mirror of
https://github.com/HandBrake/HandBrake-docs.git
synced 2025-12-11 13:54:49 -06:00
Bradley Sepos
parent
8009badb98
commit
0f19c39239
@ -139,7 +139,7 @@ Inhaltsverzeichnis
|
||||
- [AMD VCE](technical/video-vce.html)
|
||||
- [Apple VideoToolbox](technical/video-videotoolbox.html)
|
||||
- [Intel QuickSync Video](technical/video-qsv.html)
|
||||
- [NVidia NVENC](technical/video-nvenc.html)
|
||||
- [NVIDIA NVENC](technical/video-nvenc.html)
|
||||
|
||||
- [Video Kodierer Performance](technical/video-encoding-performance.html)<span class="notice draft"><span>draft</span></span>
|
||||
- [Intel QuickSync Video (QSV) Optionen](technical/video-qsv-options.html)<span class="notice draft"><span>draft</span></span>
|
||||
|
||||
@ -71,11 +71,11 @@ x265 ist ein neuerer Videokodierer welcher Standard H.265/HEVC Videos erstellt.
|
||||
|
||||
Andere Videokodierer wie beispielsweise VP8 und VP9 versprechen Resultate änhlich denen von x264 und x265 aber benötigen üblicherweise länger zum Kodieren. VP8 und VP9 Hardware Dekodierer für Mobilgeräte sind nicht weit verbreitet, dadurch kann die Batterie schneller aufgebraucht werden wenn Videos dieser Typen angeschaut werden.
|
||||
|
||||
HandBrake unterstützt zudem AMD VCE, Intel QSV und Nvidia NVENC Hardware Kodierer. Diese Kodierer produzieren H.264 und/oder H.265 Videos mit extrem hoher Geschwindigkeit jedoch mit etwas geringerer Qualität und größeren Dateien.
|
||||
HandBrake unterstützt zudem AMD VCE, Intel QSV und NVIDIA NVENC Hardware Kodierer. Diese Kodierer produzieren H.264 und/oder H.265 Videos mit extrem hoher Geschwindigkeit jedoch mit etwas geringerer Qualität und größeren Dateien.
|
||||
|
||||
Vergleichen wir einmal ein paar Kodierer. Wir haben dieselbe High Quality 2160p 4K Video `Quelle` zu 1080p mit acht verschiedenen Kodieren kodiert.
|
||||
|
||||
Die folgenden Resultate wurden mit einem PC mit einer Intel Xeon E5-2699 v4 CPU mit 22 Kernen und 44 Threads bei 2.6-2.8 GHz (konstanter Turbo), 32 GB Memory, einer AMD Radeon RX 580, einer Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060 und Windows 10 Professional erzeugt.
|
||||
Die folgenden Resultate wurden mit einem PC mit einer Intel Xeon E5-2699 v4 CPU mit 22 Kernen und 44 Threads bei 2.6-2.8 GHz (konstanter Turbo), 32 GB Memory, einer AMD Radeon RX 580, einer NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 und Windows 10 Professional erzeugt.
|
||||
|
||||
| Offizielle Voreinstellung | Kodierer | Typ | Qualität / Bit Rate | Audiospuren | Kodiergeschwindigkeit | Realtime Speed | Gesamte Bit Rate | Gesamtgröße |
|
||||
|-------------------|---------------|----------|----------------------|---------------|----------------|----------------|----------------|------------|
|
||||
@ -113,7 +113,7 @@ Obwohl keine kompatible Hardware für diesen Test zur Verfügung stand, würde d
|
||||
|
||||
Kodierer nach Schnelligkeit absteigend sortiert:
|
||||
|
||||
1. Hardware Kodierer (AMD VCE, Intel QSV, Nvidia NVENC)
|
||||
1. Hardware Kodierer (AMD VCE, Intel QSV, NVIDIA NVENC)
|
||||
2. x264
|
||||
3. VP8
|
||||
4. x265
|
||||
@ -123,12 +123,12 @@ Kodierer nach Qualität vs. Dateigröße absteigend sortiert:
|
||||
|
||||
1. x265 and VP9
|
||||
2. x264
|
||||
3. Hardware encoders (AMD VCE, Intel QSV, Nvidia NVENC)
|
||||
3. Hardware encoders (AMD VCE, Intel QSV, NVIDIA NVENC)
|
||||
4. VP8
|
||||
|
||||
Der x264 Software Kodierer stellt eine exzellente Balance zwischen Geschwindigkeit und Qualität dar und das H.264/AVC Video das erstellt wird ist mit einem Großteil moderner Geräte kompatibel. Er ist der Standard Videokodierer bei den meisten der offiziellen `Voreinstellungen` von HandBrake.
