Rather than using private IFTTT Applets that send mails to this
maintainer whenever a new version of a Git for Windows component was
released, let's use the power of GitHub workflows to make this process
publicly visible.
This workflow monitors the Atom/RSS feeds, and opens a ticket whenever a
new version was released.
Note: Bash sometimes releases multiple patched versions within a few
minutes of each other (i.e. 5.1p1 through 5.1p4, 5.0p15 and 5.0p16). The
MSYS2 runtime also has a similar system. We can address those patches as
a group, so we shouldn't get multiple issues about them.
Note further: We're not acting on newlib releases, OpenSSL alphas, Perl
release candidates or non-stable Perl releases. There's no need to open
issues about them.
Co-authored-by: Matthias Aßhauer <mha1993@live.de>
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Git for Windows accepts pull requests; Core Git does not. Therefore we
need to adjust the template (because it only matches core Git's
project management style, not ours).
Also: direct Git for Windows enhancements to their contributions page,
space out the text for easy reading, and clarify that the mailing list
is plain text, not HTML.
Signed-off-by: Philip Oakley <philipoakley@iee.org>
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
We now have a GitHub Action to download and cache Azure Pipelines
artifacts (such as the `vcpkg` artifacts), hiding gnarly internals, and
also providing some robustness against network glitches. Let's use it.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
As mentioned in the Makefile and CMakeLists.txt: "When cross-compiling, define HOST_CPU as the canonical name of the CPU on which the built Git will run (for instance "x86_64")"
This commit sets the HOST_CPU variable since Git for Windows arm64 is cross-compiled from an amd64 host.
Signed-off-by: Dennis Ameling <dennis@dennisameling.com>
This is needed for the next change, where we add HOST_CPU support to the
CMake definition.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
This simplifies the workflow dramatically.
Note that we have to reinstate that `/usr/bin/git` hack (a shell script
that simply redirects to `/mingw64/bin/git.exe`) in the `pkg` job
manually, since we no longer cache the `build-installers` artifact
_after_ installing that hack in `bundle-artifacts`.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Git's regular Makefile mentions that HOST_CPU should be defined when cross-compiling Git: 37796bca76/Makefile (L438-L439)
This is then used to set the GIT_HOST_CPU variable when compiling Git: 37796bca76/Makefile (L1337-L1341)
Then, when the user runs `git version --build-options`, it returns that value: 37796bca76/help.c (L658)
This commit adds the same functionality to the CMake configuration. Users can now set -DHOST_CPU= to set the target architecture.
Signed-off-by: Dennis Ameling <dennis@dennisameling.com>
Since there is no GCM Core for ARM64, let's just install a simple shell
script that calls the i686 version for now.
Signed-off-by: Dennis Ameling <dennis@dennisameling.com>
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
We cannot just check out the current revision: The user might have
overridden `REPOSITORY` and `REF` via the workflow dispatch.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
This workflow needs to be triggered manually, and it offers to specify a
couple input parameters. But none of them are required. Make that
explicit.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
When building the Pacman packages, we technically do not need the full
`build-installers` artifact (which is substantially larger than the
`makepkg-git` artifact). However, the former is already cached and
includes the latter's files. And it is _so_ much faster to download the
cached (larger) artifact than to download the smaller `makepkg-git`
artifact from Azure Pipelines.
Suggested-by: Dennis Ameling <dennis@dennisameling.com>
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
When the user asked for `installer-x86_64`, there is no point in
building `pkg-i686` or `build-arm64`; Let's be a bit smarter about this.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
It is a bit expensive to fetch just the git-sdk-64-build-installers
artifact from Azure Pipelines and then to unpack it (takes some 6-7
minutes, typically). Let's cache it if possible.
Signed-off-by: Dennis Ameling <dennis@dennisameling.com>
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
The workflow allows users to restrict what parts are being built. For
example, `installer-i686` will build only the 32-bit installer, not the
64-bit one nor any MinGit flavor.
However, this logic was not extended when introducing support for ARM64:
Instead, we _also_ built the ARM64 installer when the user asked for
`installer-i686`.
Let's allow restricting to `installer-i686` _without_ building the ARM64
version, and allow restricting to `installer-arm64` _just_ for the ARM64
version.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
GitHub workflows run in agents that have quite a bit of stuff in their
`PATH`, e.g. Chocolatey. To make sure that those bits and pieces are
_not_ used to build the artifacts, let's whittle down the `PATH` to
contain the bare minimum.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
The archive and MinGit variants really get bloated because they handle
those as straight copies instead of hard-links.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
With this change, users can specify the branch and repository from which
they want to build Git for Windows' artifacts, via the `ref` and
`repository` inputs.
