Windows paths are typically limited to MAX_PATH = 260 characters, even
though the underlying NTFS file system supports paths up to 32,767 chars.
This limitation is also evident in Windows Explorer, cmd.exe and many
other applications (including IDEs).
Particularly annoying is that most Windows APIs return bogus error codes
if a relative path only barely exceeds MAX_PATH in conjunction with the
current directory, e.g. ERROR_PATH_NOT_FOUND / ENOENT instead of the
infinitely more helpful ERROR_FILENAME_EXCED_RANGE / ENAMETOOLONG.
Many Windows wide char APIs support longer than MAX_PATH paths through the
file namespace prefix ('\\?\' or '\\?\UNC\') followed by an absolute path.
Notable exceptions include functions dealing with executables and the
current directory (CreateProcess, LoadLibrary, Get/SetCurrentDirectory) as
well as the entire shell API (ShellExecute, SHGetSpecialFolderPath...).
Introduce a handle_long_path function to check the length of a specified
path properly (and fail with ENAMETOOLONG), and to optionally expand long
paths using the '\\?\' file namespace prefix. Short paths will not be
modified, so we don't need to worry about device names (NUL, CON, AUX).
Contrary to MSDN docs, the GetFullPathNameW function doesn't seem to be
limited to MAX_PATH (at least not on Win7), so we can use it to do the
heavy lifting of the conversion (translate '/' to '\', eliminate '.' and
'..', and make an absolute path).
Add long path error checking to xutftowcs_path for APIs with hard MAX_PATH
limit.
Add a new MAX_LONG_PATH constant and xutftowcs_long_path function for APIs
that support long paths.
While improved error checking is always active, long paths support must be
explicitly enabled via 'core.longpaths' option. This is to prevent end
users to shoot themselves in the foot by checking out files that Windows
Explorer, cmd/bash or their favorite IDE cannot handle.
Test suite:
Test the case is when the full pathname length of a dir is close
to 260 (MAX_PATH).
Bug report and an original reproducer by Andrey Rogozhnikov:
https://github.com/msysgit/git/pull/122#issuecomment-43604199
[jes: adjusted test number to avoid conflicts, added support for
chdir(), etc]
Thanks-to: Martin W. Kirst <maki@bitkings.de>
Thanks-to: Doug Kelly <dougk.ff7@gmail.com>
Original-test-by: Andrey Rogozhnikov <rogozhnikov.andrey@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Karsten Blees <blees@dcon.de>
Signed-off-by: Stepan Kasal <kasal@ucw.cz>
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Add a macro to mark code sections that only read from the file system,
along with a config option and documentation.
This facilitates implementation of relatively simple file system level
caches without the need to synchronize with the file system.
Enable read-only sections for 'git status' and preload_index.
Signed-off-by: Karsten Blees <blees@dcon.de>
Atomic append on windows is only supported on local disk files, and it may
cause errors in other situations, e.g. network file system. If that is the
case, this config option should be used to turn atomic append off.
Co-Authored-By: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: 孙卓识 <sunzhuoshi@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
This adds support for a new http.sslAutoClientCert config value.
In cURL 7.77 or later the schannel backend does not automatically send
client certificates from the Windows Certificate Store anymore.
This config value is only used if http.sslBackend is set to "schannel",
and can be used to opt in to the old behavior and force cURL to send
client certificates.
This fixes https://github.com/git-for-windows/git/issues/3292
Signed-off-by: Pascal Muller <pascalmuller@gmail.com>
The native Windows HTTPS backend is based on Secure Channel which lets
the caller decide how to handle revocation checking problems caused by
missing information in the certificate or offline CRL distribution
points.
Unfortunately, cURL chose to handle these problems differently than
OpenSSL by default: while OpenSSL happily ignores those problems
(essentially saying "¯\_(ツ)_/¯"), the Secure Channel backend will error
out instead.
As a remedy, the "no revoke" mode was introduced, which turns off
revocation checking altogether. This is a bit heavy-handed. We support
this via the `http.schannelCheckRevoke` setting.
In https://github.com/curl/curl/pull/4981, we contributed an opt-in
"best effort" strategy that emulates what OpenSSL seems to do.
In Git for Windows, we actually want this to be the default. This patch
makes it so, introducing it as a new value for the
`http.schannelCheckRevoke" setting, which now becmes a tristate: it
accepts the values "false", "true" or "best-effort" (defaulting to the
last one).