|
||||
|
||||
Hardware Kodierer wie zum Beispiel AMD VCE, Intel QSV und Nvidia NVENC sind sehr schnell und sind die beste Wahl auf langsameren Computern wo die Performance im Vordergrund steht, und höchste Qualität und sehr kleine Dateien nicht so wichtig sind.
|
||||
Hardware Kodierer wie zum Beispiel AMD VCE, Intel QSV und NVIDIA NVENC sind sehr schnell und sind die beste Wahl auf langsameren Computern wo die Performance im Vordergrund steht, und höchste Qualität und sehr kleine Dateien nicht so wichtig sind.
|
||||
|
||||
x265 und VP9 produzieren Videos mit exzellenter Qualität, brauchen dafür jedoch lange. Hier musst du, mit Ausnahme von sehr schnellen Computern, mit langen Zeiten rechnen.
|
||||
|
||||
@ -140,7 +140,7 @@ Ein Teil von HandBrake's Videokodierer haben ihre eigenen Voreinstellungen. Dies
|
||||
|
||||
Manche Kodierer Voreinstellungen sind so gestaltet, dass die Geschwindigkeit des Kodierungsprozesses beeinflusst wird. Die Aktivierung von bestimmten Optimierungen oder die Deaktivierung von bestimmten rechenintensiven Features des Kodierers hat eine Beschleunigung des Kodierungsprozesses zur Folge. Dies kann jedoch die resultierende Dateigröße und/oder die Qualität negativ beeinflussen. Alle x264 und x265 Kodierer Voreinstellungen beziehen sich auf die Geschwindigkeit.
|
||||
|
||||
Andere Kodierer, vor allem Hardware Kodierer wie AMD VCE, Intel QSV und Nvidia NVENC, haben zudem Qualitätsbasierte Kodierer Voreinstellungen um fortgeschrittene Features zu aktivieren welche die Qualität verbessern; wiederum auf Kosten der Geschwindigkeit.
|
||||
Andere Kodierer, vor allem Hardware Kodierer wie AMD VCE, Intel QSV und NVIDIA NVENC, haben zudem Qualitätsbasierte Kodierer Voreinstellungen um fortgeschrittene Features zu aktivieren welche die Qualität verbessern; wiederum auf Kosten der Geschwindigkeit.
|
||||
|
||||
Hier haben wir dieselbe High Quality 2160p 4K Video `Quelle` zu 1080p mit den unterschiedlichen Geschwindigkeitsbasierten Kodierer Voreinstellungen des x264 Kodierers kodiert.
|
||||
|
||||
@ -262,7 +262,7 @@ Trotzdem ist der NLMeans Filter ein großartiger Weg, um `Quellen` mit sichtbare
|
||||
|
||||
Die Einstellungen des Videokodierers haben einen großen Einfluss auf die Performance.
|
||||
|
||||
Verglichen mit x264 und Hardwarekodierer wie AMD VCE, Intel QSV und Nvidia NVENC, benötigen langsamere Kodierer wie x265 und VP9 mehr Zeit.
|
||||
Verglichen mit x264 und Hardwarekodierer wie AMD VCE, Intel QSV und NVIDIA NVENC, benötigen langsamere Kodierer wie x265 und VP9 mehr Zeit.
|
||||
|
||||
Ein Großteil der verglichenen Kodierer haben Geschwindigkeitsvoreinstellungen. Schnellere Kodierervoreinstellungen haben eine bessere Performance wobei hier die Qualität und die Dateigröße darunter leiden kann.
