Always perform structural comparison when variance check fails

This commit is contained in:
Anders Hejlsberg 2017-09-21 21:31:11 -07:00
parent 589e1f440c
commit afc8a261cc
2 changed files with 35 additions and 86 deletions

View File

@ -282,9 +282,9 @@ namespace ts {
const noConstraintType = createAnonymousType(undefined, emptySymbols, emptyArray, emptyArray, undefined, undefined);
const circularConstraintType = createAnonymousType(undefined, emptySymbols, emptyArray, emptyArray, undefined, undefined);
const markerSuperType = createType(TypeFlags.MarkerType);
const markerSubType = createType(TypeFlags.MarkerType);
const markerOtherType = createType(TypeFlags.MarkerType);
const markerSuperType = <TypeParameter>createType(TypeFlags.TypeParameter);
const markerSubType = <TypeParameter>createType(TypeFlags.TypeParameter);
markerSubType.constraint = markerSuperType;
const anySignature = createSignature(undefined, undefined, undefined, emptyArray, anyType, /*typePredicate*/ undefined, 0, /*hasRestParameter*/ false, /*hasLiteralTypes*/ false);
const unknownSignature = createSignature(undefined, undefined, undefined, emptyArray, unknownType, /*typePredicate*/ undefined, 0, /*hasRestParameter*/ false, /*hasLiteralTypes*/ false);
@ -8948,10 +8948,6 @@ namespace ts {
if (isSimpleTypeRelatedTo(source, target, relation, reportErrors ? reportError : undefined)) return Ternary.True;
if (source.flags & TypeFlags.MarkerType && target.flags & TypeFlags.MarkerType && !(source.flags & TypeFlags.Object || target.flags & TypeFlags.Object)) {
return source === markerSubType && target === markerSuperType ? Ternary.True : Ternary.False;
}
if (getObjectFlags(source) & ObjectFlags.ObjectLiteral && source.flags & TypeFlags.FreshLiteral) {
if (hasExcessProperties(<FreshObjectLiteralType>source, target, reportErrors)) {
if (reportErrors) {
@ -9219,41 +9215,15 @@ namespace ts {
// in the process of computing variance information for recursive types and when
// comparing 'this' type arguments.
const variance = i < variances.length ? variances[i] : Variance.Covariant;
// We simply ignore omnivariant type arguments (because they're never witnessed).
if (variance !== Variance.Omnivariant) {
const s = sources[i];
const t = targets[i];
let related = Ternary.True;
if (variance === Variance.Covariant) {
related = isRelatedTo(s, t, reportErrors);
}
else if (variance === Variance.Contravariant) {
related = isRelatedTo(t, s, reportErrors);
}
else if (variance === Variance.Bivariant) {
// In the bivariant case we first compare contravariantly without reporting
// errors. Then, if that doesn't succeed, we compare covariantly with error
// reporting. Thus, error elaboration will be based on the the covariant check,
// which is generally easier to reason about.
related = isRelatedTo(t, s, /*reportErrors*/ false);
if (!related) {
related = isRelatedTo(s, t, reportErrors);
}
}
else {
// In the invariant case we first compare covariantly, and only when that
// succeeds do we proceed to compare contravariantly. Thus, error elaboration
// will typically be based on the covariant check.
related = isRelatedTo(s, t, reportErrors);
if (related) {
related &= isRelatedTo(t, s, reportErrors);
}
}
if (!related) {
return Ternary.False;
}
result &= related;
const s = sources[i];
const t = targets[i];
const related = variance === Variance.Covariant ? isRelatedTo(s, t, reportErrors) :
variance === Variance.Contravariant ? isRelatedTo(t, s, reportErrors) :
Ternary.False;
if (!related) {
return Ternary.False;
}
result &= related;
}
return result;
}
@ -9418,21 +9388,14 @@ namespace ts {
!(source.flags & TypeFlags.MarkerType || target.flags & TypeFlags.MarkerType)) {
// We have type references to the same generic type, and the type references are not marker
// type references (which are intended by be compared structurally). Obtain the variance
// information for the type parameters and relate the type arguments accordingly.
// information for the type parameters and relate the type arguments accordingly. If we do
// not succeed, fall through and do a structural comparison instead (there are instances
// where the variance information isn't accurate, e.g. when type parameters are used only
// in bivariant positions or when a type argument is 'any' or 'void'.)
const variances = getVariances((<TypeReference>source).target);
if (result = typeArgumentsRelatedTo(<TypeReference>source, <TypeReference>target, variances, reportErrors)) {
return result;
}
// The type arguments did not relate appropriately, but it may be because getVariances was
// invoked recursively and returned emptyArray (in which case typeArgumentsRelatedTo defaulted
// to covariance for all type arguments). It might also be the case that the target type has a
// 'void' type argument for a covariant type parameter that is only used in return positions
// within the generic type (in which case any type argument is permitted on the source side).
// In those cases we proceed with a structural comparison. Otherwise, we know for certain the
// instantiations aren't related and we can return here.
