December 8, 2020, Defendant Ghislaine Maxwell filed her renewed application for bail under seal with proposed redactions, in accordance with this Court's December 7, 2020 Order, see Dkt. No. 89. The Government did not file any opposition to the Defendant's proposed redactions. After due consideration, the Court will adopt the Defendant's proposed redactions. The Court's decision to adopt those redactions is guided by the three-part test articulated by the Second Circuit in Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of Onondaga, 435 F.3d 110 (2d Cir. 2006). Under this test, the Court must: (i) determine whether the documents in question are \"judicial documents;\" (ii) assess the weight of the common law presumption of access to the materials; and (iii) balance competing considerations against the presumption of access. Id. at 11920. \"Such countervailing factors include but are not limited to the danger of impairing law enforcement or judicial efficiency' and 'the privacy interests of those resisting disclosure.'\" Id. at 120 (quoting United States v. Amodeo, 71 F.3d 1044, 1048 (2d Cir.1995) (\"Amodeo II\")). The proposed redactions satisfy this test. The Court finds that Defendant's letter motions are \"relevant to the performance of the judicial function and useful in the judicial process,' thereby qualifying as a \"judicial document\" for purposes of the first element of the Lugosch test. United States v. Amodeo (\"Amodeo I\"), 44 F.3d 141, 145 (2d Cir. 1995). And the Court also finds that the common law presumption of access attaches. Id. at 146; see also Nixon v. Warner Commc'ns, Inc., 435 U.S. 589, 602 (1978). Nevertheless, in balancing competing considerations against the presumption of access, the Court finds that the redactions are narrowly tailored to properly guard the privacy interests of the individuals referenced in the Defendant's submission and in the corresponding exhibits The Defendant is hereby ORDERED to docket the redacted documents and corresponding exhibits dated 12/14/2020) (ap) (Entered: 12/14/2020)",
"position": "middle"
},
{
"type": "printed",
"content": "12/14/2020 96 LETTER by Ghislaine Maxwell addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan from Christian R. Everdell dated December 8, 2020 re: Cover Letter for Renewed Bail Application (Everdell, Christian) (Entered: 12/14/2020)",
"position": "middle"
},
{
"type": "printed",
"content": "12/14/2020 97 MEMORANDUM OF LAW in Support by Ghislaine Maxwell re: Renewed Motion for Bail. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B, # 3 Exhibit C, # 4 Exhibit D, # 5 Exhibit E, # 6 Exhibit F, # 7 Exhibit G, # 8 Exhibit H, # 9 Exhibit I, # 10 Exhibit J, # 11 Exhibit K, # 12 Exhibit L, # 13 Exhibit M, # 14 Exhibit N, # 15 Exhibit O, # 16 Exhibit P, # 17 Exhibit Q, # 18 Exhibit R, # 19 Exhibit S, # 20 Exhibit T, # 21 Exhibit U, # 22 Exhibit V, # 23 Exhibit W, # 24 Exhibit X)(Everdell, Christian) (Entered: 12/14/2020)",
"position": "middle"
},
{
"type": "printed",
"content": "12/17/2020 98 NOTICE OF ATTORNEY APPEARANCE Andrew Rohrbach appearing for USA. (Rohrbach, Andrew) (Entered: 12/17/2020)",
"position": "middle"
},
{
"type": "printed",
"content": "12/18/2020 99 ORDER as to Ghislaine Maxwell: On December 16, 2020, the Government filed its opposition to Defendant Ghislaine Maxwell's renewed application for bail. In accordance with this Court's December 7, 2020 Order, see Dkt. No. 89, the Government filed its materials under seal and proposed narrowly tailored redactions on DOJ-OGR-00019732",
"position": "bottom"
}
],
"entities": {
"people": [
"Ghislaine Maxwell",
"Alison J. Nathan",
"Kristen Carannante",
"Kelly McGuirk",
"Christian R. Everdell",
"Andrew Rohrbach"
],
"organizations": [
"USA"
],
"locations": [],
"dates": [
"01/12/2021",
"12/10/2020",
"7/14/2020",
"12/8/2020",
"12/31/2020",
"1/11/2021",
"3/10/2021",
"12/14/2020",
"12/7/2020",
"12/16/2020",
"12/17/2020",
"12/18/2020"
],
"reference_numbers": [
"3011691",
"Case 21-58",
"Document 3-2",
"93",
"94",
"95",
"96",
"97",
"98",
"99",
"Dkt. No. 89",
"DOJ-OGR-00019732"
]
},
"additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court docket sheet with various entries related to the case of Ghislaine Maxwell. The entries include transcripts, notices, orders, and other documents filed with the court. The document is well-formatted and easy to read."
},
"error": null
},
{
"filename": "IMAGES007/DOJ-OGR-00019758.jpg",
"success": true,
"data": {
"document_metadata": {
"page_number": "13",
"document_number": "20-2",
"date": "03/24/2021",
"document_type": "Court Document",
"has_handwriting": false,
"has_stamps": false
},
"full_text": "Case 21-58, Document 20-2, 03/24/2021, 3065965, Page13 of 24\n\n| Date | Docket # | Description |",
"text_blocks": [
{
"type": "printed",
"content": "Case 21-58, Document 20-2, 03/24/2021, 3065965, Page13 of 24",
"position": "header"
},
{
"type": "printed",
"content": "| Date | Docket # | Description |",
"position": "main"
}
],
"entities": {
"people": [
"Ghislaine Maxwell",
"Alison J. Nathan",
"Maurene Comey",
"Alison Moe",
"Lara Pomerantz",
"Catherine O'Hagan Wolfe",
"Bobbi C. Sternheim",
"Heriberto Tellez"
],
"organizations": [
"USCA",
"MDC"
],
"locations": [],
"dates": [
"11/06/2020",
"11/09/2020",
"11/18/2020",
"11/23/2020",
"11/24/2020",
"12/01/2020",
"01/11/2021",
"02/19/2021",
"03/12/2021"
],
"reference_numbers": [
"20-3061-cr",
"3065965",
"21-58",
"20-2"
]
},
"additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court docket sheet with various entries related to the case of Ghislaine Maxwell. The entries include letters, affidavits, mandates, and orders from the court and the parties involved. The document is well-formatted and easy to read."
},
"error": null
},
{
"filename": "IMAGES007/DOJ-OGR-00019761.jpg",
"success": true,
"data": {
"document_metadata": {
"page_number": "16 of 24",
"document_number": "20-2",
"date": "03/24/2021",
"document_type": "Court Document",
"has_handwriting": false,
"has_stamps": false
},
"full_text": "Case 21-58, Document 20-2, 03/24/2021, 3065965, Page16 of 24 necessary steps to ensure that the Defendant continues to receive adequate access to her legal materials and her ability to communicate with defense counsel. (Signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan on 12/8/2020) (ap) (Entered: 12/08/2020) 12/10/2020 93 TRANSCRIPT of Proceedings as to Ghislaine Maxwell re: Conference held on 7/14/2020 before Judge Alison J. Nathan. Court Reporter/Transcriber: Kristen Carannante, (212) 805-0300, Transcript may be viewed at the court public terminal or purchased through the Court Reporter/Transcriber before the deadline for Release of Transcript Restriction. After that date it may be obtained through PACER. Redaction Request due 12/31/2020. Redacted Transcript Deadline set for 1/11/2021. Release of Transcript Restriction set for 3/10/2021. (McGuirk, Kelly) (Entered: 12/10/2020) 12/10/2020 94 NOTICE OF FILING OF OFFICIAL TRANSCRIPT as to Ghislaine Maxwell. Notice is hereby given that an official transcript of a Conference proceeding held on 7/14/2020 has been filed by the court reporter/transcriber in the above-captioned matter. The parties have seven (7) calendar days to file with the court a Notice of Intent to Request Redaction of this transcript. If no such Notice is filed, the transcript may be made remotely electronically available to the public without redaction after 90 calendar days.... (McGuirk, Kelly) (Entered: 12/10/2020) 12/14/2020 95 ORDER as to Ghislaine Maxwell: On December 8, 2020, Defendant Ghislaine Maxwell filed her renewed application for bail under seal with proposed redactions, in accordance with this Court's December 7, 2020 Order, see Dkt. No. 89. The Government did not file any opposition to the Defendant's proposed redactions. After due consideration, the Court will adopt the Defendant's proposed redactions. The Court's decision to adopt those redactions is guided by the three-part test articulated by the Second Circuit in Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of Onondaga, 435 F.3d 110 (2d Cir. 2006). Under this test, the Court must: (i) determine whether the documents in question are \"judicial documents;\" (ii) assess the weight of the common law presumption of access to the materials; and (iii) balance competing considerations against the presumption of access. Id. at 11920. \"Such countervailing factors include but are not limited to the danger of impairing law enforcement or judicial efficiency' and 'the privacy interests of those resisting disclosure.'\" Id. at 120 (quoting United States v. Amodeo, 71 F.3d 1044, 1048 (2d Cir.1995) (\"Amodeo II\")). The proposed redactions satisfy this test. The Court finds that Defendant's letter motions are \"relevant to the performance of the judicial function and useful in the judicial process,' thereby qualifying as a \"judicial document\" for purposes of the first element of the Lugosch test. United States v. Amodeo (\"Amodeo I\"), 44 F.3d 141, 145 (2d Cir. 1995). And the Court also finds that the common law presumption of access attaches. Id. at 146; see also Nixon v. Warner Commc'ns, Inc., 435 U.S. 589, 602 (1978). Nevertheless, in balancing competing considerations against the presumption of access, the Court finds that the redactions are narrowly tailored to properly guard the privacy interests of the individuals referenced in the Defendant's submission and in the corresponding exhibits The Defendant is hereby ORDERED to docket the redacted documents and corresponding exhibits dated 12/14/2020) (ap) (Entered: 12/14/2020) 12/14/2020 96 LETTER by Ghislaine Maxwell addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan from Christian R. Everdell dated December 8, 2020 re: Cover Letter for Renewed Bail Application (Everdell, Christian) (Entered: 12/14/2020) 12/14/2020 97 MEMORANDUM OF LAW in Support by Ghislaine Maxwell re: Renewed Motion for Bail. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B, # 3 Exhibit C, # 4 Exhibit D, # 5 Exhibit E, # 6 Exhibit F, # 7 Exhibit G, # 8 Exhibit H, # 9 Exhibit I, # 10 Exhibit J, # 11 Exhibit K, # 12 Exhibit L, # 13 Exhibit M, # 14 Exhibit N, # 15 Exhibit O, # 16 Exhibit P, # 17 Exhibit Q, # 18 Exhibit R, # 19 Exhibit S, # 20 Exhibit T, # 21 Exhibit U, # 22 Exhibit V, # 23 Exhibit W, # 24 Exhibit X)(Everdell, Christian) (Entered: 12/14/2020) 12/17/2020 98 NOTICE OF ATTORNEY APPEARANCE Andrew Rohrbach appearing for USA. (Rohrbach, Andrew) (Entered: 12/17/2020) 12/18/2020 99 ORDER as to Ghislaine Maxwell: On December 16, 2020, the Government filed its opposition to Defendant Ghislaine Maxwell's renewed application for bail. In accordance with this Court's December 7, 2020 Order, see Dkt. No. 89, the Government filed its materials under seal and proposed narrowly tailored redactions on DOJ-OGR-00019761",
"text_blocks": [
{
"type": "printed",
"content": "Case 21-58, Document 20-2, 03/24/2021, 3065965, Page16 of 24",
"position": "header"
},
{
"type": "printed",
"content": "necessary steps to ensure that the Defendant continues to receive adequate access to her legal materials and her ability to communicate with defense counsel. (Signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan on 12/8/2020) (ap) (Entered: 12/08/2020)",
"position": "top"
},
{
"type": "printed",
"content": "12/10/2020 93 TRANSCRIPT of Proceedings as to Ghislaine Maxwell re: Conference held on 7/14/2020 before Judge Alison J. Nathan. Court Reporter/Transcriber: Kristen Carannante, (212) 805-0300, Transcript may be viewed at the court public terminal or purchased through the Court Reporter/Transcriber before the deadline for Release of Transcript Restriction. After that date it may be obtained through PACER. Redaction Request due 12/31/2020. Redacted Transcript Deadline set for 1/11/2021. Release of Transcript Restriction set for 3/10/2021. (McGuirk, Kelly) (Entered: 12/10/2020)",
"position": "middle"
},
{
"type": "printed",
"content": "12/10/2020 94 NOTICE OF FILING OF OFFICIAL TRANSCRIPT as to Ghislaine Maxwell. Notice is hereby given that an official transcript of a Conference proceeding held on 7/14/2020 has been filed by the court reporter/transcriber in the above-captioned matter. The parties have seven (7) calendar days to file with the court a Notice of Intent to Request Redaction of this transcript. If no such Notice is filed, the transcript may be made remotely electronically available to the public without redaction after 90 calendar days.... (McGuirk, Kelly) (Entered: 12/10/2020)",
"position": "middle"
},
{
"type": "printed",
"content": "12/14/2020 95 ORDER as to Ghislaine Maxwell: On December 8, 2020, Defendant Ghislaine Maxwell filed her renewed application for bail under seal with proposed redactions, in accordance with this Court's December 7, 2020 Order, see Dkt. No. 89. The Government did not file any opposition to the Defendant's proposed redactions. After due consideration, the Court will adopt the Defendant's proposed redactions. The Court's decision to adopt those redactions is guided by the three-part test articulated by the Second Circuit in Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of Onondaga, 435 F.3d 110 (2d Cir. 2006). Under this test, the Court must: (i) determine whether the documents in question are \"judicial documents;\" (ii) assess the weight of the common law presumption of access to the materials; and (iii) balance competing considerations against the presumption of access. Id. at 11920. \"Such countervailing factors include but are not limited to the danger of impairing law enforcement or judicial efficiency' and 'the privacy interests of those resisting disclosure.'\" Id. at 120 (quoting United States v. Amodeo, 71 F.3d 1044, 1048 (2d Cir.1995) (\"Amodeo II\")). The proposed redactions satisfy this test. The Court finds that Defendant's letter motions are \"relevant to the performance of the judicial function and useful in the judicial process,' thereby qualifying as a \"judicial document\" for purposes of the first element of the Lugosch test. United States v. Amodeo (\"Amodeo I\"), 44 F.3d 141, 145 (2d Cir. 1995). And the Court also finds that the common law presumption of access attaches. Id. at 146; see also Nixon v. Warner Commc'ns, Inc., 435 U.S. 589, 602 (1978). Nevertheless, in balancing competing considerations against the presumption of access, the Court finds that the redactions are narrowly tailored to properly guard the privacy interests of the individuals referenced in the Defendant's submission and in the corresponding exhibits The Defendant is hereby ORDERED to docket the redacted documents and corresponding exhibits dated 12/14/2020) (ap) (Entered: 12/14/2020)",
"position": "middle"
},
{
"type": "printed",
"content": "12/14/2020 96 LETTER by Ghislaine Maxwell addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan from Christian R. Everdell dated December 8, 2020 re: Cover Letter for Renewed Bail Application (Everdell, Christian) (Entered: 12/14/2020)",
"position": "middle"
},
{
"type": "printed",
"content": "12/14/2020 97 MEMORANDUM OF LAW in Support by Ghislaine Maxwell re: Renewed Motion for Bail. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B, # 3 Exhibit C, # 4 Exhibit D, # 5 Exhibit E, # 6 Exhibit F, # 7 Exhibit G, # 8 Exhibit H, # 9 Exhibit I, # 10 Exhibit J, # 11 Exhibit K, # 12 Exhibit L, # 13 Exhibit M, # 14 Exhibit N, # 15 Exhibit O, # 16 Exhibit P, # 17 Exhibit Q, # 18 Exhibit R, # 19 Exhibit S, # 20 Exhibit T, # 21 Exhibit U, # 22 Exhibit V, # 23 Exhibit W, # 24 Exhibit X)(Everdell, Christian) (Entered: 12/14/2020)",
"position": "middle"
},
{
"type": "printed",
"content": "12/17/2020 98 NOTICE OF ATTORNEY APPEARANCE Andrew Rohrbach appearing for USA. (Rohrbach, Andrew) (Entered: 12/17/2020)",
"position": "middle"
},
{
"type": "printed",
"content": "12/18/2020 99 ORDER as to Ghislaine Maxwell: On December 16, 2020, the Government filed its opposition to Defendant Ghislaine Maxwell's renewed application for bail. In accordance with this Court's December 7, 2020 Order, see Dkt. No. 89, the Government filed its materials under seal and proposed narrowly tailored redactions on DOJ-OGR-00019761",
"position": "bottom"
}
],
"entities": {
"people": [
"Ghislaine Maxwell",
"Alison J. Nathan",
"Kristen Carannante",
"Kelly McGuirk",
"Christian R. Everdell",
"Andrew Rohrbach"
],
"organizations": [
"USA"
],
"locations": [],
"dates": [
"12/8/2020",
"7/14/2020",
"12/10/2020",
"12/31/2020",
"1/11/2021",
"3/10/2021",
"12/14/2020",
"12/7/2020",
"12/16/2020",
"12/17/2020",
"12/18/2020"
],
"reference_numbers": [
"Case 21-58",
"Document 20-2",
"3065965",
"Dkt. No. 89",
"DOJ-OGR-00019761"
]
},
"additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court docket sheet with various entries related to the case of Ghislaine Maxwell."