|
||||
|
||||
@ -278,7 +278,7 @@ Prozesse, die eine höhere Auflösung verwenden, benötigen länger und erzeugen
|
||||
|
||||
### Filter
|
||||
|
||||
Manche Filter sind rechenintensiv und können ein Bottleneck für den Kodierprozess unabhängig von den Kodiereinstellungen darstellen. Dies trifft vor allem für den EEDI2 Deinterlacer und den NLMeans Denoiser zu. Andere Filter wie der Decomb Deinterlacer und der hqdn3d Denoiser sind viel schneller, können aber trotzdem noch ein Bottleneck darstellen, wenn Hardware Kodierer wie AMD VCE, Intel QSV und Nvidia NVENC verwendet wird.
|
||||
Manche Filter sind rechenintensiv und können ein Bottleneck für den Kodierprozess unabhängig von den Kodiereinstellungen darstellen. Dies trifft vor allem für den EEDI2 Deinterlacer und den NLMeans Denoiser zu. Andere Filter wie der Decomb Deinterlacer und der hqdn3d Denoiser sind viel schneller, können aber trotzdem noch ein Bottleneck darstellen, wenn Hardware Kodierer wie AMD VCE, Intel QSV und NVIDIA NVENC verwendet wird.
|
||||
|
||||
Aufgrund der weiten Verbreitung von interlaced Content, ist der Decomb Deinterlacer in allen offiziellen `Voreinstellungen` von HandBrake (ausgenommen den Production `Voreinstellungen`) aktiv. Zusätzlich aktiviert ist der Interlacing Detection Filter, welcher sicherstellt, dass nur interlaced frames deinterlaced werden und progressive frames unberührt bleiben. Diese Analyse könnte ein limitierender Factor für die Performance sein. Solltest du dir sicher sein, dass es in der `Quelle` keine interlaced frames gibt, kannst du diese Filter für einen kleinen Performanceboost deaktivieren.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@ -76,7 +76,7 @@ Bitte lese den jeweiligen Dokumentationsartikel für die Kodierer für mehr Deta
|
||||
- [AMD VCE](video-vce.html)
|
||||
- [Apple VideoToolbox](video-videotoolbox.html)
|
||||
- [Intel QuickSync Video](video-qsv.html)
|
||||
- [Nvidia Nvenc](video-nvenc.html)
|
||||
- [NVIDIA NVENC](video-nvenc.html)
|
||||
|
||||
## Software
|
||||
Folgende Auflistung beschreibt die Unterstützung der aktuellen HandBrake Version für verschiedene Systeme.
|
||||
|
||||
@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
Type: article
|
||||
State: [ draft ]
|
||||
Title: Nvidia Nvenc
|
||||
Title: NVIDIA NVENC
|
||||
Project: HandBrake
|
||||
Project_URL: https://handbrake.fr/
|
||||
Project_Version: 1.3.0
|
||||
@ -14,13 +14,13 @@ License_Abbr: CC BY-SA 4.0
|
||||
License_URL: https://handbrake.fr/docs/license.html
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
Nvidia Nvenc
|
||||
NVIDIA NVENC
|
||||
============
|
||||
|
||||
## Unterstützte Hardware und Konfigurationen
|
||||
|
||||
- Nvidia GeForce GTX Pascal (1050+) und RTX Turing (1650+, 2060+) series GPU oder besser
|
||||
- Nvidia Graphics Driver 418.81 oder neuer
|
||||
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX Pascal (1050+) und RTX Turing (1650+, 2060+) series GPU oder besser
|
||||
- NVIDIA Graphics Driver 418.81 oder neuer
|
||||
- Windows 10
|
||||
- Experimentelle Unterstützung für Linux ist via der Kommandozeile verfügbar
|
||||
|
||||
@ -29,7 +29,7 @@ Beachte bitte, dass trotz diesen Einschränkungen das Feature *möglicherweise*
|
||||
|
||||
## Unterstützung aktivieren
|
||||
|
||||
Unterstützung für den NVEnc Kodierer kann in den Einstellungen im Video Tab aktiviert werden. Falls dein System nicht unterstützt wird, ist diese Option deaktiviert.
|
||||
Unterstützung für den NVENC Kodierer kann in den Einstellungen im Video Tab aktiviert werden. Falls dein System nicht unterstützt wird, ist diese Option deaktiviert.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
## Performance
|
||||
@ -41,7 +41,7 @@ Es ist vor allem auf lower-end-hardware üblich, dass die CPU ein Bottleneck fü
|
||||
|
||||
## Fortgeschrittene Optionen
|
||||
|
||||
Der Nividia Nvenc Hardwarekodierer hat ein limitiertes Set von Fortgeschrittenen Kodieroptionen welche verwendet werden können. Grundsätzlich ist es nicht empfohlen, diese Parameter zu ändern, da die Built-in Voreinstellungen eine gute Auswahl von Optionen bieten.