if (variances !== emptyArray && !hasCovariantVoidArgument(<TypeReference>target, variances)) {
return Ternary.False;
}
}
// Even if relationship doesn't hold for unions, intersections, or generic type references,
// it may hold in a structural comparison.
@ -9851,13 +9814,18 @@ namespace ts {
return result;
}
// Return an array containing the variance of each type parameter. The variance is effectively
// a digest of the type comparisons that occur for each type argument when instantiations of the
// generic type are structurally compared. We infer the variance information by comparing
// instantiations of the generic type for type arguments with known relations. Note that the
// function returns the emptyArray singleton to signal that it has been invoked recursively for
// the given generic type.
// Return an array containing the variance of each type parameter. The variance information is
// computed by comparing instantiations of the generic type for type arguments with known relations.
// A type parameter is marked as covariant if a covariant comparison succeeds; otherwise, it is
// marked contravariant if a contravarint comparison succeeds; otherwise, it is marked invariant.
// One form of variance doesn't exclude another, so this information simply serves to indicate
// a "primary" relationship that can be checked as an optimization ahead of a full structural
// comparison. The function returns the emptyArray singleton if we're not in strictFunctionTypes
// mode or if the function has been invoked recursively for the given generic type.
function getVariances(type: GenericType): Variance[] {
if (!strictFunctionTypes) {
return emptyArray;
}
const typeParameters = type.typeParameters || emptyArray;
let variances = type.variances;
if (!variances) {
@ -9870,20 +9838,14 @@ namespace ts {
type.variances = emptyArray;
variances = [];
for (const tp of typeParameters) {
// We first compare instantiations where the type parameter is replaced with
// marker types that have a known subtype relationship. From this we can infer
// invariance, covariance, contravariance or bivariance.
// We compare instantiations where the type parameter is replaced with marker types
// that have a known subtype relationship. From this we infer covariance, contravariance
// or invariance.
const typeWithSuper = getMarkerTypeReference(type, tp, markerSuperType);
const typeWithSub = getMarkerTypeReference(type, tp, markerSubType);
let variance = (isTypeAssignableTo(typeWithSub, typeWithSuper) ? Variance.Covariant : 0) |
(isTypeAssignableTo(typeWithSuper, typeWithSub) ? Variance.Contravariant : 0);
// If the instantiations appear to be related bivariantly, it may be because the
// type parameter is omnivariant (i.e. it isn't witnessed anywhere in the generic
// type). To determine this we compare instantiations where the type parameter is
// replaced with marker types that are known to be unrelated.
if (variance === Variance.Bivariant && isTypeAssignableTo(getMarkerTypeReference(type, tp, markerOtherType), typeWithSuper)) {
variance = Variance.Omnivariant;
}
const variance = isTypeAssignableTo(typeWithSub, typeWithSuper) ? Variance.Covariant :
isTypeAssignableTo(typeWithSuper, typeWithSub) ? Variance.Contravariant :
Variance.Invariant;
variances.push(variance);
}
}
@ -9892,17 +9854,6 @@ namespace ts {
return variances;
}
// Return true if the given type reference has a 'void' type argument for a covariant type parameter.
// See comment at call in recursiveTypeRelatedTo for when this case matters.
function hasCovariantVoidArgument(type: TypeReference, variances: Variance[]): boolean {
for (let i = 0; i < variances.length; i++) {
if (variances[i] === Variance.Covariant && type.typeArguments[i].flags & TypeFlags.Void) {
return true;
}
}
return false;
}
function isUnconstrainedTypeParameter(type: Type) {
return type.flags & TypeFlags.TypeParameter && !getConstraintFromTypeParameter(<TypeParameter>type);
}
@ -10709,9 +10660,9 @@ namespace ts {
const sourceTypes = (<TypeReference>source).typeArguments || emptyArray;
const targetTypes = (<TypeReference>target).typeArguments || emptyArray;
const count = sourceTypes.length < targetTypes.length ? sourceTypes.length : targetTypes.length;
const variances = strictFunctionTypes ? getVariances((<TypeReference>source).target) : undefined;
const variances = getVariances((<TypeReference>source).target);
for (let i = 0; i < count; i++) {
if (variances && i < variances.length && variances[i] === Variance.Contravariant) {
if (i < variances.length && variances[i] === Variance.Contravariant) {
inferFromContravariantTypes(sourceTypes[i], targetTypes[i]);
}
else {

View File

@ -3345,11 +3345,9 @@ namespace ts {
}
export const enum Variance {
Invariant = 0, // Both covariant and contravariant
Invariant = 0, // Neither covariant nor contravariant
Covariant = 1, // Covariant
Contravariant = 2, // Contravariant
Bivariant = 3, // Either covariant or contravariant
Omnivariant = 4 // Unwitnessed type parameter
}
// Generic class and interface types