},
"error": null
},
{
"filename": "IMAGES007/DOJ-OGR-00019810.jpg",
"success": true,
"data": {
"document_metadata": {
"page_number": "15",
"document_number": "23",
"date": "03/29/2021",
"document_type": "Court Document",
"has_handwriting": false,
"has_stamps": false
},
"full_text": "Case 21-58, Document 23, 03/29/2021, 3065988, Page15 of 24\n\n| Date | Dkt. No. | Description ",
"text_blocks": [
{
"type": "printed",
"content": "Case 21-58, Document 23, 03/29/2021, 3065988, Page15 of 24",
"position": "header"
},
{
"type": "printed",
"content": "| Date | Dkt. No. | Description |",
"position": "main"
}
],
"entities": {
"people": [
"Ghislaine Maxwell",
"Alison J. Nathan",
"Christian R. Everdell",
"Sophia Papapetru",
"John Wallace",
"Mark S. Cohen",
"Bobbi C. Sternheim",
"Warden Heriberto Tellez"
],
"organizations": [],
"locations": [
"Brooklyn",
"New York",
"Metropolitan Detention Center"
],
"dates": [
"12/04/2020",
"11/25/2020",
"11/30/2020",
"12/07/2020",
"12/02/2020",
"12/18/2020",
"12/08/2020",
"12/16/2020",
"12/4/2020",
"11/24/2020",
"12/7/2020",
"03/29/2021"
],
"reference_numbers": [
"21-58",
"23",
"3065988",
"85",
"86",
"87",
"88",
"89",
"90",
"91",
"92",
"02879-509"
]
},
"additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court docket sheet with various entries related to Ghislaine Maxwell's case."
},
"error": null
},
{
"filename": "IMAGES007/DOJ-OGR-00019818.jpg",
"success": true,
"data": {
"document_metadata": {
"page_number": "23",
"document_number": "23",
"date": "03/29/2021",
"document_type": "Court Docket",
"has_handwriting": false,
"has_stamps": false
},
"full_text": "Case 21-58, Document 23, 03/29/2021, 3065988, Page23 of 24\n\n| Date | Docket # | Description ",
"text_blocks": [
{
"type": "printed",
"content": "Case 21-58, Document 23, 03/29/2021, 3065988, Page23 of 24",
"position": "header"
},
{
"type": "printed",
"content": "| Date | Docket # | Description ",
"position": "main"
}
],
"entities": {
"people": [
"Ghislaine Maxwell",
"Alison J. Nathan",
"Maurene Comey",
"Lara Pomerantz",
"Andrew Rohrbach",
"Bobbi Sternheim"
],
"organizations": [
"USA"
],
"locations": [],
"dates": [
"03/22/2021",
"03/23/2021",
"03/24/2021",
"March 5, 2021",
"March 12, 2021",
"March 19, 2021",
"March 22, 2021",
"March 24, 2021",
"March 26, 2021",
"Nov. 25, 2020"
],
"reference_numbers": [
"21-58",
"23",
"3065988",
"160",
"169",
"170",
"171",
"172",
"173",
"20-CR-110",
"435 F.3d 110"
]
},
"additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court docket sheet with various entries related to the case of Ghislaine Maxwell. The entries include orders, letters, and notices of appeal. The document is well-formatted and easy to read."
},
"error": null
},
{
"filename": "IMAGES007/DOJ-OGR-00019787.jpg",
"success": true,
"data": {
"document_metadata": {
"page_number": "17",
"document_number": "21-2",
"date": "03/24/2021",
"document_type": "Court Document",
"has_handwriting": false,
"has_stamps": false
},
"full_text": "Case 21-58, Document 21-2, 03/24/2021, 3065978, Page17 of 25 necessary steps to ensure that the Defendant continues to receive adequate access to her legal materials and her ability to communicate with defense counsel. (Signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan on 12/8/2020) (ap) (Entered: 12/08/2020) 12/10/2020 93 TRANSCRIPT of Proceedings as to Ghislaine Maxwell re: Conference held on 7/14/2020 before Judge Alison J. Nathan. Court Reporter/Transcriber: Kristen Carannante, (212) 805-0300, Transcript may be viewed at the court public terminal or purchased through the Court Reporter/Transcriber before the deadline for Release of Transcript Restriction. After that date it may be obtained through PACER. Redaction Request due 12/31/2020. Redacted Transcript Deadline set for 1/11/2021. Release of Transcript Restriction set for 3/10/2021. (McGuirk, Kelly) (Entered: 12/10/2020) 12/10/2020 94 NOTICE OF FILING OF OFFICIAL TRANSCRIPT as to Ghislaine Maxwell. Notice is hereby given that an official transcript of a Conference proceeding held on 7/14/2020 has been filed by the court reporter/transcriber in the above-captioned matter. The parties have seven (7) calendar days to file with the court a Notice of Intent to Request Redaction of this transcript. If no such Notice is filed, the transcript may be made remotely electronically available to the public without redaction after 90 calendar days.... (McGuirk, Kelly) (Entered: 12/10/2020) 12/14/2020 95 ORDER as to Ghislaine Maxwell: On December 8, 2020, Defendant Ghislaine Maxwell filed her renewed application for bail under seal with proposed redactions, in accordance with this Court's December 7, 2020 Order, see Dkt. No. 89. The Government did not file any opposition to the Defendant's proposed redactions. After due consideration, the Court will adopt the Defendant's proposed redactions. The Court's decision to adopt those redactions is guided by the three-part test articulated by the Second Circuit in Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of Onondaga, 435 F.3d 110 (2d Cir. 2006). Under this test, the Court must: (i) determine whether the documents in question are \"judicial documents;\" (ii) assess the weight of the common law presumption of access to the materials; and (iii) balance competing considerations against the presumption of access. Id. at 11920. \"Such countervailing factors include but are not limited to the danger of impairing law enforcement or judicial efficiency' and 'the privacy interests of those resisting disclosure.'\" Id. at 120 (quoting United States v. Amodeo, 71 F.3d 1044, 1048 (2d Cir.1995) (\"Amodeo II\")). The proposed redactions satisfy this test. The Court finds that Defendant's letter motions are \"relevant to the performance of the judicial function and useful in the judicial process,' thereby qualifying as a \"judicial document\" for purposes of the first element of the Lugosch test. United States v. Amodeo (\"Amodeo I\"), 44 F.3d 141, 145 (2d Cir. 1995). And the Court also finds that the common law presumption of access attaches. Id. at 146; see also Nixon v. Warner Commc'ns, Inc., 435 U.S. 589, 602 (1978). Nevertheless, in balancing competing considerations against the presumption of access, the Court finds that the redactions are narrowly tailored to properly guard the privacy interests of the individuals referenced in the Defendant's submission and in the corresponding exhibits The Defendant is hereby ORDERED to docket the redacted documents and corresponding exhibits dated 12/14/2020) (ap) (Entered: 12/14/2020) 12/14/2020 96 LETTER by Ghislaine Maxwell addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan from Christian R. Everdell dated December 8, 2020 re: Cover Letter for Renewed Bail Application (Everdell, Christian) (Entered: 12/14/2020) 12/14/2020 97 MEMORANDUM OF LAW in Support by Ghislaine Maxwell re: Renewed Motion for Bail. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B, # 3 Exhibit C, # 4 Exhibit D, # 5 Exhibit E, # 6 Exhibit F, # 7 Exhibit G, # 8 Exhibit H, # 9 Exhibit I, # 10 Exhibit J, # 11 Exhibit K, # 12 Exhibit L, # 13 Exhibit M, # 14 Exhibit N, # 15 Exhibit O, # 16 Exhibit P, # 17 Exhibit Q, # 18 Exhibit R, # 19 Exhibit S, # 20 Exhibit T, # 21 Exhibit U, # 22 Exhibit V, # 23 Exhibit W, # 24 Exhibit X)(Everdell, Christian) (Entered: 12/14/2020) 12/17/2020 98 NOTICE OF ATTORNEY APPEARANCE Andrew Rohrbach appearing for USA. (Rohrbach, Andrew) (Entered: 12/17/2020) 12/18/2020 99 ORDER as to Ghislaine Maxwell: On December 16, 2020, the Government filed its opposition to Defendant Ghislaine Maxwell's renewed application for bail. In accordance with this Court's December 7, 2020 Order, see Dkt. No. 89, the Government filed its materials under seal and proposed narrowly tailored redactions on DOJ-OGR-00019787",
"text_blocks": [
{
"type": "printed",
"content": "Case 21-58, Document 21-2, 03/24/2021, 3065978, Page17 of 25",
"position": "header"
},
{
"type": "printed",
"content": "necessary steps to ensure that the Defendant continues to receive adequate access to her legal materials and her ability to communicate with defense counsel. (Signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan on 12/8/2020) (ap) (Entered: 12/08/2020)",
"position": "top"
},
{
"type": "printed",
"content": "12/10/2020 93 TRANSCRIPT of Proceedings as to Ghislaine Maxwell re: Conference held on 7/14/2020 before Judge Alison J. Nathan. Court Reporter/Transcriber: Kristen Carannante, (212) 805-0300, Transcript may be viewed at the court public terminal or purchased through the Court Reporter/Transcriber before the deadline for Release of Transcript Restriction. After that date it may be obtained through PACER. Redaction Request due 12/31/2020. Redacted Transcript Deadline set for 1/11/2021. Release of Transcript Restriction set for 3/10/2021. (McGuirk, Kelly) (Entered: 12/10/2020)",
"position": "middle"
},
{
"type": "printed",
"content": "12/10/2020 94 NOTICE OF FILING OF OFFICIAL TRANSCRIPT as to Ghislaine Maxwell. Notice is hereby given that an official transcript of a Conference proceeding held on 7/14/2020 has been filed by the court reporter/transcriber in the above-captioned matter. The parties have seven (7) calendar days to file with the court a Notice of Intent to Request Redaction of this transcript. If no such Notice is filed, the transcript may be made remotely electronically available to the public without redaction after 90 calendar days.... (McGuirk, Kelly) (Entered: 12/10/2020)",
"position": "middle"
},
{
"type": "printed",
"content": "12/14/2020 95 ORDER as to Ghislaine Maxwell: On December 8, 2020, Defendant Ghislaine Maxwell filed her renewed application for bail under seal with proposed redactions, in accordance with this Court's December 7, 2020 Order, see Dkt. No. 89. The Government did not file any opposition to the Defendant's proposed redactions. After due consideration, the Court will adopt the Defendant's proposed redactions. The Court's decision to adopt those redactions is guided by the three-part test articulated by the Second Circuit in Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of Onondaga, 435 F.3d 110 (2d Cir. 2006). Under this test, the Court must: (i) determine whether the documents in question are \"judicial documents;\" (ii) assess the weight of the common law presumption of access to the materials; and (iii) balance competing considerations against the presumption of access. Id. at 11920. \"Such countervailing factors include but are not limited to the danger of impairing law enforcement or judicial efficiency' and 'the privacy interests of those resisting disclosure.'\" Id. at 120 (quoting United States v. Amodeo, 71 F.3d 1044, 1048 (2d Cir.1995) (\"Amodeo II\")). The proposed redactions satisfy this test. The Court finds that Defendant's letter motions are \"relevant to the performance of the judicial function and useful in the judicial process,' thereby qualifying as a \"judicial document\" for purposes of the first element of the Lugosch test. United States v. Amodeo (\"Amodeo I\"), 44 F.3d 141, 145 (2d Cir. 1995). And the Court also finds that the common law presumption of access attaches. Id. at access; see also Nixon v. Warner Commc'ns, Inc., 435 U.S. 589, 602 (1978). Nevertheless, in balancing competing considerations against the presumption of access, the Court finds that the redactions are narrowly tailored to properly guard the privacy interests of the individuals referenced in the Defendant's submission and in the corresponding exhibits The Defendant is hereby ORDERED to docket the redacted documents and corresponding exhibits dated 12/14/2020) (ap) (Entered: 12/14/2020)",
"position": "middle"
},
{
"type": "printed",
"content": "12/14/2020 96 LETTER by Ghislaine Maxwell addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan from Christian R. Everdell dated December 8, 2020 re: Cover Letter for Renewed Bail Application (Everdell, Christian) (Entered: 12/14/2020)",
"position": "middle"
},
{
"type": "printed",
"content": "12/14/2020 97 MEMORANDUM OF LAW in Support by Ghislaine Maxwell re: Renewed Motion for Bail. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B, # 3 Exhibit C, # 4 Exhibit D, # 5 Exhibit E, # 6 Exhibit F, # 7 Exhibit G, # 8 Exhibit H, # 9 Exhibit I, # 10 Exhibit J, # 11 Exhibit K, # 12 Exhibit L, # 13 Exhibit M, # 14 Exhibit N, # 15 Exhibit O, # 16 Exhibit P, # 17 Exhibit Q, # 18 Exhibit R, # 19 Exhibit S, # 20 Exhibit T, # 21 Exhibit U, # 22 Exhibit V, # 23 Exhibit W, # 24 Exhibit X)(Everdell, Christian) (Entered: 12/14/2020)",
"position": "middle"
},
{
"type": "printed",
"content": "12/17/2020 98 NOTICE OF ATTORNEY APPEARANCE Andrew Rohrbach appearing for USA. (Rohrbach, Andrew) (Entered: 12/17/2020)",
"position": "middle"
},
{
"type": "printed",
"content": "12/18/2020 99 ORDER as to Ghislaine Maxwell: On December 16, 2020, the Government filed its opposition to Defendant Ghislaine Maxwell's renewed application for bail. In accordance with this Court's December 7, 2020 Order, see Dkt. No. 89, the Government filed its materials under seal and proposed narrowly tailored redactions on DOJ-OGR-00019787",
"position": "bottom"
}
],
"entities": {
"people": [
"Ghislaine Maxwell",
"Alison J. Nathan",
"Kristen Carannante",
"Kelly McGuirk",
"Christian R. Everdell",
"Andrew Rohrbach"
],
"organizations": [
"USA"
],
"locations": [],
"dates": [
"12/8/2020",
"7/14/2020",
"12/10/2020",
"12/31/2020",
"1/11/2021",
"3/10/2021",
"12/14/2020",
"12/7/2020",
"12/16/2020",
"12/17/2020",
"12/18/2020"
],
"reference_numbers": [
"21-58",
"21-2",
"3065978",
"93",
"94",
"95",
"96",
"97",
"98",
"99",
"Dkt. No. 89",
"DOJ-OGR-00019787"
]
},
"additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court docket sheet with various entries related to the case of Ghislaine Maxwell. The entries include transcripts, notices, orders, and other documents filed with the court. The document is well-formatted and easy to read."