|
||||
Der Nividia NVENC Hardwarekodierer hat ein limitiertes Set von Fortgeschrittenen Kodieroptionen welche verwendet werden können. Grundsätzlich ist es nicht empfohlen, diese Parameter zu ändern, da die Built-in Voreinstellungen eine gute Auswahl von Optionen bieten.
|
||||
|
||||
Auf der Kommandozeile kannst du den --encopts Parameter wie folgt benutzen:
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@ -141,7 +141,7 @@ Table of contents
|
||||
- [AMD VCE](technical/video-vce.html)
|
||||
- [Apple VideoToolbox](technical/video-videotoolbox.html)
|
||||
- [Intel QuickSync Video](technical/video-qsv.html)
|
||||
- [Nvidia Nvenc](technical/video-nvenc.html)
|
||||
- [NVIDIA NVENC](technical/video-nvenc.html)
|
||||
- Audio
|
||||
- [Dynamic range compression](technical/dynamic-range-compression.html)<span class="notice draft"><span>draft</span></span>
|
||||
- [Audio quality](technical/audio-quality.html)<span class="notice draft"><span>draft</span></span>
|
||||
|
||||
@ -72,11 +72,11 @@ x265 is a newer video encoder that creates standard H.265/HEVC video that is bec
|
||||
|
||||
Other software video encoders such as VP8 and VP9 promise similar results to x264 and x265, but generally take longer to encode. VP8 and VP9 hardware decoders for mobile devices are not widespread, which can lead to faster battery drain while playing these types of videos. Most modern computers can play VP8 and VP9 video with ease.
|
||||
|
||||
HandBrake also includes support for AMD VCE, Intel QSV, and Nvidia NVENC hardware encoders. These encoders produce H.264 and/or H.265 video at extremely high speed, at the expense of some quality and larger file sizes.
|
||||
HandBrake also includes support for AMD VCE, Intel QSV, and NVIDIA NVENC hardware encoders. These encoders produce H.264 and/or H.265 video at extremely high speed, at the expense of some quality and larger file sizes.
|
||||
|
||||
Let’s compare. Here, we’ve encoded the same high quality 2160p 4K video `Source` to 1080p using eight different video encoders.
|
||||
|
||||
The following results were produced using a PC equipped with an Intel Xeon E5-2699 v4 CPU with 22 cores and 44 threads running at a sustained turbo between 2.6-2.8 GHz, 32 GB memory, an AMD Radeon RX 580, an Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060, and Windows 10 Professional.
|
||||
The following results were produced using a PC equipped with an Intel Xeon E5-2699 v4 CPU with 22 cores and 44 threads running at a sustained turbo between 2.6-2.8 GHz, 32 GB memory, an AMD Radeon RX 580, an NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060, and Windows 10 Professional.
|
||||
|
||||
| Official Preset | Encoder | Type | Quality / Bit Rate | Audio Tracks | Encoding Speed | Realtime Speed | Total Bit Rate | Total Size |
|
||||
|-------------------|---------------|----------|----------------------|---------------|----------------|----------------|----------------|------------|
|
||||
@ -114,7 +114,7 @@ Although compatible hardware was not available on the computer used in these tes
|
||||
|
||||
Encoders ranked fastest to slowest:
|
||||
|
||||
1. Hardware encoders (AMD VCE, Intel QSV, Nvidia NVENC)
|
||||
1. Hardware encoders (AMD VCE, Intel QSV, NVIDIA NVENC)
|
||||
2. x264
|
||||
3. VP8
|
||||
4. x265
|
||||
@ -124,12 +124,12 @@ Encoder quality versus file size efficiency, ranked best to worst:
|
||||
|
||||
1. x265 and VP9
|
||||
2. x264
|
||||
3. Hardware encoders (AMD VCE, Intel QSV, Nvidia NVENC)
|
||||
3. Hardware encoders (AMD VCE, Intel QSV, NVIDIA NVENC)
|
||||
4. VP8
|
||||
|
||||
The x264 software encoder presents an excellent balance between speed and quality, and the H.264/AVC video it creates is widely compatible with all modern devices. It is the default video encoder in most of HandBrake’s official `Presets`.
