mirror of
https://github.com/epstein-docs/epstein-docs.github.io.git
synced 2025-12-10 04:01:31 -06:00
55 lines
4.0 KiB
JSON
55 lines
4.0 KiB
JSON
{
|
|
"document_metadata": {
|
|
"page_number": "13",
|
|
"document_number": "311-1",
|
|
"date": "07/02/21",
|
|
"document_type": "court transcript",
|
|
"has_handwriting": false,
|
|
"has_stamps": false
|
|
},
|
|
"full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 311-1 Filed 07/02/21 Page 13 of 23\n12\nxj3q1gra\nSEALED\nposition to be able to describe the investigation in the way that we have in our submission.\nTHE COURT: Well, that's clear. That's clear. I mean, were I Boies Schiller, I would have -- never mind. We won't say what I would have done.\nSo I'm looking at the protective order itself, and of course not having been privy to any of the materials in the case -- and they're all under seal, so, I mean, I can dissolve the seal and get them, but there are 150 documents there that are under seal for filings, there are multiple documents that are under seal.\nMR. ROSSMILLER: Not to mention all the underlying materials, of course.\nTHE COURT: Not to mention all the underlying materials.\nSo you argue there isn't any truly confidential material in this, this isn't a trade secrets case, and obviously it's not a trade secrets case. It's a libel case. It would seem that the most scurrilous of accusations would have already floated across the face of the complaint. But since Maxwell can't object, how can I know that all this is about is information that would be, you know, embarrassing?\nMR. ROSSMILLER: I would point the Court in the first instance to the definition of \"confidential materials\" in the protective order itself, which describes \"confidential\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300 SDNY_GM_00000864\nDOJ-OGR-00004906",
|
|
"text_blocks": [
|
|
{
|
|
"type": "printed",
|
|
"content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 311-1 Filed 07/02/21 Page 13 of 23",
|
|
"position": "header"
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"type": "printed",
|
|
"content": "12\nxj3q1gra\nSEALED",
|
|
"position": "top"
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"type": "printed",
|
|
"content": "position to be able to describe the investigation in the way that we have in our submission.\nTHE COURT: Well, that's clear. That's clear. I mean, were I Boies Schiller, I would have -- never mind. We won't say what I would have done.\nSo I'm looking at the protective order itself, and of course not having been privy to any of the materials in the case -- and they're all under seal, so, I mean, I can dissolve the seal and get them, but there are 150 documents there that are under seal for filings, there are multiple documents that are under seal.\nMR. ROSSMILLER: Not to mention all the underlying materials, of course.\nTHE COURT: Not to mention all the underlying materials.\nSo you argue there isn't any truly confidential material in this, this isn't a trade secrets case, and obviously it's not a trade secrets case. It's a libel case. It would seem that the most scurrilous of accusations would have already floated across the face of the complaint. But since Maxwell can't object, how can I know that all this is about is information that would be, you know, embarrassing?\nMR. ROSSMILLER: I would point the Court in the first instance to the definition of \"confidential materials\" in the protective order itself, which describes \"confidential",
|
|
"position": "middle"
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"type": "printed",
|
|
"content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300 SDNY_GM_00000864\nDOJ-OGR-00004906",
|
|
"position": "footer"
|
|
}
|
|
],
|
|
"entities": {
|
|
"people": [
|
|
"Boies Schiller",
|
|
"Maxwell",
|
|
"MR. ROSSMILLER"
|
|
],
|
|
"organizations": [
|
|
"Boies Schiller",
|
|
"SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
|
|
],
|
|
"locations": [],
|
|
"dates": [
|
|
"07/02/21"
|
|
],
|
|
"reference_numbers": [
|
|
"1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
|
|
"311-1",
|
|
"SDNY_GM_00000864",
|
|
"DOJ-OGR-00004906"
|
|
]
|
|
},
|
|
"additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript with a header and footer. The content is a discussion between the court and MR. ROSSMILLER about a case involving Maxwell. The document is marked as 'SEALED'."
|
|
} |