{ "document_metadata": { "page_number": "14 of 29", "document_number": "522", "date": "04/06/12", "document_type": "court document", "has_handwriting": false, "has_stamps": false }, "full_text": "Case 1:09-cr-00581-WHP Document 522 Filed 04/06/12 Page 14 of 29 Stephen Gillers PUBLICATIONS ARTICLES (continued) Ethics 131 (1999) (paper delivered at conference \"Legal Ethics: Access to Justice\" at Hofstra University School of Law, April 5-7, 1998). More About Us: Another Take on the Abusive Use of Legal Ethics Rules, 11 Geo. J. Legal Ethics 843 (1998). Caveat Client: How the Proposed Final Draft of the Restatement of the Law Governing Lawyers Fails to Protect Unsophisticated Consumers in Fee Agreements With Lawyers, 10 Geo. J. Legal Ethics 581 (1997). Participant, Ethical Issues Arising From Congressional Limitations on Legal Services Lawyers, 25 Fordham Urban Law Journal 357 (1998) (panel discussion). The Year: 2075, the Product: Law, 1 J. Inst. Study of Legal Ethics 285 (1996) (paper delivered on the future of the legal profession at Hofstra University Law School's conference \"Legal Ethics: The Core Issues\"). Getting Personal, 58 Law & Contemp. Probs. 61 (Summer/Autumn 1995) (contribution to symposium on teaching legal ethics). Against the Wall, 43 J. Legal Ed. 405 (1993) (ethical considerations for the scholar as advocate). Participant, Disqualification of Judges (The Sarokin Matter): Is It a Threat to Judicial Independence?, 58 Brooklyn L. Rev. 1063 (1993) (panel discussion). The New Old Idea of Professionalism, 47 The Record of the Assoc Bar of the City of N.Y. 147 (March 1992). The Case of Jane Loring-Kraft: Parent, Lawyer, 4 Geo. J. Legal Ethics 115 (1990). Taking L.A. Law More Seriously, 98 Yale L.J. 1607 (1989) (contribution to symposium on popular legal culture). Protecting Lawyers Who Just Say No, 5 Ga. St. L. Rev. 1 (1988) (article based on Henry J. Miller Distinguished Lecture delivered at Georgia State University College of Law). Model Rule 1.13(c) Gives the Wrong Answer to the Question of Corporate Counsel Disclosure, 1 Geo. J. Legal Ethics 289 (1987). 4 DOJ-OGR-00010139", "text_blocks": [ { "type": "printed", "content": "Case 1:09-cr-00581-WHP Document 522 Filed 04/06/12 Page 14 of 29", "position": "header" }, { "type": "printed", "content": "Stephen Gillers", "position": "header" }, { "type": "printed", "content": "PUBLICATIONS ARTICLES (continued)", "position": "top" }, { "type": "printed", "content": "Ethics 131 (1999) (paper delivered at conference \"Legal Ethics: Access to Justice\" at Hofstra University School of Law, April 5-7, 1998). More About Us: Another Take on the Abusive Use of Legal Ethics Rules, 11 Geo. J. Legal Ethics 843 (1998). Caveat Client: How the Proposed Final Draft of the Restatement of the Law Governing Lawyers Fails to Protect Unsophisticated Consumers in Fee Agreements With Lawyers, 10 Geo. J. Legal Ethics 581 (1997). Participant, Ethical Issues Arising From Congressional Limitations on Legal Services Lawyers, 25 Fordham Urban Law Journal 357 (1998) (panel discussion). The Year: 2075, the Product: Law, 1 J. Inst. Study of Legal Ethics 285 (1996) (paper delivered on the future of the legal profession at Hofstra University Law School's conference \"Legal Ethics: The Core Issues\"). Getting Personal, 58 Law & Contemp. Probs. 61 (Summer/Autumn 1995) (contribution to symposium on teaching legal ethics). Against the Wall, 43 J. Legal Ed. 405 (1993) (ethical considerations for the scholar as advocate). Participant, Disqualification of Judges (The Sarokin Matter): Is It a Threat to Judicial Independence?, 58 Brooklyn L. Rev. 1063 (1993) (panel discussion). The New Old Idea of Professionalism, 47 The Record of the Assoc Bar of the City of N.Y. 147 (March 1992). The Case of Jane Loring-Kraft: Parent, Lawyer, 4 Geo. J. Legal Ethics 115 (1990). Taking L.A. Law More Seriously, 98 Yale L.J. 1607 (1989) (contribution to symposium on popular legal culture). Protecting Lawyers Who Just Say No, 5 Ga. St. L. Rev. 1 (1988) (article based on Henry J. Miller Distinguished Lecture delivered at Georgia State University College of Law). Model Rule 1.13(c) Gives the Wrong Answer to the Question of Corporate Counsel Disclosure, 1 Geo. J. Legal Ethics 289 (1987).", "position": "middle" }, { "type": "printed", "content": "4", "position": "footer" }, { "type": "printed", "content": "DOJ-OGR-00010139", "position": "footer" } ], "entities": { "people": [ "Stephen Gillers", "Jane Loring-Kraft", "Henry J. Miller" ], "organizations": [ "Hofstra University School of Law", "Fordham Urban Law Journal", "Brooklyn L. Rev", "Assoc Bar of the City of N.Y", "Yale L.J.", "Ga. St. L. Rev", "Georgia State University College of Law" ], "locations": [ "New York" ], "dates": [ "04/06/12", "1999", "1998", "1997", "1996", "1995", "1993", "1992", "1990", "1989", "1988", "1987" ], "reference_numbers": [ "Case 1:09-cr-00581-WHP", "Document 522" ] }, "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court filing with a list of publications by Stephen Gillers. The document is in good condition with no visible damage or redactions." }