|
||||
|
||||
Hardware encoders such as AMD VCE, Intel QSV, and Nvidia NVENC are very fast and may be a good choice on less powerful computers where performance is the greatest concern, and the highest quality and smallest file sizes are not top priority.
|
||||
Hardware encoders such as AMD VCE, Intel QSV, and NVIDIA NVENC are very fast and may be a good choice on less powerful computers where performance is the greatest concern, and the highest quality and smallest file sizes are not top priority.
|
||||
|
||||
x265 and VP9 produce excellent quality encodes, but are much slower performers. Expect long encoding times on all except the best computers.
|
||||
|
||||
@ -141,7 +141,7 @@ Some of HandBrake’s video encoders have their own presets. These are different
|
||||
|
||||
Some encoder presets are designed to affect the speed of the encoding process. By enabling certain optimizations or disabling certain computationally expensive features of the encoder, greater encoding speeds can be achieved, although this is usually at the expense of larger file sizes and/or slight quality losses. The x264 and x265 encoder presets are all speed related.
|
||||
|
||||
Other encoders, notably hardware encoders such as AMD VCE, Intel QSV, and Nvidia NVENC, also have quality-based encoder presets to enable advanced features that can improve quality, usually at the expense of encoding speed.
|
||||
Other encoders, notably hardware encoders such as AMD VCE, Intel QSV, and NVIDIA NVENC, also have quality-based encoder presets to enable advanced features that can improve quality, usually at the expense of encoding speed.
|
||||
|
||||
Here, we’ve encoded the same high quality 2160p 4K video `Source` to 1080p using the various speed-based encoder presets provided by the x264 software encoder.
|
||||
|
||||
@ -262,7 +262,7 @@ Despite this, it is excellent for restoring `Sources` with prominent visual nois
|
||||
|
||||
Video encoder settings have a major impact on performance.
|
||||
|
||||
Compared to x264 and hardware encoders such as AMD VCE, Intel QSV, and Nvidia NVENC, encodes will take longer to complete when using slower video encoders such as x265 and VP9.
|
||||
Compared to x264 and hardware encoders such as AMD VCE, Intel QSV, and NVIDIA NVENC, encodes will take longer to complete when using slower video encoders such as x265 and VP9.
|
||||
|
||||
Most video encoders we compared have speed presets, and faster encoder presets will perform better, potentially at the expense of larger file sizes and slight quality losses.
|
||||
|
||||
@ -278,7 +278,7 @@ Higher resolution encodes take longer and produce larger file sizes, while retai
|
||||
|
||||
### Filters
|
||||
|
||||
Some filters are computationally expensive and can bottleneck the encoding process regardless of video encoder settings, notably the EEDI2 deinterlacer and the NLMeans denoiser. Other filters such as the Decomb deinterlacer and the hqdn3d denoiser are much faster, but can still be a bottleneck when using hardware video encoders such as AMD VCE, Intel QSV, and Nvidia NVENC.
|
||||
Some filters are computationally expensive and can bottleneck the encoding process regardless of video encoder settings, notably the EEDI2 deinterlacer and the NLMeans denoiser. Other filters such as the Decomb deinterlacer and the hqdn3d denoiser are much faster, but can still be a bottleneck when using hardware video encoders such as AMD VCE, Intel QSV, and NVIDIA NVENC.
