Remove unnecessary widening, more PR feedback

This commit is contained in:
Ron Buckton
2017-01-19 13:19:46 -08:00
parent f9999e9738
commit 74498bb076
3 changed files with 6 additions and 10 deletions

View File

@@ -16493,7 +16493,6 @@ namespace ts {
// }
//
// TODO(rbuckton): Verify whether we need to call getApparentType. See checkNonThenableType in master
const thenFunction = getTypeOfPropertyOfType(type, "then");
const thenSignatures = thenFunction ? getSignaturesOfType(thenFunction, SignatureKind.Call) : emptyArray;
if (thenSignatures.length > 0) {
@@ -16600,7 +16599,7 @@ namespace ts {
if (type.id === promisedType.id || indexOf(awaitedTypeStack, promisedType.id) >= 0) {
// Verify that we don't have a bad actor in the form of a promise whose
// promised type is the same as the promise type, or a mutually recursive
// promise. If so, we returnundefined as we cannot guess the shape. If this
// promise. If so, we return undefined as we cannot guess the shape. If this
// were the actual case in the JavaScript, this Promise would never resolve.
//
// An example of a bad actor with a singly-recursive promise type might
@@ -16664,15 +16663,14 @@ namespace ts {
// of a runtime problem. If the user wants to return this value from an async
// function, they would need to wrap it in some other value. If they want it to
// be treated as a promise, they can cast to <any>.
const widenedType = getWidenedType(type);
if (isThenableType(widenedType)) {
if (isThenableType(type)) {
if (errorNode) {
error(errorNode, Diagnostics.Type_used_as_operand_to_await_or_the_return_type_of_an_async_function_must_either_be_a_valid_promise_or_must_not_contain_a_callable_then_member);
}
return undefined;
}
return typeAsAwaitable.awaitedTypeOfType = widenedType;
return typeAsAwaitable.awaitedTypeOfType = type;
}
/**

View File

@@ -262,8 +262,7 @@ namespace ts {
function forEachLeadingCommentToEmit(pos: number, cb: (commentPos: number, commentEnd: number, kind: SyntaxKind, hasTrailingNewLine: boolean, rangePos: number) => void) {
// Emit the leading comments only if the container's pos doesn't match because the container should take care of emitting these comments
if ((containerPos === -1 || pos !== containerPos) /* && !leadingCommentPositions[pos] */) {
// leadingCommentPositions[pos] = true;
if ((containerPos === -1 || pos !== containerPos)) {
if (hasDetachedComments(pos)) {
forEachLeadingCommentWithoutDetachedComments(cb);
}
@@ -275,8 +274,7 @@ namespace ts {
function forEachTrailingCommentToEmit(end: number, cb: (commentPos: number, commentEnd: number, kind: SyntaxKind, hasTrailingNewLine: boolean) => void) {
// Emit the trailing comments only if the container's end doesn't match because the container should take care of emitting these comments
if ((containerEnd === -1 || (end !== containerEnd && end !== declarationListContainerEnd)) /*&& !trailingCommentPositions[end] */) {
// trailingCommentPositions[end] = true;
if ((containerEnd === -1 || (end !== containerEnd && end !== declarationListContainerEnd))) {
forEachTrailingCommentRange(currentText, end, cb);
}
}