},
"error": null
},
{
"filename": "IMAGES007/DOJ-OGR-00020066.jpg",
"success": false,
"data": null,
"error": "Expecting ',' delimiter: line 10 column 2234 (char 2514)"
},
{
"filename": "IMAGES008/DOJ-OGR-00020412.jpg",
"success": true,
"data": {
"document_metadata": {
"page_number": "26",
"document_number": "1-2",
"date": "07/08/2022",
"document_type": "Court Document",
"has_handwriting": false,
"has_stamps": false
},
"full_text": "Case 22-1426, Document 1-2, 07/08/2022, 3344417, Page26 of 91\n\n| Date | Number | Description |\n|------------|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|\n| 03/26/2021 | | >>>NOTICE REGARDING PRO HAC VICE MOTION. Regarding Document No. 182 MOTION for Sigrid S. McCawley to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number ANYSDC-24312691. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. The document has been reviewed and there are no deficiencies. (wb) (Entered: 03/26/2021) |\n| 03/26/2021 | 183 | LETTER by Boies Schiller Flexner LLP as to Ghislaine Maxwell addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan from Sigrid S. McCawley dated March 22, 2021 re: Objection to subpoena. Document filed by Boies Schiller Flexner LLP. (McCawley, Sigrid) (Entered: 03/26/2021) |\n| 03/26/2021 | 184 | LETTER by Boies Schiller Flexner LLP as to Ghislaine Maxwell addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan from Sigrid S. McCawley dated March 26, 2021 re: Proposed redactions to March 22, 2021 Letter (ECF No. 183) Document filed by Boies Schiller Flexner LLP. (McCawley, Sigrid) (Entered: 03/26/2021) |\n| 03/26/2021 | 185 | LETTER by USA as to Ghislaine Maxwell addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan from AUSAs Maurene Comey, Alison Moe, Lara Pomerantz, and Andrew Rohrbach dated March 26, 2021 re: Recent decision in United States v. Schulte, 17 Cr. 548 (PAC) Document filed by USA. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1)(Comey, Maurene) (Entered: 03/26/2021) |\n| 03/26/2021 | 186 | ORDER as to Ghislaine Maxwell: The Court sees no reason to maintain the redactions on Boies Schiller Flexner LLP's March 26, 2021 letter. Dkt. No. 183. Unless the Government indicates an objection to removing those redactions by March 29, 2021, BSF shall file the unredacted version on the docket on March 30, 2021. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan on 3/26/2021) (lnl) (Entered: 03/26/2021) |\n| 03/29/2021 | 187 | (S2) SUPERSEDING INDICTMENT FILED as to Ghislaine Maxwell (1) count(s) 1ss, 2ss, 3ss, 4ss, 5ss, 6ss, 7ss–8ss. (jm) (Entered: 03/29/2021) |\n| 03/29/2021 | 188 | LETTER by USA as to Ghislaine Maxwell addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan from AUSAs Maurene Comey, Alison Moe, Lara Pomerantz, and Andrew Rohrbach dated March 29, 2021 re: S2 Superseding Indictment Document filed by USA. (Comey, Maurene) (Entered: 03/29/2021) |\n| 03/29/2021 | 189 | ORDER as to Ghislaine Maxwell. The Court is in receipt of the Government's letter memorandum of law in opposition to the Defendant's twelve pretrial motions. Dkt. No. 170. the Court ORDERS that the information contained on pages 129134 of the Governments brief be unredacted. With respect to the proposed redactions to pages 118119 and Exhibit 11, the Court now understands that the parties seek redactions on the basis that the material has been maintained under seal in Giuffre v. Maxwell, Case No 15-cv-7433 (S.D.N.Y.). By April 1, 2021, the parties must meet and confer and either submit to the Court justification for those redactionsbeyond that it has been ordered redacted in the civil matteror, in the alternative, notify the Court that the parties are no longer seeking those redactions. If the parties disagree, they shall indicate their separate views in the joint letter. (Signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan on 3/29/21) (jw) (Entered: 03/29/2021) |\n| 03/29/2021 | 190 | LETTER by USA as to Ghislaine Maxwell addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan from AUSAs Maurene Comey, Alison Moe, and Lara Pomerantz dated March 29, 2021 re: Clarification re October 7, 2020 Letter Document filed by USA. (Comey, Maurene) (Entered: 03/29/2021) |\n| 03/29/2021 | | USCA Appeal Fees received $ 505.00, receipt number 465401276762 as to Ghislaine Maxwell on 3/25/2021 re: 173 Notice of Appeal - Final Judgment filed by Ghislaine Maxwell. (tp) (Entered: 04/01/2021) |\n| 03/30/2021 | 191 | LETTER by Boies Schiller Flexner LLP as to Ghislaine Maxwell addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan from Sigrid S. McCawley dated March 22,2021 re: Unredacted Objection to Defendant Ghislaine Maxwell's motion for an order authorizing a Rule 17(c) subpoena. Document filed by Boies Schiller Flexner LLP. (McCawley, Sigrid) (Entered: 03/30/2021) |\n\nDOJ-OGR-00020412",
"text_blocks": [
{
"type": "printed",
"content": "Case 22-1426, Document 1-2, 07/08/2022, 3344417, Page26 of 91",
"position": "header"
},
{
"type": "printed",
"content": "The table contains court documents related to Ghislaine Maxwell's case, including dates, document numbers, and descriptions of the documents.",
"position": "main"
},
{
"type": "printed",
"content": "DOJ-OGR-00020412",
"position": "footer"
}
],
"entities": {
"people": [
"Ghislaine Maxwell",
"Sigrid S. McCawley",
"Alison J. Nathan",
"Maurene Comey",
"Alison Moe",
"Lara Pomerantz",
"Andrew Rohrbach",
"Schulte"
],
"organizations": [
"Boies Schiller Flexner LLP",
"USA",
"USCA"
],
"locations": [
"S.D.N.Y."
],
"dates": [
"03/26/2021",
"03/22/2021",
"03/29/2021",
"03/30/2021",
"03/25/2021",
"04/01/2021",
"07/08/2022",
"October 7, 2020"
],
"reference_numbers": [
"182",
"183",
"184",
"185",
"186",
"187",
"188",
"189",
"190",
"191",
"173",
"24312691",
"465401276762",
"15-cv-7433",
"17 Cr. 548 (PAC)"
]
},
"additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court docket sheet with a table listing various court documents related to Ghislaine Maxwell's case. The table includes dates, document numbers, and descriptions of the documents. The document is well-formatted and legible."
},
"error": null
},
{
"filename": "IMAGES008/DOJ-OGR-00020441.jpg",
"success": true,
"data": {
"document_metadata": {
"page_number": "55",
"document_number": "1-2",
"date": "07/08/2022",
"document_type": "Court Document",
"has_handwriting": false,
"has_stamps": false
},
"full_text": "Case 22-1426, Document 1-2, 07/08/2022, 3344417, Page55 of 91\n\n| 11/03/2021 | 413 | ORDER as to Ghislaine Maxwell. The Court is in receipt of the Defendant's motions for reconsideration. See Dkt. Nos. 407, 408. The Government is hereby ORDERED to respond to Defendant's motion for reconsideration, Dkt. No. 408, on or before November 8, 2021. As to the motion for reconsideration regarding the disclosure of juror names, the Court reminds counsel of the following. First, as the Court previously indicated, the lawyers will be provided the names of jurors on November 16, prior to the commencement of the voir dire process. Second, the Court has now resolved the logistical issues regarding the ability to conduct peremptory challenges on November 29 and the Court can now confirm that peremptory strikes will not be exercised until November 29. Finally, as previously indicated, although only 40 qualified jurors are needed for the exercise of peremptory strikes, the Court will seek to qualify approximately 50 to 60 prospective jurors to return on November 29 for the exercise of peremptory strikes. If counsel for either side learns of any additional information that would be a basis for a strike for cause prior to November 29, they shall immediately raise the issue with the Court. Bearing in mind this information, the Government is ORDERED to respond to Defendant's motion for reconsideration, Dkt. No. 407, on or before November 4, 2021. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan on 11/3/2021)(bw) (Entered: 11/04/2021) |\n| 11/04/2021 | 410 | LETTER by USA as to Ghislaine Maxwell addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan from AUSAs Alison Moe, Lara Pomerantz, and Andrew Rohrbach dated November 3, 2021 re: RTC and Verdict Sheet Document filed by USA. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Request to Charge, # 2 Exhibit Verdict sheet)(Rohrbach, Andrew) (Entered: 11/04/2021) |\n| 11/04/2021 | 411 | LETTER MOTION addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan from AUSAs Alison Moe, Lara Pomerantz, and Andrew Rohrbach dated November 4, 2021 re: Reconsideration of Court Order (Dkt. 409) . Document filed by USA as to Ghislaine Maxwell. (Pomerantz, Lara) (Entered: 11/04/2021) |\n| 11/04/2021 | 414 | MEMO ENDORSEMENT as to Ghislaine Maxwell on re: 411 LETTER MOTION filed by USA addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan from AUSAs Alison Moe, Lara Pomerantz, and Andrew Rohrbach dated November 4, 2021 re: Reconsideration of Court Order (Dkt. 409). ENDORSEMENT: The Court hereby DENIES the Government's request as to Dr. Park Dietz and Dr. Elizabeth Loftus. Pursuant to this Court's Order, if the Government seeks to exclude these anticipated witnesses, briefing must be submitted by November 8, 2021. Dkt. No. 409. As to the remaining individuals disclosed in Defendant's notice, the Court GRANTS the Government's request. If the Government seeks to exclude those anticipated witnesses, briefing must be submitted by November 15, 2021, with a response by Defendant due November 19, 2021. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan on 11/4/2021)(bw) (Entered: 11/04/2021) |\n| 11/04/2021 | 415 | LETTER by USA as to Ghislaine Maxwell addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan from AUSAs Alison Moe, Lara Pomerantz, and Andrew Rohrbach dated November 4, 2021 re: Reply to Defendant's Motion for Reconsideration regarding Disclosure of Juror Names Document filed by USA. (Pomerantz, Lara) (Entered: 11/04/2021) |\n| 11/05/2021 | 416 | MEMO ENDORSEMENT as to Ghislaine Maxwell on re: 415 LETTER by USA as to Ghislaine Maxwell addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan from AUSAs Alison Moe, Lara Pomerantz, and Andrew Rohrbach dated November 4, 2021 re: Reply to Defendant's Motion for Reconsideration regarding Disclosure of Juror Names. ENDORSEMENT: For the reasons stated in the Government's letter, the motion for reconsideration, Dkt. No. 407, is DENIED. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan on 11/5/2021) (ap) (Entered: 11/05/2021) |\n| 11/08/2021 | 417 | ORDER as to Ghislaine Maxwell: The Court is in receipt of the Government's supplemental letter regarding its opposition to the defense motion to exclude evidence of Minor Victim-3. See Dkt. No. 387. The letter is submitted temporarily under seal to allow defense counsel the opportunity to propose any additional redactions beyond what the Government proposes. At the November 1, 2021 conference, the Court asked the Government to provide its position as to whether Alleged \"Victim-3\" could be considered a \"victim\" of the crimes charged in the indictment for any legal purpose, including for purposes of restitution under 18 U.S.C. § 3663(a)(2). See Transcript at 71–72. The Government's supplemental letter does not address this issue. While acknowledging that the Court's request may have been unclear, the Government is now |\nDOJ-OGR-00020441",
"text_blocks": [
{
"type": "printed",
"content": "Case 22-1426, Document 1-2, 07/08/2022, 3344417, Page55 of 91",
"position": "header"
},
{
"type": "printed",
"content": "The table contains court documents related to Ghislaine Maxwell's case, including orders, letters, and endorsements.",
"position": "main"
},
{
"type": "printed",
"content": "DOJ-OGR-00020441",
"position": "footer"
}
],
"entities": {
"people": [
"Ghislaine Maxwell",
"Alison J. Nathan",
"Alison Moe",
"Lara Pomerantz",
"Andrew Rohrbach",
"Dr. Park Dietz",
"Dr. Elizabeth Loftus"
],
"organizations": [
"USA"
],
"locations": [],
"dates": [
"11/03/2021",
"11/04/2021",
"11/05/2021",
"11/08/2021",
"07/08/2022",
"November 8, 2021",
"November 16, 2021",
"November 29, 2021",
"November 3, 2021",
"November 4, 2021",
"November 15, 2021",
"November 19, 2021",
"November 1, 2021"
],
"reference_numbers": [
"Dkt. Nos. 407, 408",
"Dkt. No. 408",
"Dkt. No. 407",
"Dkt. 409",
"Dkt. No. 409",
"Dkt. No. 387",
"413",
"410",
"411",
"414",
"415",
"416",
"417"
]
},
"additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court filing related to Ghislaine Maxwell's case. The table contains various court documents, including orders, letters, and endorsements. The documents are related to motions for reconsideration, disclosure of juror names, and other legal matters."
