mirror of
https://github.com/epstein-docs/epstein-docs.github.io.git
synced 2025-12-10 04:01:31 -06:00
65 lines
2.9 KiB
JSON
65 lines
2.9 KiB
JSON
{
|
|
"document_metadata": {
|
|
"page_number": "9",
|
|
"document_number": "17",
|
|
"date": "09/10/2020",
|
|
"document_type": "court document",
|
|
"has_handwriting": false,
|
|
"has_stamps": false
|
|
},
|
|
"full_text": "Case 20-3061, Document 17, 09/10/2020, 2928288, Page9 of 15\n\n\n\nMs. Maxwell has appealed Judge Preska's order unsealing the deposition material, Giuffre v. Maxwell, Case No. 20-2413 (2d Cir.), and she is now appealing Judge Nathan's order denying the motion to modify the criminal protective order, United States v. Maxwell, Case No. 20-3061 (2d Cir).\n\n\n\n\nArgument\nThis Court should consolidate the appeal of Judge Preska's order unsealing the deposition material with the appeal of Judge Nathan's order denying the motion to modify the criminal protective order. Consolidation is necessary for a fair and efficient resolution of these appeals.\nFirst, unless this Court consolidates these appeals, it will find itself in the very same position as the two district courts - one panel of this Court will be privy\n\n8\nDOJ-OGR-00019295",
|
|
"text_blocks": [
|
|
{
|
|
"type": "printed",
|
|
"content": "Case 20-3061, Document 17, 09/10/2020, 2928288, Page9 of 15",
|
|
"position": "header"
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"type": "printed",
|
|
"content": "Ms. Maxwell has appealed Judge Preska's order unsealing the deposition material, Giuffre v. Maxwell, Case No. 20-2413 (2d Cir.), and she is now appealing Judge Nathan's order denying the motion to modify the criminal protective order, United States v. Maxwell, Case No. 20-3061 (2d Cir.).",
|
|
"position": "top"
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"type": "printed",
|
|
"content": "Argument",
|
|
"position": "middle"
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"type": "printed",
|
|
"content": "This Court should consolidate the appeal of Judge Preska's order unsealing the deposition material with the appeal of Judge Nathan's order denying the motion to modify the criminal protective order. Consolidation is necessary for a fair and efficient resolution of these appeals.\nFirst, unless this Court consolidates these appeals, it will find itself in the very same position as the two district courts - one panel of this Court will be privy",
|
|
"position": "middle"
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"type": "printed",
|
|
"content": "8",
|
|
"position": "footer"
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"type": "printed",
|
|
"content": "DOJ-OGR-00019295",
|
|
"position": "footer"
|
|
}
|
|
],
|
|
"entities": {
|
|
"people": [
|
|
"Maxwell",
|
|
"Preska",
|
|
"Nathan",
|
|
"Giuffre"
|
|
],
|
|
"organizations": [
|
|
"United States"
|
|
],
|
|
"locations": [],
|
|
"dates": [
|
|
"09/10/2020"
|
|
],
|
|
"reference_numbers": [
|
|
"20-3061",
|
|
"20-2413",
|
|
"2928288",
|
|
"DOJ-OGR-00019295"
|
|
]
|
|
},
|
|
"additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court filing related to the case of United States v. Maxwell. The text is mostly printed, with some redacted sections. The page number is 9 of 15."
|
|
} |