mirror of
https://github.com/epstein-docs/epstein-docs.github.io.git
synced 2025-12-10 04:01:31 -06:00
77 lines
5.3 KiB
JSON
77 lines
5.3 KiB
JSON
{
|
|
"document_metadata": {
|
|
"page_number": "13",
|
|
"document_number": "522",
|
|
"date": "04/06/12",
|
|
"document_type": "court document",
|
|
"has_handwriting": false,
|
|
"has_stamps": false
|
|
},
|
|
"full_text": "Case 1:09-cr-00581-WHP Document 522 Filed 04/06/12 Page 13 of 29\nStephen Gillers\nPUBLICATIONS\nARTICLES (continued)\nProfessional Identity: 2011 Michael Franck Award Acceptance Speech, 21 Professional Lawyer 6 (2011).\nChoosing and Working with Estate and Foundation Counsel to Secure an Artistic and Philanthropic Legacy, in The Artist as Philanthropist, volume 2, page 293 (The Aspen Institute Program on Philanthropy and Social Innovation 2010)\nVirtual Clients: An Idea in Search of a Theory (with Limits), 42 Valparaiso L. Rev. 797 (2008) (Tabor lecture).\nThe \"Charles Stimson\" Rule and Three Other Proposals to Protect Lawyers From Lawyers, 36 Hofstra L. Rev. 323 (2007)\nA Tendency to Deprave and Corrupt: The Transformation of American Obscenity Law from Hicklin to Ulysses II, 85 Washington U. L. Rev. 215 (2007)\nSome Problem with Model Rule 5.6(a), Professional Lawyer (ABA 2007 Symposium Issue).\nMonroe Freedman's Solution to the Criminal Defense Lawyer's Trilemma Is Wrong as a Matter of Policy and Constitutional Law, 34 Hofstra L. Rev. 821 (2006)\n\"In the Pink Room,\" TriQuarterly 124.\nFree the Lawyers: A Proposal to Permit No-Sue Promises in Settlement Agreements, 18 Georgetown J. Legal Ethics 291 (2005) (with Richard W. Painter).\nLessons from the Multijurisdictional Practice Commission: The Art of Making Change, 44 Ariz. L. Rev. 685 (2002).\nSpeak No Evil: Settlement Agreements Conditioned On Noncooperation Are Illegal and Unethical, 31 Hofstra L. Rev. 1 (2002) (reprinted at 52 Defense L.J. 769 (2003)).\n\"If Elected, I Promise [ ]\"-What Should Judicial Candidates Be Allowed to Say? 35 Ind. L. Rev. 735 (2002).\nLegal Ethics: Art or Theory?, 58 Annual Survey Am. L. 49 (2001).\nThe Anxiety of Influence, 27 Fla. St. L. Rev. 123 (1999) (discussing rules that restrict multidisciplinary practice.\nCan a Good Lawyer Be a Bad Person? 2 J. Inst. Study of Legal 3\nDOJ-OGR-00010138",
|
|
"text_blocks": [
|
|
{
|
|
"type": "printed",
|
|
"content": "Case 1:09-cr-00581-WHP Document 522 Filed 04/06/12 Page 13 of 29",
|
|
"position": "header"
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"type": "printed",
|
|
"content": "Stephen Gillers",
|
|
"position": "header"
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"type": "printed",
|
|
"content": "PUBLICATIONS\nARTICLES (continued)",
|
|
"position": "top"
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"type": "printed",
|
|
"content": "Professional Identity: 2011 Michael Franck Award Acceptance Speech, 21 Professional Lawyer 6 (2011).\nChoosing and Working with Estate and Foundation Counsel to Secure an Artistic and Philanthropic Legacy, in The Artist as Philanthropist, volume 2, page 293 (The Aspen Institute Program on Philanthropy and Social Innovation 2010)\nVirtual Clients: An Idea in Search of a Theory (with Limits), 42 Valparaiso L. Rev. 797 (2008) (Tabor lecture).\nThe \"Charles Stimson\" Rule and Three Other Proposals to Protect Lawyers From Lawyers, 36 Hofstra L. Rev. 323 (2007)\nA Tendency to Deprave and Corrupt: The Transformation of American Obscenity Law from Hicklin to Ulysses II, 85 Washington U. L. Rev. 215 (2007)\nSome Problem with Model Rule 5.6(a), Professional Lawyer (ABA 2007 Symposium Issue).\nMonroe Freedman's Solution to the Criminal Defense Lawyer's Trilemma Is Wrong as a Matter of Policy and Constitutional Law, 34 Hofstra L. Rev. 821 (2006)\n\"In the Pink Room,\" TriQuarterly 124.\nFree the Lawyers: A Proposal to Permit No-Sue Promises in Settlement Agreements, 18 Georgetown J. Legal Ethics 291 (2005) (with Richard W. Painter).\nLessons from the Multijurisdictional Practice Commission: The Art of Making Change, 44 Ariz. L. Rev. 685 (2002).\nSpeak No Evil: Settlement Agreements Conditioned On Noncooperation Are Illegal and Unethical, 31 Hofstra L. Rev. 1 (2002) (reprinted at 52 Defense L.J. 769 (2003)).\n\"If Elected, I Promise [ ]\"-What Should Judicial Candidates Be Allowed to Say? 35 Ind. L. Rev. 735 (2002).\nLegal Ethics: Art or Theory?, 58 Annual Survey Am. L. 49 (2001).\nThe Anxiety of Influence, 27 Fla. St. L. Rev. 123 (1999) (discussing rules that restrict multidisciplinary practice.\nCan a Good Lawyer Be a Bad Person? 2 J. Inst. Study of Legal 3",
|
|
"position": "middle"
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"type": "printed",
|
|
"content": "DOJ-OGR-00010138",
|
|
"position": "footer"
|
|
}
|
|
],
|
|
"entities": {
|
|
"people": [
|
|
"Stephen Gillers",
|
|
"Michael Franck",
|
|
"Monroe Freedman",
|
|
"Richard W. Painter"
|
|
],
|
|
"organizations": [
|
|
"The Aspen Institute",
|
|
"ABA",
|
|
"Georgetown J. Legal Ethics",
|
|
"Hofstra L. Rev.",
|
|
"Valparaiso L. Rev.",
|
|
"Washington U. L. Rev.",
|
|
"Ariz. L. Rev.",
|
|
"Defense L.J.",
|
|
"Ind. L. Rev.",
|
|
"Fla. St. L. Rev.",
|
|
"J. Inst. Study of Legal"
|
|
],
|
|
"locations": [],
|
|
"dates": [
|
|
"2011",
|
|
"2010",
|
|
"2008",
|
|
"2007",
|
|
"2006",
|
|
"2005",
|
|
"2002",
|
|
"2001",
|
|
"1999"
|
|
],
|
|
"reference_numbers": [
|
|
"Case 1:09-cr-00581-WHP",
|
|
"Document 522",
|
|
"DOJ-OGR-00010138"
|
|
]
|
|
},
|
|
"additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court filing with a list of publications by Stephen Gillers. The text is clear and legible, with no visible redactions or damage."
|
|
} |