|
||||
|
||||
Due to the widespread availability of interlaced content in the world today, the Decomb deinterlacer is enabled in all HandBrake official `Presets` except the Production `Presets`. Also enabled is the Interlacing Detection filter, which ensures only interlaced frames are deinterlaced, leaving progressive frames untouched. This analysis can sometimes be a limiting factor for performance. If you are certain your `Source` contains no interlaced frames, you can disable these filters for a small increase in performance.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@ -42,7 +42,7 @@ Please see the specific documentation pages for these encoders for further detai
|
||||
- [AMD VCE](video-vce.html)
|
||||
- [Apple VideoToolbox](video-videotoolbox.html)
|
||||
- [Intel QuickSync Video](video-qsv.html)
|
||||
- [Nvidia Nvenc](video-nvenc.html)
|
||||
- [NVIDIA NVENC](video-nvenc.html)
|
||||
|
||||
## Software
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@ -141,7 +141,7 @@ Table of contents
|
||||
- [AMD VCE](technical/video-vce.html)
|
||||
- [Apple VideoToolbox](technical/video-videotoolbox.html)
|
||||
- [Intel QuickSync Video](technical/video-qsv.html)
|
||||
- [Nvidia Nvenc](technical/video-nvenc.html)
|
||||
- [NVIDIA NVENC](technical/video-nvenc.html)
|
||||
- Audio
|
||||
- [Dynamic range compression](technical/dynamic-range-compression.html)<span class="notice draft"><span>draft</span></span>
|
||||
- [Audio quality](technical/audio-quality.html)<span class="notice draft"><span>draft</span></span>
|
||||
|
||||
@ -72,11 +72,11 @@ x265 is a newer video encoder that creates standard H.265/HEVC video that is bec
|
||||
|
||||
Other software video encoders such as VP8 and VP9 promise similar results to x264 and x265, but generally take longer to encode. VP8 and VP9 hardware decoders for mobile devices are not widespread, which can lead to faster battery drain while playing these types of videos. Most modern computers can play VP8 and VP9 video with ease.
|
||||
|
||||
HandBrake also includes support for AMD VCE, Intel QSV, and Nvidia NVENC hardware encoders. These encoders produce H.264 and/or H.265 video at extremely high speed, at the expense of some quality and larger file sizes.
|
||||
HandBrake also includes support for AMD VCE, Intel QSV, and NVIDIA NVENC hardware encoders. These encoders produce H.264 and/or H.265 video at extremely high speed, at the expense of some quality and larger file sizes.
|
||||
|
||||
Let’s compare. Here, we’ve encoded the same high quality 2160p 4K video `Source` to 1080p using eight different video encoders.
|
||||
|
||||
The following results were produced using a PC equipped with an Intel Xeon E5-2699 v4 CPU with 22 cores and 44 threads running at a sustained turbo between 2.6-2.8 GHz, 32 GB memory, an AMD Radeon RX 580, an Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060, and Windows 10 Professional.
|
||||
The following results were produced using a PC equipped with an Intel Xeon E5-2699 v4 CPU with 22 cores and 44 threads running at a sustained turbo between 2.6-2.8 GHz, 32 GB memory, an AMD Radeon RX 580, an NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060, and Windows 10 Professional.
|
||||
|
||||
| Official Preset | Encoder | Type | Quality / Bit Rate | Audio Tracks | Encoding Speed | Realtime Speed | Total Bit Rate | Total Size |
|
||||
|-------------------|---------------|----------|----------------------|---------------|----------------|----------------|----------------|------------|
|
||||
@ -114,7 +114,7 @@ Although compatible hardware was not available on the computer used in these tes
|
||||
|
||||
Encoders ranked fastest to slowest:
|
||||
|
||||
1. Hardware encoders (AMD VCE, Intel QSV, Nvidia NVENC)
|
||||
1. Hardware encoders (AMD VCE, Intel QSV, NVIDIA NVENC)
|
||||
2. x264
|
||||
3. VP8
|
||||
4. x265
|
||||
@ -124,12 +124,12 @@ Encoder quality versus file size efficiency, ranked best to worst:
|
||||
|
||||
1. x265 and VP9
|
||||
2. x264
|
||||
3. Hardware encoders (AMD VCE, Intel QSV, Nvidia NVENC)
|
||||
3. Hardware encoders (AMD VCE, Intel QSV, NVIDIA NVENC)
|
||||
4. VP8
|
||||
|
||||
The x264 software encoder presents an excellent balance between speed and quality, and the H.264/AVC video it creates is widely compatible with all modern devices. It is the default video encoder in most of HandBrake’s official `Presets`.
|
||||
|
||||
Hardware encoders such as AMD VCE, Intel QSV, and Nvidia NVENC are very fast and may be a good choice on less powerful computers where performance is the greatest concern, and the highest quality and smallest file sizes are not top priority.
|
||||
Hardware encoders such as AMD VCE, Intel QSV, and NVIDIA NVENC are very fast and may be a good choice on less powerful computers where performance is the greatest concern, and the highest quality and smallest file sizes are not top priority.
