diff --git a/src/compiler/checker.ts b/src/compiler/checker.ts
index a3902d9ea79..519b724fb62 100644
--- a/src/compiler/checker.ts
+++ b/src/compiler/checker.ts
@@ -31857,10 +31857,10 @@ export function createTypeChecker(host: TypeCheckerHost): TypeChecker {
         const parentType = getContextualTypeForVariableLikeDeclaration(parent, contextFlags) ||
             parent.kind !== SyntaxKind.BindingElement && parent.initializer && checkDeclarationInitializer(parent, declaration.dotDotDotToken ? CheckMode.RestBindingElement : CheckMode.Normal);
         if (!parentType || isBindingPattern(name) || isComputedNonLiteralName(name)) return undefined;
-        if (parent.name.kind === SyntaxKind.ArrayBindingPattern) {
-            const index = indexOfNode(declaration.parent.elements, declaration);
-            if (index < 0) return undefined;
-            return getContextualTypeForElementExpression(parentType, index);
+        if (parent.name.kind === SyntaxKind.ArrayBindingPattern) {
+            const index = indexOfNode(declaration.parent.elements, declaration);
+            if (index < 0) return undefined;
+            return getContextualTypeForElementExpression(parentType, index, declaration.parent.elements.length);
         }
         const nameType = getLiteralTypeFromPropertyName(name);
         if (isTypeUsableAsPropertyName(nameType)) {
@@ -32391,25 +32391,25 @@ export function createTypeChecker(host: TypeCheckerHost): TypeChecker {
         return { first, last };
     }
 
-    function getContextualTypeForElementExpression(type: Type | undefined, index: number, length?: number, firstSpreadIndex?: number, lastSpreadIndex?: number): Type | undefined {
-        return type && mapType(type, t => {
-            if (isTupleType(t)) {
-                // If index is before any spread element and within the fixed part of the contextual tuple type, return
-                // the type of the contextual tuple element.
-                if ((firstSpreadIndex === undefined || index < firstSpreadIndex) && index < t.target.fixedLength) {
-                    return removeMissingType(getTypeArguments(t)[index], !!(t.target.elementFlags[index] && ElementFlags.Optional));
-                }
-                // When the length is known and the index is after all spread elements we compute the offset from the element
-                // to the end and the number of ending fixed elements in the contextual tuple type.
-                const offset = length !== undefined && (lastSpreadIndex === undefined || index > lastSpreadIndex) ? length - index : 0;
-                const fixedEndLength = offset > 0 && (t.target.combinedFlags & ElementFlags.Variable) ? getEndElementCount(t.target, ElementFlags.Fixed) : 0;
-                // If the offset is within the ending fixed part of the contextual tuple type, return the type of the contextual
-                // tuple element.
-                if (offset > 0 && offset <= fixedEndLength) {
-                    return getTypeArguments(t)[getTypeReferenceArity(t) - offset];
-                }
-                // Return a union of the possible contextual element types with no subtype reduction.
-                return getElementTypeOfSliceOfTupleType(t, firstSpreadIndex === undefined ? t.target.fixedLength : Math.min(t.target.fixedLength, firstSpreadIndex), length === undefined || lastSpreadIndex === undefined ? fixedEndLength : Math.min(fixedEndLength, length - lastSpreadIndex), /*writing*/ false, /*noReductions*/ true);
+    function getContextualTypeForElementExpression(type: Type | undefined, index: number, length?: number, firstSpreadIndex?: number, lastSpreadIndex?: number): Type | undefined {
+        return type && mapType(type, t => {
+            if (isTupleType(t)) {
+                // If index is before any spread element and within the fixed part of the contextual tuple type, return
+                // the type of the contextual tuple element.
+                if ((firstSpreadIndex === undefined || index < firstSpreadIndex) && index < t.target.fixedLength) {
+                    return removeMissingType(getTypeArguments(t)[index], !!(t.target.elementFlags[index] && ElementFlags.Optional));
+                }
+                // When the length is known and the index is after all spread elements we compute the offset from the element
+                // to the end and the number of ending fixed elements in the contextual tuple type.
+                const offset = length !== undefined && (lastSpreadIndex === undefined || index > lastSpreadIndex) ? length - index : 0;
+                const fixedEndLength = offset > 0 && (t.target.combinedFlags & ElementFlags.Variable) ? getEndElementCount(t.target, ElementFlags.Fixed) : 0;
+                // If the offset is within the ending fixed part of the contextual tuple type, return the type of the contextual
+                // tuple element.
+                if (offset > 0 && offset <= fixedEndLength) {
+                    return getTypeArguments(t)[getTypeReferenceArity(t) - offset];
+                }
+                // Return a union of the possible contextual element types with no subtype reduction.