This allows e.g. building `refs/heads/seen` of `git/git` (even if no
`git-artifacts` workflow is configured in that repository), or
`refs/pull/<number>/merge` for a given Pull Request.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
There are no Windows/ARM64 agents in GitHub Actions yet, therefore we
just skip adjusting the `vs-test` job for now.
Signed-off-by: Dennis Ameling <dennis@dennisameling.com>
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Users can now specify which artifacts they want to build, via the
`build_only` input, which is a space-separated list of artifacts. For
example, `installer portable` will build `installer-x86_64`,
`installer-i686`, `portable-x86_64` and `portable-i686`, and an empty or
unset value will build all artifacts.
Please note that the `mingw-w64-git` packages are built always, as it
would be tricky to figure out when they need to be built (for example,
`build_only=portable-x86_64` technically does not need `pkg-i686` to be
built, while `build_only=portable` does).
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
The two NuGet artifact exists only in the 64-bit version. So let's make
them in a separate, non-matrix job.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
When the secrets `CODESIGN_P12` and `CODESIGN_PASS` are set, the
workflow will now code-sign the `.exe` files contained in the package.
This should help with a few anti-malware programs, at least when the
certificate saw some action and gained trust.
Note: `CODESIGN_P12` needs to be generated via
cat <certificate>.p12 | base64 | tr '\n' %
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
This expects the `GPGKEY` and `PRIVGPGKEY` secrets to be set in the
respective GitHub repository.
The `GPGKEY` value should be of the form
<short-key> --passphrase <pass> --yes --batch --no-tty --pinentry-mode loopback --digest-algo SHA256
and the `PRIVGPGKEY` should be generated via
gpg --export-secret-keys | base64 | tr '\n' %
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Git for Windows uses MSYS2 as base system, and therefore the Git
binaries are bundled as Pacman package.
This workflow allows building the 64-bit version of this package (which
is called `mingw-w64-x86_64-git`).
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
The PATH used in CI job may be too wide and let incompatible dlls
to be grabbed, which can cause the build&test to fail. Tighten it.
* js/windows-ci-path-fix:
ci(windows): ensure that we do not pick up random executables
The "--preserve-merges" option of "git rebase" has been removed.
* js/retire-preserve-merges:
sequencer: restrict scope of a formerly public function
rebase: remove a no-longer-used function
rebase: stop mentioning the -p option in comments
rebase: remove obsolete code comment
rebase: drop the internal `rebase--interactive` command
git-svn: drop support for `--preserve-merges`
rebase: drop support for `--preserve-merges`
pull: remove support for `--rebase=preserve`
tests: stop testing `git rebase --preserve-merges`
remote: warn about unhandled branch.<name>.rebase values
t5520: do not use `pull.rebase=preserve`
On the Windows build agents, a lot of programs are installed, and added
to the PATH automatically.
One such program is Git for Windows, and due to the way it is set up,
unfortunately its copy of `gpg.exe` is also reachable via the PATH.
This usually does not pose any problems. To the contrary, it even allows
us to test the GPG parts of Git's test suite even if `gpg.exe` is not
delivered as part of `git-sdk-64-minimal`, the minimal subset of Git for
Windows' SDK that we use in the CI builds to compile Git.
However, every once in a while we build a new MSYS2 runtime, which means
that there is a mismatch between the copy in `git-sdk-64-minimal` and
the copy in C:\Program Files\Git\usr\bin. When that happens we hit the
dreaded problem where only one `msys-2.0.dll` is expected to be in the
PATH, and things start to fail.
Let's avoid all of this by restricting the PATH to the minimal set. This
is actually done by `git-sdk-64-minimal`'s `/etc/profile`, and we just
have to source this file manually (one would expect that it is sourced
automatically, but the Bash steps in Azure Pipelines/GitHub workflows
are explicitly run using `--noprofile`, hence the need for doing this
explicitly).
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Use upload-artifacts v1 (instead of v2) for 32-bit linux, as the
new version has a blocker bug for that architecture.
* cb/ci-use-upload-artifacts-v1:
ci: use upload-artifacts v1 for dockerized jobs
CI learns to run the leak sanitizer builds.
* ab/sanitize-leak-ci:
tests: add a test mode for SANITIZE=leak, run it in CI
Makefile: add SANITIZE=leak flag to GIT-BUILD-OPTIONS
While git can be compiled with SANITIZE=leak, we have not run
regression tests under that mode. Memory leaks have only been fixed as
one-offs without structured regression testing.
This change adds CI testing for it. We'll now build and small set of
whitelisted t00*.sh tests under Linux with a new job called
"linux-leaks".
