mirror of
https://github.com/epstein-docs/epstein-docs.github.io.git
synced 2025-12-10 04:01:31 -06:00
53 lines
4.0 KiB
JSON
53 lines
4.0 KiB
JSON
{
|
|
"document_metadata": {
|
|
"page_number": "4",
|
|
"document_number": "753",
|
|
"date": "08/10/22",
|
|
"document_type": "court transcript",
|
|
"has_handwriting": false,
|
|
"has_stamps": false
|
|
},
|
|
"full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 753 Filed 08/10/22 Page 4 of 264 1426 LC7VMAX1 1 has been fully complied with. 2 The other legal principle is that the government 3 cannot have substantive communications with Jane because she is 4 subject to recross about prior consistent statements. We have 5 not violated that legal principle either. 6 With respect to communications between Jane and Brian, 7 we have disclosed our awareness of that and defense counsel is 8 free to cross-examine Brian about those communications; that's 9 all the law requires. There is no sequestration order that 10 prevents family members from talking to one another; of course, 11 it's not best practice. 12 THE COURT: Did the government give any guidance? 13 Just on the first point, witnesses sequestered, so not 14 in the courtroom, could they be provided by another witness or 15 an attorney the transcript of the trial testimony? 16 MS. MOE: I have no awareness of whether that's 17 occurred, your Honor. 18 THE COURT: No, it's just to test the boundaries of 19 what you suggested in the first point, which is the only 20 question is whether they observed trial or not. And I don't 21 think -- I think that strikes me, I haven't looked at the law 22 on this, as an overstatement. 23 For example, I don't think a witness could be 24 provided, consistent with a sequestration order, the transcript 25 of trial testimony; and I wondered if the government agreed SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300 DOJ-OGR-00018602",
|
|
"text_blocks": [
|
|
{
|
|
"type": "printed",
|
|
"content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 753 Filed 08/10/22 Page 4 of 264 1426 LC7VMAX1",
|
|
"position": "header"
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"type": "printed",
|
|
"content": "1 has been fully complied with. 2 The other legal principle is that the government 3 cannot have substantive communications with Jane because she is 4 subject to recross about prior consistent statements. We have 5 not violated that legal principle either. 6 With respect to communications between Jane and Brian, 7 we have disclosed our awareness of that and defense counsel is 8 free to cross-examine Brian about those communications; that's 9 all the law requires. There is no sequestration order that 10 prevents family members from talking to one another; of course, 11 it's not best practice. 12 THE COURT: Did the government give any guidance? 13 Just on the first point, witnesses sequestered, so not 14 in the courtroom, could they be provided by another witness or 15 an attorney the transcript of the trial testimony? 16 MS. MOE: I have no awareness of whether that's 17 occurred, your Honor. 18 THE COURT: No, it's just to test the boundaries of 19 what you suggested in the first point, which is the only 20 question is whether they observed trial or not. And I don't 21 think -- I think that strikes me, I haven't looked at the law 22 on this, as an overstatement. 23 For example, I don't think a witness could be 24 provided, consistent with a sequestration order, the transcript 25 of trial testimony; and I wondered if the government agreed",
|
|
"position": "main content"
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"type": "printed",
|
|
"content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300",
|
|
"position": "footer"
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"type": "printed",
|
|
"content": "DOJ-OGR-00018602",
|
|
"position": "footer"
|
|
}
|
|
],
|
|
"entities": {
|
|
"people": [
|
|
"Jane",
|
|
"Brian",
|
|
"MS. MOE"
|
|
],
|
|
"organizations": [
|
|
"SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
|
|
],
|
|
"locations": [],
|
|
"dates": [
|
|
"08/10/22"
|
|
],
|
|
"reference_numbers": [
|
|
"1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
|
|
"753",
|
|
"DOJ-OGR-00018602"
|
|
]
|
|
},
|
|
"additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript with a clear and readable format. There are no visible redactions or damage."
|
|
} |