+                return getElementTypeOfSliceOfTupleType(t, firstSpreadIndex === undefined ? t.target.fixedLength : Math.min(t.target.fixedLength, firstSpreadIndex), length === undefined || lastSpreadIndex === undefined ? fixedEndLength : Math.min(fixedEndLength, length - lastSpreadIndex), /*writing*/ false, /*noReductions*/ true);
             }
             // If element index is known and a contextual property with that name exists, return it. Otherwise return the
             // iterated or element type of the contextual type.
@@ -36069,11 +36069,7 @@ export function createTypeChecker(host: TypeCheckerHost): TypeChecker {
                 // If one or more arguments are still excluded (as indicated by CheckMode.SkipContextSensitive),
                 // we obtain the regular type of any object literal arguments because we may not have inferred complete
                 // parameter types yet and therefore excess property checks may yield false positives (see #17041).
-                // Also skip fresh literal checking when the call is in certain destructuring contexts that can cause
-                // incorrect excess property errors (see #41548).
-                const shouldSkipFreshness = (checkMode & CheckMode.SkipContextSensitive) ||
-                    (isCallExpression(node) && isCallInProblematicDestructuringContext(node));
-                const checkArgType = shouldSkipFreshness ? getRegularTypeOfObjectLiteral(argType) : argType;
+                const checkArgType = checkMode & CheckMode.SkipContextSensitive ? getRegularTypeOfObjectLiteral(argType) : argType;
                 const effectiveCheckArgumentNode = getEffectiveCheckNode(arg);
                 if (!checkTypeRelatedToAndOptionallyElaborate(checkArgType, paramType, relation, reportErrors ? effectiveCheckArgumentNode : undefined, effectiveCheckArgumentNode, headMessage, containingMessageChain, errorOutputContainer)) {
                     Debug.assert(!reportErrors || !!errorOutputContainer.errors, "parameter should have errors when reporting errors");
@@ -36421,24 +36417,6 @@ export function createTypeChecker(host: TypeCheckerHost): TypeChecker {
         return createDiagnosticForNodeArray(getSourceFileOfNode(node), typeArguments, Diagnostics.Expected_0_type_arguments_but_got_1, belowArgCount === -Infinity ? aboveArgCount : belowArgCount, argCount);
     }
 
-    function isCallInProblematicDestructuringContext(node: CallLikeExpression): boolean {
-        // Check if this call expression is used as the initializer in a variable declaration with a destructuring pattern
-        const parent = node.parent;
-        if (parent && isVariableDeclaration(parent) && parent.initializer === node) {
-            if (isArrayBindingPattern(parent.name)) {
-                // Only apply this fix for the specific known problematic case:
-                // destructuring where the third position (index 2) is accessed
-                const elements = parent.name.elements;
-                return elements.length === 3 && 
-                       isOmittedExpression(elements[0]) && 
-                       isOmittedExpression(elements[1]) && 
-                       !isOmittedExpression(elements[2]);
-            }
-        }
-        
-        return false;
-    }
-
     function resolveCall(node: CallLikeExpression, signatures: readonly Signature[], candidatesOutArray: Signature[] | undefined, checkMode: CheckMode, callChainFlags: SignatureFlags, headMessage?: DiagnosticMessage): Signature {
         const isTaggedTemplate = node.kind === SyntaxKind.TaggedTemplateExpression;
         const isDecorator = node.kind === SyntaxKind.Decorator;
diff --git a/tests/cases/compiler/lastTupleElementDestructuring.ts b/tests/cases/compiler/lastTupleElementDestructuring.ts
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..43015dbb039
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tests/cases/compiler/lastTupleElementDestructuring.ts
@@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
+// Test for fixing excess property checking when accessing last tuple element in destructuring
+declare function foo<T extends { dataType: 'a' | 'b' }>(template: T): [T, any, any];
+
+// This should NOT error after fix
+const [, , last] = foo({ dataType: 'a', day: 0 });
+
+// This already works (doesn't access last element) 
+const [, mid, ] = foo({ dataType: 'a', day: 0 });
+
+// Also test that legitimate errors are still caught
+const [, , last2] = foo({ dataType: 'c' }); // Should still error
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/tests/debug_test.ts b/tests/debug_test.ts
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..2a49a4ee07e
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tests/debug_test.ts
@@ -0,0 +1,8 @@
+// Test case to check the fix
+declare function foo<T extends { dataType: 'a' | 'b' }>(template: T): [T, any, any];
+
+// Error case - accessing last element 
+const [, , last] = foo({ dataType: 'a', day: 0 });
+
+// Working case - not accessing last element
+const [, mid, ] = foo({ dataType: 'a', day: 0 });
\ No newline at end of file