mirror of
https://github.com/epstein-docs/epstein-docs.github.io.git
synced 2025-12-10 04:01:31 -06:00
61 lines
4.0 KiB
JSON
61 lines
4.0 KiB
JSON
{
|
|
"document_metadata": {
|
|
"page_number": "8",
|
|
"document_number": "82",
|
|
"date": "10/02/2020",
|
|
"document_type": "court document",
|
|
"has_handwriting": false,
|
|
"has_stamps": false
|
|
},
|
|
"full_text": "Case 20-3061, Document 82, 10/02/2020, 2944267, Page8 of 37\n2\ngirls by, among other things, helping Epstein to recruit, groom, and ultimately abuse minor victims. The Indictment further alleges that in or about 2016, Maxwell attempted to cover up her crimes by lying under oath about her role in Epstein's scheme.\nOn July 30, 2020, upon the Government's application, Judge Nathan entered a protective order governing the parties' disclosure of information produced to Maxwell by the Government in discovery in the criminal case (the \"Protective Order\"). The Protective Order, among other things, prohibits the use of criminal discovery materials in civil litigation. Three weeks later, Maxwell moved to modify the Protective Order to allow Maxwell to use confidential criminal discovery materials, which were produced to Maxwell by the Government, in filings Maxwell intended to submit in separate civil litigation.\nJudge Nathan denied Maxwell's motion on September 2, 2020, holding, among other things, that Maxwell had failed to establish good cause to modify the Protective Order and failed to coherently explain how the criminal discovery materials related to any argument Maxwell intended to make in the civil litigation.\nMaxwell filed a notice of appeal on September 4, 2020.\nStatement of Facts\nA. The Indictment\nOn June 29, 2020, Indictment 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) was filed under seal in the Southern District of New York,",
|
|
"text_blocks": [
|
|
{
|
|
"type": "printed",
|
|
"content": "Case 20-3061, Document 82, 10/02/2020, 2944267, Page8 of 37",
|
|
"position": "header"
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"type": "printed",
|
|
"content": "2\ngirls by, among other things, helping Epstein to recruit, groom, and ultimately abuse minor victims. The Indictment further alleges that in or about 2016, Maxwell attempted to cover up her crimes by lying under oath about her role in Epstein's scheme.\nOn July 30, 2020, upon the Government's application, Judge Nathan entered a protective order governing the parties' disclosure of information produced to Maxwell by the Government in discovery in the criminal case (the \"Protective Order\"). The Protective Order, among other things, prohibits the use of criminal discovery materials in civil litigation. Three weeks later, Maxwell moved to modify the Protective Order to allow Maxwell to use confidential criminal discovery materials, which were produced to Maxwell by the Government, in filings Maxwell intended to submit in separate civil litigation.\nJudge Nathan denied Maxwell's motion on September 2, 2020, holding, among other things, that Maxwell had failed to establish good cause to modify the Protective Order and failed to coherently explain how the criminal discovery materials related to any argument Maxwell intended to make in the civil litigation.\nMaxwell filed a notice of appeal on September 4, 2020.",
|
|
"position": "main content"
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"type": "printed",
|
|
"content": "Statement of Facts\nA. The Indictment\nOn June 29, 2020, Indictment 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) was filed under seal in the Southern District of New York,",
|
|
"position": "main content"
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"type": "printed",
|
|
"content": "DOJ-OGR-00019615",
|
|
"position": "footer"
|
|
}
|
|
],
|
|
"entities": {
|
|
"people": [
|
|
"Epstein",
|
|
"Maxwell",
|
|
"Judge Nathan"
|
|
],
|
|
"organizations": [
|
|
"Government"
|
|
],
|
|
"locations": [
|
|
"Southern District of New York"
|
|
],
|
|
"dates": [
|
|
"2016",
|
|
"July 30, 2020",
|
|
"September 2, 2020",
|
|
"September 4, 2020",
|
|
"June 29, 2020"
|
|
],
|
|
"reference_numbers": [
|
|
"20-3061",
|
|
"82",
|
|
"2944267",
|
|
"20 Cr. 330 (AJN)",
|
|
"DOJ-OGR-00019615"
|
|
]
|
|
},
|
|
"additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court filing related to the case of Maxwell, with references to Epstein and legal proceedings."
|
|
} |