From 972a149d4aa9ac1a6884efed4597e763716bc580 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Daniel Rosenwasser Date: Fri, 9 Nov 2018 12:24:09 -0800 Subject: [PATCH] Update Feature_request.md --- .github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/Feature_request.md | 6 ++++-- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/Feature_request.md b/.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/Feature_request.md index bddacd1f2fc..f40965f503a 100644 --- a/.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/Feature_request.md +++ b/.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/Feature_request.md @@ -32,8 +32,10 @@ What shortcomings exist with current approaches? ## Checklist My suggestion meets these guidelines: -* [ ] This wouldn't be a breaking change in existing TypeScript / JavaScript code + +* [ ] This wouldn't be a breaking change in existing TypeScript/JavaScript code * [ ] This wouldn't change the runtime behavior of existing JavaScript code * [ ] This could be implemented without emitting different JS based on the types of the expressions -* [ ] This isn't a runtime feature (e.g. new expression-level syntax) +* [ ] This isn't a runtime feature (e.g. library functionality, non-ECMAScript syntax with JavaScript output, etc.) +* [ ] This feature would agree with the rest of [TypeScript's Design Goals](https://github.com/Microsoft/TypeScript/wiki/TypeScript-Design-Goals).