},
"error": null
},
{
"filename": "IMAGES008/DOJ-OGR-00020513.jpg",
"success": true,
"data": {
"document_metadata": {
"page_number": "27",
"document_number": "3-2",
"date": "07/08/2022",
"document_type": "Court Document",
"has_handwriting": false,
"has_stamps": false
},
"full_text": "Case 22-1426, Document 3-2, 07/08/2022, 3344434, Page27 of 92\n\n| Date | Number | Description |\n|------------|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|\n| 03/26/2021 | | >>>NOTICE REGARDING PRO HAC VICE MOTION. Regarding Document No. 182 MOTION for Sigrid S. McCawley to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Filing fee $200.00, receipt number ANYSDC-24312691. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. The document has been reviewed and there are no deficiencies. (wb) (Entered: 03/26/2021) |\n| 03/26/2021 | 183 | LETTER by Boies Schiller Flexner LLP as to Ghislaine Maxwell addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan from Sigrid S. McCawley dated March 22, 2021 re: Objection to Defendant Ghislaine Maxwell's motion for an order authorizing a Rule 17(c) subpoena. Document filed by Boies Schiller Flexner LLP. (McCawley, Sigrid) (Entered: 03/26/2021) |\n| 03/26/2021 | 184 | LETTER by Boies Schiller Flexner LLP as to Ghislaine Maxwell addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan from Sigrid S. McCawley dated March 26, 2021 re: Proposed redactions to March 22, 2021 Letter (ECF No. 183) Document filed by Boies Schiller Flexner LLP. (McCawley, Sigrid) (Entered: 03/26/2021) |\n| 03/26/2021 | 185 | LETTER by USA as to Ghislaine Maxwell addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan from AUSAs Maurene Comey, Alison Moe, Lara Pomerantz, and Andrew Rohrbach dated March 26, 2021 re: Recent decision in United States v. Schulte, 17 Cr. 548 (PAC) Document filed by USA. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1)(Comey, Maurene) (Entered: 03/26/2021) |\n| 03/26/2021 | 186 | ORDER as to Ghislaine Maxwell: The Court sees no reason to maintain the redactions on Boies Schiller Flexner LLP's March 26, 2021 letter. Dkt. No. 183. Unless the Government indicates an objection to removing those redactions by March 29, 2021, BSF shall file the unredacted version on the docket on March 30, 2021. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan on 3/26/2021) (lnl) (Entered: 03/26/2021) |\n| 03/29/2021 | 187 | (S2) SUPERSEDING INDICTMENT FILED as to Ghislaine Maxwell (1) count(s) 1ss, 2ss, 3ss, 4ss, 5ss, 6ss, 7ss–8ss. (jm) (Entered: 03/29/2021) |\n| 03/29/2021 | 188 | LETTER by USA as to Ghislaine Maxwell addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan from AUSAs Maurene Comey, Alison Moe, Lara Pomerantz, and Andrew Rohrbach dated March 29, 2021 re: S2 Superseding Indictment Document filed by USA. (Comey, Maurene) (Entered: 03/29/2021) |\n| 03/29/2021 | 189 | ORDER as to Ghislaine Maxwell. The Court is in receipt of the Government's letter responding to its March 18, 2021 order regarding redactions to its omnibus memorandum of law in opposition to the Defendant's twelve pretrial motions. Dkt. No. 170. the Court ORDERS that the information contained on pages 129134 of the Governments brief be unredacted. With respect to the proposed redactions to pages 118119 and Exhibit 11, the Court now understands that the parties seek redactions on the basis that the material has been maintained under seal in Giuffre v. Maxwell, Case No 15-cv-7433 (S.D.N.Y.). By April 1, 2021, the parties must meet and confer and either submit to the Court justification for those redactionsbeyond that it has been ordered redacted in the civil matter, or notify the Court that the parties are no longer seeking those redactions. If the parties disagree, they shall indicate their separate views in the joint letter. (Signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan on 3/29/21)(jw) (Entered: 03/29/2021) |\n| 03/29/2021 | 190 | LETTER by USA as to Ghislaine Maxwell addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan from AUSAs Maurene Comey, Alison Moe, and Lara Pomerantz dated March 29, 2021 re: Clarification re October 7, 2020 Letter Document filed by USA. (Comey, Maurene) (Entered: 03/29/2021) |\n| 03/29/2021 | | USCAppeal Fees received $ 505.00, receipt number 465401276762 as to Ghislaine Maxwell on 3/25/2021 re: 173 Notice of Appeal - Final Judgment filed by Ghislaine Maxwell. (tp) (Entered: 04/01/2021) |\n| 03/30/2021 | 191 | LETTER by Boies Schiller Flexner LLP as to Ghislaine Maxwell addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan from Sigrid S. McCawley dated March 22,2021 re: Unredacted Objection to Defendant Ghislaine Maxwell's motion for an order authorizing a Rule 17(c) subpoena. Document filed by Boies Schiller Flexner LLP. (McCawley, Sigrid) (Entered: 03/30/2021) |\n\nDOJ-OGR-00020513",
"text_blocks": [
{
"type": "printed",
"content": "Case 22-1426, Document 3-2, 07/08/2022, 3344434, Page27 of 92",
"position": "header"
},
{
"type": "printed",
"content": "The table contents",
"position": "middle"
},
{
"type": "printed",
"content": "DOJ-OGR-00020513",
"position": "footer"
}
],
"entities": {
"people": [
"Sigrid S. McCawley",
"Ghislaine Maxwell",
"Alison J. Nathan",
"Maurene Comey",
"Alison Moe",
"Lara Pomerantz",
"Andrew Rohrbach",
"Schulte"
],
"organizations": [
"Boies Schiller Flexner LLP",
"USA"
],
"locations": [
"S.D.N.Y."
],
"dates": [
"03/26/2021",
"03/22/2021",
"03/29/2021",
"03/18/2021",
"03/30/2021",
"03/25/2021",
"07/08/2022",
"October 7, 2020",
"April 1, 2021"
],
"reference_numbers": [
"182",
"183",
"184",
"185",
"186",
"187",
"188",
"189",
"190",
"191",
"173",
"24312691",
"465401276762",
"15-cv-7433",
"17 Cr. 548 (PAC)"
]
},
"additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court docket sheet with various entries related to the case against Ghislaine Maxwell. The entries include letters, orders, and other documents filed by the parties involved. The document is well-formatted and legible."
},
"error": null
},
{
"filename": "IMAGES008/DOJ-OGR-00020413.jpg",
"success": true,
"data": {
"document_metadata": {
"page_number": "27",
"document_number": "1-2",
"date": "07/08/2022",
"document_type": "Court Document",
"has_handwriting": false,
"has_stamps": false
},
"full_text": "Case 22-1426, Document 1-2, 07/08/2022, 3344417, Page27 of 91\n\n| Date | Number | Description |",
"text_blocks": [
{
"type": "printed",
"content": "Case 22-1426, Document 1-2, 07/08/2022, 3344417, Page27 of 91",
"position": "header"
},
{
"type": "printed",
"content": "| Date | Number | Description |",
"position": "main"
}
],
"entities": {
"people": [
"Ghislaine Maxwell",
"Alison J. Nathan",
"Sigrid S. McCawley",
"Bobbi C. Sternheim",
"Laura A. Menninger",
"Maurene Comey",
"Alison Moe",
"Lara Pomerantz",
"Andrew Rohrbach"
],
"organizations": [
"USA",
"SDNY"
],
"locations": [
"New York"
],
"dates": [
"03/31/2021",
"04/02/2021",
"04/05/2021",
"04/06/2021",
"04/07/2021",
"04/08/2021",
"04/09/2021",
"04/14/2021",
"07/08/2022",
"April 16, 2021",
"April 23, 2021"
],
"reference_numbers": [
"22-1426",
"1-2",
"3344417",
"182",
"192",
"193",
"194",
"195",
"196",
"197",
"198",
"199",
"200",
"201"
]
},
"additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court docket sheet with a list of entries related to the case of Ghislaine Maxwell."
},
"error": null
},
{
"filename": "IMAGES008/DOJ-OGR-00020438.jpg",
"success": true,
"data": {
"document_metadata": {
"page_number": "52",
"document_number": "22-1426, Document 1-2",
"date": "07/08/2022",
"document_type": "Court Document",
"has_handwriting": false,
"has_stamps": false
},
"full_text": "Case 22-1426, Document 1-2, 07/08/2022, 3344417, Page52 of 91\n\n| Date | Number | Description |",
"text_blocks": [
{
"type": "printed",
"content": "Case 22-1426, Document 1-2, 07/08/2022, 3344417, Page52 of 91",
"position": "header"
},
{
"type": "printed",
"content": "| Date | Number | Description |",
"position": "main"
}
],
"entities": {
"people": [
"Ghislaine Maxwell",
"Jeffrey Epstein",
"Jeffrey Pagliuca",
"Alison J. Nathan",
"Alison Moe",
"Lara Pomerantz",
"Andrew Rohrbach"
],
"organizations": [
"USA",
"AUSAs"
],
"locations": [
"358 El Brillo Way"
],
"dates": [
"10/29/2021",
"07/08/2022",
"October 20, 2005",
"October 28, 2021"
],
"reference_numbers": [
"22-1426",
"Document 1-2",
"3344417",
"392",
"393",
"394",
"395",
"396",
"397",
"398",
"399",
"251",
"288",
"294",
"313",
"606",
"390",
"389",
"388",
"387",
"384",
"385",
"391",
"DOJ-OGR-00020438"
]
},
"additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court filing related to the case of Ghislaine Maxwell, with various motions and responses listed."
},
"error": null
},
{
"filename": "IMAGES008/DOJ-OGR-00020536.jpg",
"success": true,
"data": {
"document_metadata": {
"page_number": "50",
"document_number": "3-2",
"date": "07/08/2022",
"document_type": "Court Document",
"has_handwriting": false,
"has_stamps": false
},
"full_text": "Case 22-1426, Document 3-2, 07/08/2022, 3344434, Page50 of 92\n\n| 10/20/2021 | 362 | LETTER RESPONSE in Opposition by Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press as to Ghislaine Maxwell addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan from Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press and 17 News Media Organizations dated October 20, 2021 re: 339 LETTER MOTION addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan from AUSAs Alison Moe, Lara Pomerantz, and Andrew Rohrbach dated October 11, 2021 re: Sealing of Joint Proposed Juror Questionnaire and Voir Dire .. (Townsend, Katielynn) (Entered: 10/20/2021)\n| 10/21/2021 | 363 | LETTER as to USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan from Pete Brush, reporter, New York federal courts, dated Thu 10/21/2021 11:28 AM re: members of SDNY press corps join RFCF in opposition to secret jury selection in USA v. Maxwell. (bw) (Entered: 10/21/2021)\n| 10/21/2021 | | Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Alison J. Nathan: Pretrial Conference as to Ghislaine Maxwell held on 10/21/2021. Defendant Ghislaine Maxwell present via telephone with attorney Bobbi Sternheim, Jeff Pagliuca, Christian Everdell and Laura Menninger via telephone. AUSA Lara Pomerantz, Maurene Comey, Alison Moe and Andrew Rohrbach for the government via telephone. Court Reporter Carol Ganley via telephone. Pretrial Conference held via telephone. Defendant remains remanded. See Transcript. (jbo) (Entered: 10/25/2021)\n| 10/22/2021 | 364 | ORDER as to Ghislaine Maxwell: For the reasons stated on the record at yesterday's conference, the Court will implement the following procedures for jury selection: A screening questionnaire will be administered on November 4, 5, and 12. The Clerk's Office will create a corresponding list of names and randomly assigned juror numbers. Jurors will be identified on the questionnaire and in court throughout the process by their assigned number only. Completed questionnaires will be copied and distributed to defense counsel by the U.S. Attorney's Office. After reviewing the completed questionnaires, counsel must confer in good faith and jointly submit four lists: (1) prospective jurors that both sides agree should proceed to voir dire; (2) prospective jurors that both sides agree should be excused; (3) prospective jurors that the defense, but not the Government believes should be excused; and (4) prospective jurors that the Government, but not the defense believes should be excused. Lists for questionnaires completed on November 4 and 5 will be due to the Court via email by November 7. Lists for questionnaires completed on November 12 will be due to the Court via email by November 13. If necessary, there will be an in-person conference on November 15 at 9:30 a.m. to resolve any disputes. Voir dire will proceed on November 16-19. The Court will conduct one-on-one voir dire with each prospective juror in the presence of the parties and with public access to the proceeding. At the conference, both sides indicated the potential need for additional procedures during voir dire under certain circumstances. See Transcript at 1011. As the Court indicated, it will consider proposed narrowly tailored measures that may be necessary during voir dire on a case-by-case basis. See id. at 12. The Court will decide in due course whether the exercise of peremptory strikes will proceed on November 19 or November 29. The Court implements these procedures taking into account the significant publicity this case has garnered, the nature of the charges, and the District's COVID-19 protocols. These procedures are carefully balanced and tailored to ensure the safety of the parties and prospective jurors in light of the continuing pandemic; to ensure juror candor, impartiality, and privacy; and to ensure the First Amendment right to public access of criminal proceedings. Also for the reasons stated on the record at yesterday's conference, the request to seal the parties' proposed questionnaire and voir dire and the Court's draft questionnaire and voir dire until after jury selection is completed is denied. Although the Court has and will continue to implement tailored measures to ensure a fair trial despite significant media interest, see Dkt. Nos. 28, 81, 95, 99, 101, 232, 241, 284, 301, 315, the defense did not justify sealing the entirety of the proposed and draft questionnaires and voir dire. See Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of Onondaga, 435 F.3d 110 (2d Cir. 2006). The Court's planned individual voir dire process is designed to carefully probe the prior exposure to and the potential influence of any pre-trial media. As noted at the conference, the parties may continue to propose for the Court's consideration, any appropriate and tailored procedures in light of the specific factors related to this case and upcoming trial. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan on 10/22/2021) (lnl) (Entered: 10/22/2021)\n| 10/22/2021 | 365 | ORDER as to Ghislaine Maxwell: Attached are the Court's draft jury questionnairewith changes adopted at yesterday's proceeding in redlineand draft voir dire\n\nDOJ-OGR-00020536",
"text_blocks": [
{
"type": "printed",
"content": "Case 22-1426, Document 3-2, 07/08/2022, 3344434, Page50 of 92",
"position": "header"
},
{
"type": "printed",
"content": "The table contains court documents related to Ghislaine Maxwell's case, including letter responses, minute entries, and court orders.",
"position": "main"
},
{
"type": "printed",
"content": "DOJ-OGR-00020536",
"position": "footer"
}
],
"entities": {
"people": [
"Ghislaine Maxwell",
"Alison J. Nathan",
"Alison Moe",
"Lara Pomerantz",
"Andrew Rohrbach",
"Pete Brush",
"Bobbi Sternheim",
"Jeff Pagliuca",
"Christian Everdell",
"Laura Menninger",
"Maurene Comey",
"Carol Ganley"
],
"organizations": [
"Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press",
"New York federal courts",
"SDNY press corps",
"RFCF",
"U.S. Attorney's Office"
],
"locations": [
"New York"
],
"dates": [
"10/20/2021",
"10/21/2021",
"10/22/2021",
"07/08/2022",
"October 11, 2021",
"October 20, 2021",
"November 4, 2021",
"November 5, 2021",
"November 7, 2021",
"November 12, 2021",
"November 13, 2021",
"November 15, 2021",
"November 16, 2021",
"November 19, 2021",
"November 29, 2021"
],
"reference_numbers": [
"22-1426",
"3-2",
"3344434",
"362",
"363",
"364",
"365",
"339",
"28",
"81",
"95",
"99",
"101",
"232",
"241",
"284",
"301",
"315"
]
},
"additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court filing related to the Ghislaine Maxwell case. The table contains various court documents, including letter responses, minute entries, and court orders. The documents are related to jury selection and the procedures to be followed during the trial."
