mirror of
https://github.com/git-for-windows/git.git
synced 2026-02-21 19:21:05 -06:00
0ef4a4e434
The pack_name_hash() method has not been materially changed since it was
introduced in ce0bd64299a (pack-objects: improve path grouping
heuristics., 2006-06-05). The intention here is to group objects by path
name, but also attempt to group similar file types together by making
the most-significant digits of the hash be focused on the final
characters.
Here's the crux of the implementation:
/*
* This effectively just creates a sortable number from the
* last sixteen non-whitespace characters. Last characters
* count "most", so things that end in ".c" sort together.
*/
while ((c = *name++) != 0) {
if (isspace(c))
continue;
hash = (hash >> 2) + (c << 24);
}
As the comment mentions, this only cares about the last sixteen
non-whitespace characters. This cause some filenames to collide more
than others. Here are some examples that I've seen while investigating
repositories that are growing more than they should be:
* "/CHANGELOG.json" is 15 characters, and is created by the beachball
[1] tool. Only the final character of the parent directory can
differntiate different versions of this file, but also only the two
most-significant digits. If that character is a letter, then this is
always a collision. Similar issues occur with the similar
"/CHANGELOG.md" path, though there is more opportunity for
differences in the parent directory.
* Localization files frequently have common filenames but differentiate
via parent directories. In C#, the name "/strings.resx.lcl" is used
for these localization files and they will all collide in name-hash.
[1] https://github.com/microsoft/beachball
I've come across many other examples where some internal tool uses a
common name across multiple directories and is causing Git to repack
poorly due to name-hash collisions.
It is clear that the existing name-hash algorithm is optimized for
repositories with short path names, but also is optimized for packing a
single snapshot of a repository, not a repository with many versions of
the same file. In my testing, this has proven out where the name-hash
algorithm does a good job of finding peer files as delta bases when
unable to use a historical version of that exact file.
However, for repositories that have many versions of most files and
directories, it is more important that the objects that appear at the
same path are grouped together.
Create a new pack_full_name_hash() method and a new --full-name-hash
option for 'git pack-objects' to call that method instead. Add a simple
pass-through for 'git repack --full-name-hash' for additional testing in
the context of a full repack, where I expect this will be most
effective.
The hash algorithm is as simple as possible to be reasonably effective:
for each character of the path string, add a multiple of that character
and a large prime number (chosen arbitrarily, but intended to be large
relative to the size of a uint32_t). Then, shift the current hash value
to the right by 5, with overlap. The addition and shift parameters are
standard mechanisms for creating hard-to-predict behaviors in the bits
of the resulting hash.
This is not meant to be cryptographic at all, but uniformly distributed
across the possible hash values. This creates a hash that appears
pseudorandom. There is no ability to consider similar file types as
being close to each other.
In a later change, a test-tool will be added so the effectiveness of
this hash can be demonstrated directly.
For now, let's consider how effective this mechanism is when repacking a
repository with and without the --full-name-hash option. Specifically,
let's use 'git repack -adf [--full-name-hash]' as our test.
On the Git repository, we do not expect much difference. All path names
are short. This is backed by our results:
| Stage | Pack Size | Repack Time |
|-----------------------|-----------|-------------|
| After clone | 260 MB | N/A |
| Standard Repack | 127MB | 106s |
| With --full-name-hash | 126 MB | 99s |
This example demonstrates how there is some natural overhead coming from
the cloned copy because the server is hosting many forks and has not
optimized for exactly this set of reachable objects. But the full repack
has similar characteristics with and without --full-name-hash.
However, we can test this in a repository that uses one of the
problematic naming conventions above. The fluentui [2] repo uses
beachball to generate CHANGELOG.json and CHANGELOG.md files, and these
files have very poor delta characteristics when comparing against
versions across parent directories.
| Stage | Pack Size | Repack Time |
|-----------------------|-----------|-------------|
| After clone | 694 MB | N/A |
| Standard Repack | 438 MB | 728s |
| With --full-name-hash | 168 MB | 142s |
[2] https://github.com/microsoft/fluentui
In this example, we see significant gains in the compressed packfile
size as well as the time taken to compute the packfile.
Using a collection of repositories that use the beachball tool, I was
able to make similar comparisions with dramatic results. While the
fluentui repo is public, the others are private so cannot be shared for
reproduction. The results are so significant that I find it important to
share here:
| Repo | Standard Repack | With --full-name-hash |
|----------|-----------------|-----------------------|
| fluentui | 438 MB | 168 MB |
| Repo B | 6,255 MB | 829 MB |
| Repo C | 37,737 MB | 7,125 MB |
| Repo D | 130,049 MB | 6,190 MB |
Future changes could include making --full-name-hash implied by a config
value or even implied by default during a full repack.
Signed-off-by: Derrick Stolee <stolee@gmail.com>
Git - fast, scalable, distributed revision control system
Git is a fast, scalable, distributed revision control system with an unusually rich command set that provides both high-level operations and full access to internals.
Git is an Open Source project covered by the GNU General Public License version 2 (some parts of it are under different licenses, compatible with the GPLv2). It was originally written by Linus Torvalds with help of a group of hackers around the net.
Please read the file INSTALL for installation instructions.
Many Git online resources are accessible from https://git-scm.com/ including full documentation and Git related tools.
See Documentation/gittutorial.txt to get started, then see
Documentation/giteveryday.txt for a useful minimum set of commands, and
Documentation/git-<commandname>.txt for documentation of each command.
If git has been correctly installed, then the tutorial can also be
read with man gittutorial or git help tutorial, and the
documentation of each command with man git-<commandname> or git help <commandname>.
CVS users may also want to read Documentation/gitcvs-migration.txt
(man gitcvs-migration or git help cvs-migration if git is
installed).
The user discussion and development of Git take place on the Git mailing list -- everyone is welcome to post bug reports, feature requests, comments and patches to git@vger.kernel.org (read Documentation/SubmittingPatches for instructions on patch submission and Documentation/CodingGuidelines).
Those wishing to help with error message, usage and informational message
string translations (localization l10) should see po/README.md
(a po file is a Portable Object file that holds the translations).
To subscribe to the list, send an email to git+subscribe@vger.kernel.org (see https://subspace.kernel.org/subscribing.html for details). The mailing list archives are available at https://lore.kernel.org/git/, https://marc.info/?l=git and other archival sites.
Issues which are security relevant should be disclosed privately to the Git Security mailing list git-security@googlegroups.com.
The maintainer frequently sends the "What's cooking" reports that list the current status of various development topics to the mailing list. The discussion following them give a good reference for project status, development direction and remaining tasks.
The name "git" was given by Linus Torvalds when he wrote the very first version. He described the tool as "the stupid content tracker" and the name as (depending on your mood):
- random three-letter combination that is pronounceable, and not actually used by any common UNIX command. The fact that it is a mispronunciation of "get" may or may not be relevant.
- stupid. contemptible and despicable. simple. Take your pick from the dictionary of slang.
- "global information tracker": you're in a good mood, and it actually works for you. Angels sing, and a light suddenly fills the room.
- "goddamn idiotic truckload of sh*t": when it breaks