Rethink (GNU)Linux 32 bits builds #1194

New Issue

Open

opened 2025-09-10 23:50:58 -05:00 by giteasync · 2 comments

giteasync commented 2025-09-10 23:50:58 -05:00

Owner

Copy Link

Originally created by @EchedelleLR on GitHub.

Electron, not taking in account the old article (https://www.electronjs.org/blog/linux-32bit-support), is supporting (GNU)Linux 32 bits builds (AKA as ia32):

• https://github.com/electron/electron/releases/tag/v8.4.1
• https://github.com/electron/electron/releases/tag/v9.1.1

Other apps, such as Kettler (https://www.zettlr.com/) are building (GNU)Linux 32 bits editions on top of Electron too (https://github.com/Zettlr/Zettlr/blob/develop/package.json#L187) and packages as AppImage in this case:

• https://github.com/Zettlr/Zettlr/releases/tag/v1.7.2

Originally created by @EchedelleLR on GitHub. Electron, not taking in account the old article (https://www.electronjs.org/blog/linux-32bit-support), is supporting (GNU)Linux 32 bits builds (AKA as ia32): - https://github.com/electron/electron/releases/tag/v8.4.1 - https://github.com/electron/electron/releases/tag/v9.1.1 Other apps, such as Kettler (https://www.zettlr.com/) are building (GNU)Linux 32 bits editions on top of Electron too (https://github.com/Zettlr/Zettlr/blob/develop/package.json#L187) and packages as AppImage in this case: - https://github.com/Zettlr/Zettlr/releases/tag/v1.7.2

giteasync added the help wanteddiscussionenhancement labels 2025-09-10 23:50:58 -05:00

giteasync commented 2025-09-10 23:50:59 -05:00

Author

Owner

Copy Link

@EchedelleLR commented on GitHub:

Thank you for not refusing the proposition in raw and be able to maintain discussion about it.

:3

@EchedelleLR commented on GitHub: Thank you for not refusing the proposition in raw and be able to maintain discussion about it. :3

giteasync commented 2025-09-10 23:50:59 -05:00

Author

Owner

Copy Link

@stripedpajamas commented on GitHub:

I'm wary of investing time into building for Linux 32-bit when MS isn't supporting it, and we haven't even reached feature parity with MS (e.g. they are now building for Windows on ARM and we aren't). As such, more than welcome to review PRs toward this end, and very happy if anyone is able to get a working binary built for Linux 32-bit. Personally it will be on the back burner for myself.

@stripedpajamas commented on GitHub: I'm wary of investing time into building for Linux 32-bit when MS isn't supporting it, and we haven't even reached feature parity with MS (e.g. they are now building for Windows on ARM and we aren't). As such, more than welcome to review PRs toward this end, and very happy if anyone is able to get a working binary built for Linux 32-bit. Personally it will be on the back burner for myself.

Sign in to join this conversation.

