Commit Graph

6 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Patrick Steinhardt
6c6c2cf4f9 cbtree: allow using arbitrary wrapper structures for nodes
The cbtree subsystem allows the user to store arbitrary data in a
prefix-free set of strings. This is used by us to store object IDs in a
way that we can easily iterate through them in lexicograph order, and so
that we can easily perform lookups with shortened object IDs.

In its current form, it is not easily possible to store arbitrary data
with the tree nodes. There are a couple of approaches such a caller
could try to use, but none of them really work:

  - One may embed the `struct cb_node` in a custom structure. This does
    not work though as `struct cb_node` contains a flex array, and
    embedding such a struct in another struct is forbidden.

  - One may use a `union` over `struct cb_node` and ones own data type,
    which _is_ allowed even if the struct contains a flex array. This
    does not work though, as the compiler may align members of the
    struct so that the node key would not immediately start where the
    flex array starts.

  - One may allocate `struct cb_node` such that it has room for both its
    key and the custom data. This has the downside though that if the
    custom data is itself a pointer to allocated memory, then the leak
    checker will not consider the pointer to be alive anymore.

Refactor the cbtree to drop the flex array and instead take in an
explicit offset for where to find the key, which allows the caller to
embed `struct cb_node` is a wrapper struct.

Note that this change has the downside that we now have a bit of padding
in our structure, which grows the size from 60 to 64 bytes on a 64 bit
system. On the other hand though, it allows us to get rid of the memory
copies that we previously had to do to ensure proper alignment. This
seems like a reasonable tradeoff.

Signed-off-by: Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2026-04-09 11:17:08 -07:00
Patrick Steinhardt
fe446b01ae oidtree: extend iteration to allow for arbitrary return codes
The interface `cb_each()` iterates through a crit-bit tree and calls a
specific callback function for each of the contained items. The callback
function is expected to return either:

  - `CB_CONTINUE` in case iteration shall continue.

  - `CB_BREAK` to abort iteration.

This is needlessly restrictive though, as callers may want to return
arbitrary values and have them be bubbled up to the `cb_each()` call
site. In fact, this is a rather common pattern we have: whenever such a
callback function returns a non-zero error code, we abort iteration and
bubble up the code as-is.

Refactor both the crit-bit tree and oidtree subsystems to behave
accordingly.

Signed-off-by: Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2026-03-20 13:16:22 -07:00
Andrew Kreimer
0627c58e7a cbtree: fix a typo
Fix a typo in comments.

Signed-off-by: Andrew Kreimer <algonell@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2024-09-16 10:46:00 -07:00
Elijah Newren
8bff5ca030 treewide: ensure one of the appropriate headers is sourced first
We had several C files ignoring the rule to include one of the
appropriate headers first; fix that.

While at it, the rule in Documentation/CodingGuidelines about which
header to include has also fallen out of sync, so update the wording to
mention other allowed headers.

Unfortunately, C files in reftable/ don't actually follow the previous
or updated rule.  If you follow the #include chain in its C files,
reftable/system.h _tends_ to be first (i.e. record.c first includes
record.h, which first includes basics.h, which first includees
system.h), but not always (e.g. publicbasics.c includes another header
first that does not include system.h).  However, I'm going to punt on
making actual changes to the C files in reftable/ since I do not want to
risk bringing it out-of-sync with any version being used externally.

Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2023-02-23 17:25:28 -08:00
Eric Wong
2c68f577fc cbtree: remove broken and unused cb_unlink
cb_unlink is broken once a node is no longer self-referential
due to subsequent insertions.  This is a consequence of an
intrusive implementation and I'm not sure if it's easily fixable
while retaining our cache-friendly intrusive property (I've
tried for several hours in another project).

In any case, we're not using cb_unlink anywhere in our codebase,
just get rid of it to avoid misleading future readers.

Signed-off-by: Eric Wong <e@80x24.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2021-12-07 15:18:35 -08:00
Eric Wong
92d8ed8ac1 oidtree: a crit-bit tree for odb_loose_cache
This saves 8K per `struct object_directory', meaning it saves
around 800MB in my case involving 100K alternates (half or more
of those alternates are unlikely to hold loose objects).

This is implemented in two parts: a generic, allocation-free
`cbtree' and the `oidtree' wrapper on top of it.  The latter
provides allocation using alloc_state as a memory pool to
improve locality and reduce free(3) overhead.

Unlike oid-array, the crit-bit tree does not require sorting.
Performance is bound by the key length, for oidtree that is
fixed at sizeof(struct object_id).  There's no need to have
256 oidtrees to mitigate the O(n log n) overhead like we did
with oid-array.

Being a prefix trie, it is natively suited for expanding short
object IDs via prefix-limited iteration in
`find_short_object_filename'.

On my busy workstation, p4205 performance seems to be roughly
unchanged (+/-8%).  Startup with 100K total alternates with no
loose objects seems around 10-20% faster on a hot cache.
(800MB in memory savings means more memory for the kernel FS
cache).

The generic cbtree implementation does impose some extra
overhead for oidtree in that it uses memcmp(3) on
"struct object_id" so it wastes cycles comparing 12 extra bytes
on SHA-1 repositories.  I've not yet explored reducing this
overhead, but I expect there are many places in our code base
where we'd want to investigate this.

More information on crit-bit trees: https://cr.yp.to/critbit.html

Signed-off-by: Eric Wong <e@80x24.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2021-07-07 21:28:04 -07:00