mirror of
https://github.com/epstein-docs/epstein-docs.github.io.git
synced 2025-12-10 04:01:31 -06:00
55 lines
4.1 KiB
JSON
55 lines
4.1 KiB
JSON
{
|
|
"document_metadata": {
|
|
"page_number": "16",
|
|
"document_number": "749",
|
|
"date": "08/10/22",
|
|
"document_type": "court transcript",
|
|
"has_handwriting": false,
|
|
"has_stamps": false
|
|
},
|
|
"full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 749 Filed 08/10/22 Page 16 of 236 920 LBUCmax1\n1 testify that he found or he saw at least a green massage table when they did the video sweep and that he was able to look at that table when he was there in the house, and then he saw what appeared to him to be semen on the table.\n2\n3 I don't think that that testimony is appropriate because, for example, on both 401 and 403 grounds, this table was found a full year after the last year of the conspiracy charged here, so that's 2004. The search was October 20th, 2005, a full year later.\n4\n5 Him seeing something that appeared to be semen, first, they never tested it, it's in a room with lotions for massage. How he knows this appears to be semen, I don't know, but regardless of that fact, it's done a year after the fact. Any number of ways that could have been on there, if it is, in fact, semen, I don't see how it's probative of a conspiracy that ends in 2004, unless they can show that the semen was on the table during the time period of the conspiracy.\n6\n7 Given that, if we have an agent talking about semen in front of the jury, that's just going to be a salacious detail that is going to be prejudicial of the client. So we object on 401, 403.\n8\n9 MS. COMEY: Your Honor, I expect this testimony would be very brief and very clinical. He would describe seeing a white stain that he saw and thought was consistent with the appearance of semen, and I think that is entirely --\n10\n11 SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300\n12 DOJ-OGR-00018117",
|
|
"text_blocks": [
|
|
{
|
|
"type": "printed",
|
|
"content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 749 Filed 08/10/22 Page 16 of 236 920 LBUCmax1",
|
|
"position": "header"
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"type": "printed",
|
|
"content": "1 testify that he found or he saw at least a green massage table when they did the video sweep and that he was able to look at that table when he was there in the house, and then he saw what appeared to him to be semen on the table.\n\nI don't think that that testimony is appropriate because, for example, on both 401 and 403 grounds, this table was found a full year after the last year of the conspiracy charged here, so that's 2004. The search was October 20th, 2005, a full year later.\n\nHim seeing something that appeared to be semen, first, they never tested it, it's in a room with lotions for massage. How he knows this appears to be semen, I don't know, but regardless of that fact, it's done a year after the fact. Any number of ways that could have been on there, if it is, in fact, semen, I don't see how it's probative of a conspiracy that ends in 2004, unless they can show that the semen was on the table during the time period of the conspiracy.\n\nGiven that, if we have an agent talking about semen in front of the jury, that's just going to be a salacious detail that is going to be prejudicial of the client. So we object on 401, 403.\n\nMS. COMEY: Your Honor, I expect this testimony would be very brief and very clinical. He would describe seeing a white stain that he saw and thought was consistent with the appearance of semen, and I think that is entirely --",
|
|
"position": "main content"
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"type": "printed",
|
|
"content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300",
|
|
"position": "footer"
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"type": "printed",
|
|
"content": "DOJ-OGR-00018117",
|
|
"position": "footer"
|
|
}
|
|
],
|
|
"entities": {
|
|
"people": [
|
|
"MS. COMEY"
|
|
],
|
|
"organizations": [
|
|
"SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
|
|
],
|
|
"locations": [],
|
|
"dates": [
|
|
"October 20th, 2005",
|
|
"2004",
|
|
"08/10/22"
|
|
],
|
|
"reference_numbers": [
|
|
"1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
|
|
"749",
|
|
"401",
|
|
"403",
|
|
"DOJ-OGR-00018117"
|
|
]
|
|
},
|
|
"additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript with a clear and legible format. There are no visible redactions or damage."
|
|
} |