|
||||
|
||||
x265 and VP9 produce excellent quality encodes, but are much slower performers. Expect long encoding times on all except the best computers.
|
||||
|
||||
@ -141,7 +141,7 @@ Some of HandBrake’s video encoders have their own presets. These are different
|
||||
|
||||
Some encoder presets are designed to affect the speed of the encoding process. By enabling certain optimizations or disabling certain computationally expensive features of the encoder, greater encoding speeds can be achieved, although this is usually at the expense of larger file sizes and/or slight quality losses. The x264 and x265 encoder presets are all speed related.
|
||||
|
||||
Other encoders, notably hardware encoders such as AMD VCE, Intel QSV, and Nvidia NVENC, also have quality-based encoder presets to enable advanced features that can improve quality, usually at the expense of encoding speed.
|
||||
Other encoders, notably hardware encoders such as AMD VCE, Intel QSV, and NVIDIA NVENC, also have quality-based encoder presets to enable advanced features that can improve quality, usually at the expense of encoding speed.
|
||||
|
||||
Here, we’ve encoded the same high quality 2160p 4K video `Source` to 1080p using the various speed-based encoder presets provided by the x264 software encoder.
|
||||
|
||||
@ -262,7 +262,7 @@ Despite this, it is excellent for restoring `Sources` with prominent visual nois
|
||||
|
||||
Video encoder settings have a major impact on performance.
|
||||
|
||||
Compared to x264 and hardware encoders such as AMD VCE, Intel QSV, and Nvidia NVENC, encodes will take longer to complete when using slower video encoders such as x265 and VP9.
|
||||
Compared to x264 and hardware encoders such as AMD VCE, Intel QSV, and NVIDIA NVENC, encodes will take longer to complete when using slower video encoders such as x265 and VP9.
|
||||
|
||||
Most video encoders we compared have speed presets, and faster encoder presets will perform better, potentially at the expense of larger file sizes and slight quality losses.
|
||||
|
||||
@ -278,7 +278,7 @@ Higher resolution encodes take longer and produce larger file sizes, while retai
|
||||
|
||||
### Filters
|
||||
|
||||
Some filters are computationally expensive and can bottleneck the encoding process regardless of video encoder settings, notably the EEDI2 deinterlacer and the NLMeans denoiser. Other filters such as the Decomb deinterlacer and the hqdn3d denoiser are much faster, but can still be a bottleneck when using hardware video encoders such as AMD VCE, Intel QSV, and Nvidia NVENC.
|
||||
Some filters are computationally expensive and can bottleneck the encoding process regardless of video encoder settings, notably the EEDI2 deinterlacer and the NLMeans denoiser. Other filters such as the Decomb deinterlacer and the hqdn3d denoiser are much faster, but can still be a bottleneck when using hardware video encoders such as AMD VCE, Intel QSV, and NVIDIA NVENC.
|
||||
|
||||
Due to the widespread availability of interlaced content in the world today, the Decomb deinterlacer is enabled in all HandBrake official `Presets` except the Production `Presets`. Also enabled is the Interlacing Detection filter, which ensures only interlaced frames are deinterlaced, leaving progressive frames untouched. This analysis can sometimes be a limiting factor for performance. If you are certain your `Source` contains no interlaced frames, you can disable these filters for a small increase in performance.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@ -42,7 +42,7 @@ Please see the specific documentation pages for these encoders for further detai
|
||||
- [AMD VCE](video-vce.html)
|
||||
- [Apple VideoToolbox](video-videotoolbox.html)
|
||||
- [Intel QuickSync Video](video-qsv.html)
|
||||
- [Nvidia Nvenc](video-nvenc.html)
|
||||
- [NVIDIA NVENC](video-nvenc.html)
|
||||
|
||||
## Software
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@ -32,7 +32,7 @@ Support for the AMD VCE encoder is enabled in preferences on the video tab. If y
|
||||
|
||||
## Performance
|
||||
|
||||
HandBrake supports the Nvidia AMD VCE encoder but does not support the VCN (decoder).
|
||||
HandBrake supports the NVIDIA AMD VCE encoder but does not support the VCN (decoder).
|
||||
|
||||
The CPU will still be used for:
|
||||
- Video decoding
|
||||
|
||||
Loading…
x
Reference in New Issue
Block a user