mirror of
https://github.com/epstein-docs/epstein-docs.github.io.git
synced 2025-12-09 19:46:33 -06:00
61 lines
4.8 KiB
JSON
61 lines
4.8 KiB
JSON
{
|
|
"document_metadata": {
|
|
"page_number": "8",
|
|
"document_number": "609",
|
|
"date": "02/24/22",
|
|
"document_type": "court document",
|
|
"has_handwriting": false,
|
|
"has_stamps": false
|
|
},
|
|
"full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 609 Filed 02/24/22 Page 8 of 13\n\nF3d 76, 79 (2d Cir 1998) (Citing United States v. King, No. 94 Cr. 455, 1998 WL 50221 (S.D.N.Y. Feb. 5, 1998)).\n\nMoreover, conclusion of the trial on which the subject juror served does not remove a jurors' interest in privacy and protection from harassment. See United States v. Gurney, 558 F.2d 1202, 1210-12 (5th Cir.1977).\n\n2. Jurors may face criminal exposure for answers given on jury questionnaires\n\nTo complete the jury questionnaire, jurors must swear to truthfully answer the same under penalty of perjury; jurors are also placed under oath prior to answering questions in voir dire. See e.g., United States v Parse, 789 F3d 83, 88 (2d Cir 2015). A juror who knowingly submits false answers on the jury questionnaire and/or during voir dire testimony may expose himself or herself to arrest and prosecution, while jurors also maintain a fifth amendment right against self-incrimination. Id., at 91.\n\n3. Intervention in criminal trials may be granted to protect the rights of third parties\n\nIt is indisputable that precedent supports interventions by interested third parties in criminal matters, as such have been repeatedly granted in \"circumstances where 'a third party's constitutional or other federal rights are implicated by the resolution of a particular motion, request, or other issue during the course of a criminal case.'\" United States v. Collyard, case no. 12cr0058, 2013 WL 1346202 at *2 (D. Minn. April 3, 2013) (quoting United States v. Carmichael, 342 F. Supp. 2d 1070, 1072 (M.D. Ala. 2004)). For example, courts have allowed the press to intervene in criminal cases to assert the First Amendment rights of the Press. See In re Associated Press, 162 F.3d 503, 506- 507 (7th Cir. 1998). Courts have also allowed\n8\nDOJ-OGR-00008987",
|
|
"text_blocks": [
|
|
{
|
|
"type": "printed",
|
|
"content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 609 Filed 02/24/22 Page 8 of 13",
|
|
"position": "header"
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"type": "printed",
|
|
"content": "F3d 76, 79 (2d Cir 1998) (Citing United States v. King, No. 94 Cr. 455, 1998 WL 50221 (S.D.N.Y. Feb. 5, 1998)).\n\nMoreover, conclusion of the trial on which the subject juror served does not remove a jurors' interest in privacy and protection from harassment. See United States v. Gurney, 558 F.2d 1202, 1210-12 (5th Cir.1977).\n\n2. Jurors may face criminal exposure for answers given on jury questionnaires\n\nTo complete the jury questionnaire, jurors must swear to truthfully answer the same under penalty of perjury; jurors are also placed under oath prior to answering questions in voir dire. See e.g., United States v Parse, 789 F3d 83, 88 (2d Cir 2015). A juror who knowingly submits false answers on the jury questionnaire and/or during voir dire testimony may expose himself or herself to arrest and prosecution, while jurors also maintain a fifth amendment right against self-incrimination. Id., at 91.\n\n3. Intervention in criminal trials may be granted to protect the rights of third parties\n\nIt is indisputable that precedent supports interventions by interested third parties in criminal matters, as such have been repeatedly granted in \"circumstances where 'a third party's constitutional or other federal rights are implicated by the resolution of a particular motion, request, or other issue during the course of a criminal case.'\" United States v. Collyard, case no. 12cr0058, 2013 WL 1346202 at *2 (D. Minn. April 3, 2013) (quoting United States v. Carmichael, 342 F. Supp. 2d 1070, 1072 (M.D. Ala. 2004)). For example, courts have allowed the press to intervene in criminal cases to assert the First Amendment rights of the Press. See In re Associated Press, 162 F.3d 503, 506- 507 (7th Cir. 1998). Courts have also allowed",
|
|
"position": "main content"
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"type": "printed",
|
|
"content": "8",
|
|
"position": "footer"
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"type": "printed",
|
|
"content": "DOJ-OGR-00008987",
|
|
"position": "footer"
|
|
}
|
|
],
|
|
"entities": {
|
|
"people": [],
|
|
"organizations": [
|
|
"Associated Press"
|
|
],
|
|
"locations": [
|
|
"S.D.N.Y.",
|
|
"Minn.",
|
|
"Ala."
|
|
],
|
|
"dates": [
|
|
"02/24/22",
|
|
"Feb. 5, 1998",
|
|
"April 3, 2013",
|
|
"1998",
|
|
"1977",
|
|
"2015",
|
|
"2004"
|
|
],
|
|
"reference_numbers": [
|
|
"1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
|
|
"609",
|
|
"94 Cr. 455",
|
|
"12cr0058",
|
|
"DOJ-OGR-00008987"
|
|
]
|
|
},
|
|
"additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court filing with a clear and legible format. There are no visible redactions or damage to the document."
|
|
} |