mirror of
https://github.com/Cleanuparr/Cleanuparr.git
synced 2026-02-04 21:38:07 -06:00
[BUG] Changing unlinked downloads category has weird behavior with Transmission #52
Loading…
x
Reference in New Issue
Block a user
No description provided.
Delete Branch "%!s()"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
Originally created by @denysdovhan on GitHub.
Before submitting a bug report, I have:
What is the behavior?
I am using Transmission, and it seems like Cleanuparr doesn't handle changing the download category well. For example, I have this folder structure:
As you see
tvandmoviesare categories. I have this configuration in Cleanuparr:With this configuration I expect unlinked downloads to end up alongside
moviesandtv, but instead it is placed within these directories asmoves/orphanedandtv/orphaned:However, this is only part of the issue. At the end of the day, I'd like to have downloads completely removed from download client. Can we have an option to remove downloads, alongside of changing category.
Which operating system do you use?
Linux
What type of deployment do you use?
Docker container
Relevant log output
Anything else?
My
compose.yaml@Flaminel commented on GitHub:
Yes, I meant in Cleanuparr.
@Flaminel commented on GitHub:
This is correct.
The moving part is totally up to Transmission to do it correctly - Cleanuparr just calls Transmission to handle that, it does not move it by itself. Any idea why there's a problem on your setup? Also, if you remove one of those
orphaneddownloads, do the files also get permanently deleted? If so, you can probably ignore the "missing" part that Transmission warns about.@denysdovhan commented on GitHub:
You mean seeding rule in Cleanuparr? AFAIK, transmission doesn't have seeding rules.
@Flaminel commented on GitHub:
This is done to avoid moving files from a filesystem to another, which would take time and resources. Why is your example the better solution?
If you want the download from the
orphanedcategory to be removed, you have to set up a seeding rule for it. Why would this be an issue?@denysdovhan commented on GitHub:
Oh, it seems like I've got it wrong.
So, if I understand it correctly:
orphaned.orphanedshould remove downloads from the download client, when applied.The problem for me, Transmission doesn't seem to handle changing categories well. For some reason when download is moved, Transmission UI says it's missing, since the directory was changed.
@Flaminel commented on GitHub:
No problem!
@denysdovhan commented on GitHub:
Okay, I've played with it a bit, and it seems like it's actually working properly, even though it moves files to
orphanedsubfolder.Thanks for clarifying that for me!