mirror of
https://github.com/epstein-docs/epstein-docs.github.io.git
synced 2025-12-10 04:01:31 -06:00
81 lines
3.7 KiB
JSON
81 lines
3.7 KiB
JSON
{
|
|
"document_metadata": {
|
|
"page_number": "43",
|
|
"document_number": "613",
|
|
"date": "02/24/22",
|
|
"document_type": "court document",
|
|
"has_handwriting": false,
|
|
"has_stamps": false
|
|
},
|
|
"full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 613 Filed 02/24/22 Page 43 of 66\npresented by the parties' and, therefore, are indicative of a lack of impartiality because a fundamental instruction in every federal case is that a juror must render a verdict 'solely on the evidence presented at trial.'\" Sampson, 820 F. Supp. 2d at 165 (quoting Thomas, 116 F.3d at 617 & n.10 (citing The Federal Judicial Center's Benchbook for U.S. District Court Judges)). Therefore, dishonest answers are a factor that can contribute to a finding of implied bias. See Skaggs, 164 F.3d at 517.\nThe false answers Ms. Maxwell knows about so far, by themselves, provide a basis for a new trial because, if they had been exposed during voir dire, this Court would have treated Juror No. 50 just as it treated Juror No. [REDACTED]. [REDACTED]\n[REDACTED]\n[REDACTED]. But he also did much more, falsely denying that he had been a victim of sexual assault or sexual abuse. [REDACTED]\n[REDACTED]\nThis Court should treat Juror No. 50 just as it treated Juror No. [REDACTED], and on that ground order a new trial. [REDACTED].\n36\nDOJ-OGR-00009044",
|
|
"text_blocks": [
|
|
{
|
|
"type": "printed",
|
|
"content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 613 Filed 02/24/22 Page 43 of 66",
|
|
"position": "header"
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"type": "printed",
|
|
"content": "presented by the parties' and, therefore, are indicative of a lack of impartiality because a fundamental instruction in every federal case is that a juror must render a verdict 'solely on the evidence presented at trial.'\" Sampson, 820 F. Supp. 2d at 165 (quoting Thomas, 116 F.3d at 617 & n.10 (citing The Federal Judicial Center's Benchbook for U.S. District Court Judges)). Therefore, dishonest answers are a factor that can contribute to a finding of implied bias. See Skaggs, 164 F.3d at 517.",
|
|
"position": "top"
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"type": "printed",
|
|
"content": "The false answers Ms. Maxwell knows about so far, by themselves, provide a basis for a new trial because, if they had been exposed during voir dire, this Court would have treated Juror No. 50 just as it treated Juror No. [REDACTED]. [REDACTED]",
|
|
"position": "middle"
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"type": "printed",
|
|
"content": "[REDACTED]",
|
|
"position": "middle"
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"type": "printed",
|
|
"content": "[REDACTED]. But he also did much more, falsely denying that he had been a victim of sexual assault or sexual abuse. [REDACTED]",
|
|
"position": "middle"
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"type": "printed",
|
|
"content": "[REDACTED]",
|
|
"position": "middle"
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"type": "printed",
|
|
"content": "This Court should treat Juror No. 50 just as it treated Juror No. [REDACTED], and on that ground order a new trial. [REDACTED].",
|
|
"position": "bottom"
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"type": "printed",
|
|
"content": "36",
|
|
"position": "footer"
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"type": "printed",
|
|
"content": "DOJ-OGR-00009044",
|
|
"position": "footer"
|
|
}
|
|
],
|
|
"entities": {
|
|
"people": [
|
|
"Ms. Maxwell",
|
|
"Sampson",
|
|
"Thomas",
|
|
"Skaggs"
|
|
],
|
|
"organizations": [
|
|
"The Federal Judicial Center",
|
|
"U.S. District Court",
|
|
"DOJ"
|
|
],
|
|
"locations": [],
|
|
"dates": [
|
|
"02/24/22"
|
|
],
|
|
"reference_numbers": [
|
|
"1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
|
|
"Document 613",
|
|
"DOJ-OGR-00009044"
|
|
]
|
|
},
|
|
"additional_notes": "The document contains redactions, likely due to sensitive information. The text is mostly printed, with no visible handwriting or stamps."
|
|
} |