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Since commit 0c499ea60f (send-pack: demultiplex a sideband stream with
status data, 2010-02-05) the send-pack builtin uses the side-band-64k
capability if advertised by the server.
Unfortunately this breaks pushing over the dump git protocol if used
over a network connection.
The detailed reasons for this breakage are (by courtesy of Jeff Preshing,
quoted from https://groups.google.com/d/msg/msysgit/at8D7J-h7mw/eaLujILGUWoJ):
MinGW wraps Windows sockets in CRT file descriptors in order to
mimic the functionality of POSIX sockets. This causes msvcrt.dll
to treat sockets as Installable File System (IFS) handles,
calling ReadFile, WriteFile, DuplicateHandle and CloseHandle on
them. This approach works well in simple cases on recent
versions of Windows, but does not support all usage patterns. In
particular, using this approach, any attempt to read & write
concurrently on the same socket (from one or more processes)
will deadlock in a scenario where the read waits for a response
from the server which is only invoked after the write. This is
what send_pack currently attempts to do in the use_sideband
codepath.
The new config option `sendpack.sideband` allows to override the
side-band-64k capability of the server, and thus makes the dumb git
protocol work.
Other transportation methods like ssh and http/https still benefit from
the sideband channel, therefore the default value of `sendpack.sideband`
is still true.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Braun <thomas.braun@byte-physics.de>
Signed-off-by: Oliver Schneider <oliver@assarbad.net>
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Typo/grammofix to documentation added during this cycle.
* tl/notes-separator:
notes doc: tidy up `--no-stripspace` paragraph
notes doc: split up run-on sentences
With `--stdin`, we read *from* standard input, not *for*.
Signed-off-by: Martin Ågren <martin.agren@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When commit 00bf685975 (show-ref doc: update for internal consistency,
2023-05-19) switched from double quotes to backticks around our {caret}
macro, we started rendering "{caret}" literally. Fix this by replacing
by a "^" character.
Signed-off-by: Martin Ågren <martin.agren@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Where we document the `--no-stripspace` option, remove a superfluous
"For" to fix the grammar. Mark option names and command names using
`backticks` to set them in monospace.
Signed-off-by: Martin Ågren <martin.agren@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When commit c4e2aa7d45 (notes.c: introduce "--[no-]stripspace" option,
2023-05-27) mentioned the new `--no-stripspace` in the documentation for
`-m` and `-F`, it created run-on sentences. It also used slightly
different language in the two sections for no apparent reason. Split the
sentences in two to improve readability, and while touching the two
sites, make them more similar.
Signed-off-by: Martin Ågren <martin.agren@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
"git bisect visualize" stopped running "gitk" on Git for Windows
when the command was reimplemented in C around Git 2.34 timeframe.
This has been corrected.
* ma/locate-in-path-for-windows:
docs: update when `git bisect visualize` uses `gitk`
compat/mingw: implement a native locate_in_PATH()
run-command: conditionally define locate_in_PATH()
Tone down the warning on SHA-256 repositories being an experimental
curiosity. We do not have support for them to interoperate with
traditional SHA-1 repositories, but at this point, we do not plan
to make breaking changes to SHA-256 repositories and there is no
longer need for such a strongly phrased warning.
* am/doc-sha256:
doc: sha256 is no longer experimental
Clarify how to pick a starting point for a new topic in the
SubmittingPatches document.
* la/doc-choose-starting-point-fixup:
SubmittingPatches: use of older maintenance tracks is an exception
SubmittingPatches: explain why 'next' and above are inappropriate base
SubmittingPatches: choice of base for fixing an older maintenance track
Rewrite the description of giving a custom command to the
submodule.<name>.update configuration variable.
* pv/doc-submodule-update-settings:
doc: highlight that .gitmodules does not support !command
Clarify how to choose the starting point for a new topic in
developer guidance document.
* la/doc-choose-starting-point:
SubmittingPatches: simplify guidance for choosing a starting point
SubmittingPatches: emphasize need to communicate non-default starting points
SubmittingPatches: de-emphasize branches as starting points
SubmittingPatches: discuss subsystems separately from git.git
SubmittingPatches: reword awkward phrasing
This check has involved more environment variables than just `DISPLAY` since
508e84a790 (bisect view: check for MinGW32 and MacOSX in addition to X11,
2008-02-14), so let's update the documentation accordingly.