},
"error": null
},
{
"filename": "IMAGES008/DOJ-OGR-00020470.jpg",
"success": true,
"data": {
"document_metadata": {
"page_number": "84",
"document_number": "1-2",
"date": "07/08/2022",
"document_type": "Court Document",
"has_handwriting": false,
"has_stamps": false
},
"full_text": "Case 22-1426, Document 1-2, 07/08/2022, 3344417, Page84 of 91\n\n| Date | Number | Description |",
"text_blocks": [
{
"type": "printed",
"content": "Case 22-1426, Document 1-2, 07/08/2022, 3344417, Page84 of 91",
"position": "header"
},
{
"type": "printed",
"content": "| Date | Number | Description |",
"position": "main"
}
],
"entities": {
"people": [
"Ghislaine Maxwell",
"Alison J. Nathan",
"Bobby C Sternheim",
"Jeffrey S. Pagliuca",
"Lara Pomerantz",
"Christian Everdell",
"Maureen Comey",
"Alison Moe",
"Andrew Rohrbach",
"Todd Spodek",
"Mike McDaniel",
"Kelly Surina"
],
"organizations": [],
"locations": [
"New York"
],
"dates": [
"03/03/2022",
"03/02/2022",
"March 2, 2022",
"March 8, 2022",
"03/07/2022",
"03/08/2022",
"03/09/2022",
"February 24, 2022"
],
"reference_numbers": [
"22-1426",
"1-2",
"3344417",
"84",
"91",
"626",
"627",
"629",
"630",
"631",
"632",
"633",
"634",
"637",
"638",
"639",
"610"
]
},
"additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court docket sheet with various entries related to the case of Ghislaine Maxwell. The entries include memos, endorsements, orders, and other court documents. The document is well-formatted and easy to read."
},
"error": null
},
{
"filename": "IMAGES008/DOJ-OGR-00020559.jpg",
"success": true,
"data": {
"document_metadata": {
"page_number": "73 of 92",
"document_number": "3-2",
"date": "07/08/2022",
"document_type": "Case document",
"has_handwriting": false,
"has_stamps": false
},
"full_text": "Case 22-1426, Document 3-2, 07/08/2022, 3344434, Page73 of 92\n\n| | | 12/09/2021)\n\n12/09/2021 | 533 | LETTER MOTION addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan from AUSAs Maurene Comey, Alison Moe, Lara Pomerantz, and Andrew Rohrbach dated December 8, 2021 re: Admission of GX 52. Document filed by USA as to Ghislaine Maxwell. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B)(Rohrbach, Andrew) (Entered: 12/09/2021)\n\n12/09/2021 | 534 | LETTER MOTION addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan from AUSAs Maurene Comey, Alison Moe, Lara Pomerantz, and Andrew Rohrbach dated December 9, 2021 re: Proposed redactions to Dkt. No. 533. Document filed by USA as to Ghislaine Maxwell. (Rohrbach, Andrew) (Entered: 12/09/2021)\n\n12/09/2021 | 535 | MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER as to Ghislaine Maxwell. The Government seeks to admit what has been identified as Government Exhibit 52 (\"GX 52\"), and submit to the jury a redacted version of GX 52. The Defense objects to the admission of GX 52 on authentication and hearsay grounds. The admissibility of the exhibit has been the subject of pretrial motion in limine briefing and extensive supplemental briefing. See Dkt. Nos. 390, 397, 398, 457, 476, 490. This includes supplemental briefing received on December 8, 2021, after the authenticating witness, Mr. Juan Alessi, underwent direct examination by the Government and voir dire by the Defense. The Court reserved ruling on the exhibit, pending what was anticipated to be additional testimony. Trial Tr. at 876. The Court now overrules the Defenses objections. The parties are ORDERED to confer and propose a limiting instruction consistent with this ruling on or before today, December 9, 2021, at 7:00 p.m. The parties are FURTHER ORDERED to confer and prepare a stipulation that Government Exhibits 52A, 52D, 52E, 52F, 52G, and 52H are true and correct photocopies of five pages from GX 52. See Trial Tr. at 858. (Signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan on 12/9/21)(jw) (Entered: 12/10/2021)\n\n12/09/2021 | | Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Alison J. Nathan:Jury Trial as to Ghislaine Maxwell present with attorney Bobbi Sternheim, Jeff Pagliuca, Christian Everdell and Laura Menninger. AUSA Lara Pomerantz, Maurene Comey, Alison Moe and Andrew Rohrbach for the government. Court Reporters Martha Martin and George Malinowski. See transcript. (jw) (Entered: 12/13/2021)\n\n12/10/2021 | 536 | TRANSCRIPT of Proceedings as to Ghislaine Maxwell re: Conference held on 11/23/21 before Judge Alison J. Nathan. Court Reporter/Transcriber: Paula Speer, (212) 805-0300, Transcript may be viewed at the court public terminal or purchased through the Court Reporter/Transcriber before the deadline for Release of Transcript Restriction. After that date it may be obtained through PACER. Redaction Request due 1/3/2022. Redacted Transcript Deadline set for 1/10/2022. Release of Transcript Restriction set for 3/10/2022. (Moya, Goretti) (Entered: 12/10/2021)\n\n12/10/2021 | 537 | NOTICE OF FILING OF OFFICIAL TRANSCRIPT as to Ghislaine Maxwell. Notice is hereby given that an official transcript of a Conference proceeding held on 11/23/21 has been filed by the court reporter/transcriber in the above-captioned matter. The parties have seven (7) calendar days to file with the court a Notice of Intent to Request Redaction of this transcript. If no such Notice is filed, the transcript may be made remotely electronically available to the public without redaction after 90 calendar days.... (Moya, Goretti) (Entered: 12/10/2021)\n\n12/10/2021 | | Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Alison J. Nathan: Jury Trial as to Ghislaine Maxwell held on 12/10/2021. Defendant Ghislaine Maxwell present with attorney Bobbi Sternheim, Jeff Pagliuca, Christian Everdell and Laura Menninger. AUSA Lara Pomerantz, Maurene Comey, Alison Moe and Andrew Rohrbach for the government. Court Reporters Martha Martin and George Malinowski Jury trial held. See Transcript. (jbo) (Entered: 12/20/2021)\n\n12/11/2021 | 538 | LETTER by USA as to Ghislaine Maxwell addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan from AUSAs Maurene Comey, Alison Moe, Lara Pomerantz, and Andrew Rohrbach dated December 9, 2021 re: Limiting instruction for GX 52 Document filed by USA. (Rohrbach, Andrew) (Entered: 12/11/2021)\n\n12/12/2021 | 539 | LETTER MOTION addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan from AUSAs Maurene Comey, Alison Moe, Lara Pomerantz, and Andrew Rohrbach dated December 12, 2021 re: Defense witness order. Document filed by USA as to Ghislaine Maxwell. (Rohrbach, Andrew) (Entered: 12/12/2021)\n\nDOJ-OGR-00020559",
"text_blocks": [
{
"type": "printed",
"content": "Case 22-1426, Document 3-2, 07/08/2022, 3344434, Page73 of 92",
"position": "header"
},
{
"type": "printed",
"content": "The rest of the document content",
"position": "body"
},
{
"type": "printed",
"content": "DOJ-OGR-00020559",
"position": "footer"
}
],
"entities": {
"people": [
"Alison J. Nathan",
"Maurene Comey",
"Alison Moe",
"Lara Pomerantz",
"Andrew Rohrbach",
"Ghislaine Maxwell",
"Bobbi Sternheim",
"Jeff Pagliuca",
"Christian Everdell",
"Laura Menninger",
"Martha Martin",
"George Malinowski",
"Paula Speer",
"Juan Alessi",
"Moya Goretti",
"jbo",
"jw"
],
"organizations": [
"USA"
],
"locations": [],
"dates": [
"12/09/2021",
"12/08/2021",
"12/09/2021",
"12/09/2021",
"12/10/2021",
"11/23/21",
"1/3/2022",
"1/10/2022",
"3/10/2022",
"12/10/2021",
"12/10/2021",
"12/11/2021",
"12/09/2021",
"12/12/2021",
"12/12/2021",
"07/08/2022"
],
"reference_numbers": [
"22-1426",
"3-2",
"3344434",
"533",
"534",
"535",
"536",
"537",
"538",
"539",
"390",
"397",
"398",
"457",
"476",
"490",
"52",
"52A",
"52D",
"52E",
"52F",
"52G",
"52H",
"805-0300",
"DOJ-OGR-00020559"
]
},
"additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court docket sheet from a case involving Ghislaine Maxwell. The document is a table with various columns including date, docket number, and description of the document filed. The document contains various legal terms and procedures."
},
"error": null
},
{
"filename": "IMAGES008/DOJ-OGR-00020456.jpg",
"success": false,
"data": null,
"error": "Expecting ',' delimiter: line 9 column 4 (char 209)"
},
{
"filename": "IMAGES008/DOJ-OGR-00020557.jpg",
"success": false,
"data": null,
"error": "Expecting ',' delimiter: line 9 column 4 (char 204)"
},
{
"filename": "IMAGES008/DOJ-OGR-00020736.jpg",
"success": false,
"data": null,
"error": "Expecting ',' delimiter: line 9 column 4 (char 209)"
},
{
"filename": "IMAGES008/DOJ-OGR-00021151.jpg",
"success": false,
"data": null,
"error": "Expecting ',' delimiter: line 9 column 4 (char 198)"
},
{
"filename": "IMAGES008/DOJ-OGR-00021650.jpg",
"success": false,
"data": null,
"error": "Expecting ',' delimiter: line 9 column 4 (char 202)"
},
{
"filename": "IMAGES008/DOJ-OGR-00021652.jpg",
"success": false,
"data": null,
"error": "Expecting ',' delimiter: line 9 column 4 (char 202)"
},
{
"filename": "IMAGES009/DOJ-OGR-00024000.jpg",
"success": true,
"data": {
"document_metadata": {
"page_number": null,
"document_number": "DOJ-OGR-00024000",
"date": null,
"document_type": "Annual Data Summary",
"has_handwriting": false,
"has_stamps": false
},
"full_text": "ANNUAL DATA SUMMARY 1990 - 1999\nAverage Daily Population\nNumber of Suicides\nRate per 100,000\nNumber of Attempts\nRate per 100,000\nNumber of Suicide Watches\nRate per 100,000\nNumber of Risk Assessments\nRate per 100,000\nType of Institution\nUSP/ADX/SMU\nFCI\nContract Facility\nFDC/MCC/MDC\nFMC\nFPC\nFTC\nRRC/Home Confinement\nFurlough\nLocation\nSHU\nGeneral Population\nSeclusion (FMC)\nOther\nHistory of Mental Illness\nFY 1990\n64,936\n11\n16.9\n186\n286.4\n534\n822.3\n1069\n1,646.2\n1\n4\n0\n2\n1\n0\n0\n0\n0\n5 (63%)\nFY 1991\n79,678\n8\n10.0\n198\n248.5\n516\n647.6\n1321\n1,657.9\n5\n2\n0\n1\n1\n0\n0\n0\n0\n4 (44%)\nFY 1992\n79,602\n6\n7.5\n232\n291.4\n577\n724.9\n1611\n2,023.8\n1\n0\n0\n3\n1\n1\n0\n0\n0\n3 (50%)\nFY 1993\n89,060\n9\n10.1\n412\n462.6\n1046\n1,174.5\n2698\n3,029.4\n2\n1\n0\n5\n3\n0\n0\n0\n0\n6 (55%)\nFY 1994\n92,445\n12\n13.0\n383\n414.3\n753\n814.5\n2049\n2,216.5\n2\n9\n0\n3\n1\n1\n0\n0\n0\n2 (13%)\nFY 1995\n97,934\n15\n15.3\n426\n435.0\n1033\n1,054.8\n2728\n2,785.5\n5\n4\n0\n1\n0\n0\n0\n0\n0\n3 (30%)\nFY 1996\n103,211\n9\n8.7\n342\n331.4\n998\n967.0\n2853\n2,764.2\n1\n3\n0\n4\n1\n0\n1\n0\n0\n4 (40%)\nFY 1997\n109,199\n10\n9.2\n294\n269.2\n1001\n916.7\n3393\n3,107.2\n6\n4\n0\n2\n1\n1\n1\n0\n0\n2 (13%)\nFY 1998\n117,422\n17\n14.5\n515\n438.6\n1067\n908.7\n2839\n2,417.8\n3\n3\n0\n4\n2\n0\n0\n0\n0\n5 (42%)\nFY 1999\n128,427\n7\n5.5\n559\n435.3\n1247\n971.0\n2921\n2,274.4\n4\n1\n0\n2\n0\n0\n0\n0\n0\n2 (29%)\n6\n7\n5 (465)\n7\n0\n0\n4 (103)\n3\n0\n0\n9\n4\n0\n0\n6\n103\nDOJ-OGR-00024000",
"text_blocks": [
{
"type": "printed",
"content": "ANNUAL DATA SUMMARY 1990 - 1999",
"position": "header"
},
{
"type": "printed",
"content": "Average Daily Population\nNumber of Suicides\nRate per 100,000\nNumber of Attempts\nRate per 100,000\nNumber of Suicide Watches\nRate per 100,000\nNumber of Risk Assessments\nRate per 100,000\nType of Institution\nUSP/ADX/SMU\nFCI\nContract Facility\nFDC/MCC/MDC\nFMC\nFPC\nFTC\nRRC/Home Confinement\nFurlough\nLocation\nSHU\nGeneral Population\nSeclusion (FMC)\nOther\nHistory of Mental Illness",
"position": "left margin"
},
{
"type": "printed",
"content": "FY 1990\n64,936\n11\n16.9\n186\n286.4\n534\n822.3\n1069\n1,646.2\n1\n4\n0\n2\n1\n0\n0\n0\n0\n5 (63%)\nFY 1991\n79,678\n8\n10.0\n198\n248.5\n516\n647.6\n1321\n1,657.9\n5\n2\n0\n1\n1\n0\n0\n0\n0\n4 (44%)\nFY 1992\n79,602\n6\n7.5\n232\n291.4\n577\n724.9\n1611\n2,023.8\n1\n0\n0\n3\n1\n1\n0\n0\n0\n3 (50%)\nFY 1993\n89,060\n9\n10.1\n412\n462.6\n1046\n1,174.5\n2698\n3,029.4\n2\n1\n0\n5\n3\n0\n0\n0\n0\n6 (55%)\nFY 1994\n92,445\n12\n13.0\n383\n414.3\n753\n814.5\n2049\n2,216.5\n2\n9\n0\n3\n1\n1\n0\n0\n0\n2 (13%)\nFY 1995\n97,934\n15\n15.3\n426\n435.0\n1033\n1,054.8\n2728\n2,785.5\n5\n4\n0\n1\n0\n0\n0\n0\n0\n3 (30%)\nFY 1996\n103,211\n9\n8.7\n342\n331.4\n998\n967.0\n2853\n2,764.2\n1\n3\n0\n4\n1\n0\n1\n0\n0\n4 (40%)\nFY 1997\n109,199\n10\n9.2\n294\n269.2\n1001\n916.7\n3393\n3,107.2\n6\n4\n0\n2\n1\n1\n1\n0\n0\n2 (13%)\nFY 1998\n117,422\n17\n14.5\n515\n438.6\n1067\n908.7\n2839\n2,417.8\n3\n3\n0\n4\n2\n0\n0\n0\n0\n5 (42%)\nFY 1999\n128,427\n7\n5.5\n559\n435.3\n1247\n971.0\n2921\n2,274.4\n4\n1\n0\n2\n0\n0\n0\n0\n0\n2 (29%)\n6\n7\n5 (465)\n7\n0\n0\n4 (103)\n3\n0\n0\n9\n4\n0\n0\n6\n103",
"position": "main content"
},
{
"type": "printed",
"content": "DOJ-OGR-00024000",
"position": "footer"
}
],
"entities": {
"people": [],
"organizations": [
"DOJ"
],
"locations": [],
"dates": [
"1990",
"1991",
"1992",
"1993",
"1994",
"1995",
"1996",
"1997",
"1998",
"1999"
],
"reference_numbers": [
"DOJ-OGR-00024000"
]
},
"additional_notes": "The document appears to be a table summarizing annual data on suicides and related statistics within a correctional or penal institution from FY 1990 to FY 1999. The data includes various metrics such as average daily population, number of suicides, suicide attempts, suicide watches, and risk assessments, categorized by type of institution and other factors."
