This upgrades to [check-spelling v0.0.24].
A number of GitHub APIs are being turned off shortly, so we need to
upgrade or various uncertain outcomes will occur.
There are some minor bugs that I'm aware of and which I've fixed since
this release (including a couple I discovered while preparing this PR).
There's a new accessibility forbidden pattern:
#### Should be `cannot` (or `can't`)
See https://www.grammarly.com/blog/cannot-or-can-not/
> Don't use `can not` when you mean `cannot`. The only time you're
likely to see `can not` written as separate words is when the word `can`
happens to precede some other phrase that happens to start with `not`.
> `Can't` is a contraction of `cannot`, and it's best suited for
informal writing.
> In formal writing and where contractions are frowned upon, use
`cannot`.
> It is possible to write `can not`, but you generally find it only as
part of some other construction, such as `not only . . . but also.`
- if you encounter such a case, add a pattern for that case to
patterns.txt.
```
\b[Cc]an not\b
```
[check-spelling v0.0.24]: https://github.com/check-spelling/check-spelling/releases/tag/v0.0.24
Signed-off-by: Josh Soref <2119212+jsoref@users.noreply.github.com>
<!-- Enter a brief description/summary of your PR here. What does it fix/what does it change/how was it tested (even manually, if necessary)? -->
## Summary of the Pull Request
👋 Just a minor change to fix an outdated link.
<!-- Other than the issue solved, is this relevant to any other issues/existing PRs? -->
## References
N/A - subject matter expert
<!-- Please review the items on the PR checklist before submitting-->
## PR Checklist
* [ ] Closes #xxx
* [ ] CLA signed. If not, go over [here](https://cla.opensource.microsoft.com/microsoft/Terminal) and sign the CLA
* [ ] Tests added/passed
* [ ] Documentation updated. If checked, please file a pull request on [our docs repo](https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/terminal) and link it here: #xxx
* [ ] Schema updated.
* [ ] I've discussed this with core contributors already. If not checked, I'm ready to accept this work might be rejected in favor of a different grand plan. Issue number where discussion took place: #xxx
<!-- Provide a more detailed description of the PR, other things fixed or any additional comments/features here -->
## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments
Original link was demised late 2020. Updated link to be correct.
<!-- Describe how you validated the behavior. Add automated tests wherever possible, but list manual validation steps taken as well -->
## Validation Steps Performed
We were using a tag to trigger the bot for the verbose feedback hub response.
But...
1. We have run into several instances of the bot aggressively replying multiple times before the tag is removed.
2. We asked for a "comment contains" function in the bot and the Fabric Bot team obliged.
So I've changed it to `/duplicate` from the tag trigger and will remove the tag.
* Propose banner at top of issue templates
Getting tired of obvious low quality issues and I want to provide the warning that we may start closing things without further explanation as our volume is too high to deal with junk issues.
* Add bot rule information too.