Signed-off-by: Matthias Aßhauer <mha1993@live.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
"git branch --list --format=<format>" and friends are taught
a new "%(describe)" placeholder.
* ks/ref-filter-describe:
ref-filter: add new "describe" atom
ref-filter: add multiple-option parsing functions
Remove scary wording that basically stops people using sha256
repositories not because of interoperability issues with sha1
repositories, but from fear that their work will suddenly become
incompatible in some future version of git.
We should be clear that currently sha256 repositories will not work with
sha1 repositories but stop the scary words.
Signed-off-by: Adam Majer <adamm@zombino.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Finding mistakes in and improving your own patches is a good idea,
but doing so too quickly is being inconsiderate to reviewers who
have just seen the initial iteration and taking their time to review
it. Encourage new developers to perform such a self review before
they send out their patches, not after. After sending a patch that
they immediately found mistakes in, they are welcome to comment on
them, mentioning what and how they plan to improve them in an
updated version, before sending out their updates.
Helped-by: Torsten Bögershausen <tboegi@web.de>
Helped-by: Linus Arver <linusa@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
While we could technically fix each and every bug on top of the
commit that introduced it, it is not necessarily practical. For
trivial and low-value bugfixes, it often is simpler and sufficient
to just fix it in the current maintenance track, leaving the bug
unfixed in the older maintenance tracks.
Demote the "use older maintenance track to fix old bugs" as a side
note, and explain that the choice is used only in exceptional cases.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The 'next' branch is primarily meant to be a testing ground to make
sure that topics that are reasonably well done work well together.
Building a new work on it would mean everything that was already in
'next' must have graduated to 'master' before the new work can also
be merged to 'master', and that is why we do not encourage basing
new work on 'next'.
Helped-by: Linus Arver <linusa@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When working on an high-value bugfix that must be given to ancient
maintenance tracks, a starting point that is older than `maint` may
have to be chosen.
Helped-by: Linus Arver <linusa@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Bugfix for fc01a5d2 (submodule update documentation: don't repeat
ourselves, 2016-12-27).
The `custom command` and `none` options are described as sharing the
same limitations, but one is allowed in .gitmodules and the other is
not.
Rewrite the description for custom commands to be more precise,
and make it easier for readers to notice that custom commands cannot
be used in the .gitmodules file.
Signed-off-by: Petar Vutov <pvutov@imap.cc>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Duplicate the logic of %(describe) and friends from pretty to
ref-filter. In the future, this change helps in unifying both the
formats as ref-filter will be able to do everything that pretty is doing
and we can have a single interface.
The new atom "describe" and its friends are equivalent to the existing
pretty formats with the same name.
Helped-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Mentored-by: Christian Couder <christian.couder@gmail.com>
Mentored-by: Hariom Verma <hariom18599@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kousik Sanagavarapu <five231003@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Enumerating refs in the packed-refs file, while excluding refs that
match certain patterns, has been optimized.
* tb/refs-exclusion-and-packed-refs:
ls-refs.c: avoid enumerating hidden refs where possible
upload-pack.c: avoid enumerating hidden refs where possible
builtin/receive-pack.c: avoid enumerating hidden references
refs.h: implement `hidden_refs_to_excludes()`
refs.h: let `for_each_namespaced_ref()` take excluded patterns
revision.h: store hidden refs in a `strvec`
refs/packed-backend.c: add trace2 counters for jump list
refs/packed-backend.c: implement jump lists to avoid excluded pattern(s)
refs/packed-backend.c: refactor `find_reference_location()`
refs: plumb `exclude_patterns` argument throughout
builtin/for-each-ref.c: add `--exclude` option
ref-filter.c: parameterize match functions over patterns
ref-filter: add `ref_filter_clear()`
ref-filter: clear reachable list pointers after freeing
ref-filter.h: provide `REF_FILTER_INIT`
refs.c: rename `ref_filter`
In the "PATTERN FORMAT" section, all the other pattern elements are
shown as `monospace` literals inside "double quoted" strings. Do
the same for the explanation of a slash to make it consistent.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Among four examples, only this one used "double quoted" sample
patterns, but all others marked up the patterns in `monospace`.
Signed-off-by: Johan Ruokangas <johan@latehours.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
