mirror of
https://github.com/epstein-docs/epstein-docs.github.io.git
synced 2025-12-09 19:46:33 -06:00
73 lines
4.7 KiB
JSON
73 lines
4.7 KiB
JSON
{
|
|
"document_metadata": {
|
|
"page_number": "8",
|
|
"document_number": "613",
|
|
"date": "02/24/22",
|
|
"document_type": "court document",
|
|
"has_handwriting": false,
|
|
"has_stamps": false
|
|
},
|
|
"full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 613 Filed 02/24/22 Page 8 of 66\n\nGhislaine Maxwell moves under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 33 for a new trial.\n\nIntroduction\n\nJuror No. 50 says he was a victim of sexual assault and sexual abuse as a child.\nWhen he told his fellow jurors of this abuse during deliberations, \"[t]he room went dead silent.\" Juror No. 50 has told several media outlets that he drew on his personal experience as a victim to persuade fellow jurors to believe Ms. Maxwell's accusers, despite the inconsistencies and holes in their stories, even though they delayed disclosing their allegations against Ms. Maxwell, and in spite of expert testimony from Dr. Elizabeth Loftus casting significant doubt on the reliability of their claimed memories.\nThis was unfair and prejudicial to Ms. Maxwell, and it all would have been avoided if Juror No. 50 had told the truth during voir dire. But he didn't. To the contrary, Juror No. 50 repeatedly and unequivocally denied having been the victim of sexual abuse, and he denied having any experience that would affect his ability to serve fairly and impartially as a juror. Had Juror No. 50 told the truth, he would have been challenged, and excluded, for cause.\nThe Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution guarantees trial by jury. Fundamental to that guarantee is the promise that the jury will be comprised of twelve dispassionate individuals who will fairly and impartially decide, based on the evidence or lack of evidence and not on their personal predilections and biases, whether the government has proved its case beyond a reasonable doubt. Voir dire plays an essential\n\n1\n\nDOJ-OGR-00009009",
|
|
"text_blocks": [
|
|
{
|
|
"type": "printed",
|
|
"content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 613 Filed 02/24/22 Page 8 of 66",
|
|
"position": "header"
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"type": "printed",
|
|
"content": "Ghislaine Maxwell moves under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 33 for a new trial.",
|
|
"position": "top"
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"type": "printed",
|
|
"content": "Introduction",
|
|
"position": "top"
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"type": "printed",
|
|
"content": "Juror No. 50 says he was a victim of sexual assault and sexual abuse as a child. When he told his fellow jurors of this abuse during deliberations, \"[t]he room went dead silent.\" Juror No. 50 has told several media outlets that he drew on his personal experience as a victim to persuade fellow jurors to believe Ms. Maxwell's accusers, despite the inconsistencies and holes in their stories, even though they delayed disclosing their allegations against Ms. Maxwell, and in spite of expert testimony from Dr. Elizabeth Loftus casting significant doubt on the reliability of their claimed memories.",
|
|
"position": "middle"
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"type": "printed",
|
|
"content": "This was unfair and prejudicial to Ms. Maxwell, and it all would have been avoided if Juror No. 50 had told the truth during voir dire. But he didn't. To the contrary, Juror No. 50 repeatedly and unequivocally denied having been the victim of sexual abuse, and he denied having any experience that would affect his ability to serve fairly and impartially as a juror. Had Juror No. 50 told the truth, he would have been challenged, and excluded, for cause.",
|
|
"position": "middle"
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"type": "printed",
|
|
"content": "The Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution guarantees trial by jury. Fundamental to that guarantee is the promise that the jury will be comprised of twelve dispassionate individuals who will fairly and impartially decide, based on the evidence or lack of evidence and not on their personal predilections and biases, whether the government has proved its case beyond a reasonable doubt. Voir dire plays an essential",
|
|
"position": "middle"
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"type": "printed",
|
|
"content": "1",
|
|
"position": "bottom"
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"type": "printed",
|
|
"content": "DOJ-OGR-00009009",
|
|
"position": "footer"
|
|
}
|
|
],
|
|
"entities": {
|
|
"people": [
|
|
"Ghislaine Maxwell",
|
|
"Dr. Elizabeth Loftus",
|
|
"Juror No. 50"
|
|
],
|
|
"organizations": [],
|
|
"locations": [
|
|
"United States"
|
|
],
|
|
"dates": [
|
|
"02/24/22"
|
|
],
|
|
"reference_numbers": [
|
|
"1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
|
|
"613",
|
|
"DOJ-OGR-00009009"
|
|
]
|
|
},
|
|
"additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court filing related to the case of Ghislaine Maxwell. The text is well-formatted and clear, with no visible redactions or damage."
|
|
} |