},
"error": null
},
{
"filename": "IMAGES008/DOJ-OGR-00021908.jpg",
"success": false,
"data": null,
"error": "Expecting ',' delimiter: line 9 column 4 (char 208)"
},
{
"filename": "IMAGES010/DOJ-OGR-00025738.jpg",
"success": true,
"data": {
"document_metadata": {
"page_number": "1695",
"document_number": "DOJ-OGR-00025738",
"date": "2019/11/13",
"document_type": "email",
"has_handwriting": false,
"has_stamps": false
},
"full_text": "Re: Epstein Response\nFrom\nTo\nDate\nSubject:\nAttachments:\nWill do.\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\nIf you are emailing about an inmate that may be at risk for suicide or self-harm, this is an emergency situation. Please make sure that you make contact (verbally) to Psychology Staff or the on-call psychologist. Please ensure to maintain constant visual observation of the inmate until formal steps can be taken to ensure his/her safety pending a formal assessment by a Psychologist.\n\n>>> Charisma Edge 11/13/2019 9:00 AM >>>\nYes, I signed it and placed it in the warden's out-box. Double check w him, please so we can have it during the reconstruction meeting. Thanks\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\ngreat, thanks! I put the corrected Psy Alert memo in your box yesterday\n\n\n\n\n\nPage 8724",
"text_blocks": [
{
"type": "printed",
"content": "Re: Epstein Response",
"position": "header"
},
{
"type": "printed",
"content": "From\nTo\nDate\nSubject:\nAttachments:",
"position": "header"
},
{
"type": "handwritten",
"content": "Will do.",
"position": "middle"
},
{
"type": "printed",
"content": "If you are emailing about an inmate that may be at risk for suicide or self-harm, this is an emergency situation. Please make sure that you make contact (verbally) to Psychology Staff or the on-call psychologist. Please ensure to maintain constant visual observation of the inmate until formal steps can be taken to ensure his/her safety pending a formal assessment by a Psychologist.",
"position": "middle"
},
{
"type": "handwritten",
"content": ">>> Charisma Edge 11/13/2019 9:00 AM >>>\nYes, I signed it and placed it in the warden's out-box. Double check w him, please so we can have it during the reconstruction meeting. Thanks",
"position": "middle"
},
{
"type": "handwritten",
"content": "great, thanks! I put the corrected Psy Alert memo in your box yesterday",
"position": "middle"
}
],
"entities": {
"people": [
"Charisma Edge"
],
"organizations": [
"U.S. Department of Justice",
"Federal Bureau of Prisons",
"Metropolitan Correctional Center"
],
"locations": [
"New York",
"150 Park Row"
],
"dates": [
"2019/11/13",
"11/13/2019"
],
"reference_numbers": [
"DOJ-OGR-00025738"
]
},
"additional_notes": "The document appears to be an email chain related to the Epstein case, with redactions of personal information. The email discusses an inmate at risk for suicide or self-harm and includes instructions for handling such situations. The tone is professional, and the content suggests an official or institutional context."
},
"error": null
},
{
"filename": "IMAGES008/DOJ-OGR-00021954.jpg",
"success": false,
"data": null,
"error": "Expecting ',' delimiter: line 9 column 4 (char 204)"
},
{
"filename": "IMAGES008/DOJ-OGR-00021972.jpg",
"success": false,
"data": null,
"error": "Expecting ',' delimiter: line 9 column 4 (char 203)"
},
{
"filename": "IMAGES009/DOJ-OGR-00025168.jpg",
"success": true,
"data": {
"document_metadata": {
"page_number": "868",
"document_number": "DOJ-OGR-00025168",
"date": "2019/07/24",
"document_type": "email",
"has_handwriting": false,
"has_stamps": false
},
"full_text": "Page 868\nRe: Epstein\nFrom Shirley V. Skipper-Scott\nTo Lamine N'Diaye\nDate 2019/07/24 11:54\nSubject: Re: Epstein\nAttachments: TEXT.htm\nHe is pending a Code 228, Tattooing or Self-Mutilation and I spoke with [redacted] who indicated that most likely he will be found competent because he is not mentally ill. Therefore, he will be pending a UDC hearing. I am looking at the SHU Roster now to see who can be a good cell mate.\nShirley Skipper-Scott\nAssociate Warden\nMCC New York\n150 Park Row\nNew York, New York 10007\nOffice: 646-836 [redacted]\nBlack Berry: 646-423 [redacted] @bop.gov\n>>> Lamine N'Diaye [redacted] @bop.gov> 7/24/2019 10:47 AM >>>\nLooks good\nSent from my Verizon, Samsung Galaxy smartphone\n------- Original message ---------\nFrom: \"Shirley V. Skipper-Scott\" [redacted] @bop.gov>\nDate: 7/24/19 10:10 AM (GMT-05:00)\nTo: Lamine N'Diaye [redacted] @bop.gov>\nSubject: Re: Epstein\n>>> \"Shirley V. Skipper-Scott\" 7/24/2019 10:10 >>>\nThis is the response I am sending the RD. Are you ok with this?\nBelow is the definition of Psychological Observation provided by [redacted] Chief Psychologist. He will remain on Psychological Observation until tomorrow, where he will be reassessed.\nDEFINITION: A Psychological Observation occurs when an inmate who suffers from a mental illness, a serious personality disorder, a medical problem (impairing their mental status), or drug intoxication and/or withdrawal symptoms begins to deteriorate. The inmate is no longer mentally stable and therefore, it is inappropriate for s/he to remain in general population or the Special Housing Unit (SHU). Inmates placed on psychological observation differ from inmates placed on suicide watch as they are not imminently suicidal (e.g., have not expressed self-harm or engaged in self-harming behavior), but rather, due to his/her impairment in mental status or functioning (e.g., not eating, not sleeping, disorganized/unusual thinking, poor self-care), his/her behavior can be unpredictable. Psychological Observation status is intended as a temporary status.\nPage 1685",
"text_blocks": [
{
"type": "printed",
"content": "Re: Epstein",
"position": "header"
},
{
"type": "printed",
"content": "From: Shirley V. Skipper-Scott\nTo: Lamine N'Diaye\nDate: 2019/07/24 11:54\nSubject: Re: Epstein\nAttachments: TEXT.htm",
"position": "header"
},
{
"type": "printed",
"content": "He is pending a Code 228, Tattooing or Self-Mutilation and I spoke with [redacted] who indicated that most likely he will be found competent because he is not mentally ill. Therefore, he will be pending a UDC hearing. I am looking at the SHU Roster now to see who can be a good cell mate.",
"position": "body"
},
{
"type": "printed",
"content": "Shirley Skipper-Scott\nAssociate Warden\nMCC New York\n150 Park Row\nNew York, New York 10007\nOffice: 646-836 [redacted]\nBlack Berry: 646-423 [redacted] @bop.gov",
"position": "footer"
},
{
"type": "printed",
"content": ">>> Lamine N'Diaye [redacted] @bop.gov> 7/24/2019 10:47 AM >>>\nLooks good",
"position": "body"
},
{
"type": "printed",
"content": "Sent from my Verizon, Samsung Galaxy smartphone",
"position": "footer"
},
{
"type": "printed",
"content": "------- Original message ---------\nFrom: \"Shirley V. Skipper-Scott\" [redacted] @bop.gov>\nDate: 7/24/19 10:10 AM (GMT-05:00)\nTo: Lamine N'Diaye [redacted] @bop.gov>\nSubject: Re: Epstein",
"position": "body"
},
{
"type": "printed",
"content": ">>> \"Shirley V. Skipper-Scott\" 7/24/2019 10:10 >>>\nThis is the response I am sending the RD. Are you ok with this?",
"position": "body"
},
{
"type": "printed",
"content": "Below is the definition of Psychological Observation provided by [redacted] Chief Psychologist. He will remain on Psychological Observation until tomorrow, where he will be reassessed.",
"position": "body"
},
{
"type": "printed",
"content": "DEFINITION: A Psychological Observation occurs when an inmate who suffers from a mental illness, a serious personality disorder, a medical problem (impairing their mental status), or drug intoxication and/or withdrawal symptoms begins to deteriorate. The inmate is no longer mentally stable and therefore, it is inappropriate for s/he to remain in general population or the Special Housing Unit (SHU). Inmates placed on psychological observation differ from inmates placed on suicide watch as they are not imminently suicidal (e.g., have not expressed self-harm or engaged in self-harming behavior), but rather, due to his/her impairment in mental status or functioning (e.g., not eating, not sleeping, disorganized/unusual thinking, poor self-care), his/her behavior can be unpredictable. Psychological Observation status is intended as a temporary status.",
"position": "body"
}
],
"entities": {
"people": [
"Shirley V. Skipper-Scott",
"Lamine N'Diaye"
],
"organizations": [
"MCC New York",
"BOP"
],
"locations": [
"New York"
],
"dates": [
"2019/07/24",
"7/24/19",
"7/24/2019"
],
"reference_numbers": [
"DOJ-OGR-00025168",
"228"
]
},
"additional_notes": "The document is an email chain discussing an inmate's status and the definition of Psychological Observation. The email contains redactions."
},
"error": null
},
{
"filename": "IMAGES009/DOJ-OGR-00024076.jpg",
"success": false,
"data": null,
"error": "Expecting ',' delimiter: line 9 column 4 (char 201)"
},
{
"filename": "IMAGES010/DOJ-OGR-00025895.jpg",
"success": true,
"data": {
"document_metadata": {
"page_number": "1977",
"document_number": "DOJ-OGR-00025895",
"date": "2019/07/27",
"document_type": "Email",
"has_handwriting": false,
"has_stamps": false
},
"full_text": "Page 1977\nFwd: Re: Suicide Watch/Psych Observation Update\nFrom\nTo\nDate\nSubject:\nAttachments:\nFYI\n>>> [b(6); (b)(7)(C)] 7/27/2019 9:46 AM >>>\nAW Skipper-Scott,\nI saw him before his Legal visit. He seems stable and is now at his Legal visit. I'll be coming in tomorrow before his Legal visit to see him again.\nHe complained about being dehydrated because he stated he cannot drink enough water because of limited bathroom breaks in Legal since he stated he sees his Attorney for about 12 hours.\nHe also complained about having to go back up to SHU. Being anxious about it and not being able to sleep there because of the noise of inmates banging and screaming at night.\n[b(6); (b)(7)(C)]\n>>> Shirley V. Skipper-Scott [b(6); (b)(7)(C)] @bop.gov> 7/27/2019 9:41 AM >>>\nGood morning,\nYou assessed inmate Epstein today?\nSent from my Verizon, Samsung Galaxy smartphone\n------- Original message -------\nFrom [b(6); (b)(7)(C)] @bop.gov>\nDate: 7/27/19 6:08 AM (GMT-05:00)\nTo [b(6); (b)(7)(C)] @bop.gov>",
"text_blocks": [
{
"type": "printed",
"content": "Page 1977\nFwd: Re: Suicide Watch/Psych Observation Update",
"position": "header"
},
{
"type": "printed",
"content": "From\nTo\nDate\nSubject:\nAttachments:",
"position": "top"
},
{
"type": "handwritten",
"content": "[b(6); (b)(7)(C)]",
"position": "inline"
},
{
"type": "printed",
"content": "FYI\n>>> [b(6); (b)(7)(C)] 7/27/2019 9:46 AM >>>\nAW Skipper-Scott,\nI saw him before his Legal visit. He seems stable and is now at his Legal visit. I'll be coming in tomorrow before his Legal visit to see him again.\nHe complained about being dehydrated because he stated he cannot drink enough water because of limited bathroom breaks in Legal since he stated he sees his Attorney for about 12 hours.\nHe also complained about having to go back up to SHU. Being anxious about it and not being able to sleep there because of the noise of inmates banging and screaming at night.",
"position": "middle"
},
{
"type": "printed",
"content": ">>> Shirley V. Skipper-Scott [b(6); (b)(7)(C)] @bop.gov> 7/27/2019 9:41 AM >>>\nGood morning,\nYou assessed inmate Epstein today?\nSent from my Verizon, Samsung Galaxy smartphone",
"position": "middle"
},
{
"type": "printed",
"content": "------- Original message -------\nFrom [b(6); (b)(7)(C)] @bop.gov>\nDate: 7/27/19 6:08 AM (GMT-05:00)\nTo [b(6); (b)(7)(C)] @bop.gov>",
"position": "bottom"
}
],
"entities": {
"people": [
"Shirley V. Skipper-Scott",
"Epstein"
],
"organizations": [
"BOP",
"Verizon"
],
"locations": [
"SHU"
],
"dates": [
"7/27/2019",
"7/27/19"
],
"reference_numbers": [
"DOJ-OGR-00025895"
]
},
"additional_notes": "The document contains multiple redactions of personal information marked as [b(6); (b)(7)(C)]."