No Branch/Tag Specified

Branches Tags

master

insider

1.112.01907

1.110.11631

1.110.11607

1.110.11602

1.110.01571

1.109.51242

1.109.41146

1.109.31074

1.109.21026

1.109.01000

1.108.20787

1.108.10359

1.107.18627

1.107.18605

1.106.37943

1.106.37938

1.106.27818

1.105.17075

1.105.17017

1.105.16999

1.105.16954

1.105.06922

1.105.06808

1.104.36664

1.104.26450

1.104.16282

1.104.06131

1.104.06114

1.103.25610

1.103.15539

1.103.15418

1.103.05312

1.102.35058

1.102.24914

1.102.14746

1.102.04606

1.101.24242

1.101.14098

1.101.03933

1.100.33714

1.100.23258

1.100.13210

1.100.03093

1.99.32846

1.99.32704

1.99.32562

1.99.22418

1.99.12392

1.99.02289

1.99.02283

1.99.02277

1.98.2.25078

1.98.2.25077

1.98.2.25072

1.98.1.25070

1.98.0.25067

1.97.2.25045

1.97.1.25044

1.97.0.25037

1.96.4.25026

1.96.4.25017

1.96.3.25013

1.96.2.24355

1.96.1.24353

1.96.0.24352

1.96.0.24347

1.95.3.24321

1.95.3.24320

1.95.2.24313

1.95.1.24307

1.94.2.24286

1.94.2.24284

1.94.1.24283

1.94.0.24282

1.94.0.24281

1.93.1.24256

1.93.0.24253

1.92.2.24228

1.92.1.24225

1.91.1.24193

1.91.0.24190

1.90.2.24171

1.90.1.24165

1.90.0.24158

1.89.1.24130

1.89.0.24127

1.89.0.24126

1.88.1.24104

1.88.1.24102

1.88.0.24096

1.87.2.24072

1.87.1.24068

1.87.0.24060

1.86.2.24057

1.86.2.24054

1.86.2.24053

1.85.2.24019

1.85.1.23348

1.85.0.23343

1.84.2.23319

1.84.2.23317

1.84.2.23314

1.84.0.23306

1.84.1.23311

1.83.0.23283

1.83.1.23285

1.83.0.23277

1.82.3.23277

1.82.2.23257

1.82.0.23250

1.82.1.23255

1.81.1.23222

1.81.0.23216

1.80.1.23208

1.80.2.23209

1.81.0.23215

1.80.0.23188

1.80.1.23194

1.79.2.23166

1.79.1.23164

1.79.0.23159

1.78.1.23131

1.78.2.23132

1.78.1.23130

1.77.3.23102

1.77.1.23095

1.77.2.23101

1.77.0.23095

1.77.0.23093

1.77.0.23090

1.76.0.23062

1.76.1.23069

1.76.2.23074

1.75.1.23040

1.75.0.23033

1.74.3.23010

1.74.2.23007

1.74.0.22342

1.74.1.22349

1.74.2.22355

1.73.1.22314

1.73.0.22306

1.72.2.22289

1.72.2.22286

1.72.1.22284

1.72.0.22279

1.71.2.22258

1.71.1.22256

1.71.0.22245

1.70.2.22230

1.70.1.22229

1.70.1.22228

1.70.1

1.70.0

1.69.2

1.69.1

1.69.0

1.68.1

1.68.0

1.67.2

1.67.1

1.67.0

1.66.2

1.66.1

1.66.0

1.65.1

1.65.2

1.65.0

1.64.1

1.64.2

1.64.0

1.63.1

1.63.2

1.63.0

1.62.3

1.62.2

1.62.1

1.62.0

1.61.2

1.61.0

1.61.1

1.60.2

1.60.1

1.60.0

1.59.1

1.59.0

1.58.2

1.58.0

1.58.1

1.57.1

1.57.0

1.56.0

1.56.1

1.56.2

1.55.0

1.55.1

1.55.2

1.54.2

1.54.3

1.53.1

1.53.2

1.53.0

1.52.1

1.52.0

1.51.0

1.51.1

1.50.1

1.50.0

1.49.2

1.49.3

1.49.1

1.49.0

1.48.1

1.48.2

1.48.0

1.47.0

1.47.1

1.47.2

1.47.3

1.46.0

1.46.1

1.45.0

1.45.1

1.43.2

1.44.0

1.44.1

1.44.2

1.43.1

1.43.0

1.42.0

1.42.1

1.41.1

1.41.0

1.40.2

1.40.0

1.40.1

1.39.0

1.39.1

1.39.2

1.38.1

1.38.0

1.37.1

1.37.0

1.36.1

1.36.0

1.35.1

1.35.0

1.34.0

1.33.1

1.33.0

1.32.2

1.32.3

1.32.1

1.32.0

1.31.1

1.31.0

1.30.2

1.30.0

1.30.1

1.29.1

1.29.0

1.28.2

1.28.1

1.28.0

1.27.2

1.27.1

1.26.1

1.26.0

Labels

Clear labels

bug

bug

discussion

documentation

downstream

duplicate

enhancement

extension

good first issue

help wanted

invalid

never-stale

pull-request

Mirrored from GitHub Pull Request

question

stale

telemetry

upstream

wontfix

No Label discussion enhancement help wanted

Milestone

No items

No Milestone

Projects

Clear projects

No project

Assignees

Clear assignees

giteasync

No Assignees

1 Participants

Notifications

Subscribe

Due Date

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: VSCodium/vscodium#1194