The CI target uses a new GIT_TEST_PASSING_SANITIZE_LEAK=true test
mode. When running in that mode, we'll assert that we were compiled
with SANITIZE=leak. We'll then skip all tests, except those that we've
opted-in by setting "TEST_PASSES_SANITIZE_LEAK=true".
A test setting "TEST_PASSES_SANITIZE_LEAK=true" setting can in turn
make use of the "SANITIZE_LEAK" prerequisite, should they wish to
selectively skip tests even under
"GIT_TEST_PASSING_SANITIZE_LEAK=true". In the preceding commit we
started doing this in "t0004-unwritable.sh" under SANITIZE=leak, now
it'll combine nicely with "GIT_TEST_PASSING_SANITIZE_LEAK=true".
This is how tests that don't set "TEST_PASSES_SANITIZE_LEAK=true" will
be skipped under GIT_TEST_PASSING_SANITIZE_LEAK=true:
$ GIT_TEST_PASSING_SANITIZE_LEAK=true ./t0001-init.sh
1..0 # SKIP skip all tests in t0001 under SANITIZE=leak, TEST_PASSES_SANITIZE_LEAK not set
The intent is to add more TEST_PASSES_SANITIZE_LEAK=true annotations
as follow-up change, but let's start small to begin with.
In ci/run-build-and-tests.sh we make use of the default "*" case to
run "make test" without any GIT_TEST_* modes. SANITIZE=leak is known
to fail in combination with GIT_TEST_SPLIT_INDEX=true in
t0016-oidmap.sh, and we're likely to have other such failures in
various GIT_TEST_* modes. Let's focus on getting the base tests
passing, we can expand coverage to GIT_TEST_* modes later.
It would also be possible to implement a more lightweight version of
this by only relying on setting "LSAN_OPTIONS". See
<YS9OT/pn5rRK9cGB@coredump.intra.peff.net>[1] and
<YS9ZIDpANfsh7N+S@coredump.intra.peff.net>[2] for a discussion of
that. I've opted for this approach of adding a GIT_TEST_* mode instead
because it's consistent with how we handle other special test modes.
Being able to add a "!SANITIZE_LEAK" prerequisite and calling
"test_done" early if it isn't satisfied also means that we can more
incrementally add regression tests without being forced to fix
widespread and hard-to-fix leaks at the same time.
We have tests that do simple checking of some tool we're interested
in, but later on in the script might be stressing trace2, or common
sources of leaks like "git log" in combination with the tool (e.g. the
commit-graph tests). To be clear having a prerequisite could also be
accomplished by using "LSAN_OPTIONS" directly.
On the topic of "LSAN_OPTIONS": It would be nice to have a mode to
aggregate all failures in our various scripts, see [2] for a start at
doing that which sets "log_path" in "LSAN_OPTIONS". I've punted on
that for now, it can be added later.
As of writing this we've got major regressions between master..seen,
i.e. the t000*.sh tests and more fixed since 31f9acf9ce (Merge branch
'ah/plugleaks', 2021-08-04) have regressed recently.
See the discussion at <87czsv2idy.fsf@evledraar.gmail.com>[3] about
the lack of this sort of test mode, and 0e5bba53af (add UNLEAK
annotation for reducing leak false positives, 2017-09-08) for the
initial addition of SANITIZE=leak.
See also 09595ab381 (Merge branch 'jk/leak-checkers', 2017-09-19),
7782066f67 (Merge branch 'jk/apache-lsan', 2019-05-19) and the recent
936e58851a (Merge branch 'ah/plugleaks', 2021-05-07) for some of the
past history of "one-off" SANITIZE=leak (and more) fixes.
As noted in [5] we can't support this on OSX yet until Clang 14 is
released, at that point we'll probably want to resurrect that
"osx-leaks" job.
1. https://github.com/google/sanitizers/wiki/AddressSanitizerLeakSanitizer
2. https://lore.kernel.org/git/YS9OT%2Fpn5rRK9cGB@coredump.intra.peff.net/
3. https://lore.kernel.org/git/87czsv2idy.fsf@evledraar.gmail.com/
4. https://lore.kernel.org/git/YS9ZIDpANfsh7N+S@coredump.intra.peff.net/
5. https://lore.kernel.org/git/20210916035603.76369-1-carenas@gmail.com/
Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belón <carenas@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The repository of git-l10n is a fork of "git/git" on GitHub, and uses
GitHub pull request for code review. A helper program "git-po-helper"
can be used to check typos in ".po" files, validate syntax, and check
commit messages. It would be convenient to integrate this helper program
to CI and add comments in pull request.
The new github-action workflow will be enabled for l10n related
operations, such as:
* Operations on a repository named as "git-po", such as a repository
forked from "git-l10n/git-po".
* Push to a branch that contains "l10n" in the name.