},
"error": null
},
{
"filename": "IMAGES010/DOJ-OGR-00025804.jpg",
"success": false,
"data": null,
"error": "Expecting ',' delimiter: line 9 column 4 (char 210)"
},
{
"filename": "IMAGES010/DOJ-OGR-00025896.jpg",
"success": false,
"data": null,
"error": "Expecting ',' delimiter: line 9 column 4 (char 211)"
},
{
"filename": "IMAGES010/DOJ-OGR-00025898.jpg",
"success": false,
"data": null,
"error": "Expecting ',' delimiter: line 9 column 4 (char 211)"
},
{
"filename": "IMAGES010/DOJ-OGR-00026589.jpg",
"success": true,
"data": {
"document_metadata": {
"page_number": "2933",
"document_number": "DOJ-OGR-00026589",
"date": "08-11-2019",
"document_type": "BUREAU OF PRISONS COUNT SHEET",
"has_handwriting": true,
"has_stamps": false
},
"full_text": "Page 2933 08-11-2019 01:41:50 NYMBMi ±530.03 * BUREAU OF PRISONS COUNT SHEET PAGE 001 QTRG EQ *** NEW YORK MCC OCTG EQ **** ATTY F F N N Y Y S COUNT SECTION TR V OC TU T VERIFY COUNT COUNT AREA CENSUS E-N E-S G-N G-S H-A I-N K-N K-S R-A Z-A Z-B TOTAL COUNT VERIFY B-A C-A E-N E-S G-N G-S H-A I-N K-N K-S R-A Z-A Z-B OFFICIAL PREPARING COUNT: OFFICIAL TAKING COUNT: COUNT CLEARED TIME: b(7)(F) b(7)(F) b(6); b(7)(C) b(7)(F) 19 b(7)(F) Cook verbatim. b(7)(F) 01:42 DOJ-OGR-00026589",
"text_blocks": [
{
"type": "printed",
"content": "BUREAU OF PRISONS COUNT SHEET NEW YORK MCC",
"position": "header"
},
{
"type": "printed",
"content": "COUNT AREA CENSUS",
"position": "middle"
},
{
"type": "printed",
"content": "COUNT VERIFY",
"position": "middle"
},
{
"type": "handwritten",
"content": "Cook verbatim.",
"position": "bottom"
},
{
"type": "printed",
"content": "DOJ-OGR-00026589",
"position": "footer"
}
],
"entities": {
"people": [],
"organizations": [
"BUREAU OF PRISONS",
"NEW YORK MCC"
],
"locations": [
"NEW YORK"
],
"dates": [
"08-11-2019"
],
"reference_numbers": [
"DOJ-OGR-00026589",
"±530.03"
]
},
"additional_notes": "The document contains redactions marked as b(6), b(7)(C), and b(7)(F). The count sheet appears to be a record of a count conducted at the New York MCC on August 11, 2019."
},
"error": null
},
{
"filename": "IMAGES010/DOJ-OGR-00026632.jpg",
"success": true,
"data": {
"document_metadata": {
"page_number": "2976",
"document_number": "NYMAQ 530.03",
"date": "08-11-2019",
"document_type": "BUREAU OF PRISONS COUNT SHEET",
"has_handwriting": true,
"has_stamps": false
},
"full_text": "Page 2976 NYMAQ 530.03 * BUREAU OF PRISONS COUNT SHEET * 08-11-2019 PAGE 001 NEW YORK MCC 15:36:11 QTRG EQ *** OCTG EQ **** COUNT AREA CENSUS OUT COUNT SECTION TR V OC TU N VERIFY COUNT COUNT AREA ATTY F F F H M R S TR V OC TU N VERIFY COUNT COUNT AREA N J N Y E S S P N W I D I T N J N Y E S S P N W I D I T (b)(7)(F) (b)(7)(F) B-A B-A C-A C-A E-N 1 . . . . . . 1 E-N E-S . 2 1 . . . 3 E-S G-N . . . . . . . G-N G-S . . . . . . . G-S H-A . . . . . . . H-A I-N . . . . . . . I-N K-N . . . . . . . K-N K-S . 10 1 . . . 11 K-S R-A . . . . . . . R-A Z-A . . . . . . . Z-A Z-B . . . . . . . Z-B TOTAL 1 12 2 . . 15 TOTAL COUNT COUNT VERIFY COUNT VERIFY OFFICIAL PREPARING COUNT OFFICIAL TAKING COUNT COUNT CLEARED TIME (b)(6); (b)(7)(C) (b)(7)(F) Good Verbal DOJ-OGR-00026632",
"text_blocks": [
{
"type": "printed",
"content": "NYMAQ 530.03 * BUREAU OF PRISONS COUNT SHEET * 08-11-2019 PAGE 001 NEW YORK MCC 15:36:11 QTRG EQ *** OCTG EQ ****",
"position": "header"
},
{
"type": "printed",
"content": "COUNT AREA CENSUS OUT COUNT SECTION TR V OC TU N VERIFY COUNT COUNT AREA",
"position": "header"
},
{
"type": "printed",
"content": "B-A C-A E-N E-S G-N G-S H-A I-N K-N K-S R-A Z-A Z-B TOTAL",
"position": "left"
},
{
"type": "printed",
"content": "TOTAL",
"position": "left"
},
{
"type": "printed",
"content": "COUNT VERIFY",
"position": "left"
},
{
"type": "printed",
"content": "OFFICIAL PREPARING COUNT OFFICIAL TAKING COUNT COUNT CLEARED TIME",
"position": "footer"
},
{
"type": "handwritten",
"content": "Good Verbal",
"position": "footer"
},
{
"type": "printed",
"content": "DOJ-OGR-00026632",
"position": "footer"
}
],
"entities": {
"people": [],
"organizations": [
"BUREAU OF PRISONS",
"DOJ"
],
"locations": [
"NEW YORK"
],
"dates": [
"08-11-2019"
],
"reference_numbers": [
"NYMAQ 530.03",
"DOJ-OGR-00026632"
]
},
"additional_notes": "The document appears to be a count sheet from the Bureau of Prisons, detailing the count of inmates in various areas. The document has some redacted information, indicated by '(b)(7)(F)' and '(b)(6); (b)(7)(C)'. The count was cleared with a 'Good Verbal' notation."
},
"error": null
},
{
"filename": "IMAGES010/DOJ-OGR-00027081.jpg",
"success": true,
"data": {
"document_metadata": {
"page_number": null,
"document_number": "DOJ-OGR-00027081",
"date": "1/2/13",
"document_type": null,
"has_handwriting": true,
"has_stamps": false
},
"full_text": "(b)(6), (b)(7)(C) (b)(6), (b)(7)(C) (b)(6), (b)(7)(C) Expedit 76318-054 1/2/13 2: (b)(6), (b)(7)(C) DOJ-OGR-00027081",
"text_blocks": [
{
"type": "printed",
"content": "(b)(6), (b)(7)(C)",
"position": "header"
},
{
"type": "handwritten",
"content": "Expedit",
"position": "middle"
},
{
"type": "handwritten",
"content": "76318-054 1/2/13 2:",
"position": "middle"
},
{
"type": "printed",
"content": "DOJ-OGR-00027081",
"position": "footer"
}
],
"entities": {
"people": [],
"organizations": [],
"locations": [],
"dates": [
"1/2/13"
],
"reference_numbers": [
"76318-054",
"DOJ-OGR-00027081"
]
},
"additional_notes": "The document has been heavily redacted, with most of the content obscured by green highlights. The visible text is mostly handwritten and appears to be a date and a reference number."
},
"error": null
},
{
"filename": "IMAGES010/DOJ-OGR-00026069.jpg",
"success": false,
"data": null,
"error": "Expecting ',' delimiter: line 9 column 4 (char 210)"
},
{
"filename": "IMAGES010/DOJ-OGR-00026542.jpg",
"success": false,
"data": null,
"error": "Expecting ',' delimiter: line 9 column 4 (char 229)"
},
{
"filename": "IMAGES011/DOJ-OGR-00031001.jpg",
"success": true,
"data": {
"document_metadata": {
"page_number": "4",
"document_number": "05-104607",
"date": "11/24/05",
"document_type": "Incident Report",
"has_handwriting": false,
"has_stamps": false
},
"full_text": "Incident Report CHEROKEE COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE JUVENILE 1: JAMES Involvement Inv1 No Type Name MNI Race Sex JUVENILE 1 Individual JAMES 258904 WHITE MALE Juvenile? Yes Phone Type Phone No OTHER (404) 316-3145 OTHER 1: Involvement Inv1 No Type Name MNI Race Sex OTHER 1 Individual 258903 WHITE FEMALE Date of Birth Age Juvenile? 03/17/1969 36 No Type Address City State HOME WALESKA GEORGIA ZIP Code Phone Type Phone No HOME Narrative On 11/24/05 at about 21:49 hours I went to in reference to a suspicious person. I met with who stated she has two juvenile daughters. Tonight she noticed they went across the street to a vacant house with some boys. When she went to check on them she caught the boys drinking alcohol. She knew the boys were juveniles so she took the alcohol (tequila) from them she said a couple of the boys ran off. Juvenile one got in his silver Mitsubishi and went to the end of the street. He then stopped infront of her house. The juvenile stated he wanted his tequila back and he would come back at midnight. Mrs. is concerned juvenile one might return and damage her guests vehicles. Mrs. asked her juveniles who the subject was and they were unfamiliar. I gave Mrs. a case card. I returned into service with no further incident. I informed morning watch of this address for an extra patrol for tonight only. Report Officer 000202/BEDOYA, BROOKE Printed At 06/06/2006 11:21 Page 2 of 2 07/26/17 Page 4 of 95 Public Records Request No.: 17-295 DOJ-OGR-00031001",
"text_blocks": [
{
"type": "printed",
"content": "Incident Report CHEROKEE COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE",
"position": "header"
},
{
"type": "printed",
"content": "JUVENILE 1: JAMES",
"position": "top"
},
{
"type": "printed",
"content": "Involvement Inv1 No Type Name MNI Race Sex JUVENILE 1 Individual JAMES 258904 WHITE MALE Juvenile? Yes Phone Type Phone No OTHER (404) 316-3145",
"position": "top"
},
{
"type": "printed",
"content": "OTHER 1: Involvement Inv1 No Type Name MNI Race Sex OTHER 1 Individual 258903 WHITE FEMALE Date of Birth Age Juvenile? 03/17/1969 36 No Type Address City State HOME WALESKA GEORGIA ZIP Code Phone Type Phone No HOME",
"position": "middle"
},
{
"type": "printed",
"content": "Narrative On 11/24/05 at about 21:49 hours I went to in reference to a suspicious person. I met with who stated she has two juvenile daughters. Tonight she noticed they went across the street to a vacant house with some boys. When she went to check on them she caught the boys drinking alcohol. She knew the boys were juveniles so she took the alcohol (tequila) from them she said a couple of the boys ran off. Juvenile one got in his silver Mitsubishi and went to the end of the street. He then stopped infront of her house. The juvenile stated he wanted his tequila back and he would come back at midnight. Mrs. is concerned juvenile one might return and damage her guests vehicles. Mrs. asked her juveniles who the subject was and they were unfamiliar. I gave Mrs. a case card. I returned into service with no further incident. I informed morning watch of this address for an extra patrol for tonight only.",
"position": "middle"
},
{
"type": "printed",
"content": "Report Officer 000202/BEDOYA, BROOKE Printed At 06/06/2006 11:21 Page 2 of 2",
"position": "footer"
},
{
"type": "printed",
"content": "07/26/17 Page 4 of 95 Public Records Request No.: 17-295 DOJ-OGR-00031001",
"position": "footer"
}
],
"entities": {
"people": [
"JAMES",
"BEDOYA, BROOKE"
],
"organizations": [
"CHEROKEE COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE"
],
"locations": [
"WALESKA",
"GEORGIA"
],
"dates": [
"11/24/05",
"03/17/1969",
"06/06/2006",
"07/26/17"
],
"reference_numbers": [
"05-104607",
"258904",
"258903",
"17-295",
"DOJ-OGR-00031001"
]
},
"additional_notes": "The document contains redactions in the narrative section and other areas, indicating sensitive information has been removed."
},
"error": null
},
{
"filename": "IMAGES010/DOJ-OGR-00026557.jpg",
"success": false,
"data": null,
"error": "Expecting ',' delimiter: line 9 column 4 (char 229)"
},
{
"filename": "IMAGES011/DOJ-OGR-00030839.jpg",
"success": true,
"data": {
"document_metadata": {
"page_number": "13",
"document_number": null,
"date": null,
"document_type": "webpage footer",
"has_handwriting": true,
"has_stamps": false
},
"full_text": "Myspace.com Page 13 of 13 About | FAQ | Terms | Privacy | Safety Tips | Contact Myspace | Promote | Advertise | MySpace Shop © 2003-2005 MySpace.com All Rights Reserved. http://www.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=user.viewComments&friendID=204256 11/14/2005 07/26/17 Page 39 of 125 Public Records Request No.: 17-295 DOJ-OGR-00030839",
"text_blocks": [
{
"type": "printed",
"content": "Myspace.com Page 13 of 13",
"position": "header"
},
{
"type": "printed",
"content": "About | FAQ | Terms | Privacy | Safety Tips | Contact Myspace | Promote | Advertise | MySpace Shop",
"position": "header"
},
{
"type": "printed",
"content": "© 2003-2005 MySpace.com All Rights Reserved.",
"position": "header"
},
{
"type": "printed",
"content": "http://www.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=user.viewComments&friendID=204256",
"position": "footer"
},
{
"type": "handwritten",
"content": "11/14/2005",
"position": "footer"
},
{
"type": "handwritten",
"content": "07/26/17",
"position": "footer"
},
{
"type": "handwritten",
"content": "Page 39 of 125",
"position": "footer"
},
{
"type": "handwritten",
"content": "Public Records Request No.: 17-295",
"position": "footer"
},
{
"type": "handwritten",
"content": "DOJ-OGR-00030839",
"position": "footer"
}
],
"entities": {
"people": [],
"organizations": [
"MySpace.com",
"DOJ"
],
"locations": [],
"dates": [
"2003-2005",
"11/14/2005",
"07/26/17"
],
"reference_numbers": [
"17-295",
"DOJ-OGR-00030839",
"204256"
]
},
"additional_notes": "The document appears to be a printed copy of a Myspace webpage footer with some handwritten notes at the bottom."
