From f0955e22b3d70ddb16285d17bc21948a1083bc0d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Johannes Schindelin Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2019 14:30:15 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] msvc: avoid using minus operator on unsigned types MSVC complains about this with `-Wall`, which can be taken as a sign that this is indeed a real bug. The symptom is: C4146: unary minus operator applied to unsigned type, result still unsigned Let's avoid this warning in the minimal way, e.g. writing `-1 - ` instead of `- - 1`. Note that the change in the `estimate_cache_size()` function is needed because MSVC considers the "return type" of the `sizeof()` operator to be `size_t`, i.e. unsigned, and therefore it cannot be negated using the unary minus operator. Even worse, that arithmetic is doing extra work, in vain. We want to calculate the entry extra cache size as the difference between the size of the `cache_entry` structure minus the size of the `ondisk_cache_entry` structure, padded to the appropriate alignment boundary. To that end, we start by assigning that difference to the `per_entry` variable, and then abuse the `len` parameter of the `align_padding_size()` macro to take the negative size of the ondisk entry size. Essentially, we try to avoid passing the already calculated difference to that macro by passing the operands of that difference instead, when the macro expects operands of an addition: #define align_padding_size(size, len) \ ((size + (len) + 8) & ~7) - (size + len) Currently, we pass A and -B to that macro instead of passing A - B and 0, where A - B is already stored in the `per_entry` variable, ready to be used. This is neither necessary, nor intuitive. Let's fix this, and have code that is both easier to read and that also does not trigger MSVC's warning. Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin --- read-cache.c | 4 ++-- sha1-lookup.c | 2 +- 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/read-cache.c b/read-cache.c index 52ffa8a313..a50f1047d3 100644 --- a/read-cache.c +++ b/read-cache.c @@ -1276,7 +1276,7 @@ static int add_index_entry_with_check(struct index_state *istate, struct cache_e */ if (istate->cache_nr > 0 && strcmp(ce->name, istate->cache[istate->cache_nr - 1]->name) > 0) - pos = -istate->cache_nr - 1; + pos = -1 - istate->cache_nr; else pos = index_name_stage_pos(istate, ce->name, ce_namelen(ce), ce_stage(ce)); @@ -1894,7 +1894,7 @@ static size_t estimate_cache_size(size_t ondisk_size, unsigned int entries) /* * Account for potential alignment differences. */ - per_entry += align_padding_size(sizeof(struct cache_entry), -sizeof(struct ondisk_cache_entry)); + per_entry += align_padding_size(per_entry, 0); return ondisk_size + entries * per_entry; } diff --git a/sha1-lookup.c b/sha1-lookup.c index 796ab68da8..c819687730 100644 --- a/sha1-lookup.c +++ b/sha1-lookup.c @@ -97,7 +97,7 @@ int sha1_pos(const unsigned char *sha1, void *table, size_t nr, lo = mi + 1; mi = lo + (hi - lo) / 2; } while (lo < hi); - return -lo-1; + return -1 - lo; } int bsearch_hash(const unsigned char *sha1, const uint32_t *fanout_nbo,