* Pull request from a remote branch which has "l10n" in the name, such
as: "l10n/fix-fuzzy-translations".
The new l10n workflow listens to two types of github events:
on: [push, pull_request_target]
The reason we use "pull_request_target" instead of "pull_request" is
that pull requests from forks receive a read-only GITHUB_TOKEN and
workflows cannot write comments back to pull requests for security
reasons. GitHub provides a "pull_request_target" event to resolve
security risks by checking out the base commit from the target
repository, and provide write permissions for the workflow.
By default, administrators can set strict permissions for workflows. The
following code is used to modify the permissions for the GITHUB_TOKEN
and grant write permission in order to create comments in pull-requests.
permissions:
pull-requests: write
This workflow will scan commits one by one. If a commit does not look
like a l10n commit (no file in "po/" has been changed), the scan process
will stop immediately. For a "push" event, no error will be reported
because it is normal to push non-l10n commits merged from upstream. But
for the "pull_request_target" event, errors will be reported. For this
reason, additional option is provided for "git-po-helper".
git-po-helper check-commits \
--github-action-event="${{ github.event_name }}" -- \
<base>..<head>
The output messages of "git-po-helper" contain color codes not only for
console, but also for logfile. This is because "git-po-helper" uses a
package named "logrus" for logging, and I use an additional option
"ForceColor" to initialize "logrus" to print messages in a user-friendly
format in logfile output. These color codes help produce beautiful
output for the log of workflow, but they must be stripped off when
creating comments for pull requests. E.g.:
perl -pe 's/\e\[[0-9;]*m//g' git-po-helper.out
"git-po-helper" may generate two kinds of suggestions, errors and
warnings. All the errors and warnings will be reported in the log of the
l10n workflow. However, warnings in the log of the workflow for a
successfully running "git-po-helper" can easily be ignored by users.
For the "pull_request_target" event, this issue is resolved by creating
an additional comment in the pull request. A l10n contributor should try
to fix all the errors, and should pay attention to the warnings.
Helped-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Jiang Xin <zhiyou.jx@alibaba-inc.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
This backend has been deprecated in favor of `git rebase
--rebase-merges`.
In preparation for dropping it, let's remove all the regression tests
that would need it.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Reviewed-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
e9f79acb28 (ci: upgrade to using actions/{up,down}load-artifacts v2,
2021-06-23) changed all calls to that action from v1 to v2, but there
is still an open bug[1] that affects all nodejs actions and prevents
its use in 32-bit linux (as used by the Linux32 container)
move all dockerized jobs to use v1 that was built in C# and therefore
doesn't have this problem, which will otherwise manifest with confusing
messages like:
/usr/bin/docker exec 0285adacc4536b7cd962079c46f85fa05a71e66d7905b5e4b9b1a0e8b305722a sh -c "cat /etc/*release | grep ^ID"
OCI runtime exec failed: exec failed: container_linux.go:380: starting container process caused: no such file or directory: unknown
[1] https://github.com/actions/runner/issues/1011
Signed-off-by: Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belón <carenas@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
similar to the recently added sparse task, it is nice to know as early
as possible.
add a dockerized build using fedora (that usually has the latest gcc)
to be ahead of the curve and avoid older ISO C issues at the same time.
Signed-off-by: Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belón <carenas@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
CI update.
* js/ci-check-whitespace-updates:
ci(check-whitespace): restrict to the intended commits
ci(check-whitespace): stop requiring a read/write token
The CI gained a new job to run "make sparse" check.
* js/ci-make-sparse:
ci/install-dependencies: handle "sparse" job package installs
ci: run "apt-get update" before "apt-get install"
ci: run `make sparse` as part of the GitHub workflow
This just matches the style/location of the package installation for
other jobs. There should be no functional change.
I did flip the order of the options and command-name ("-y update"
instead of "update -y") for consistency with other lines in the same
file.
Note also that we have to reorder the dependency install with the
"checkout" action, so that we actually have the "ci" scripts available.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Acked-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The "sparse" workflow runs "apt-get install" to pick up a few necessary
packages. But it needs to run "apt-get update" first, or it risks trying
to download an old package version that no longer exists. And in fact
this happens now, with output like:
2021-07-26T17:40:51.2551880Z E: Failed to fetch http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/pool/main/c/curl/libcurl4-openssl-dev_7.68.0-1ubuntu2.5_amd64.deb 404 Not Found [IP: 52.147.219.192 80]
2021-07-26T17:40:51.2554304Z E: Unable to fetch some archives, maybe run apt-get update or try with --fix-missing?
Our other ci jobs don't suffer from this; they rely on scripts in ci/,
and ci/install-dependencies does the appropriate "apt-get update".
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Acked-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