},
"error": null
},
{
"filename": "IMAGES010/DOJ-OGR-00026598.jpg",
"success": false,
"data": null,
"error": "Expecting ',' delimiter: line 9 column 4 (char 229)"
},
{
"filename": "IMAGES011/DOJ-OGR-00030574.jpg",
"success": false,
"data": null,
"error": "Expecting ',' delimiter: line 46 column 6 (char 7515)"
},
{
"filename": "IMAGES012/DOJ-OGR-00031967.jpg",
"success": true,
"data": {
"document_metadata": {
"page_number": "27",
"document_number": "17-295",
"date": "07/26/17",
"document_type": "Public Records Request",
"has_handwriting": false,
"has_stamps": false
},
"full_text": "Page 27\n\nA\nAbsolutely 18:11\naction 26:14,14\nAdam 8:11\naddress 5:20\nadults 9:15\naffirmed 4:8\nago 6:5 14:8 16:18 18:1,2,2,20\nagreement 4:15\n14:15,16\nAlessi 1:6 3:2 4:7\n4:12,18 19:8\n25:6 26:6\nAllison 21:17,17\n23:3\nallow 7:8\namicable 14:15\nand/or 26:16\nAnnie 8:20\nanybody 7:8\n17:12 18:22\n19:6\nanymore 14:9\napartment 7:14\n7:15,16,20\n15:24 16:3\nApparently 10:22\nappear 11:7,18\nAPPEARANCES\n2:1\nappeared 25:6\napply 26:16\nappreciate 23:22\n24:1\narea 16:13\nArizona 22:6\narrangements\n6:24\nasked 9:20 17:22\n18:9 22:23,25\nassistant 2:3 8:5\n8:18,19,22\nassistants 8:3,4\n17:13\nAssociates 1:24\nattorney 2:3\n17:14,16,17,17\n17:18,21 23:13\n26:12,13\nauthority 25:5\n\nB\nauthorized 26:7\nB 3:5\nback 7:22 9:7\n12:3 15:15\n18:25 20:9,15\n20:15,19\nBad 14:5\nbalcony 10:1,2,3\n10:8\nballs 20:20\nBased 11:23,24\nbasically 6:7 8:24\n10:15 17:22\n19:8 22:24\nbasis 5:6,8\nbasket 13:1,2\nbathroom 10:4,4\n10:7,8 13:8,9\nbattery 20:19\nBeach 1:1,4,11\n2:4,8,11 4:19\n25:2 26:3\nBlack's 17:20\nblame 5:17\nblood 13:24\nboss 6:14 8:25\nbothering 17:4\nbride 7:15\nBrillo 5:21\nbringing 12:8 15:5,5\nbuild 15:21\nbuilding 15:20,21\nbutler 5:9\nby 12:16\n\nC\nC 26:1,1\ncall 18:25 19:6,18\n23:23\ncalled 16:20,24,25\n\n17:6 19:15\ncancer 13:23,24\ncard 16:18 17:2,3\nCaribbean 22:10\nCarrabas 20:7,8\ncause 4:4\nCenter 2:7\ncertification\n26:15\ncertify 25:5 26:6\ncertifying 26:17\ncetera 23:19\nchance 23:8\ncharge 5:11\nchef 8:7,7,13,15\nchef's 8:9\nchoice 18:15\nchores 5:11 7:2\nclean 11:4 12:3\n15:13 22:2,16\n22:19\ncleaned 11:16\n22:20\ncleaning 5:12 7:3\n7:10\ncleanup 11:6,23\n11:24\nclean-up 7:6\nclosed 10:24 11:3\n11:22\ncloset 13:1\ncolor 20:16\ncome 6:21 7:22\n8:17,17 9:2,7\n10:16 15:1,1,3\n15:15 20:24\ncoming 6:22\n21:21\ncommenced 26:11\nCommission\n25:15,16 26:22\n26:22\ncomplaint 14:24\ncomplete 19:12\ncompleted 26:11\nconcluded 24:4\nconducting 4:20\nconnected 26:13\nconsequence\n16:20\n\nConsor 1:24\nConstantly 13:21\ncontact 19:3,5\n20:1 23:12,24\ncontacted 17:12\n18:4,23 19:15\n23:8\ncontrol 26:16\ncooking 7:11\ncorrect 6:19 26:8\ncorridor 11:2\ndoing 7:10 20:1\ndomo 5:9,14\nDonna 21:5\nDONNIE 2:6\ndoor 10:24,25\n11:1\ndoors 11:22\ndouble 10:24\ndownstairs 15:7,9\ndrain 13:23\ndressed 16:11,12\n16:14\nDrive 2:7\ndriver 5:10\ndriving 7:11\nduly 4:8 25:6 26:6\ndump 13:3\n\nD\nD 3:1,5\nDALIAH 2:2\ndate 18:2,4\ndated 14:13\nday 9:5 11:14\n12:2 14:20 25:9\n26:18\ndays 18:1,2\nDD 25:15 26:22\ndeal 6:8,14\nDecember 5:3\n25:10 26:18\ndecision 18:15,17\ndeliver 23:10\ndelivery 23:15\ndemanding 13:19\n14:3\ndepartment 2:11\n20:1\nDepends 7:7\ndescribe 20:10\nDET 3:3 4:17\ndiagnosed 13:23\ndick 20:13\nDidier 8:13\ndifferent 9:11\n10:12,18 12:11\n\nE\nE 3:1,5,5 26:1,1\neight 4:23,24\neither 12:5\nEl 5:21\nElaine 6:17\nElaine's 10:8\neleven 5:4 6:21\n9:10 21:19\nemployee 26:13\nemployer 4:21\nEnglish 8:15,20\nentertainment\n16:13\nenvironment\n14:21\n23:16,19,22\n24:1\nEpstein 4:23 5:18\n6:9 16:16,17\n17:13 19:16\nespecially 14:25\nEsquire 2:2,6\net 23:19\nexactly 5:4 17:23\n18:9 23:1\n\n12:12,13,14,15\n12:16,17 15:16\n20:18\nDina 21:18\ndinner 15:11,11\ndirect 26:16\ndirection 26:16\ndirectly 6:8,15\ndiscuss 19:10\nDixie 1:10 2:3\n\nJ. CONSOR & ASSOCIATES REPORTING & TRANSCRIPTION\n561.835.9738\nPage 28 of 100\nPublic Records Request No.: 17-295\nDOJ-OGR-00031967",
"text_blocks": [
{
"type": "printed",
"content": "Page 27",
"position": "header"
},
{
"type": "printed",
"content": "A\nAbsolutely 18:11\naction 26:14,14\nAdam 8:11\naddress 5:20\nadults 9:15\naffirmed 4:8\nago 6:5 14:8 16:18 18:1,2,2,20\nagreement 4:15\n14:15,16\nAlessi 1:6 3:2 4:7\n4:12,18 19:8\n25:6 26:6\nAllison 21:17,17\n23:3\nallow 7:8\namicable 14:15\nand/or 26:16\nAnnie 8:20\nanybody 7:8\n17:12 18:22\n19:6\nanymore 14:9\napartment 7:14\n7:15,16,20\n15:24 16:3\nApparently 10:22\nappear 11:7,18\nAPPEARANCES\n2:1\nappeared 25:6\napply 26:16\nappreciate 23:22\n24:1\narea 16:13\nArizona 22:6\narrangements\n6:24\nasked 9:20 17:22\n18:9 22:23,25\nassistant 2:3 8:5\n8:18,19,22\nassistants 8:3,4\n17:13\nAssociates 1:24\nattorney 2:3\n17:14,16,17,17\n17:18,21 23:13\n26:12,13\nauthority 25:5",
"position": "left"
},
{
"type": "printed",
"content": "B\nauthorized 26:7\nB 3:5\nback 7:22 9:7\n12:3 15:15\n18:25 20:9,15\n20:15,19\nBad 14:5\nbalcony 10:1,2,3\n10:8\nballs 20:20\nBased 11:23,24\nbasically 6:7 8:24\n10:15 17:22\n19:8 22:24\nbasis 5:6,8\nbasket 13:1,2\nbathroom 10:4,4\n10:7,8 13:8,9\nbattery 20:19\nBeach 1:1,4,11\n2:4,8,11 4:19\n25:2 26:3\nBlack's 17:20\nblame 5:17\nblood 13:24\nboss 6:14 8:25\nbothering 17:4\nbride 7:15\nBrillo 5:21\nbringing 12:8 15:5,5\nbuild 15:21\nbuilding 15:20,21\nbutler 5:9\nby 12:16",
"position": "left-middle"
},
{
"type": "printed",
"content": "17:6 19:15\ncancer 13:23,24\ncard 16:18 17:2,3\nCaribbean 22:10\nCarrabas 20:7,8\ncause 4:4\nCenter 2:7\ncertification\n26:15\ncertify 25:5 26:6\ncertifying 26:17\ncetera 23:19\nchance 23:8\ncharge 5:11\nchef 8:7,7,13,15\nchef's 8:9\nchoice 18:15\nchores 5:11 7:2\nclean 11:4 12:3\n15:13 22:2,16\n22:19\ncleaned 11:16\n22:20\ncleaning 5:12 7:3\n7:10\ncleanup 11:6,23\n11:24\nclean-up 7:6\nclosed 10:24 11:3\n11:22\ncloset 13:1\ncolor 20:16\ncome 6:21 7:22\n8:17,17 9:2,7\n10:16 15:1,1,3\n15:15 20:24\ncoming 6:22\n21:21\ncommenced 26:11\nCommission\n25:15,16 26:22\n26:22\ncomplaint 14:24\ncomplete 19:12\ncompleted 26:11\nconcluded 24:4\nconducting 4:20\nconnected 26:13\nconsequence\n16:20",
"position": "middle"
},
{
"type": "printed",
"content": "Consor 1:24\nConstantly 13:21\ncontact 19:3,5\n20:1 23:12,24\ncontacted 17:12\n18:4,23 19:15\n23:8\ncontrol 26:16\ncooking 7:11\ncorrect 6:19 26:8\ncorridor 11:2\ndoing 7:10 20:1\ndomo 5:9,14\nDonna 21:5\nDONNIE 2:6\ndoor 10:24,25\n11:1\ndoors 11:22\ndouble 10:24\ndownstairs 15:7,9\ndrain 13:23\ndressed 16:11,12\n16:14\nDrive 2:7\ndriver 5:10\ndriving 7:11\nduly 4:8 25:6 26:6\ndump 13:3",
"position": "right-middle"
},
{
"type": "printed",
"content": "12:12,13,14,15\n12:16,17 15:16\n20:18\nDina 21:18\ndinner 15:11,11\ndirect 26:16\ndirection 26:16\ndirectly 6:8,15\ndiscuss 19:10\nDixie 1:10 2:3",
"position": "right"
},
{
"type": "printed",
"content": "D\nD 3:1,5\nDALIAH 2:2\ndate 18:2,4\ndated 14:13\nday 9:5 11:14\n12:2 14:20 25:9\n26:18\ndays 18:1,2\nDD 25:15 26:22\ndeal 6:8,14\nDecember 5:3\n25:10 26:18\ndecision 18:15,17\ndeliver 23:10\ndelivery 23:15\ndemanding 13:19\n14:3\ndepartment 2:11\n20:1\nDepends 7:7\ndescribe 20:10\nDET 3:3 4:17\ndiagnosed 13:23\ndick 20:13\nDidier 8:13\ndifferent 9:11\n10:12,18 12:11",
"position": "bottom-left"
},
{
"type": "printed",
"content": "E\nE 3:1,5,5 26:1,1\neight 4:23,24\neither 12:5\nEl 5:21\nElaine 6:17\nElaine's 10:8\neleven 5:4 6:21\n9:10 21:19\nemployee 26:13\nemployer 4:21\nEnglish 8:15,20\nentertainment\n16:13\nenvironment\n14:21\n23:16,19,22\n24:1\nEpstein 4:23 5:18\n6:9 16:16,17\n17:13 19:16\nespecially 14:25\nEsquire 2:2,6\net 23:19\nexactly 5:4 17:23\n18:9 23:1",
"position": "bottom-right"
},
{
"type": "printed",
"content": "J. CONSOR & ASSOCIATES REPORTING & TRANSCRIPTION\n561.835.9738\nPage 28 of 100\nPublic Records Request No.: 17-295\nDOJ-OGR-00031967",
"position": "footer"
}
],
"entities": {
"people": [
"Alessi",
"Allison",
"Annie",
"Dina",
"Dixie",
"Donna",
"DONNIE",
"Elaine",
"Epstein",
"Didier"
],
"organizations": [
"J. CONSOR & ASSOCIATES REPORTING & TRANSCRIPTION"
],
"locations": [
"Arizona",
"Beach",
"Caribbean",
"Carrabas"
],
"dates": [
"December 5:3",
"25:10 26:18"
],
"reference_numbers": [
"17-295",
"DOJ-OGR-00031967"
]
},
"additional_notes": "The document appears to be a transcription of a public records request. The text is mostly printed, with no visible handwriting or stamps. The document is well-formatted and easy to read."
},
"error": null
},
{
"filename": "IMAGES012/DOJ-OGR-00032630.jpg",
"success": true,
"data": {
"document_metadata": {
"page_number": "2317",
"document_number": "17-295",
"date": "07/26/17",
"document_type": "Arrest/Notice to Appear Juvenile Referral Report",
"has_handwriting": true,
"has_stamps": false
},
"full_text": "ARREST / NOTICE TO APPEAR Juvenile Referral Report",
"text_blocks": [
{
"type": "printed",
"content": "ARREST / NOTICE TO APPEAR Juvenile Referral Report",
"position": "header"
},
{
"type": "handwritten",
"content": "ISPYAR LESLIE JAMIN SKILLER",
"position": "middle"
}
],
"entities": {
"people": [
"ISPYAR LESLIE JAMIN SKILLER"
],
"organizations": [
"PALM BEACH POLICE DEPARTMENT"
],
"locations": [
"PALM BEACH",
"BAHAMA LANE",
"GEN CLARA ROAD WEST PALM BEACH"
],
"dates": [
"09/11/05",
"10/25/80",
"SEPTEMBER 29"
],
"reference_numbers": [
"7610010501263110",
"0501263",
"0501263",
"17-295",
"DOJ-OGR-00032630"
]
},
"additional_notes": "The document is a Juvenile Referral Report from the Palm Beach Police Department. It contains handwritten information about the arrest, including the name of the individual, charges, and court date."
},
"error": null
},
{
"filename": "IMAGES012/DOJ-OGR-00031438.jpg",
"success": false,
"data": null,
"error": "Expecting ',' delimiter: line 9 column 4 (char 210)"
},
{
"filename": "IMAGES012/DOJ-OGR-00031466.jpg",
"success": false,
"data": null,
"error": "Expecting ',' delimiter: line 9 column 4 (char 213)"
}
]
}
Reference in New Issue View Git Blame Copy Permalink